Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum

This study determines the optimal conditions for the ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction (UA‐SLE) of the total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Cenostigma macrophyllum leaves. The experiments were carried out according to three‐level, four‐variable Box‐Behnken design combined with the response su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemometrics 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Moreira, Bruno Oliveira, Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado, Carvalho, Anaildes Lago, Silva, Douglas Gonçalves, Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto, Yatsuda, Regiane, David, Jorge Mauricio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Journal of chemometrics
container_volume 34
creator Moreira, Bruno Oliveira
Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado
Carvalho, Anaildes Lago
Silva, Douglas Gonçalves
Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto
Yatsuda, Regiane
David, Jorge Mauricio
description This study determines the optimal conditions for the ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction (UA‐SLE) of the total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Cenostigma macrophyllum leaves. The experiments were carried out according to three‐level, four‐variable Box‐Behnken design combined with the response surface methodology (RSM). Extraction (sonication) time, liquid‐solid ratio, methanol concentration, and ultrasonic power were investigated as independent variables to obtain the optimal extraction conditions for TPC. Data were fitted to a second‐order polynomial model, and the model fitness was evaluated by the analysis of variance, which indicated the model (P < 0.0001), presenting precision and reliability with the experiments performed (R2 = 0.9947, coefficient of variance [CV] = 4.29, SD = 1.67). Individual and interactive effects of the independent variables on TPC extraction were interpreted using the proposed mathematical model. The results showed that for the maximum TPC extraction, the optimal conditions included 32 min extraction time, 29.73 mL·g−1 liquid‐solid ratio, 47.72% methanol concentration, and 145.71 W ultrasonic power. Under these optimal conditions, the predicted values were in agreement with the experimental values, thus validating the RSM model. When the optimal conditions were compared with those of conventional extraction techniques, the results showed that UA‐SLE presented significantly better results for TPC extraction (71.2% to 138.3% more efficient) and for antioxidant activity (115.0% to 179.2% more efficient). High‐performance liquid chromatography analysis of the extracts revealed that UA‐SLE did not interfere with the extract chemical composition, thus confirming that it was more effective than conventional techniques. Ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction conditions were optimized for the maximum extraction of the total phenolic compounds of Cenostigma macrophyllum using a Box‐Behnken design combined with response surface methodology. Independent variables in the extraction processes were investigated to obtain the optimal conditions for the extraction. The results indicated optimal conditions for TPC extraction and validated the RSM model. These parameters also showed that UA‐SLE exhibited significantly higher TPC extraction efficiency than conventional methods and that it did not alter the chemical composition of the extracts.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cem.3290
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2448995312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2448995312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2080-b251265acf3b028edcfa5256f6e7fe0e2843172a43323e8f72451b5a051c63c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKNDEQhYMoOF7ARwi4cdOaS3dPeimDN1DcKLhrMumKE0k6MenGf1z5CD6Dj-aTmHH83QkFBXW-U1VwEDqg5JgSwk4UuGPOGrKBJpQ0TUGZeNhEEyJEXTRc8G20k9ITIVnj5QR9nIZgjZKD8T32GkdIwfcJcBqjlgqwg2HhO2_94xJrH7EPg3Hm9dcw2iHK5Me--3x7lymZNECHk7dmNbDmeTQdhn8ZUv8tYQF91hVW3oWVM2EdvcOzPE6DeXQSO6miD4ultaPbQ1ta2gT7P30X3Z-f3c0ui-vbi6vZ6XWhGBGkmLOKsrqSSvM5YQI6pWXFqlrXMNVAgImS0ymTJeeMg9BTVlZ0XklSUVXzXLvocL03RP88QhraJz_GPp9sWVmKpqk4ZZk6WlP5wZQi6DZE42RctpS0qwTanEC7SiCjxRp9MRaWf3Lt7Ozmm_8CQBuOSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448995312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira ; Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado ; Carvalho, Anaildes Lago ; Silva, Douglas Gonçalves ; Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto ; Yatsuda, Regiane ; David, Jorge Mauricio</creator><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira ; Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado ; Carvalho, Anaildes Lago ; Silva, Douglas Gonçalves ; Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto ; Yatsuda, Regiane ; David, Jorge Mauricio</creatorcontrib><description>This study determines the optimal conditions for the ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction (UA‐SLE) of the total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Cenostigma macrophyllum leaves. The experiments were carried out according to three‐level, four‐variable Box‐Behnken design combined with the response surface methodology (RSM). Extraction (sonication) time, liquid‐solid ratio, methanol concentration, and ultrasonic power were investigated as independent variables to obtain the optimal extraction conditions for TPC. Data were fitted to a second‐order polynomial model, and the model fitness was evaluated by the analysis of variance, which indicated the model (P &lt; 0.0001), presenting precision and reliability with the experiments performed (R2 = 0.9947, coefficient of variance [CV] = 4.29, SD = 1.67). Individual and interactive effects of the independent variables on TPC extraction were interpreted using the proposed mathematical model. The results showed that for the maximum TPC extraction, the optimal conditions included 32 min extraction time, 29.73 mL·g−1 liquid‐solid ratio, 47.72% methanol concentration, and 145.71 W ultrasonic power. Under these optimal conditions, the predicted values were in agreement with the experimental values, thus validating the RSM model. When the optimal conditions were compared with those of conventional extraction techniques, the results showed that UA‐SLE presented significantly better results for TPC extraction (71.2% to 138.3% more efficient) and for antioxidant activity (115.0% to 179.2% more efficient). High‐performance liquid chromatography analysis of the extracts revealed that UA‐SLE did not interfere with the extract chemical composition, thus confirming that it was more effective than conventional techniques. Ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction conditions were optimized for the maximum extraction of the total phenolic compounds of Cenostigma macrophyllum using a Box‐Behnken design combined with response surface methodology. Independent variables in the extraction processes were investigated to obtain the optimal conditions for the extraction. The results indicated optimal conditions for TPC extraction and validated the RSM model. These parameters also showed that UA‐SLE exhibited significantly higher TPC extraction efficiency than conventional methods and that it did not alter the chemical composition of the extracts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-9383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-128X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cem.3290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antioxidants ; Box‐Behnken design ; Cenostigma macrophyllum ; Chemical composition ; Independent variables ; Liquid chromatography ; Mathematical models ; Methanol ; Optimization ; phenolic compounds ; Phenols ; Polynomials ; Response surface methodology ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemometrics, 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2080-b251265acf3b028edcfa5256f6e7fe0e2843172a43323e8f72451b5a051c63c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2080-b251265acf3b028edcfa5256f6e7fe0e2843172a43323e8f72451b5a051c63c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3601-4856 ; 0000-0001-6375-9055</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcem.3290$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcem.3290$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Anaildes Lago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Douglas Gonçalves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatsuda, Regiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Jorge Mauricio</creatorcontrib><title>Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum</title><title>Journal of chemometrics</title><description>This study determines the optimal conditions for the ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction (UA‐SLE) of the total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Cenostigma macrophyllum leaves. The experiments were carried out according to three‐level, four‐variable Box‐Behnken design combined with the response surface methodology (RSM). Extraction (sonication) time, liquid‐solid ratio, methanol concentration, and ultrasonic power were investigated as independent variables to obtain the optimal extraction conditions for TPC. Data were fitted to a second‐order polynomial model, and the model fitness was evaluated by the analysis of variance, which indicated the model (P &lt; 0.0001), presenting precision and reliability with the experiments performed (R2 = 0.9947, coefficient of variance [CV] = 4.29, SD = 1.67). Individual and interactive effects of the independent variables on TPC extraction were interpreted using the proposed mathematical model. The results showed that for the maximum TPC extraction, the optimal conditions included 32 min extraction time, 29.73 mL·g−1 liquid‐solid ratio, 47.72% methanol concentration, and 145.71 W ultrasonic power. Under these optimal conditions, the predicted values were in agreement with the experimental values, thus validating the RSM model. When the optimal conditions were compared with those of conventional extraction techniques, the results showed that UA‐SLE presented significantly better results for TPC extraction (71.2% to 138.3% more efficient) and for antioxidant activity (115.0% to 179.2% more efficient). High‐performance liquid chromatography analysis of the extracts revealed that UA‐SLE did not interfere with the extract chemical composition, thus confirming that it was more effective than conventional techniques. Ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction conditions were optimized for the maximum extraction of the total phenolic compounds of Cenostigma macrophyllum using a Box‐Behnken design combined with response surface methodology. Independent variables in the extraction processes were investigated to obtain the optimal conditions for the extraction. The results indicated optimal conditions for TPC extraction and validated the RSM model. These parameters also showed that UA‐SLE exhibited significantly higher TPC extraction efficiency than conventional methods and that it did not alter the chemical composition of the extracts.