Energy Recovery from Olive Pomace by Hydrothermal Carbonization on Hypothetical Industrial Scale: a LCA Perspective

This work aimed to analyze and compare the environmental impacts of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process performed on olive pomace, aimed at energy recovery. Twelve alternative pathways, considering variable process conditions in terms of temperature (260, 280 and 305 °C), heat recovery layouts...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste and biomass valorization 2020-10, Vol.11 (10), p.5503-5519
Hauptverfasser: Mendecka, Barbara, Lombardi, Lidia, Micali, Francesco, De Risi, Arturo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5519
container_issue 10
container_start_page 5503
container_title Waste and biomass valorization
container_volume 11
creator Mendecka, Barbara
Lombardi, Lidia
Micali, Francesco
De Risi, Arturo
description This work aimed to analyze and compare the environmental impacts of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process performed on olive pomace, aimed at energy recovery. Twelve alternative pathways, considering variable process conditions in terms of temperature (260, 280 and 305 °C), heat recovery layouts and the subsequent combustion of the generated solid product, were analyzed. Results, related only to the processing phases (i.e. without including avoided effects), showed, as expected, that the final environmental performance depends on the HTC process temperature. Moreover, it was noted that the resulting impacts are from 1.4 to 2.0 lower for the layouts with heat recovery, for all the analyzed impact categories, with exception of Freshwater Toxicity. It was also reported that by substituting the fuel in marginal processes of heat production, environmental load reduction potential, regarding all impact categories, can be achieved. The highest benefits were achieved by substituting coal with HTC pellet in the heat production, followed by wood pellets and natural gas. Concerning the contribution analysis, the combustion processes of HTC and wood pellet represent the major contributions to the Climate Change and Acidification impacts, the combustion processes of HTC and wood pellet represent the major contributions, around the 95% and the 75% of the total, respectively, for the cases with the highest HTC temperature and no recovery scheme. For the Eutrophication potential, biomass production contributes significantly to the final effect. Regarding the Freshwater Ecotoxicity, the major part of the impact is coming from the HTC process and the relative liquid phase emissions assumed to be composed by phenols and furfurals released from the process. However, this part of the system needs to be further analyzed in detail. Graphic Abstract
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12649-020-01212-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2450335539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2450335539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-20b2c32cdc66c2ef043f089a0f947a8b8b4926a2d045d04878b8122d1c0cc4f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UF1LwzAULaLgmPsDPgV8rt7cpF--jTHdYLDhB_gW0jSdHWtTk25Qf72ZFX0T7uV-nXMunCC4pnBLAZI7RzHmWQgIIVCkGMJZMKJpkoQYR2_nvz2nl8HEuR0AIKUpsmQUuHmj7bYnT1qZo7Y9Ka2pyXpfHTXZmFoqTfKeLPrCmu5d21ruyUza3DTVp-wq0xAfi749HbtK-euyKQ6us5Vvn_2s74kkq9mUbLR1rVadF74KLkq5d3ryU8fB68P8ZbYIV-vH5Wy6ChVLki5EyFExVIWKY4W6BM5KSDMJZcYTmeZpzjOMJRbAI59p4lcUsaAKlOIlY-PgZtBtrfk4aNeJnTnYxr8UyCNgLIpY5lE4oJQ1zllditZWtbS9oCBO_orBX-H9Fd_-CvAkNpCcBzdbbf-k_2F9AfohfdM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2450335539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy Recovery from Olive Pomace by Hydrothermal Carbonization on Hypothetical Industrial Scale: a LCA Perspective</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Mendecka, Barbara ; Lombardi, Lidia ; Micali, Francesco ; De Risi, Arturo</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendecka, Barbara ; Lombardi, Lidia ; Micali, Francesco ; De Risi, Arturo</creatorcontrib><description>This work aimed to analyze and compare the environmental impacts of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process performed on olive pomace, aimed at energy recovery. Twelve alternative pathways, considering variable process conditions in terms of temperature (260, 280 and 305 °C), heat recovery layouts and the subsequent combustion of the generated solid product, were analyzed. Results, related only to the processing phases (i.e. without including avoided effects), showed, as expected, that the final environmental performance depends on the HTC process temperature. Moreover, it was noted that the resulting impacts are from 1.4 to 2.0 lower for the layouts with heat recovery, for all the analyzed impact categories, with exception of Freshwater Toxicity. It was also reported that by substituting the fuel in marginal processes of heat production, environmental load reduction potential, regarding all impact categories, can be achieved. The highest benefits were achieved by substituting coal with HTC pellet in the heat production, followed by wood pellets and natural gas. Concerning the contribution analysis, the combustion processes of HTC and wood pellet represent the major contributions to the Climate Change and Acidification impacts, the combustion processes of HTC and wood pellet represent the major