Infant and child mortality by socio‐economic status in early nineteenth‐century England

Historical relationships between socio‐economic status and mortality remain poorly understood. This is particularly the case in England, due to a lack of status indicators in available sources especially before c. 1850. This study uses the paternal occupational descriptors routinely recorded in Angl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Economic history review 2020-11, Vol.73 (4), p.991-1022
Hauptverfasser: Jaadla, Hannaliis, Potter, Ellen, Keibek, Sebastian, Davenport, Romola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1022
container_issue 4
container_start_page 991
container_title The Economic history review
container_volume 73
creator Jaadla, Hannaliis
Potter, Ellen
Keibek, Sebastian
Davenport, Romola
description Historical relationships between socio‐economic status and mortality remain poorly understood. This is particularly the case in England, due to a lack of status indicators in available sources especially before c. 1850. This study uses the paternal occupational descriptors routinely recorded in Anglican baptism registers from 1813–37 to compare infant and early childhood mortality by social status. The sample consists of eight of the Cambridge Group family reconstitution parishes, which make it possible to investigate the contributions of environment as well as household characteristics. The main variable of interest was an individual‐level continuous measure of wealth based on ranking paternal occupations by the propensity for their movable wealth to be inventoried upon death. The findings show that wealth conferred no clear survival advantage in infancy, once differences in average mortality levels between parishes were adjusted for. However, wealth was associated with higher survival rates in early childhood, especially in the second year of life, and this pattern persisted after adjustment for parish‐level effects. The striking exception to this pattern was labourers, who were among the poorest of fathers but whose children enjoyed relatively low mortality. Thus socio‐economic differentials in mortality were present in early nineteenth‐century England; however, they were small, age‐specific, and non‐linear.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ehr.12971
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2450769970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2450769970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2801-efad34ca4ea46eac89d68c4ab0d9f38cc3255dca629634f18fb775ff2239e7503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEURoMoWKsL3yDgysW0SeYnk6WUagsFQXTlImQyiU2ZJjXJILPzEXxGn8TUcevdfIt77nfhAHCN0Qynmautn2HCKD4BE1xUdYZIzU7BBCGcZwhjeg4uQtghhMq0mIDXtdXCRihsC-XWdC3cOx9FZ-IAmwEGJ437_vxS0lm3NxKGKGIfoLFQCd8N0BqrolI2bhMlU_Z-gEv71qXCS3CmRRfU1V9Owcv98nmxyjaPD-vF3SaTpEY4U1q0eSFFoURRKSFr1la1LESDWqbzWsqclGUrRUVYlRca17qhtNSakJwpWqJ8Cm7G3oN3770Kke9c7216yUlRIloxRo_U7UhJ70LwSvODN3vhB44RP7rjyR3_dZfY-ch-mE4N_4N8uXoaL34AA4dzoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2450769970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infant and child mortality by socio‐economic status in early nineteenth‐century England</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Jaadla, Hannaliis ; Potter, Ellen ; Keibek, Sebastian ; Davenport, Romola</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaadla, Hannaliis ; Potter, Ellen ; Keibek, Sebastian ; Davenport, Romola</creatorcontrib><description>Historical relationships between socio‐economic status and mortality remain poorly understood. This is particularly the case in England, due to a lack of status indicators in available sources especially before c. 1850. This study uses the paternal occupational descriptors routinely recorded in Anglican baptism registers from 1813–37 to compare infant and early childhood mortality by social status. The sample consists of eight of the Cambridge Group family reconstitution parishes, which make it possible to investigate the contributions of environment as well as household characteristics. The main variable of interest was an individual‐level continuous measure of wealth based on ranking paternal occupations by the propensity for their movable wealth to be inventoried upon death. The findings show that wealth conferred no clear survival advantage in infancy, once differences in average mortality levels between parishes were adjusted for. However, wealth was associated with higher survival rates in early childhood, especially in the second year of life, and this pattern persisted after adjustment for parish‐level effects. The striking exception to this pattern was labourers, who were among the poorest of fathers but whose children enjoyed relatively low mortality. Thus socio‐economic differentials in mortality were present in early nineteenth‐century England; however, they were small, age‐specific, and non‐linear.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0117</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>19th century ; Baptism ; Child mortality ; Childhood ; Economic status ; Fathers ; Infancy ; Infant mortality ; Infants ; Mortality ; Occupations ; Parishes ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Social status ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>The Economic history review, 2020-11, Vol.73 (4), p.991-1022</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. The published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Economic History Society.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2801-efad34ca4ea46eac89d68c4ab0d9f38cc3255dca629634f18fb775ff2239e7503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2801-efad34ca4ea46eac89d68c4ab0d9f38cc3255dca629634f18fb775ff2239e7503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6828-9846</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fehr.12971$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fehr.12971$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaadla, Hannaliis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keibek, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davenport, Romola</creatorcontrib><title>Infant and child mortality by socio‐economic status in early nineteenth‐century England</title><title>The Economic history review</title><description>Historical relationships between socio‐economic status and mortality remain poorly understood. This is particularly the case in England, due to a lack of status indicators in available sources especially before c. 1850. This study uses the paternal occupational