The state of Canada's forests: A global comparison of the performance on Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators
In recent years, the concept of sustainable forest management has evolved into a number of Criteria and Indicators schemes that are designed to guide the practice of sustainable forestry. One such mechanism is the Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators, which identifies seven criteria and 54 indic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest policy and economics 2020-09, Vol.118, p.102234, Article 102234 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102234 |
container_title | Forest policy and economics |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Gilani, Haris R. Innes, John L. |
description | In recent years, the concept of sustainable forest management has evolved into a number of Criteria and Indicators schemes that are designed to guide the practice of sustainable forestry. One such mechanism is the Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators, which identifies seven criteria and 54 indicators associated with these seven criteria. While there is sufficient basic forest data available through the FAO's Global Forest Resource Assessment (2015), it is unclear how big forest countries compare in the key parameters surrounding sustainable forest management as defined by major Criteria and Indicator schemes. To accomplish this, we performed analyses of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 (FRA) country report data to provide insights into the current status and trends in the period 1990–2015 in eight jurisdictions, namely Australia, Canada, China, Japan, the European Union, New Zealand, the Russian Federation and the USA. This study found that Canada has performed well against several key sustainable forest management parameters of the Montréal Process, including forest area designated for multiple use, and protective functions such as soil and water conservation and ecosystems services. Forest area in Canada remained stable over the past 25 years, although a relatively small area of forest had been lost. Compared to other countries, the rate of deforestation (which involves a change in land use) in Canada is small and has declined from 65,000 ha per year in 1990 to 48,000 ha per year in 2010. Forest area was also compared in the category of primary forest. Canada lost 741,000 ha of primary forest from 1990 to 2015, although this does not necessarily imply a change in total forest area. Our findings show that Canada, has some of the most stringent forest management legal and policy frameworks. While most other jurisdictions have only national and state level policies and a legislative framework to support sustainable forest management, Canada has comprehensive policies and a legislative framework in place at the national, provincial and local levels. In terms of social parameters, stakeholders are allowed to be involved in the planning, operations and review of almost all forest areas in our selected jurisdictions. This study demonstrates that the forest management and conservation regime in Canada, within the studied domains i.e. legal framework, management plans, national forest inventory and stakeholder involvement, incorporates a sophistica |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102234 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2448691435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1389934119304964</els_id><sourcerecordid>2448691435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bfbc8854aca82486e3d5255351589041b7d6f970b8046976a3ebae8d10c7a5393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQRiMEEqVwAxaWWLBKsWM7cVggVRU_lYpgUdbWxHHAVRuHsUHiSJyDi-EqrFl5ZL3vG83LsnNGZ4yy8moz6zwOfjsraLH_KgouDrIJU1WRV1TSwzRzVec1F-w4OwlhQymrKOOTDNdvloQI0RLfkQX00MJlIKnPhhiuyZy8bn0DW2L8bgB0wfd7MKbUYDFhO-hNyvbk0fcRf74T-oze2BDIAl206IBA35Jl3zoD0WM4zY462AZ79vdOs5e72_XiIV893S8X81VuOBcxb7rGKCUFGFCFUKXlrSyk5JJJVVPBmqotu7qijaKirKsSuG3AqpZRU4HkNZ9mF2PvgP79I52jN_4D-7RSFyIV1kxwmSgxUgZ9CGg7PaDbAX5pRvXert7o0a7e29Wj3RS7GWM2XfDpLOpgnE0qWofWRN1693_BL-bHhVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448691435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The state of Canada's forests: A global comparison of the performance on Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Gilani, Haris R. ; Innes, John L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilani, Haris R. ; Innes, John L.</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, the concept of sustainable forest management has evolved into a number of Criteria and Indicators schemes that are designed to guide the practice of sustainable forestry. One such mechanism is the Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators, which identifies seven criteria and 54 indicators associated with these seven criteria. While there is sufficient basic forest data available through the FAO's Global Forest Resource Assessment (2015), it is unclear how big forest countries compare in the key parameters surrounding sustainable forest management as defined by major Criteria and Indicator schemes. To accomplish this, we performed analyses of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 (FRA) country report data to provide insights into the current status and trends in the period 1990–2015 in eight jurisdictions, namely Australia, Canada, China, Japan, the European Union, New Zealand, the Russian Federation and the USA. This study found that Canada has performed well against several key sustainable forest management parameters of the Montréal Process, including forest area designated for multiple use, and protective functions such as soil and water conservation and ecosystems services. Forest area in Canada remained stable over the past 25 years, although a relatively small area of forest had been lost. Compared to other countries, the rate of deforestation (which involves a change in land use) in Canada is small and has declined from 65,000 ha per year in 1990 to 48,000 ha per year in 2010. Forest area was also compared in the category of primary forest. Canada lost 741,000 ha of primary forest from 1990 to 2015, although this does not necessarily imply a change in total forest area. Our findings show that Canada, has some of the most stringent forest management legal and policy frameworks. While most other jurisdictions have only national and state level policies and a legislative framework to support sustainable forest management, Canada has comprehensive policies and a legislative framework in place at the national, provincial and local levels. In terms of social parameters, stakeholders are allowed to be involved in the planning, operations and review of almost all forest areas in our selected jurisdictions. This study demonstrates that the forest management and conservation regime in Canada, within the studied domains i.e. legal framework, management plans, national forest inventory and stakeholder involvement, incorporates a sophisticated understanding of the global, national and local interests linking economic, environmental and social issues.