contributions, around the 95% and the 75% of the total, respectively, for the cases with the highest HTC temperature and no recovery scheme. For the Eutrophication potential, biomass production contributes significantly to the final effect. Regarding the Freshwater Ecotoxicity, the major part of the impact is coming from the HTC process and the relative liquid phase emissions assumed to be composed by phenols and furfurals released from the process. However, this part of the system needs to be further analyzed in detail. Graphic Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-2641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-265X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12649-020-01212-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Alternative energy sources ; Carbonization ; Climate change ; Combustion ; Energy recovery ; Engineering ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental impact ; Environmental performance ; Eutrophication ; Heat ; Heat recovery ; Heat recovery systems ; Impact analysis ; Industrial Pollution Prevention ; Layouts ; Liquid phases ; Natural gas ; Original Paper ; Phenols ; Renewable and Green Energy ; Toxicity ; Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><ispartof>Waste and biomass valorization, 2020-10, Vol.11 (10), p.5503-5519</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-20b2c32cdc66c2ef043f089a0f947a8b8b4926a2d045d04878b8122d1c0cc4f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-20b2c32cdc66c2ef043f089a0f947a8b8b4926a2d045d04878b8122d1c0cc4f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4166-5768</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12649-020-01212-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12649-020-01212-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendecka, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micali, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Risi, Arturo</creatorcontrib><title>Energy Recovery from Olive Pomace by Hydrothermal Carbonization on Hypothetical Industrial Scale: a LCA Perspective</title><title>Waste and biomass valorization</title><addtitle>Waste Biomass Valor</addtitle><description>This work aimed to analyze and compare the environmental impacts of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process performed on olive pomace, aimed at energy recovery. Twelve alternative pathways, considering variable process conditions in terms of temperature (260, 280 and 305 °C), heat recovery layouts and the subsequent combustion of the generated solid product, were analyzed. Results, related only to the processing phases (i.e. without including avoided effects), showed, as expected, that the final environmental performance depends on the HTC process temperature. Moreover, it was noted that the resulting impacts are from 1.4 to 2.0 lower for the layouts with heat recovery, for all the analyzed impact categories, with exception of Freshwater Toxicity. It was also reported that by substituting the fuel in marginal processes of heat production, environmental load reduction potential, regarding all impact categories, can be achieved. The highest benefits were achieved by substituting coal with HTC pellet in the heat production, followed by wood pellets and natural gas. Concerning the contribution analysis, the combustion processes of HTC and wood pellet represent the major contributions to the Climate Change and Acidification impacts, the combustion processes of HTC and wood pellet represent the major contributions, around the 95% and the 75% of the total, respectively, for the cases with the highest HTC temperature and no recovery scheme. For the Eutrophication potential, biomass production contributes significantly to the final effect. Regarding the Freshwater Ecotoxicity, the major part of the impact is coming from the HTC process and the relative liquid phase emissions assumed to be composed by phenols and furfurals released from the process. However, this part of the system needs to be further analyzed in detail. Graphic Abstract</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Carbonization</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Energy recovery</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental performance</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Heat recovery</subject><subject>Heat recovery systems</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Industrial Pollution Prevention</subject><subject>Layouts</subject><subject>Liquid phases</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Renewable and Green Energy</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><issn>1877-2641</issn><issn>1877-265X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UF1LwzAULaLgmPsDPgV8rt7cpF--jTHdYLDhB_gW0jSdHWtTk25Qf72ZFX0T7uV-nXMunCC4pnBLAZI7RzHmWQgIIVCkGMJZMKJpkoQYR2_nvz2nl8HEuR0AIKUpsmQUuHmj7bYnT1qZo7Y9Ka2pyXpfHTXZmFoqTfKeLPrCmu5d21ruyUza3DTVp-wq0xAfi749HbtK-euyKQ6us5Vvn_2s74kkq9mUbLR1rVadF74KLkq5d3ryU8fB68P8ZbYIV-vH5Wy6ChVLki5EyFExVIWKY4W6BM5KSDMJZcYTmeZpzjOMJRbAI59p4lcUsaAKlOIlY-PgZtBtrfk4aNeJnTnYxr8UyCNgLIpY5lE4oJQ1zllditZWtbS9oCBO_orBX-H9Fd_-CvAkNpCcBzdbbf-k_2F9AfohfdM</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Mendecka, Barbara</creator><creator>Lombardi, Lidia</creator><creator>Micali, Francesco</creator><creator>De Risi, Arturo</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-5768</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Energy Recovery from Olive Pomace by Hydrothermal Carbonization on Hypothetical Industrial Scale: a LCA Perspective</title><author>Mendecka, Barbara ; Lombardi, Lidia ; Micali, Francesco ; De Risi, Arturo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-20b2c32cdc66c2ef043f089a0f947a8b8b4926a2d045d04878b8122d1c0cc4f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Carbonization</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Energy recovery</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental performance</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Heat recovery</topic><topic>Heat recovery systems</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Industrial Pollution Prevention</topic><topic>Layouts</topic><topic>Liquid phases</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Renewable and Green Energy</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Waste Management/Waste Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendecka, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micali, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Risi, Arturo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Waste and biomass valorization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendecka, Barbara</au><au>Lombardi, Lidia</au><au>Micali, Francesco</au><au>De Risi, Arturo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy Recovery from Olive Pomace by Hydrothermal Carbonization on Hypothetical Industrial Scale: a LCA Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Waste and biomass valorization</jtitle><stitle>Waste Biomass Valor</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5503</spage><epage>5519</epage><pages>5503-5519</pages><issn>1877-2641</issn><eissn>1877-265X</eissn><abstract>This work aimed to analyze and compare the environmental impacts of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process performed on olive pomace, aimed at energy recovery. Twelve alternative pathways, considering variable process conditions in terms of temperature (260, 280 and 305 °C), heat recovery layouts and the subsequent combustion of the generated solid product, were analyzed. Results, related only to the processing phases (i.e. without including avoided effects), showed, as expected, that the final environmental performance depends on the HTC process temperature. Moreover, it was noted that the resulting impacts are from 1.4 to 2.0 lower for the layouts with heat recovery, for all the analyzed impact categories, with exception of Freshwater Toxicity. It was also reported that by substituting the fuel in marginal processes of heat production, environmental load reduction potential, regarding all impact categories, can be achieved. The highest benefits were achieved by substituting coal with HTC pellet in the heat production, followed by wood pellets and natural gas. Concerning the contribution analysis, the combustion processes of HTC and wood pellet represent the major contributions to the Climate Change and Acidification impacts, the combustion processes of HTC and wood pellet represent the major contributions, around the 95% and the 75% of the total, respectively, for the cases with the highest HTC temperature and no recovery scheme. For the Eutrophication potential, biomass production contributes significantly to the final effect. Regarding the Freshwater Ecotoxicity, the major part of the impact is coming from the HTC process and the relative liquid phase emissions assumed to be composed by phenols and furfurals released from the process. However, this part of the system needs to be further analyzed in detail. Graphic Abstract</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12649-020-01212-0</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-5768</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-2641
ispartof Waste and biomass valorization, 2020-10, Vol.11 (10), p.5503-5519
issn 1877-2641
1877-265X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2450335539
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Acidification
Alternative energy sources
Carbonization
Climate change
Combustion
Energy recovery
Engineering
Environment
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Environmental impact
Environmental performance
Eutrophication
Heat
Heat recovery
Heat recovery systems
Impact analysis
Industrial Pollution Prevention
Layouts
Liquid phases
Natural gas
Original Paper
Phenols
Renewable and Green Energy
Toxicity
Waste Management/Waste Technology
title Energy Recovery from Olive Pomace by Hydrothermal Carbonization on Hypothetical Industrial Scale: a LCA Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T01%3A47%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20Recovery%20from%20Olive%20Pomace%20by%20Hydrothermal%20Carbonization%20on%20Hypothetical%20Industrial%20Scale:%20a%20LCA%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Waste%20and%20biomass%20valorization&rft.au=Mendecka,%20Barbara&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5503&rft.epage=5519&rft.pages=5503-5519&rft.issn=1877-2641&rft.eissn=1877-265X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12649-020-01212-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2450335539%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2450335539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true