descriptors routinely recorded in Anglican baptism registers from 1813–37 to compare infant and early childhood mortality by social status. The sample consists of eight of the Cambridge Group family reconstitution parishes, which make it possible to investigate the contributions of environment as well as household characteristics. The main variable of interest was an individual‐level continuous measure of wealth based on ranking paternal occupations by the propensity for their movable wealth to be inventoried upon death. The findings show that wealth conferred no clear survival advantage in infancy, once differences in average mortality levels between parishes were adjusted for. However, wealth was associated with higher survival rates in early childhood, especially in the second year of life, and this pattern persisted after adjustment for parish‐level effects. The striking exception to this pattern was labourers, who were among the poorest of fathers but whose children enjoyed relatively low mortality. Thus socio‐economic differentials in mortality were present in early nineteenth‐century England; however, they were small, age‐specific, and non‐linear.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Baptism</subject><subject>Child mortality</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Economic status</subject><subject>Fathers</subject><subject>Infancy</subject><subject>Infant mortality</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Parishes</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Social status</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0013-0117</issn><issn>1468-0289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEURoMoWKsL3yDgysW0SeYnk6WUagsFQXTlImQyiU2ZJjXJILPzEXxGn8TUcevdfIt77nfhAHCN0Qynmautn2HCKD4BE1xUdYZIzU7BBCGcZwhjeg4uQtghhMq0mIDXtdXCRihsC-XWdC3cOx9FZ-IAmwEGJ437_vxS0lm3NxKGKGIfoLFQCd8N0BqrolI2bhMlU_Z-gEv71qXCS3CmRRfU1V9Owcv98nmxyjaPD-vF3SaTpEY4U1q0eSFFoURRKSFr1la1LESDWqbzWsqclGUrRUVYlRca17qhtNSakJwpWqJ8Cm7G3oN3770Kke9c7216yUlRIloxRo_U7UhJ70LwSvODN3vhB44RP7rjyR3_dZfY-ch-mE4N_4N8uXoaL34AA4dzoA</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Jaadla, Hannaliis</creator><creator>Potter, Ellen</creator><creator>Keibek, Sebastian</creator><creator>Davenport, Romola</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6828-9846</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Infant and child mortality by socio‐economic status in early nineteenth‐century England</title><author>Jaadla, Hannaliis ; Potter, Ellen ; Keibek, Sebastian ; Davenport, Romola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2801-efad34ca4ea46eac89d68c4ab0d9f38cc3255dca629634f18fb775ff2239e7503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Baptism</topic><topic>Child mortality</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Economic status</topic><topic>Fathers</topic><topic>Infancy</topic><topic>Infant mortality</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Parishes</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Social status</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaadla, Hannaliis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keibek, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davenport, Romola</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Economic history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaadla, Hannaliis</au><au>Potter, Ellen</au><au>Keibek, Sebastian</au><au>Davenport, Romola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infant and child mortality by socio‐economic status in early nineteenth‐century England</atitle><jtitle>The Economic history review</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>991</spage><epage>1022</epage><pages>991-1022</pages><issn>0013-0117</issn><eissn>1468-0289</eissn><abstract>Historical relationships between socio‐economic status and mortality remain poorly understood. This is particularly the case in England, due to a lack of status indicators in available sources especially before c. 1850. This study uses the paternal occupational descriptors routinely recorded in Anglican baptism registers from 1813–37 to compare infant and early childhood mortality by social status. The sample consists of eight of the Cambridge Group family reconstitution parishes, which make it possible to investigate the contributions of environment as well as household characteristics. The main variable of interest was an individual‐level continuous measure of wealth based on ranking paternal occupations by the propensity for their movable wealth to be inventoried upon death. The findings show that wealth conferred no clear survival advantage in infancy, once differences in average mortality levels between parishes were adjusted for. However, wealth was associated with higher survival rates in early childhood, especially in the second year of life, and this pattern persisted after adjustment for parish‐level effects. The striking exception to this pattern was labourers, who were among the poorest of fathers but whose children enjoyed relatively low mortality. Thus socio‐economic differentials in mortality were present in early nineteenth‐century England; however, they were small, age‐specific, and non‐linear.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ehr.12971</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6828-9846</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-0117
ispartof The Economic history review, 2020-11, Vol.73 (4), p.991-1022
issn 0013-0117
1468-0289
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2450769970
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects 19th century
Baptism
Child mortality
Childhood
Economic status
Fathers
Infancy
Infant mortality
Infants
Mortality
Occupations
Parishes
Ratings & rankings
Social status
Wealth
title Infant and child mortality by socio‐economic status in early nineteenth‐century England
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T12%3A53%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infant%20and%20child%20mortality%20by%20socio%E2%80%90economic%20status%20in%20early%20nineteenth%E2%80%90century%20England&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20history%20review&rft.au=Jaadla,%20Hannaliis&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=991&rft.epage=1022&rft.pages=991-1022&rft.issn=0013-0117&rft.eissn=1468-0289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ehr.12971&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2450769970%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2450769970&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true