Idle chatter or compelling conversation? The potential of the social media‐based #NGSSchat network for supporting science education reform efforts
The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) chat (#NGSSchat) is a social media‐based professional network used to discuss topics related to the NGSS in the United States. While successful reforms involve and coordinate the work of multiple stakeholders, recent research points out a striking lack of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of research in science teaching 2020-11, Vol.57 (9), p.1322-1355 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1355 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1322 |
container_title | Journal of research in science teaching |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Rosenberg, Joshua M. Reid, Joshua W. Dyer, Elizabeth B. Koehler, Matthew Fischer, Christian McKenna, Thomas J. |
description | The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) chat (#NGSSchat) is a social media‐based professional network used to discuss topics related to the NGSS in the United States. While successful reforms involve and coordinate the work of multiple stakeholders, recent research points out a striking lack of coordination between the individuals working in different educational roles—to the detriment of intended changes in the system. In this study, we analyzed more than 7,000 posts from individuals participating in #NGSSchat on Twitter (n = 247) during 2 years of 1‐hr synchronous discussions. We studied the depth and types of conversations that took place, the extent to which the involvement of teachers, administrators, researchers, and organizations was balanced, and what explains participation in the network over time. Using a mixed‐methods approach involving social network analysis, we found that conversations were primarily transactional, or social, and substantive, or providing opportunities for sense‐making about the standards or for participants to transform their practice and that individuals from diverse roles participated, with teachers comprising the plurality of those involved. Additionally, researchers, administrators, and teachers were the most active in the network, with no differences in both initiating, or sending, and being the recipients of, or receiving, replies as a part of conversations. Finally, we found that being a teacher or administrator, as well as receiving replies from individuals who were important in the network, were positively related to sustained involvement in the network in the following year. We discuss how #NGSSchat—as a social media‐based professional network—demonstrates similar features in other effective networks, and how social media‐based networks invite new visions for how to implement ambitious, large‐scale changes in science education. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/tea.21660 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2449777039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1270741</ericid><sourcerecordid>2449777039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-5a154ca152797410730354f7db4254144c68d3710a7464e44525cb4901e25cf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8ABIljoxBM6OEzcTqlApIARDyxy5zoWmpHGwXRAbj8DAE_IkuA1iY_GdfZ8-n35CjhmcMQB-7lGdcZamsEN6DLJhxGWc7pJemPFIxDDcJwfOLQEgzljWI183RY1UL5T3aKmxVJtVi3VdNU-hbV7ROuUr01zQ2QJpazw2vlI1NSX14cEZvbmtsKjU98fnXDks6OB-Mp1ulLRB_2bsMy2D2K3b1li_ETtdYaORYrHWWzu1GJAVxTIU7w7JXqlqh0e_tU8er8azy-vo7mFyczm6izRPM4gSxRKhw8FlJgUDGUOciFIWc8ETwYTQ6bCIJQMlRSpQiIQnei4yYBiaEuI-GXTe1pqXNTqfL83aNuHLnAuRSSlDSoE67ShtjXNh07y11UrZ95xBvgk9D6Hn29ADe9KxaCv9x41vGZcQVgzz827-VtX4_r8on41HnfEHNBOOQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449777039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Idle chatter or compelling conversation? The potential of the social media‐based #NGSSchat network for supporting science education reform efforts</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rosenberg, Joshua M. ; Reid, Joshua W. ; Dyer, Elizabeth B. ; Koehler, Matthew ; Fischer, Christian ; McKenna, Thomas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Joshua M. ; Reid, Joshua W. ; Dyer, Elizabeth B. ; Koehler, Matthew ; Fischer, Christian ; McKenna, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><description>The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) chat (#NGSSchat) is a social media‐based professional network used to discuss topics related to the NGSS in the United States. While successful reforms involve and coordinate the work of multiple stakeholders, recent research points out a striking lack of coordination between the individuals working in different educational roles—to the detriment of intended changes in the system. In this study, we analyzed more than 7,000 posts from individuals participating in #NGSSchat on Twitter (n = 247) during 2 years of 1‐hr synchronous discussions. We studied the depth and types of conversations that took place, the extent to which the involvement of teachers, administrators, researchers, and organizations was balanced, and what explains participation in the network over time. Using a mixed‐methods approach involving social network analysis, we found that conversations were primarily transactional, or social, and substantive, or providing opportunities for sense‐making about the standards or for participants to transform their practice and that individuals from diverse roles participated, with teachers comprising the plurality of those involved. Additionally, researchers, administrators, and