Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum
This study determines the optimal conditions for the ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction (UA‐SLE) of the total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Cenostigma macrophyllum leaves. The experiments were carried out according to three‐level, four‐variable Box‐Behnken design combined with the response su...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemometrics 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of chemometrics |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Moreira, Bruno Oliveira Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado Carvalho, Anaildes Lago Silva, Douglas Gonçalves Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto Yatsuda, Regiane David, Jorge Mauricio |
description | This study determines the optimal conditions for the ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction (UA‐SLE) of the total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Cenostigma macrophyllum leaves. The experiments were carried out according to three‐level, four‐variable Box‐Behnken design combined with the response surface methodology (RSM). Extraction (sonication) time, liquid‐solid ratio, methanol concentration, and ultrasonic power were investigated as independent variables to obtain the optimal extraction conditions for TPC. Data were fitted to a second‐order polynomial model, and the model fitness was evaluated by the analysis of variance, which indicated the model (P < 0.0001), presenting precision and reliability with the experiments performed (R2 = 0.9947, coefficient of variance [CV] = 4.29, SD = 1.67). Individual and interactive effects of the independent variables on TPC extraction were interpreted using the proposed mathematical model. The results showed that for the maximum TPC extraction, the optimal conditions included 32 min extraction time, 29.73 mL·g−1 liquid‐solid ratio, 47.72% methanol concentration, and 145.71 W ultrasonic power. Under these optimal conditions, the predicted values were in agreement with the experimental values, thus validating the RSM model. When the optimal conditions were compared with those of conventional extraction techniques, the results showed that UA‐SLE presented significantly better results for TPC extraction (71.2% to 138.3% more efficient) and for antioxidant activity (115.0% to 179.2% more efficient). High‐performance liquid chromatography analysis of the extracts revealed that UA‐SLE did not interfere with the extract chemical composition, thus confirming that it was more effective than conventional techniques.
Ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction conditions were optimized for the maximum extraction of the total phenolic compounds of Cenostigma macrophyllum using a Box‐Behnken design combined with response surface methodology. Independent variables in the extraction processes were investigated to obtain the optimal conditions for the extraction. The results indicated optimal conditions for TPC extraction and validated the RSM model. These parameters also showed that UA‐SLE exhibited significantly higher TPC extraction efficiency than conventional methods and that it did not alter the chemical composition of the extracts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cem.3290 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2448995312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2448995312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2080-b251265acf3b028edcfa5256f6e7fe0e2843172a43323e8f72451b5a051c63c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKNDEQhYMoOF7ARwi4cdOaS3dPeimDN1DcKLhrMumKE0k6MenGf1z5CD6Dj-aTmHH83QkFBXW-U1VwEDqg5JgSwk4UuGPOGrKBJpQ0TUGZeNhEEyJEXTRc8G20k9ITIVnj5QR9nIZgjZKD8T32GkdIwfcJcBqjlgqwg2HhO2_94xJrH7EPg3Hm9dcw2iHK5Me--3x7lymZNECHk7dmNbDmeTQdhn8ZUv8tYQF91hVW3oWVM2EdvcOzPE6DeXQSO6miD4ultaPbQ1ta2gT7P30X3Z-f3c0ui-vbi6vZ6XWhGBGkmLOKsrqSSvM5YQI6pWXFqlrXMNVAgImS0ymTJeeMg9BTVlZ0XklSUVXzXLvocL03RP88QhraJz_GPp9sWVmKpqk4ZZk6WlP5wZQi6DZE42RctpS0qwTanEC7SiCjxRp9MRaWf3Lt7Ozmm_8CQBuOSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448995312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira ; Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado ; Carvalho, Anaildes Lago ; Silva, Douglas Gonçalves ; Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto ; Yatsuda, Regiane ; David, Jorge Mauricio</creator><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira ; Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado ; Carvalho, Anaildes Lago ; Silva, Douglas Gonçalves ; Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto ; Yatsuda, Regiane ; David, Jorge Mauricio</creatorcontrib><description>This study determines the optimal conditions for the ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction (UA‐SLE) of the total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Cenostigma macrophyllum leaves. The experiments were carried out according to three‐level, four‐variable Box‐Behnken design combined with the response surface methodology (RSM). Extraction (sonication) time, liquid‐solid ratio, methanol concentration, and ultrasonic power were investigated as independent variables to obtain the optimal extraction conditions for TPC. Data were fitted to a second‐order polynomial model, and the model fitness was evaluated by the analysis of variance, which indicated the model (P < 0.0001), presenting precision and reliability with the experiments performed (R2 = 0.9947, coefficient of variance [CV] = 4.29, SD = 1.67). Individual and interactive effects of the independent variables on TPC extraction were interpreted using the proposed mathematical model. The results showed that for the maximum TPC extraction, the optimal conditions included 32 min extraction time, 29.73 mL·g−1 liquid‐solid ratio, 47.72% methanol concentration, and 145.71 W ultrasonic power. Under these optimal conditions, the predicted values were in agreement with the experimental values, thus validating the RSM model. When the optimal conditions were compared with those of conventional extraction techniques, the results showed that UA‐SLE presented significantly better results for TPC extraction (71.2% to 138.3% more efficient) and for antioxidant activity (115.0% to 179.2% more efficient). High‐performance liquid chromatography analysis of the extracts revealed that UA‐SLE did not interfere with the extract chemical composition, thus confirming that it was more effective than conventional techniques.
Ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction conditions were optimized for the maximum extraction of the total phenolic compounds of Cenostigma macrophyllum using a Box‐Behnken design combined with response surface methodology. Independent variables in the extraction processes were investigated to obtain the optimal conditions for the extraction. The results indicated optimal conditions for TPC extraction and validated the RSM model. These parameters also showed that UA‐SLE exhibited significantly higher TPC extraction efficiency than conventional methods and that it did not alter the chemical composition of the extracts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-9383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-128X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cem.3290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antioxidants ; Box‐Behnken design ; Cenostigma macrophyllum ; Chemical composition ; Independent variables ; Liquid chromatography ; Mathematical models ; Methanol ; Optimization ; phenolic compounds ; Phenols ; Polynomials ; Response surface methodology ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemometrics, 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2080-b251265acf3b028edcfa5256f6e7fe0e2843172a43323e8f72451b5a051c63c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2080-b251265acf3b028edcfa5256f6e7fe0e2843172a43323e8f72451b5a051c63c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3601-4856 ; 0000-0001-6375-9055</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcem.3290$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcem.3290$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Anaildes Lago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Douglas Gonçalves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatsuda, Regiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Jorge Mauricio</creatorcontrib><title>Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum</title><title>Journal of chemometrics</title><description>This study determines the optimal conditions for the ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction (UA‐SLE) of the total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Cenostigma macrophyllum leaves. The experiments were carried out according to three‐level, four‐variable Box‐Behnken design combined with the response surface methodology (RSM). Extraction (sonication) time, liquid‐solid ratio, methanol concentration, and ultrasonic power were investigated as independent variables to obtain the optimal extraction conditions for TPC. Data were fitted to a second‐order polynomial model, and the model fitness was evaluated by the analysis of variance, which indicated the model (P < 0.0001), presenting precision and reliability with the experiments performed (R2 = 0.9947, coefficient of variance [CV] = 4.29, SD = 1.67). Individual and interactive effects of the independent variables on TPC extraction were interpreted using the proposed mathematical model. The results showed that for the maximum TPC extraction, the optimal conditions included 32 min extraction time, 29.73 mL·g−1 liquid‐solid ratio, 47.72% methanol concentration, and 145.71 W ultrasonic power. Under these optimal conditions, the predicted values were in agreement with the experimental values, thus validating the RSM model. When the optimal conditions were compared with those of conventional extraction techniques, the results showed that UA‐SLE presented significantly better results for TPC extraction (71.2% to 138.3% more efficient) and for antioxidant activity (115.0% to 179.2% more efficient). High‐performance liquid chromatography analysis of the extracts revealed that UA‐SLE did not interfere with the extract chemical composition, thus confirming that it was more effective than conventional techniques.
Ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction conditions were optimized for the maximum extraction of the total phenolic compounds of Cenostigma macrophyllum using a Box‐Behnken design combined with response surface methodology. Independent variables in the extraction processes were investigated to obtain the optimal conditions for the extraction. The results indicated optimal conditions for TPC extraction and validated the RSM model. These parameters also showed that UA‐SLE exhibited significantly higher TPC extraction efficiency than conventional methods and that it did not alter the chemical composition of the extracts.</description><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>Box‐Behnken design</subject><subject>Cenostigma macrophyllum</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methanol</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0886-9383</issn><issn>1099-128X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctKNDEQhYMoOF7ARwi4cdOaS3dPeimDN1DcKLhrMumKE0k6MenGf1z5CD6Dj-aTmHH83QkFBXW-U1VwEDqg5JgSwk4UuGPOGrKBJpQ0TUGZeNhEEyJEXTRc8G20k9ITIVnj5QR9nIZgjZKD8T32GkdIwfcJcBqjlgqwg2HhO2_94xJrH7EPg3Hm9dcw2iHK5Me--3x7lymZNECHk7dmNbDmeTQdhn8ZUv8tYQF91hVW3oWVM2EdvcOzPE6DeXQSO6miD4ultaPbQ1ta2gT7P30X3Z-f3c0ui-vbi6vZ6XWhGBGkmLOKsrqSSvM5YQI6pWXFqlrXMNVAgImS0ymTJeeMg9BTVlZ0XklSUVXzXLvocL03RP88QhraJz_GPp9sWVmKpqk4ZZk6WlP5wZQi6DZE42RctpS0qwTanEC7SiCjxRp9MRaWf3Lt7Ozmm_8CQBuOSg</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira</creator><creator>Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado</creator><creator>Carvalho, Anaildes Lago</creator><creator>Silva, Douglas Gonçalves</creator><creator>Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto</creator><creator>Yatsuda, Regiane</creator><creator>David, Jorge Mauricio</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3601-4856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-9055</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum</title><author>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira ; Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado ; Carvalho, Anaildes Lago ; Silva, Douglas Gonçalves ; Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto ; Yatsuda, Regiane ; David, Jorge Mauricio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2080-b251265acf3b028edcfa5256f6e7fe0e2843172a43323e8f72451b5a051c63c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>Box‐Behnken design</topic><topic>Cenostigma macrophyllum</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methanol</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Anaildes Lago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Douglas Gonçalves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatsuda, Regiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Jorge Mauricio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moreira, Bruno Oliveira</au><au>Barbosa Filho, Marco Roberto Dourado</au><au>Carvalho, Anaildes Lago</au><au>Silva, Douglas Gonçalves</au><au>Cruz, Mariluze Peixoto</au><au>Yatsuda, Regiane</au><au>David, Jorge Mauricio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemometrics</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0886-9383</issn><eissn>1099-128X</eissn><abstract>This study determines the optimal conditions for the ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction (UA‐SLE) of the total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Cenostigma macrophyllum leaves. The experiments were carried out according to three‐level, four‐variable Box‐Behnken design combined with the response surface methodology (RSM). Extraction (sonication) time, liquid‐solid ratio, methanol concentration, and ultrasonic power were investigated as independent variables to obtain the optimal extraction conditions for TPC. Data were fitted to a second‐order polynomial model, and the model fitness was evaluated by the analysis of variance, which indicated the model (P < 0.0001), presenting precision and reliability with the experiments performed (R2 = 0.9947, coefficient of variance [CV] = 4.29, SD = 1.67). Individual and interactive effects of the independent variables on TPC extraction were interpreted using the proposed mathematical model. The results showed that for the maximum TPC extraction, the optimal conditions included 32 min extraction time, 29.73 mL·g−1 liquid‐solid ratio, 47.72% methanol concentration, and 145.71 W ultrasonic power. Under these optimal conditions, the predicted values were in agreement with the experimental values, thus validating the RSM model. When the optimal conditions were compared with those of conventional extraction techniques, the results showed that UA‐SLE presented significantly better results for TPC extraction (71.2% to 138.3% more efficient) and for antioxidant activity (115.0% to 179.2% more efficient). High‐performance liquid chromatography analysis of the extracts revealed that UA‐SLE did not interfere with the extract chemical composition, thus confirming that it was more effective than conventional techniques.
Ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction conditions were optimized for the maximum extraction of the total phenolic compounds of Cenostigma macrophyllum using a Box‐Behnken design combined with response surface methodology. Independent variables in the extraction processes were investigated to obtain the optimal conditions for the extraction. The results indicated optimal conditions for TPC extraction and validated the RSM model. These parameters also showed that UA‐SLE exhibited significantly higher TPC extraction efficiency than conventional methods and that it did not alter the chemical composition of the extracts.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/cem.3290</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3601-4856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-9055</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-9383 |
ispartof | Journal of chemometrics, 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.n/a |
issn | 0886-9383 1099-128X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2448995312 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Antioxidants Box‐Behnken design Cenostigma macrophyllum Chemical composition Independent variables Liquid chromatography Mathematical models Methanol Optimization phenolic compounds Phenols Polynomials Response surface methodology Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction Variance analysis |
title | Application of response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound‐assisted solid‐liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from Cenostigma macrophyllum |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20response%20surface%20methodology%20for%20optimization%20of%20ultrasound%E2%80%90assisted%20solid%E2%80%90liquid%20extraction%20of%20phenolic%20compounds%20from%20Cenostigma%20macrophyllum&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemometrics&rft.au=Moreira,%20Bruno%20Oliveira&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0886-9383&rft.eissn=1099-128X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cem.3290&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2448995312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448995312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |