Efficient seismic fragility functions through sequential selection
•The uncertainty in fragility functions depends on the ground motion records.•The strategy used for selecting the records yields different levels of uncertainty.•Two strategies are proposed to improve fragility analysis done by random selection.•The methodology yields more accurate fragility functio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Structural safety 2020-11, Vol.87, p.101977, Article 101977 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 101977 |
container_title | Structural safety |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Peña, Francisco Bilionis, Ilias Dyke, Shirley J. Cao, Yenan Mavroeidis, George P. |
description | •The uncertainty in fragility functions depends on the ground motion records.•The strategy used for selecting the records yields different levels of uncertainty.•Two strategies are proposed to improve fragility analysis done by random selection.•The methodology yields more accurate fragility functions than random selection.
Fragility functions enable the assessment of a structural system for a given hazard scenario. Specifically, the fragility function provides the probability of an undesirable structural state conditioned on the occurrence of a specific hazard level. Multiple sources of uncertainty are present when estimating fragility functions, e.g., record-to-record variation, uncertain material and geometric properties, model assumptions, and limited data to characterize the hazard. The objective of this study is to develop a methodology that will accelerate the process of fragility function estimation under limitations in computational resources and data. The approach used in the methodology is as follows. The stochastic map between hazard level and structural response is first constructed using Bayesian inference for a finite number of simulations. The Bayesian approach enables the quantification of the epistemic uncertainty due to a limited number of simulations. This epistemic uncertainty is exploited to sequentially select subsequent simulations that accelerate learning based on up to two different earthquake intensity measures, peak ground velocity and spectral velocity. The methodology is applied to a benchmark model of a twenty-story nonlinear building. Simulations are performed using a set of synthetic ground motions obtained from scenario earthquakes in California. Through this case study the methodology developed here is demonstrated. Additionally, the case study highlights the ability of the methodology to achieve lower levels of epistemic uncertainty than traditional techniques using the same number of simulations. This approach is expected to enable more efficient fragility function determination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101977 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2449986925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167473020300564</els_id><sourcerecordid>2449986925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-932d69580ee1bc65e0addad9a98015367b8b6736011e86d1e9a5adbedeb4d313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwyAYx4nRxDn9CqaJ504ohcJNXeZLssTL7oSWh42maydQk3172apnTxD4PS__H0L3BC8IJvyxXYTox6AtLApcnB9lVV2gGRGVzCll7BLNEljlZUXxNboJocUYM1GIGXpZWesaB33MAriwd01mvd66zsVjZse-iW7oQxZ3fhi3u8R8jYl1ukvXDs6_t-jK6i7A3e85R5vX1Wb5nq8_3z6Wz-u8oSWOuaSF4ZIJDEDqhjPA2hhtpJYCE0Z5VYuaV5RjQkBwQ0Bqpk0NBurSUELn6GFqe_BDWiJE1Q6j79NEVZSllILLgiWKT1TjhxA8WHXwbq_9URGsTrpUq_50qZMuNelKhU9TIaQI3w68CictDRjnU05lBvdfix8HG3hK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449986925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficient seismic fragility functions through sequential selection</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Peña, Francisco ; Bilionis, Ilias ; Dyke, Shirley J. ; Cao, Yenan ; Mavroeidis, George P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peña, Francisco ; Bilionis, Ilias ; Dyke, Shirley J. ; Cao, Yenan ; Mavroeidis, George P.</creatorcontrib><description>•The uncertainty in fragility functions depends on the ground motion records.•The strategy used for selecting the records yields different levels of uncertainty.•Two strategies are proposed to improve fragility analysis done by random selection.•The methodology yields more accurate fragility functions than random selection.
