Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India
With a plethora of digital elevation models (DEM) available for elevation extraction and catchment morphometric analysis, it is essential to compare and investigate their accuracy and parameter uncertainty derived from them. To serve that purpose, in this study, we have compared the DEMs of differen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arabian journal of geosciences 2020-10, Vol.13 (19), Article 1050 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Arabian journal of geosciences |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Kasi, Venkatesh Pinninti, Ramdas Landa, Sankar Rao Rathinasamy, Maheswaran Sangamreddi, Chandramouli Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju |
description | With a plethora of digital elevation models (DEM) available for elevation extraction and catchment morphometric analysis, it is essential to compare and investigate their accuracy and parameter uncertainty derived from them. To serve that purpose, in this study, we have compared the DEMs of different resolution obtained from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), CARTOSAT, and topographic maps (1:25000) in terms of vertical accuracy and morphometric parameters. The investigation was performed on a sub-basin of Champavathi River which is located in Andhra Pradesh, the southern part of India. The vertical accuracy of the DEMs was estimated using elevation from about 1180 points obtained from the Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) survey. The morphometric analysis showed that the basin is elongated with low relief ratio, mild/rolling slopes, and medium drainage density, and the results were comparable from different DEM sources indicating that most of the morphometric parameters were not significantly dependent on the scale and source of the DEM. Further, vertical accuracy estimation showed that the CARTOSAT DEMs (10 m and 30 m) have a lower root mean square error (4.53 m and 5.89 m) when compared with the SRTM DEMs (6.11 m and 7.19 m). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2450272328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2450272328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-ac3191fc02faba4815730b24f12f72b8ab87cbc5ba824925d62714987f09aa593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9UkTZvUmyz-WVjwoJ7DtE12s7RNTVJhv73Rit48zWPmvTfwQ-iSkmtKiLgJlBVUZISRjJSEVxk_QgsqyzITRS6PfzWlp-gshD0hpSRCLlBcuX4Eb4MbsDO4tcZor4eY1NZG6LDu9AdEm869a3UXsHEetx7sAFuddn7cuV5HbxuceiBJ7cMtBtxA0DjEqT1g412PX9wUd3g9tBbO0YmBLuiLn7lEbw_3r6unbPP8uF7dbTLIOYsZNDmtqGkIM1ADl7QQOakZN5QZwWoJtRRN3RQ1SMYrVrQlE5RXUhhSARRVvkRXc-_o3fukQ1R7N_khvVSMF4QJljOZXGx2Nd6F4LVRo7c9-IOiRH3RVTNdleiqb7qKp1A-h0IyD1vt_6r_SX0CiId-dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2450272328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kasi, Venkatesh ; Pinninti, Ramdas ; Landa, Sankar Rao ; Rathinasamy, Maheswaran ; Sangamreddi, Chandramouli ; Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao ; Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</creator><creatorcontrib>Kasi, Venkatesh ; Pinninti, Ramdas ; Landa, Sankar Rao ; Rathinasamy, Maheswaran ; Sangamreddi, Chandramouli ; Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao ; Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</creatorcontrib><description>With a plethora of digital elevation models (DEM) available for elevation extraction and catchment morphometric analysis, it is essential to compare and investigate their accuracy and parameter uncertainty derived from them. To serve that purpose, in this study, we have compared the DEMs of different resolution obtained from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), CARTOSAT, and topographic maps (1:25000) in terms of vertical accuracy and morphometric parameters. The investigation was performed on a sub-basin of Champavathi River which is located in Andhra Pradesh, the southern part of India. The vertical accuracy of the DEMs was estimated using elevation from about 1180 points obtained from the Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) survey. The morphometric analysis showed that the basin is elongated with low relief ratio, mild/rolling slopes, and medium drainage density, and the results were comparable from different DEM sources indicating that most of the morphometric parameters were not significantly dependent on the scale and source of the DEM. Further, vertical accuracy estimation showed that the CARTOSAT DEMs (10 m and 30 m) have a lower root mean square error (4.53 m and 5.89 m) when compared with the SRTM DEMs (6.11 m and 7.19 m).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Catchment area ; Differential global positioning system ; Digital Elevation Models ; Drainage ; Drainage density ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Elevation ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Morphometry ; Original Paper ; Parameter uncertainty ; Parameters ; Positioning systems ; Radar ; Surveying ; Topographic mapping ; Topographic maps</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2020-10, Vol.13 (19), Article 1050</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020</rights><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-ac3191fc02faba4815730b24f12f72b8ab87cbc5ba824925d62714987f09aa593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-ac3191fc02faba4815730b24f12f72b8ab87cbc5ba824925d62714987f09aa593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8124-3092</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kasi, Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinninti, Ramdas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landa, Sankar Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathinasamy, Maheswaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangamreddi, Chandramouli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>With a plethora of digital elevation models (DEM) available for elevation extraction and catchment morphometric analysis, it is essential to compare and investigate their accuracy and parameter uncertainty derived from them. To serve that purpose, in this study, we have compared the DEMs of different resolution obtained from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), CARTOSAT, and topographic maps (1:25000) in terms of vertical accuracy and morphometric parameters. The investigation was performed on a sub-basin of Champavathi River which is located in Andhra Pradesh, the southern part of India. The vertical accuracy of the DEMs was estimated using elevation from about 1180 points obtained from the Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) survey. The morphometric analysis showed that the basin is elongated with low relief ratio, mild/rolling slopes, and medium drainage density, and the results were comparable from different DEM sources indicating that most of the morphometric parameters were not significantly dependent on the scale and source of the DEM. Further, vertical accuracy estimation showed that the CARTOSAT DEMs (10 m and 30 m) have a lower root mean square error (4.53 m and 5.89 m) when compared with the SRTM DEMs (6.11 m and 7.19 m).