Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India

With a plethora of digital elevation models (DEM) available for elevation extraction and catchment morphometric analysis, it is essential to compare and investigate their accuracy and parameter uncertainty derived from them. To serve that purpose, in this study, we have compared the DEMs of differen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arabian journal of geosciences 2020-10, Vol.13 (19), Article 1050
Hauptverfasser: Kasi, Venkatesh, Pinninti, Ramdas, Landa, Sankar Rao, Rathinasamy, Maheswaran, Sangamreddi, Chandramouli, Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao, Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page
container_title Arabian journal of geosciences
container_volume 13
creator Kasi, Venkatesh
Pinninti, Ramdas
Landa, Sankar Rao
Rathinasamy, Maheswaran
Sangamreddi, Chandramouli
Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao
Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju
description With a plethora of digital elevation models (DEM) available for elevation extraction and catchment morphometric analysis, it is essential to compare and investigate their accuracy and parameter uncertainty derived from them. To serve that purpose, in this study, we have compared the DEMs of different resolution obtained from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), CARTOSAT, and topographic maps (1:25000) in terms of vertical accuracy and morphometric parameters. The investigation was performed on a sub-basin of Champavathi River which is located in Andhra Pradesh, the southern part of India. The vertical accuracy of the DEMs was estimated using elevation from about 1180 points obtained from the Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) survey. The morphometric analysis showed that the basin is elongated with low relief ratio, mild/rolling slopes, and medium drainage density, and the results were comparable from different DEM sources indicating that most of the morphometric parameters were not significantly dependent on the scale and source of the DEM. Further, vertical accuracy estimation showed that the CARTOSAT DEMs (10 m and 30 m) have a lower root mean square error (4.53 m and 5.89 m) when compared with the SRTM DEMs (6.11 m and 7.19 m).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2450272328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2450272328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-ac3191fc02faba4815730b24f12f72b8ab87cbc5ba824925d62714987f09aa593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9UkTZvUmyz-WVjwoJ7DtE12s7RNTVJhv73Rit48zWPmvTfwQ-iSkmtKiLgJlBVUZISRjJSEVxk_QgsqyzITRS6PfzWlp-gshD0hpSRCLlBcuX4Eb4MbsDO4tcZor4eY1NZG6LDu9AdEm869a3UXsHEetx7sAFuddn7cuV5HbxuceiBJ7cMtBtxA0DjEqT1g412PX9wUd3g9tBbO0YmBLuiLn7lEbw_3r6unbPP8uF7dbTLIOYsZNDmtqGkIM1ADl7QQOakZN5QZwWoJtRRN3RQ1SMYrVrQlE5RXUhhSARRVvkRXc-_o3fukQ1R7N_khvVSMF4QJljOZXGx2Nd6F4LVRo7c9-IOiRH3RVTNdleiqb7qKp1A-h0IyD1vt_6r_SX0CiId-dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2450272328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kasi, Venkatesh ; Pinninti, Ramdas ; Landa, Sankar Rao ; Rathinasamy, Maheswaran ; Sangamreddi, Chandramouli ; Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao ; Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</creator><creatorcontrib>Kasi, Venkatesh ; Pinninti, Ramdas ; Landa, Sankar Rao ; Rathinasamy, Maheswaran ; Sangamreddi, Chandramouli ; Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao ; Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</creatorcontrib><description>With a plethora of digital elevation models (DEM) available for elevation extraction and catchment morphometric analysis, it is essential to compare and investigate their accuracy and parameter uncertainty derived from them. To serve that purpose, in this study, we have compared the DEMs of different resolution obtained from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), CARTOSAT, and topographic maps (1:25000) in terms of vertical accuracy and morphometric parameters. The investigation was performed on a sub-basin of Champavathi River which is located in Andhra Pradesh, the southern part of India. The vertical accuracy of the DEMs was estimated using elevation from about 1180 points obtained from the Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) survey. The morphometric analysis showed that the basin is elongated with low relief ratio, mild/rolling slopes, and medium drainage density, and the results were comparable from different DEM sources indicating that most of the morphometric parameters were not significantly dependent on the scale and source of the DEM. Further, vertical accuracy estimation showed that the CARTOSAT DEMs (10 m and 30 m) have a lower root mean square error (4.53 m and 5.89 m) when compared with the SRTM DEMs (6.11 m and 7.19 m).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Catchment area ; Differential global positioning system ; Digital Elevation Models ; Drainage ; Drainage density ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Elevation ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Morphometry ; Original Paper ; Parameter uncertainty ; Parameters ; Positioning systems ; Radar ; Surveying ; Topographic mapping ; Topographic maps</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2020-10, Vol.13 (19), Article 1050</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020</rights><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-ac3191fc02faba4815730b24f12f72b8ab87cbc5ba824925d62714987f09aa593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-ac3191fc02faba4815730b24f12f72b8ab87cbc5ba824925d62714987f09aa593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8124-3092</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kasi, Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinninti, Ramdas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landa, Sankar Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathinasamy, Maheswaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangamreddi, Chandramouli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>With a plethora of digital elevation models (DEM) available for elevation extraction and catchment morphometric analysis, it is essential to compare and investigate their accuracy and parameter uncertainty derived from them. To serve that purpose, in