teachers were the most active in the network, with no differences in both initiating, or sending, and being the recipients of, or receiving, replies as a part of conversations. Finally, we found that being a teacher or administrator, as well as receiving replies from individuals who were important in the network, were positively related to sustained involvement in the network in the following year. We discuss how #NGSSchat—as a social media‐based professional network—demonstrates similar features in other effective networks, and how social media‐based networks invite new visions for how to implement ambitious, large‐scale changes in science education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4308</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2736</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tea.21660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Administrators ; Ambition ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Coordination ; Education reform ; Educational Change ; learning communities ; Network Analysis ; policy ; professional networks ; Researchers ; Science Education ; Science Instruction ; Social Media ; Social network analysis ; Social networks ; Synchronous Communication ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of research in science teaching, 2020-11, Vol.57 (9), p.1322-1355</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-5a154ca152797410730354f7db4254144c68d3710a7464e44525cb4901e25cf03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-5a154ca152797410730354f7db4254144c68d3710a7464e44525cb4901e25cf03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2170-0447 ; 0000-0002-4124-7654</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftea.21660$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftea.21660$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1270741$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Joshua M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Joshua W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Elizabeth B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Idle chatter or compelling conversation? The potential of the social media‐based #NGSSchat network for supporting science education reform efforts</title><title>Journal of research in science teaching</title><description>The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) chat (#NGSSchat) is a social media‐based professional network used to discuss topics related to the NGSS in the United States. While successful reforms involve and coordinate the work of multiple stakeholders, recent research points out a striking lack of coordination between the individuals working in different educational roles—to the detriment of intended changes in the system. In this study, we analyzed more than 7,000 posts from individuals participating in #NGSSchat on Twitter (n = 247) during 2 years of 1‐hr synchronous discussions. We studied the depth and types of conversations that took place, the extent to which the involvement of teachers, administrators, researchers, and organizations was balanced, and what explains participation in the network over time. Using a mixed‐methods approach involving social network analysis, we found that conversations were primarily transactional, or social, and substantive, or providing opportunities for sense‐making about the standards or for participants to transform their practice and that individuals from diverse roles participated, with teachers comprising the plurality of those involved. Additionally, researchers, administrators, and teachers were the most active in the network, with no differences in both initiating, or sending, and being the recipients of, or receiving, replies as a part of conversations. Finally, we found that being a teacher or administrator, as well as receiving replies from individuals who were important in the network, were positively related to sustained involvement in the network in the following year. We discuss how #NGSSchat—as a social media‐based professional network—demonstrates similar features in other effective networks, and how social media‐based networks invite new visions for how to implement ambitious, large‐scale changes in science education.</description><subject>Administrators</subject><subject>Ambition</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>learning communities</subject><subject>Network Analysis</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>professional networks</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social network analysis</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Synchronous Communication</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0022-4308</issn><issn>1098-2736</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8ABIljoxBM6OEzcTqlApIARDyxy5zoWmpHGwXRAbj8DAE_IkuA1iY_GdfZ8-n35CjhmcMQB-7lGdcZamsEN6DLJhxGWc7pJemPFIxDDcJwfOLQEgzljWI183RY1UL5T3aKmxVJtVi3VdNU-hbV7ROuUr01zQ2QJpazw2vlI1NSX14cEZvbmtsKjU98fnXDks6OB-Mp1ulLRB_2bsMy2D2K3b1li_ETtdYaORYrHWWzu1GJAVxTIU7w7JXqlqh0e_tU8er8azy-vo7mFyczm6izRPM4gSxRKhw8FlJgUDGUOciFIWc8ETwYTQ6bCIJQMlRSpQiIQnei4yYBiaEuI-GXTe1pqXNTqfL83aNuHLnAuRSSlDSoE67ShtjXNh07y11UrZ95xBvgk9D6Hn29ADe9KxaCv9x41vGZcQVgzz827-VtX4_r8on41HnfEHNBOOQw</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Rosenberg, Joshua M.</creator><creator>Reid, Joshua W.</creator><creator>Dyer, Elizabeth B.