Fragility functions enable the assessment of a structural system for a given hazard scenario. Specifically, the fragility function provides the probability of an undesirable structural state conditioned on the occurrence of a specific hazard level. Multiple sources of uncertainty are present when estimating fragility functions, e.g., record-to-record variation, uncertain material and geometric properties, model assumptions, and limited data to characterize the hazard. The objective of this study is to develop a methodology that will accelerate the process of fragility function estimation under limitations in computational resources and data. The approach used in the methodology is as follows. The stochastic map between hazard level and structural response is first constructed using Bayesian inference for a finite number of simulations. The Bayesian approach enables the quantification of the epistemic uncertainty due to a limited number of simulations. This epistemic uncertainty is exploited to sequentially select subsequent simulations that accelerate learning based on up to two different earthquake intensity measures, peak ground velocity and spectral velocity. The methodology is applied to a benchmark model of a twenty-story nonlinear building. Simulations are performed using a set of synthetic ground motions obtained from scenario earthquakes in California. Through this case study the methodology developed here is demonstrated. Additionally, the case study highlights the ability of the methodology to achieve lower levels of epistemic uncertainty than traditional techniques using the same number of simulations. This approach is expected to enable more efficient fragility function determination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3355</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian inference ; Case studies ; Computer applications ; Earthquakes ; Epistemology ; Fragility ; Ground motion ; Methodology ; Seismic activity ; Seismic fragility analysis ; Sequential Monte Carlo ; Sequential selection of experiments ; Simulation ; Statistical inference ; Stochasticity ; Uncertainty ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Structural safety, 2020-11, Vol.87, p.101977, Article 101977</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-932d69580ee1bc65e0addad9a98015367b8b6736011e86d1e9a5adbedeb4d313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-932d69580ee1bc65e0addad9a98015367b8b6736011e86d1e9a5adbedeb4d313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101977$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peña, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilionis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyke, Shirley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yenan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavroeidis, George P.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficient seismic fragility functions through sequential selection</title><title>Structural safety</title><description>•The uncertainty in fragility functions depends on the ground motion records.•The strategy used for selecting the records yields different levels of uncertainty.•Two strategies are proposed to improve fragility analysis done by random selection.•The methodology yields more accurate fragility functions than random selection.
Fragility functions enable the assessment of a structural system for a given hazard scenario. Specifically, the fragility function provides the probability of an undesirable structural state conditioned on the occurrence of a specific hazard level. Multiple sources of uncertainty are present when estimating fragility functions, e.g., record-to-record variation, uncertain material and geometric properties, model assumptions, and limited data to characterize the hazard. The objective of this study is to develop a methodology that will accelerate the process of fragility function estimation under limitations in computational resources and data. The approach used in the methodology is as follows. The stochastic map between hazard level and structural response is first constructed using Bayesian inference for a finite number of simulations. The Bayesian approach enables the quantification of the epistemic uncertainty due to a limited number of simulations. This epistemic uncertainty is exploited to sequentially select subsequent simulations that accelerate learning based on up to two different earthquake intensity measures, peak ground velocity and spectral velocity. The methodology is applied to a benchmark model of a twenty-story nonlinear building. Simulations are performed using a set of synthetic ground motions obtained from scenario earthquakes in California. Through this case study the methodology developed here is demonstrated. Additionally, the case study highlights the ability of the methodology to achieve lower levels of epistemic uncertainty than traditional techniques using the same number of simulations. This approach is expected to enable more efficient fragility function determination.