Temporal dynamics of taxonomic homogenization in the fish communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes

Aim As a result of the loss of native species and the spread of non‐native species, fish communities are becoming increasingly homogenous globally. In the Laurentian Great Lakes, 21 native fish species have been extirpated from one or more lakes as a result of habitat alteration and destruction, ove...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2019-12, Vol.25 (12), p.1870-1878
Hauptverfasser: Campbell, Sara E., Mandrak, Nicholas E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1878
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1870
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 25
creator Campbell, Sara E.
Mandrak, Nicholas E.
description Aim As a result of the loss of native species and the spread of non‐native species, fish communities are becoming increasingly homogenous globally. In the Laurentian Great Lakes, 21 native fish species have been extirpated from one or more lakes as a result of habitat alteration and destruction, overexploitation and invasive species since the 1800s. Over the same time period, 30 non‐native species became established in at least one lake as a result of authorized and unauthorized introductions. This study examines temporal changes in taxonomic dissimilarity over 15 time periods spanning the last 150 years. Location Laurentian Great Lakes, North America. Methods Changes to the Great Lakes fish fauna were summarized in species lists by decade from 1870 to 2010. Taxonomic dissimilarity between and within communities was calculated using Jaccard's dissimilarity coefficient; the relative contribution of turnover (species replacement) and nestedness (species loss) to total taxonomic dissimilarity was also calculated. To test whether the Great Lakes have homogenized, we conducted a regression on multiple‐site dissimilarity values over time. Results Native species richness in the Great Lakes exhibits a latitudinal gradient that reflects post‐glacial history and current climate. We demonstrate that the establishment of non‐native species and extirpation of native species has changed fish communities in each of the Great Lakes, with communities in Lake Superior differentiating the most (~23%) and in Lake Ontario the least (~12%) since 1870. Multiple‐site dissimilarity ranges between ~50% and 53% per decade, and communities have become ~5.9% more similar over time since 1870. Main Conclusions Species introductions and extirpations have changed community composition, resulting in the fish communities becoming significantly more similar to one another over time and, thus, homogenized. As a result, ongoing management should prevent range expansion of native and non‐native species to preserve the current distinctiveness of the Great Lakes fish communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ddi.12986
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2449873401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26801106</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26801106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-ba115d94ec307f1abf29bf845f863e9f89e7b5a8987a971c3469caf4ae757e783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwyAYh4nRxDk9-AFMSDx56ORfKRzNpnPJEi_z3NAWHHOFCW10fnrRqjd9L7y8eZ4X8gPgHKMJTnXdNHaCiRT8AIwwK0jGOCOHqaecZzLH_BicxLhBCFGakxGoV7rd-aC2sNk71do6Qm9gp9688-kG1771T9rZd9VZ76B1sFtraGxcw9q3be9sZ_XgpPlS9UG7zioH50GrLg2edTwFR0Ztoz77Psfg8e52Nb3Plg_zxfRmmdVUEJ5VCuO8kUzXFBUGq8oQWRnBciM41dIIqYsqV0KKQskC15RxWSvDlC7yQheCjsHlsHcX_EuvY1dufB9cerIkjCWNMoT_pwhGnFOKEnU1UHXwMQZtyl2wrQr7EqPyM-kyJV1-JZ3Y64F9tVu9_xssZ7PFj3ExGJvY-fBrEC4QTj-gH31AiRc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2421066330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal dynamics of taxonomic homogenization in the fish communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><creator>Campbell, Sara E. ; Mandrak, Nicholas E.</creator><contributor>Andersen, Alan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Sara E. ; Mandrak, Nicholas E. ; Andersen, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>Aim As a result of the loss of native species and the spread of non‐native species, fish communities are becoming increasingly homogenous globally. In the Laurentian Great Lakes, 21 native fish species have been extirpated from one or more lakes as a result of habitat alteration and destruction, overexploitation and invasive species since the 1800s. Over the same time period, 30 non‐native species became established in at least one lake as a result of authorized and unauthorized introductions. This study examines temporal changes in taxonomic dissimilarity over 15 time periods spanning the last 150 years. Location Laurentian Great Lakes, North America. Methods Changes to the Great Lakes fish fauna were summarized in species lists by decade from 1870 to 2010. Taxonomic dissimilarity between and within communities was calculated using Jaccard's dissimilarity coefficient; the relative contribution of turnover (species replacement) and nestedness (species loss) to total taxonomic dissimilarity was also