</description><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>Box‐Behnken design</subject><subject>Cenostigma macrophyllum</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methanol</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0886-9383</issn><issn>1099-128X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctKNDEQhYMoOF7ARwi4cdOaS3dPeimDN1DcKLhrMumKE0k6MenGf1z5CD6Dj-aTmHH83QkFBXW-U1VwEDqg5JgSwk4UuGPOGrKBJpQ0TUGZeNhEEyJEXTRc8G20k9ITIVnj5QR9nIZgjZKD8T32GkdIwfcJcBqjlgqwg2HhO2_94xJrH7EPg3Hm9dcw2iHK5Me--3x7lymZNECHk7dmNbDmeTQdhn8ZUv8tYQF91hVW3oWVM2EdvcOzPE6DeXQSO6miD4ultaPbQ1ta2gT7P30X3Z-f3c0ui-vbi6vZ6XWhGBGkmLOKsrqSSvM5YQI6pWXFqlrXMNVAgImS0ymTJeeMg9BTVlZ0XklSUVXzXLvocL03RP88QhraJz_GPp9sWVmKpqk4ZZk6WlP5wZQi6DZE42RctpS0qwTanEC7SiCjxRp9MRaWf3Lt7Ozmm_8CQBuOSg</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira</creator><creator>Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado</creator><creator>Carvalho, Anaildes Lago</creator><creator>Silva, Douglas Gonçalves</creator><creator>Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto</creator><creator>Yatsuda, Regiane</creator><creator>David, Jorge Mauricio</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3601-4856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-9055</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum</title><author>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira ; Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado ; Carvalho, Anaildes Lago ; Silva, Douglas Gonçalves ; Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto ; Yatsuda, Regiane ; David, Jorge Mauricio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2080-b251265acf3b028edcfa5256f6e7fe0e2843172a43323e8f72451b5a051c63c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>Box‐Behnken design</topic><topic>Cenostigma macrophyllum</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methanol</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Anaildes Lago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Douglas Gonçalves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatsuda, Regiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Jorge Mauricio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira</au><au>Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado</au><au>Carvalho, Anaildes Lago</au><au>Silva, Douglas Gonçalves</au><au>Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto</au><au>Yatsuda, Regiane</au><au>David, Jorge Mauricio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemometrics</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0886-9383</issn><eissn>1099-128X</eissn><abstract>This study determines the optimal conditions for the ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction (UA‐SLE) of the total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Cenostigma macrophyllum leaves. The experiments were carried out according to three‐level, four‐variable Box‐Behnken design combined with the response surface methodology (RSM). Extraction (sonication) time, liquid‐solid ratio, methanol concentration, and ultrasonic power were investigated as independent variables to obtain the optimal extraction conditions for TPC. Data were fitted to a second‐order polynomial model, and the model fitness was evaluated by the analysis of variance, which indicated the model (P &lt; 0.0001), presenting precision and reliability with the experiments performed (R2 = 0.9947, coefficient of variance [CV] = 4.29, SD = 1.67). Individual and interactive effects of the independent variables on TPC extraction were interpreted using the proposed mathematical model. The results showed that for the maximum TPC extraction, the optimal conditions included 32 min extraction time, 29.73 mL·g−1 liquid‐solid ratio, 47.72% methanol concentration, and 145.71 W ultrasonic power. Under these optimal conditions, the predicted values were in agreement with the experimental values, thus validating the RSM model. When the optimal conditions were compared with those of conventional extraction techniques, the results showed that UA‐SLE presented significantly better results for TPC extraction (71.2% to 138.3% more efficient) and for antioxidant activity (115.0% to 179.2% more efficient). High‐performance liquid chromatography analysis of the extracts revealed that UA‐SLE did not interfere with the extract chemical composition, thus confirming that it was more effective than conventional techniques. Ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction conditions were optimized for the maximum extraction of the total phenolic compounds of Cenostigma macrophyllum using a Box‐Behnken design combined with response surface methodology. Independent variables in the extraction processes were investigated to obtain the optimal conditions for the extraction. The results indicated optimal conditions for TPC extraction and validated the RSM model. These parameters also showed that UA‐SLE exhibited significantly higher TPC extraction efficiency than conventional methods and that it did not alter the chemical composition of the extracts.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/cem.3290</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3601-4856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-9055</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-9383
ispartof Journal of chemometrics, 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.n/a
issn 0886-9383
1099-128X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2448995312
source Wiley Journals
subjects Antioxidants
Box‐Behnken design
Cenostigma macrophyllum
Chemical composition
Independent variables
Liquid chromatography
Mathematical models
Methanol
Optimization
phenolic compounds
Phenols
Polynomials
Response surface methodology
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction
Variance analysis
title Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20response%20surface%20methodology%20for%20optimization%20of%20ultrasound%E2%80%90assisted%20solid%E2%80%90liquid%20extraction%20of%20phenolic%20compounds%20from%20Cenostigma%20macrophyllum&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemometrics&rft.au=Moreira,%20Bruno%20Oliveira&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0886-9383&rft.eissn=1099-128X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cem.3290&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2448995312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448995312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true