•We performed comparative analysis of Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 data.•We quantified current forest areas and examined trends in key indicators of SFM.•Canada ranked high on several key sustainable forest management parameters.•Canada has consistently maintained about 232 million ha of managed forest since 1990.•Deforestation rate in Canada declined from 65 K ha/yr in 1990 to 48 K ha/yr in 2010.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102234</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Criteria ; Criteria and indicators ; Deforestation ; Ecosystems ; Environmental changes ; Forest conservation ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forest policy ; Forest resources ; Forestry ; Forests ; Global forest resources assessment ; Indicators ; Inventory ; Land use ; Management ; Policies ; Process parameters ; Soil conservation ; Soil water ; Sustainability ; Sustainable forest management ; Sustainable forestry ; The Montréal Process ; Water conservation</subject><ispartof>Forest policy and economics, 2020-09, Vol.118, p.102234, Article 102234</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bfbc8854aca82486e3d5255351589041b7d6f970b8046976a3ebae8d10c7a5393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bfbc8854aca82486e3d5255351589041b7d6f970b8046976a3ebae8d10c7a5393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102234$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilani, Haris R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, John L.</creatorcontrib><title>The state of Canada's forests: A global comparison of the performance on Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators</title><title>Forest policy and economics</title><description>In recent years, the concept of sustainable forest management has evolved into a number of Criteria and Indicators schemes that are designed to guide the practice of sustainable forestry. One such mechanism is the Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators, which identifies seven criteria and 54 indicators associated with these seven criteria. While there is sufficient basic forest data available through the FAO's Global Forest Resource Assessment (2015), it is unclear how big forest countries compare in the key parameters surrounding sustainable forest management as defined by major Criteria and Indicator schemes. To accomplish this, we performed analyses of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 (FRA) country report data to provide insights into the current status and trends in the period 1990–2015 in eight jurisdictions, namely Australia, Canada, China, Japan, the European Union, New Zealand, the Russian Federation and the USA. This study found that Canada has performed well against several key sustainable forest management parameters of the Montréal Process, including forest area designated for multiple use, and protective functions such as soil and water conservation and ecosystems services. Forest area in Canada remained stable over the past 25 years, although a relatively small area of forest had been lost. Compared to other countries, the rate of deforestation (which involves a change in land use) in Canada is small and has declined from 65,000 ha per year in 1990 to 48,000 ha per year in 2010. Forest area was also compared in the category of primary forest. Canada lost 741,000 ha of primary forest from 1990 to 2015, although this does not necessarily imply a change in total forest area. Our findings show that Canada, has some of the most stringent forest management legal and policy frameworks. While most other jurisdictions have only national and state level policies and a legislative framework to support sustainable forest management, Canada has comprehensive policies and a legislative framework in place at the national, provincial and local levels. In terms of social parameters, stakeholders are allowed to be involved in the planning, operations and review of almost all forest areas in our selected jurisdictions. This study demonstrates that the forest management and conservation regime in Canada, within the studied domains i.e. legal framework, management plans, national forest inventory and stakeholder involvement, incorporates a sophisticated understanding of the global, national and local interests linking economic, environmental and social issues.