calculated. To test whether the Great Lakes have homogenized, we conducted a regression on multiple‐site dissimilarity values over time. Results Native species richness in the Great Lakes exhibits a latitudinal gradient that reflects post‐glacial history and current climate. We demonstrate that the establishment of non‐native species and extirpation of native species has changed fish communities in each of the Great Lakes, with communities in Lake Superior differentiating the most (~23%) and in Lake Ontario the least (~12%) since 1870. Multiple‐site dissimilarity ranges between ~50% and 53% per decade, and communities have become ~5.9% more similar over time since 1870. Main Conclusions Species introductions and extirpations have changed community composition, resulting in the fish communities becoming significantly more similar to one another over time and, thus, homogenized. As a result, ongoing management should prevent range expansion of native and non‐native species to preserve the current distinctiveness of the Great Lakes fish communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Biogeography ; biological invasions ; Canals ; Community composition ; diversity ; Environmental degradation ; Fish ; Glacial periods ; Glaciers ; Homogenization ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Lakes ; Mathematical analysis ; Native species ; Overexploitation ; Range extension ; Species richness ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2019-12, Vol.25 (12), p.1870-1878</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-ba115d94ec307f1abf29bf845f863e9f89e7b5a8987a971c3469caf4ae757e783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-ba115d94ec307f1abf29bf845f863e9f89e7b5a8987a971c3469caf4ae757e783</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7195-8898</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26801106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26801106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,25354,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,54524,54530</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26801106$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Andersen, Alan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Sara E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandrak, Nicholas E.</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal dynamics of taxonomic homogenization in the fish communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><description>Aim As a result of the loss of native species and the spread of non‐native species, fish communities are becoming increasingly homogenous globally. In the Laurentian Great Lakes, 21 native fish species have been extirpated from one or more lakes as a result of habitat alteration and destruction, overexploitation and invasive species since the 1800s. Over the same time period, 30 non‐native species became established in at least one lake as a result of authorized and unauthorized introductions. This study examines temporal changes in taxonomic dissimilarity over 15 time periods spanning the last 150 years. Location Laurentian Great Lakes, North America. Methods Changes to the Great Lakes fish fauna were summarized in species lists by decade from 1870 to 2010. Taxonomic dissimilarity between and within communities was calculated using Jaccard's dissimilarity coefficient; the relative contribution of turnover (species replacement) and nestedness (species loss) to total taxonomic dissimilarity was also calculated. To test whether the Great Lakes have homogenized, we conducted a regression on multiple‐site dissimilarity values over time. Results Native species richness in the Great Lakes exhibits a latitudinal gradient that reflects post‐glacial history and current climate. We demonstrate that the establishment of non‐native species and extirpation of native species has changed fish communities in each of the Great Lakes, with communities in Lake Superior differentiating the most (~23%) and in Lake Ontario the least (~12%) since 1870. Multiple‐site dissimilarity ranges between ~50% and 53% per decade, and communities have become ~5.9% more similar over time since 1870. Main Conclusions Species introductions and extirpations have changed community composition, resulting in the fish communities becoming significantly more similar to one another over time and, thus, homogenized. As a result, ongoing management should prevent range expansion of native and non‐native species to preserve the current distinctiveness of the Great Lakes fish communities.</description><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>biological invasions</subject><subject>Canals</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>diversity</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Glacial periods</subject><subject>Glaciers</subject><subject>Homogenization</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Overexploitation</subject><subject>Range extension</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwyAYh4nRxDk9-AFMSDx56ORfKRzNpnPJEi_z3NAWHHOFCW10fnrRqjd9L7y8eZ4X8gPgHKMJTnXdNHaCiRT8AIwwK0jGOCOHqaecZzLH_BicxLhBCFGakxGoV7rd-aC2sNk71do6Qm9gp9688-kG1771T9rZd9VZ76B1sFtraGxcw9q3be9sZ_XgpPlS9UG7zioH50GrLg2edTwFR0Ztoz77Psfg8e52Nb3Plg_zxfRmmdVUEJ5VCuO8kUzXFBUGq8oQWRnBciM41dIIqYsqV0KKQskC15RxWSvDlC7yQheCjsHlsHcX_EuvY1dufB9cerIkjCWNMoT_pwhGnFOKEnU1UHXwMQZtyl2wrQr7EqPyM-kyJV1-JZ3Y64F9tVu9_xssZ7PFj3ExGJvY-fBrEC4QTj-gH31AiRc</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Campbell, Sara E.