</creator><creator>Koehler, Matthew</creator><creator>Fischer, Christian</creator><creator>McKenna, Thomas J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2170-0447</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4124-7654</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Idle chatter or compelling conversation? The potential of the social media‐based #NGSSchat network for supporting science education reform efforts</title><author>Rosenberg, Joshua M. ; Reid, Joshua W. ; Dyer, Elizabeth B. ; Koehler, Matthew ; Fischer, Christian ; McKenna, Thomas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-5a154ca152797410730354f7db4254144c68d3710a7464e44525cb4901e25cf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Administrators</topic><topic>Ambition</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>learning communities</topic><topic>Network Analysis</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>professional networks</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social network analysis</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Synchronous Communication</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Joshua M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Joshua W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Elizabeth B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of research in science teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosenberg, Joshua M.</au><au>Reid, Joshua W.</au><au>Dyer, Elizabeth B.</au><au>Koehler, Matthew</au><au>Fischer, Christian</au><au>McKenna, Thomas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1270741</ericid><atitle>Idle chatter or compelling conversation? The potential of the social media‐based #NGSSchat network for supporting science education reform efforts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of research in science teaching</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1322</spage><epage>1355</epage><pages>1322-1355</pages><issn>0022-4308</issn><eissn>1098-2736</eissn><abstract>The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) chat (#NGSSchat) is a social media‐based professional network used to discuss topics related to the NGSS in the United States. While successful reforms involve and coordinate the work of multiple stakeholders, recent research points out a striking lack of coordination between the individuals working in different educational roles—to the detriment of intended changes in the system. In this study, we analyzed more than 7,000 posts from individuals participating in #NGSSchat on Twitter (n = 247) during 2 years of 1‐hr synchronous discussions. We studied the depth and types of conversations that took place, the extent to which the involvement of teachers, administrators, researchers, and organizations was balanced, and what explains participation in the network over time. Using a mixed‐methods approach involving social network analysis, we found that conversations were primarily transactional, or social, and substantive, or providing opportunities for sense‐making about the standards or for participants to transform their practice and that individuals from diverse roles participated, with teachers comprising the plurality of those involved. Additionally, researchers, administrators, and teachers were the most active in the network, with no differences in both initiating, or sending, and being the recipients of, or receiving, replies as a part of conversations. Finally, we found that being a teacher or administrator, as well as receiving replies from individuals who were important in the network, were positively related to sustained involvement in the network in the following year. We discuss how #NGSSchat—as a social media‐based professional network—demonstrates similar features in other effective networks, and how social media‐based networks invite new visions for how to implement ambitious, large‐scale changes in science education.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/tea.21660</doi><tpages>34</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2170-0447</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4124-7654</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4308 |
ispartof | Journal of research in science teaching, 2020-11, Vol.57 (9), p.1322-1355 |
issn | 0022-4308 1098-2736 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2449777039 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Administrators Ambition Computer Mediated Communication Coordination Education reform Educational Change learning communities Network Analysis policy professional networks Researchers Science Education Science Instruction Social Media Social network analysis Social networks Synchronous Communication Teachers Teaching Methods |
title | Idle chatter or compelling conversation? The potential of the social media‐based #NGSSchat network for supporting science education reform efforts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T19%3A15%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Idle%20chatter%20or%20compelling%20conversation?%20The%20potential%20of%20the%20social%20media%E2%80%90based%20%23NGSSchat%20network%20for%20supporting%20science%20education%20reform%20efforts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20research%20in%20science%20teaching&rft.au=Rosenberg,%20Joshua%20M.&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1322&rft.epage=1355&rft.pages=1322-1355&rft.issn=0022-4308&rft.eissn=1098-2736&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tea.21660&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2449777039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449777039&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1270741&rfr_iscdi=true |