this study, we have compared the DEMs of different resolution obtained from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), CARTOSAT, and topographic maps (1:25000) in terms of vertical accuracy and morphometric parameters. The investigation was performed on a sub-basin of Champavathi River which is located in Andhra Pradesh, the southern part of India. The vertical accuracy of the DEMs was estimated using elevation from about 1180 points obtained from the Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) survey. The morphometric analysis showed that the basin is elongated with low relief ratio, mild/rolling slopes, and medium drainage density, and the results were comparable from different DEM sources indicating that most of the morphometric parameters were not significantly dependent on the scale and source of the DEM. Further, vertical accuracy estimation showed that the CARTOSAT DEMs (10 m and 30 m) have a lower root mean square error (4.53 m and 5.89 m) when compared with the SRTM DEMs (6.11 m and 7.19 m).</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Differential global positioning system</subject><subject>Digital Elevation Models</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage density</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Morphometry</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Positioning systems</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Topographic mapping</subject><subject>Topographic maps</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9UkTZvUmyz-WVjwoJ7DtE12s7RNTVJhv73Rit48zWPmvTfwQ-iSkmtKiLgJlBVUZISRjJSEVxk_QgsqyzITRS6PfzWlp-gshD0hpSRCLlBcuX4Eb4MbsDO4tcZor4eY1NZG6LDu9AdEm869a3UXsHEetx7sAFuddn7cuV5HbxuceiBJ7cMtBtxA0DjEqT1g412PX9wUd3g9tBbO0YmBLuiLn7lEbw_3r6unbPP8uF7dbTLIOYsZNDmtqGkIM1ADl7QQOakZN5QZwWoJtRRN3RQ1SMYrVrQlE5RXUhhSARRVvkRXc-_o3fukQ1R7N_khvVSMF4QJljOZXGx2Nd6F4LVRo7c9-IOiRH3RVTNdleiqb7qKp1A-h0IyD1vt_6r_SX0CiId-dg</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Kasi, Venkatesh</creator><creator>Pinninti, Ramdas</creator><creator>Landa, Sankar Rao</creator><creator>Rathinasamy, Maheswaran</creator><creator>Sangamreddi, Chandramouli</creator><creator>Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao</creator><creator>Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8124-3092</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India</title><author>Kasi, Venkatesh ; Pinninti, Ramdas ; Landa, Sankar Rao ; Rathinasamy, Maheswaran ; Sangamreddi, Chandramouli ; Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao ; Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-ac3191fc02faba4815730b24f12f72b8ab87cbc5ba824925d62714987f09aa593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Differential global positioning system</topic><topic>Digital Elevation Models</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage density</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Morphometry</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Positioning systems</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Topographic mapping</topic><topic>Topographic maps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kasi, Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinninti, Ramdas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landa, Sankar Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathinasamy, Maheswaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangamreddi, Chandramouli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kasi, Venkatesh</au><au>Pinninti, Ramdas</au><au>Landa, Sankar Rao</au><au>Rathinasamy, Maheswaran</au><au>Sangamreddi, Chandramouli</au><au>Kuppili, Rajeshwar Rao</au><au>Dandu Radha, Prasada Raju</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>19</issue><artnum>1050</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>With a plethora of digital elevation models (DEM) available for elevation extraction and catchment morphometric analysis, it is essential to compare and investigate their accuracy and parameter uncertainty derived from them. To serve that purpose, in this study, we have compared the DEMs of different resolution obtained from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), CARTOSAT, and topographic maps (1:25000) in terms of vertical accuracy and morphometric parameters. The investigation was performed on a sub-basin of Champavathi River which is located in Andhra Pradesh, the southern part of India. The vertical accuracy of the DEMs was estimated using elevation from about 1180 points obtained from the Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) survey. The morphometric analysis showed that the basin is elongated with low relief ratio, mild/rolling slopes, and medium drainage density, and the results were comparable from different DEM sources indicating that most of the morphometric parameters were not significantly dependent on the scale and source of the DEM. Further, vertical accuracy estimation showed that the CARTOSAT DEMs (10 m and 30 m) have a lower root mean square error (4.53 m and 5.89 m) when compared with the SRTM DEMs (6.11 m and 7.19 m).</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8124-3092</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-7511
ispartof Arabian journal of geosciences, 2020-10, Vol.13 (19), Article 1050
issn 1866-7511
1866-7538
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2450272328
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Accuracy
Catchment area
Differential global positioning system
Digital Elevation Models
Drainage
Drainage density
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth science
Earth Sciences
Elevation
Global positioning systems
GPS
Morphometry
Original Paper
Parameter uncertainty
Parameters
Positioning systems
Radar
Surveying
Topographic mapping
Topographic maps
title Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T20%3A46%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20different%20digital%20elevation%20models%20for%20drainage%20morphometric%20parameters:%20a%20case%20study%20from%20South%20India&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Kasi,%20Venkatesh&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=19&rft.artnum=1050&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2450272328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2450272328&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true