</creator><creator>Mandrak, Nicholas E.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7195-8898</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Temporal dynamics of taxonomic homogenization in the fish communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes</title><author>Campbell, Sara E. ; Mandrak, Nicholas E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-ba115d94ec307f1abf29bf845f863e9f89e7b5a8987a971c3469caf4ae757e783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>biological invasions</topic><topic>Canals</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>diversity</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Glacial periods</topic><topic>Glaciers</topic><topic>Homogenization</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Overexploitation</topic><topic>Range extension</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Sara E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandrak, Nicholas E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell, Sara E.</au><au>Mandrak, Nicholas E.</au><au>Andersen, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal dynamics of taxonomic homogenization in the fish communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1870</spage><epage>1878</epage><pages>1870-1878</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim As a result of the loss of native species and the spread of non‐native species, fish communities are becoming increasingly homogenous globally. In the Laurentian Great Lakes, 21 native fish species have been extirpated from one or more lakes as a result of habitat alteration and destruction, overexploitation and invasive species since the 1800s. Over the same time period, 30 non‐native species became established in at least one lake as a result of authorized and unauthorized introductions. This study examines temporal changes in taxonomic dissimilarity over 15 time periods spanning the last 150 years. Location Laurentian Great Lakes, North America. Methods Changes to the Great Lakes fish fauna were summarized in species lists by decade from 1870 to 2010. Taxonomic dissimilarity between and within communities was calculated using Jaccard's dissimilarity coefficient; the relative contribution of turnover (species replacement) and nestedness (species loss) to total taxonomic dissimilarity was also calculated. To test whether the Great Lakes have homogenized, we conducted a regression on multiple‐site dissimilarity values over time. Results Native species richness in the Great Lakes exhibits a latitudinal gradient that reflects post‐glacial history and current climate. We demonstrate that the establishment of non‐native species and extirpation of native species has changed fish communities in each of the Great Lakes, with communities in Lake Superior differentiating the most (~23%) and in Lake Ontario the least (~12%) since 1870. Multiple‐site dissimilarity ranges between ~50% and 53% per decade, and communities have become ~5.9% more similar over time since 1870. Main Conclusions Species introductions and extirpations have changed community composition, resulting in the fish communities becoming significantly more similar to one another over time and, thus, homogenized. As a result, ongoing management should prevent range expansion of native and non‐native species to preserve the current distinctiveness of the Great Lakes fish communities.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.12986</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7195-8898</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2019-12, Vol.25 (12), p.1870-1878
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2449873401
source JSTOR Open Access Journals
subjects BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH
Biogeography
biological invasions
Canals
Community composition
diversity
Environmental degradation
Fish
Glacial periods
Glaciers
Homogenization
Indigenous species
Introduced species
Invasive species
Lakes
Mathematical analysis
Native species
Overexploitation
Range extension
Species richness
Taxonomy
title Temporal dynamics of taxonomic homogenization in the fish communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T11%3A22%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20dynamics%20of%20taxonomic%20homogenization%20in%20the%20fish%20communities%20of%20the%20Laurentian%20Great%20Lakes&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Campbell,%20Sara%20E.&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1870&rft.epage=1878&rft.pages=1870-1878&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.12986&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_JFNAL%3E26801106%3C/jstor_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2421066330&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26801106&rfr_iscdi=true