</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Differential global positioning system</subject><subject>Digital Elevation Models</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage density</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Morphometry</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Positioning systems</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Topographic mapping</subject><subject>Topographic maps</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9UkTZvUmyz-WVjwoJ7DtE12s7RNTVJhv73Rit48zWPmvTfwQ-iSkmtKiLgJlBVUZISRjJSEVxk_QgsqyzITRS6PfzWlp-gshD0hpSRCLlBcuX4Eb4MbsDO4tcZor4eY1NZG6LDu9AdEm869a3UXsHEetx7sAFuddn7cuV5HbxuceiBJ7cMtBtxA0DjEqT1g412PX9wUd3g9tBbO0YmBLuiLn7lEbw_3r6unbPP8uF7dbTLIOYsZNDmtqGkIM1ADl7QQOakZN5QZwWoJtRRN3RQ1SMYrVrQlE5RXUhhSARRVvkRXc-_o3fukQ1R7N_khvVSMF4QJljOZXGx2Nd6F4LVRo7c9-IOiRH3RVTNdleiqb7qKp1A-h0IyD1vt_6r_SX0CiId-dg</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Kasi, Venkatesh</creator><creator>Pinninti, Ramdas</creator><creator>Landa, Sankar Rao</creator><creator>Rathinasamy, Maheswaran</creator><creator>Sangamreddi, Chandramouli</creator><creator>Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao</creator><creator>Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8124-3092</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India</title><author>Kasi, Venkatesh ; Pinninti, Ramdas ; Landa, Sankar Rao ; Rathinasamy, Maheswaran ; Sangamreddi, Chandramouli ; Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao ; Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-ac3191fc02faba4815730b24f12f72b8ab87cbc5ba824925d62714987f09aa593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Differential global positioning system</topic><topic>Digital Elevation Models</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage density</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Morphometry</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Positioning systems</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Topographic mapping</topic><topic>Topographic maps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kasi, Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinninti, Ramdas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landa, Sankar Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathinasamy, Maheswaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangamreddi, Chandramouli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kasi, Venkatesh</au><au>Pinninti, Ramdas</au><au>Landa, Sankar Rao</au><au>Rathinasamy, Maheswaran</au><au>Sangamreddi, Chandramouli</au><au>Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao</au><au>Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>19</issue><artnum>1050</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>With a plethora of digital elevation models (DEM) available for elevation extraction and catchment morphometric analysis, it is essential to compare and investigate their accuracy and parameter uncertainty derived from them. To serve that purpose, in this study, we have compared the DEMs of different resolution obtained from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), CARTOSAT, and topographic maps (1:25000) in terms of vertical accuracy and morphometric parameters. The investigation was performed on a sub-basin of Champavathi River which is located in Andhra Pradesh, the southern part of India. The vertical accuracy of the DEMs was estimated using elevation from about 1180 points obtained from the Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) survey. The morphometric analysis showed that the basin is elongated with low relief ratio, mild/rolling slopes, and medium drainage density, and the results were comparable from different DEM sources indicating that most of the morphometric parameters were not significantly dependent on the scale and source of the DEM. Further, vertical accuracy estimation showed that the CARTOSAT DEMs (10 m and 30 m) have a lower root mean square error (4.53 m and 5.89 m) when compared with the SRTM DEMs (6.11 m and 7.19 m).</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8124-3092</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1866-7511 |
ispartof | Arabian journal of geosciences, 2020-10, Vol.13 (19), Article 1050 |
issn | 1866-7511 1866-7538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2450272328 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accuracy Catchment area Differential global positioning system Digital Elevation Models Drainage Drainage density Earth and Environmental Science Earth science Earth Sciences Elevation Global positioning systems GPS Morphometry Original Paper Parameter uncertainty Parameters Positioning systems Radar Surveying Topographic mapping Topographic maps |
title | Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T20%3A46%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20different%20digital%20elevation%20models%20for%20drainage%20morphometric%20parameters:%20a%20case%20study%20from%20South%20India&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Kasi,%20Venkatesh&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=19&rft.artnum=1050&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2450272328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2450272328&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |