Who cares for academics? We need to talk about emotional well-being including what we avoid and intellectualise through macro-discourses
This article explores academics’ well-being through analysing published sensitive disclosures, bringing to journal space the pain, rawness and emotional suffering of individuals’ experiences. We confront the taboos of speaking openly about mental health and emotional well-being in academic instituti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organization (London, England) England), 2020-11, Vol.27 (6), p.840-857 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 857 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 840 |
container_title | Organization (London, England) |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Smith, Charlie Ulus, Eda |
description | This article explores academics’ well-being through analysing published sensitive disclosures, bringing to journal space the pain, rawness and emotional suffering of individuals’ experiences. We confront the taboos of speaking openly about mental health and emotional well-being in academic institutions, with masculine structures and encroaching neoliberal discourses that create hostile atmospheres unsupportive of vulnerability and uncertainty. We also challenge existing discourses about academics’ well-being, implicitly burdening individuals as responsible for their pain and creating walls of shame, rather than building new healthy structures. By spotlighting the voices of academics’ emotional disclosures, intensified by embodied social inequalities, we plead for openness in formal academic outlets for sharing pre-existing emotional struggles and new wounds created by cruelly competitive, winner-takes-all structures, fortified by neoliberal ideals. Led by individuals’ voices and experiences, we make recommendations for supporting academics as an attempt to extract academia from its current perverse state and commit to repair and transformation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1350508419867201 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2451517848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1350508419867201</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2451517848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fa6ca3ee883fb48c1d49849960ada19b9e7882c5fc3efe7e8c09277a811f17a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQLqLg8-4x4LmaadImPYksvmDBy8Iey2w63c3abTRJFf-BP9ssKywInuaD7zEzX5ZdAr8GUOoGRMlLriXUulIFh4PsBGQFuRKFOEw40fmWP85OQ1hzzoWQ1Un2PV85ZtBTYJ3zDA22tLEm3LI5sYGoZdGxiP0rw4UbI6ONi9YN2LNP6vt8QXZYMjuYfmy36HOFMTEMP5xtGQ5t4mISkokj9jYQiyvvxuWKbdB4l7c2GDf6QOE8O-qwD3TxO8-y2cP9bPKUT18enyd309xIrmPeYWVQEGktuoXUBlpZa1nXFccWoV7UpLQuTNkZQR0p0obXhVKoATpQKM6yq13sm3fvI4XYrNP-9E9oCllCCUpLnVR8p0o3huCpa9683aD_aoA327qbv3UnC9tZyLjBhr1BCV1xVcI2Nd9JAi5pv_ffyB_YDovS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451517848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who cares for academics? We need to talk about emotional well-being including what we avoid and intellectualise through macro-discourses</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Smith, Charlie ; Ulus, Eda</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Charlie ; Ulus, Eda</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores academics’ well-being through analysing published sensitive disclosures, bringing to journal space the pain, rawness and emotional suffering of individuals’ experiences. We confront the taboos of speaking openly about mental health and emotional well-being in academic institutions, with masculine structures and encroaching neoliberal discourses that create hostile atmospheres unsupportive of vulnerability and uncertainty. We also challenge existing discourses about academics’ well-being, implicitly burdening individuals as responsible for their pain and creating walls of shame, rather than building new healthy structures. By spotlighting the voices of academics’ emotional disclosures, intensified by embodied social inequalities, we plead for openness in formal academic outlets for sharing pre-existing emotional struggles and new wounds created by cruelly competitive, winner-takes-all structures, fortified by neoliberal ideals. Led by individuals’ voices and experiences, we make recommendations for supporting academics as an attempt to extract academia from its current perverse state and commit to repair and transformation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-5084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1350508419867201</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic staff ; Discourses ; Emotional well being ; Emotions ; Masculinity ; Mental health ; Neoliberalism ; Openness ; Pain ; Shame ; Social inequality ; Suffering ; Taboos ; Transformation ; Uncertainty ; Vulnerability ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Organization (London, England), 2020-11, Vol.27 (6), p.840-857</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fa6ca3ee883fb48c1d49849960ada19b9e7882c5fc3efe7e8c09277a811f17a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fa6ca3ee883fb48c1d49849960ada19b9e7882c5fc3efe7e8c09277a811f17a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2221-4248 ; 0000-0003-1881-2384</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1350508419867201$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1350508419867201$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,33755,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Charlie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulus, Eda</creatorcontrib><title>Who cares for academics? We need to talk about emotional well-being including what we avoid and intellectualise through macro-discourses</title><title>Organization (London, England)</title><description>This article explores academics’ well-being through analysing published sensitive disclosures, bringing to journal space the pain, rawness and emotional suffering of individuals’ experiences. We confront the taboos of speaking openly about mental health and emotional well-being in academic institutions, with masculine structures and encroaching neoliberal discourses that create hostile atmospheres unsupportive of vulnerability and uncertainty. We also challenge existing discourses about academics’ well-being, implicitly burdening individuals as responsible for their pain and creating walls of shame, rather than building new healthy structures. By spotlighting the voices of academics’ emotional disclosures, intensified by embodied social inequalities, we plead for openness in formal academic outlets for sharing pre-existing emotional struggles and new wounds created by cruelly competitive, winner-takes-all structures, fortified by neoliberal ideals. Led by individuals’ voices and experiences, we make recommendations for supporting academics as an attempt to extract academia from its current perverse state and commit to repair and transformation.</description><subject>Academic staff</subject><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Emotional well being</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Openness</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Shame</subject><subject>Social inequality</subject><subject>Suffering</subject><subject>Taboos</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1350-5084</issn><issn>1461-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQLqLg8-4x4LmaadImPYksvmDBy8Iey2w63c3abTRJFf-BP9ssKywInuaD7zEzX5ZdAr8GUOoGRMlLriXUulIFh4PsBGQFuRKFOEw40fmWP85OQ1hzzoWQ1Un2PV85ZtBTYJ3zDA22tLEm3LI5sYGoZdGxiP0rw4UbI6ONi9YN2LNP6vt8QXZYMjuYfmy36HOFMTEMP5xtGQ5t4mISkokj9jYQiyvvxuWKbdB4l7c2GDf6QOE8O-qwD3TxO8-y2cP9bPKUT18enyd309xIrmPeYWVQEGktuoXUBlpZa1nXFccWoV7UpLQuTNkZQR0p0obXhVKoATpQKM6yq13sm3fvI4XYrNP-9E9oCllCCUpLnVR8p0o3huCpa9683aD_aoA327qbv3UnC9tZyLjBhr1BCV1xVcI2Nd9JAi5pv_ffyB_YDovS</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Smith, Charlie</creator><creator>Ulus, Eda</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2221-4248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1881-2384</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Who cares for academics? We need to talk about emotional well-being including what we avoid and intellectualise through macro-discourses</title><author>Smith, Charlie ; Ulus, Eda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fa6ca3ee883fb48c1d49849960ada19b9e7882c5fc3efe7e8c09277a811f17a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic staff</topic><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Emotional well being</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Openness</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Shame</topic><topic>Social inequality</topic><topic>Suffering</topic><topic>Taboos</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Charlie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulus, Eda</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Organization (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Charlie</au><au>Ulus, Eda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who cares for academics? We need to talk about emotional well-being including what we avoid and intellectualise through macro-discourses</atitle><jtitle>Organization (London, England)</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>840</spage><epage>857</epage><pages>840-857</pages><issn>1350-5084</issn><eissn>1461-7323</eissn><abstract>This article explores academics’ well-being through analysing published sensitive disclosures, bringing to journal space the pain, rawness and emotional suffering of individuals’ experiences. We confront the taboos of speaking openly about mental health and emotional well-being in academic institutions, with masculine structures and encroaching neoliberal discourses that create hostile atmospheres unsupportive of vulnerability and uncertainty. We also challenge existing discourses about academics’ well-being, implicitly burdening individuals as responsible for their pain and creating walls of shame, rather than building new healthy structures. By spotlighting the voices of academics’ emotional disclosures, intensified by embodied social inequalities, we plead for openness in formal academic outlets for sharing pre-existing emotional struggles and new wounds created by cruelly competitive, winner-takes-all structures, fortified by neoliberal ideals. Led by individuals’ voices and experiences, we make recommendations for supporting academics as an attempt to extract academia from its current perverse state and commit to repair and transformation.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1350508419867201</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2221-4248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1881-2384</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-5084 |
ispartof | Organization (London, England), 2020-11, Vol.27 (6), p.840-857 |
issn | 1350-5084 1461-7323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2451517848 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Academic staff Discourses Emotional well being Emotions Masculinity Mental health Neoliberalism Openness Pain Shame Social inequality Suffering Taboos Transformation Uncertainty Vulnerability Well being |
title | Who cares for academics? We need to talk about emotional well-being including what we avoid and intellectualise through macro-discourses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A23%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20cares%20for%20academics?%20We%20need%20to%20talk%20about%20emotional%20well-being%20including%20what%20we%20avoid%20and%20intellectualise%20through%20macro-discourses&rft.jtitle=Organization%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Smith,%20Charlie&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=840&rft.epage=857&rft.pages=840-857&rft.issn=1350-5084&rft.eissn=1461-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1350508419867201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2451517848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451517848&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1350508419867201&rfr_iscdi=true |