•We performed comparative analysis of Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 data.•We quantified current forest areas and examined trends in key indicators of SFM.•Canada ranked high on several key sustainable forest management parameters.•Canada has consistently maintained about 232 million ha of managed forest since 1990.•Deforestation rate in Canada declined from 65 K ha/yr in 1990 to 48 K ha/yr in 2010.</description><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Criteria and indicators</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest policy</subject><subject>Forest resources</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Global forest resources assessment</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable forest management</subject><subject>Sustainable forestry</subject><subject>The Montréal Process</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><issn>1389-9341</issn><issn>1872-7050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQRiMEEqVwAxaWWLBKsWM7cVggVRU_lYpgUdbWxHHAVRuHsUHiSJyDi-EqrFl5ZL3vG83LsnNGZ4yy8moz6zwOfjsraLH_KgouDrIJU1WRV1TSwzRzVec1F-w4OwlhQymrKOOTDNdvloQI0RLfkQX00MJlIKnPhhiuyZy8bn0DW2L8bgB0wfd7MKbUYDFhO-hNyvbk0fcRf74T-oze2BDIAl206IBA35Jl3zoD0WM4zY462AZ79vdOs5e72_XiIV893S8X81VuOBcxb7rGKCUFGFCFUKXlrSyk5JJJVVPBmqotu7qijaKirKsSuG3AqpZRU4HkNZ9mF2PvgP79I52jN_4D-7RSFyIV1kxwmSgxUgZ9CGg7PaDbAX5pRvXert7o0a7e29Wj3RS7GWM2XfDpLOpgnE0qWofWRN1693_BL-bHhVY</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Gilani, Haris R.</creator><creator>Innes, John L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>The state of Canada's forests: A global comparison of the performance on Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators</title><author>Gilani, Haris R. ; Innes, John L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bfbc8854aca82486e3d5255351589041b7d6f970b8046976a3ebae8d10c7a5393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Criteria and indicators</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest policy</topic><topic>Forest resources</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Global forest resources assessment</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable forest management</topic><topic>Sustainable forestry</topic><topic>The Montréal Process</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilani, Haris R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, John L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilani, Haris R.</au><au>Innes, John L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The state of Canada's forests: A global comparison of the performance on Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators</atitle><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>118</volume><spage>102234</spage><pages>102234-</pages><artnum>102234</artnum><issn>1389-9341</issn><eissn>1872-7050</eissn><abstract>In recent years, the concept of sustainable forest management has evolved into a number of Criteria and Indicators schemes that are designed to guide the practice of sustainable forestry. One such mechanism is the Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators, which identifies seven criteria and 54 indicators associated with these seven criteria. While there is sufficient basic forest data available through the FAO's Global Forest Resource Assessment (2015), it is unclear how big forest countries compare in the key parameters surrounding sustainable forest management as defined by major Criteria and Indicator schemes. To accomplish this, we performed analyses of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 (FRA) country report data to provide insights into the current status and trends in the period 1990–2015 in eight jurisdictions, namely Australia, Canada, China, Japan, the European Union, New Zealand, the Russian Federation and the USA. This study found that Canada has performed well against several key sustainable forest management parameters of the Montréal Process, including forest area designated for multiple use, and protective functions such as soil and water conservation and ecosystems services. Forest area in Canada remained stable over the past 25 years, although a relatively small area of forest had been lost. Compared to other countries, the rate of deforestation (which involves a change in land use) in Canada is small and has declined from 65,000 ha per year in 1990 to 48,000 ha per year in 2010. Forest area was also compared in the category of primary forest. Canada lost 741,000 ha of primary forest from 1990 to 2015, although this does not necessarily imply a change in total forest area. Our findings show that Canada, has some of the most stringent forest management legal and policy frameworks. While most other jurisdictions have only national and state level policies and a legislative framework to support sustainable forest management, Canada has comprehensive policies and a legislative framework in place at the national, provincial and local levels. In terms of social parameters, stakeholders are allowed to be involved in the planning, operations and review of almost all forest areas in our selected jurisdictions. This study demonstrates that the forest management and conservation regime in Canada, within the studied domains i.e. legal framework, management plans, national forest inventory and stakeholder involvement, incorporates a sophisticated understanding of the global, national and local interests linking economic, environmental and social issues.
•We performed comparative analysis of Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 data.•We quantified current forest areas and examined trends in key indicators of SFM.•Canada ranked high on several key sustainable forest management parameters.•Canada has consistently maintained about 232 million ha of managed forest since 1990.•Deforestation rate in Canada declined from 65 K ha/yr in 1990 to 48 K ha/yr in 2010.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102234</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-9341 |
ispartof | Forest policy and economics, 2020-09, Vol.118, p.102234, Article 102234 |
issn | 1389-9341 1872-7050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2448691435 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Criteria Criteria and indicators Deforestation Ecosystems Environmental changes Forest conservation Forest ecosystems Forest management Forest policy Forest resources Forestry Forests Global forest resources assessment Indicators Inventory Land use Management Policies Process parameters Soil conservation Soil water Sustainability Sustainable forest management Sustainable forestry The Montréal Process Water conservation |
title | The state of Canada's forests: A global comparison of the performance on Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A38%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20state%20of%20Canada's%20forests:%20A%20global%20comparison%20of%20the%20performance%20on%20Montr%C3%A9al%20Process%20Criteria%20and%20Indicators&rft.jtitle=Forest%20policy%20and%20economics&rft.au=Gilani,%20Haris%20R.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=118&rft.spage=102234&rft.pages=102234-&rft.artnum=102234&rft.issn=1389-9341&rft.eissn=1872-7050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2448691435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448691435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1389934119304964&rfr_iscdi=true |