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian inference</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic fragility analysis</subject><subject>Sequential Monte Carlo</subject><subject>Sequential selection of experiments</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Statistical inference</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0167-4730</issn><issn>1879-3355</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PwyAYx4nRxDn9CqaJ504ohcJNXeZLssTL7oSWh42maydQk3172apnTxD4PS__H0L3BC8IJvyxXYTox6AtLApcnB9lVV2gGRGVzCll7BLNEljlZUXxNboJocUYM1GIGXpZWesaB33MAriwd01mvd66zsVjZse-iW7oQxZ3fhi3u8R8jYl1ukvXDs6_t-jK6i7A3e85R5vX1Wb5nq8_3z6Wz-u8oSWOuaSF4ZIJDEDqhjPA2hhtpJYCE0Z5VYuaV5RjQkBwQ0Bqpk0NBurSUELn6GFqe_BDWiJE1Q6j79NEVZSllILLgiWKT1TjhxA8WHXwbq_9URGsTrpUq_50qZMuNelKhU9TIaQI3w68CictDRjnU05lBvdfix8HG3hK</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Peña, Francisco</creator><creator>Bilionis, Ilias</creator><creator>Dyke, Shirley J.</creator><creator>Cao, Yenan</creator><creator>Mavroeidis, George P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Efficient seismic fragility functions through sequential selection</title><author>Peña, Francisco ; Bilionis, Ilias ; Dyke, Shirley J. ; Cao, Yenan ; Mavroeidis, George P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-932d69580ee1bc65e0addad9a98015367b8b6736011e86d1e9a5adbedeb4d313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian inference</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic fragility analysis</topic><topic>Sequential Monte Carlo</topic><topic>Sequential selection of experiments</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Statistical inference</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peña, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilionis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyke, Shirley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yenan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavroeidis, George P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Structural safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peña, Francisco</au><au>Bilionis, Ilias</au><au>Dyke, Shirley J.</au><au>Cao, Yenan</au><au>Mavroeidis, George P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficient seismic fragility functions through sequential selection</atitle><jtitle>Structural safety</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>101977</spage><pages>101977-</pages><artnum>101977</artnum><issn>0167-4730</issn><eissn>1879-3355</eissn><abstract>•The uncertainty in fragility functions depends on the ground motion records.•The strategy used for selecting the records yields different levels of uncertainty.•Two strategies are proposed to improve fragility analysis done by random selection.•The methodology yields more accurate fragility functions than random selection.
Fragility functions enable the assessment of a structural system for a given hazard scenario. Specifically, the fragility function provides the probability of an undesirable structural state conditioned on the occurrence of a specific hazard level. Multiple sources of uncertainty are present when estimating fragility functions, e.g., record-to-record variation, uncertain material and geometric properties, model assumptions, and limited data to characterize the hazard. The objective of this study is to develop a methodology that will accelerate the process of fragility function estimation under limitations in computational resources and data. The approach used in the methodology is as follows. The stochastic map between hazard level and structural response is first constructed using Bayesian inference for a finite number of simulations. The Bayesian approach enables the quantification of the epistemic uncertainty due to a limited number of simulations. This epistemic uncertainty is exploited to sequentially select subsequent simulations that accelerate learning based on up to two different earthquake intensity measures, peak ground velocity and spectral velocity. The methodology is applied to a benchmark model of a twenty-story nonlinear building. Simulations are performed using a set of synthetic ground motions obtained from scenario earthquakes in California. Through this case study the methodology developed here is demonstrated. Additionally, the case study highlights the ability of the methodology to achieve lower levels of epistemic uncertainty than traditional techniques using the same number of simulations. This approach is expected to enable more efficient fragility function determination.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101977</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4730 |
ispartof | Structural safety, 2020-11, Vol.87, p.101977, Article 101977 |
issn | 0167-4730 1879-3355 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2449986925 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Bayesian analysis Bayesian inference Case studies Computer applications Earthquakes Epistemology Fragility Ground motion Methodology Seismic activity Seismic fragility analysis Sequential Monte Carlo Sequential selection of experiments Simulation Statistical inference Stochasticity Uncertainty Velocity |
title | Efficient seismic fragility functions through sequential selection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficient%20seismic%20fragility%20functions%20through%20sequential%20selection&rft.jtitle=Structural%20safety&rft.au=Pe%C3%B1a,%20Francisco&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=101977&rft.pages=101977-&rft.artnum=101977&rft.issn=0167-4730&rft.eissn=1879-3355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101977&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2449986925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449986925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167473020300564&rfr_iscdi=true |