How countries link forest monitoring into policy-making
Providing decision-makers with information is often seen as an important development strategy. Wishful thinking aside, to what extent do countries actually take up forest monitoring results in policy-making? And where this does happen, how are forest monitoring systems particularly suitable for info...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest policy and economics 2020-09, Vol.118, p.102248, Article 102248 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102248 |
container_title | Forest policy and economics |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Neeff, Till Piazza, Marco |
description | Providing decision-makers with information is often seen as an important development strategy. Wishful thinking aside, to what extent do countries actually take up forest monitoring results in policy-making? And where this does happen, how are forest monitoring systems particularly suitable for informing policy-making? This paper reports on an indicator-based assessment of 38 developing countries. First, the contributions of forest monitoring were investigated throughout the stages of the policy-making cycle. In most countries, forest monitoring is instrumental in setting the agenda of decision-makers, defining solutions and evaluating outcomes. There may be an underused opportunity, however, to leverage forest monitoring in policy implementation, such as by guiding decision-making in government programmes or by underpinning fiscal incentive schemes. Second, an indicator set on the accessibility, transparency, reliability and credibility, relevance, and sustainability of forest monitoring was the basis for exploring how suitable current forest monitoring systems are for informing policy-making. The assessments showed that countries have invested more in the transparency, reliability and credibility of forest monitoring than in making sure that data and analysis are accessible and relevant to policy-makers. Moreover, in most countries, the sustainability of forest monitoring systems is at risk. Although there may therefore be the opportunity and requirement for continued investment in forest monitoring, efforts to leverage forest monitoring as a development strategy need to acknowledge that information can at best catalyse but not directly drive change. Where the point of departure is not data and analysis alone but an open window of opportunity for policy change, forest monitoring can powerfully enable better policy-making.
•In 38 developing countries the contribution of forest monitoring to policy-making was assessed.•Data and analysis are instrumental for agenda setting, for defining solutions, for implementing them, and for evaluating policy outcomes.•Most impactful are forest monitoring systems that are accessible, transparent, reliable and credible, relevant, and sustainable.•Where a window of opportunity for change is open, forest monitoring can powerfully enable better policy-making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102248 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2448686264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1389934119303405</els_id><sourcerecordid>2448686264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23a7855e6f436d8576f3a0631fa95b797de03bf74bace14cc45650a4fae065ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4DDwuet-Y72YsgRa1Q8KLnkM1OJNt2U5Ot0n9vynr2NMPjfcw8hG4JXhBM5H2_8DHt43ZBMT1BlHJ9hmZEK1orLPB52Zlu6oZxcomucu4xJgoTNkNqFX8qFw_DmALkahuGTVXMII_VLg5hjCkMn1UYxliVgOCO9c5uCnSNLrzdZrj5m3P08fz0vlzV67eX1-XjunaM8bGmzCotBEjPmey0UNIziyUj3jaiVY3qALPWK95aB4Q7x4UU2HJvAUsBns3R3eS7T_HrUM4yfTykoUQayrmWWlLJC4tPLJdizgm82aews-loCDanikxvporMqSIzVVRkD5MMygffAZLJLsDgoAsJ3Gi6GP43-AVts3Ds</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448686264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How countries link forest monitoring into policy-making</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Neeff, Till ; Piazza, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Neeff, Till ; Piazza, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Providing decision-makers with information is often seen as an important development strategy. Wishful thinking aside, to what extent do countries actually take up forest monitoring results in policy-making? And where this does happen, how are forest monitoring systems particularly suitable for informing policy-making? This paper reports on an indicator-based assessment of 38 developing countries. First, the contributions of forest monitoring were investigated throughout the stages of the policy-making cycle. In most countries, forest monitoring is instrumental in setting the agenda of decision-makers, defining solutions and evaluating outcomes. There may be an underused opportunity, however, to leverage forest monitoring in policy implementation, such as by guiding decision-making in government programmes or by underpinning fiscal incentive schemes. Second, an indicator set on the accessibility, transparency, reliability and credibility, relevance, and sustainability of forest monitoring was the basis for exploring how suitable current forest monitoring systems are for informing policy-making. The assessments showed that countries have invested more in the transparency, reliability and credibility of forest monitoring than in making sure that data and analysis are accessible and relevant to policy-makers. Moreover, in most countries, the sustainability of forest monitoring systems is at risk. Although there may therefore be the opportunity and requirement for continued investment in forest monitoring, efforts to leverage forest monitoring as a development strategy need to acknowledge that information can at best catalyse but not directly drive change. Where the point of departure is not data and analysis alone but an open window of opportunity for policy change, forest monitoring can powerfully enable better policy-making.
•In 38 developing countries the contribution of forest monitoring to policy-making was assessed.•Data and analysis are instrumental for agenda setting, for defining solutions, for implementing them, and for evaluating policy outcomes.•Most impactful are forest monitoring systems that are accessible, transparent, reliable and credible, relevant, and sustainable.•Where a window of opportunity for change is open, forest monitoring can powerfully enable better policy-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102248</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Capacity development ; Credibility ; Data analysis ; Decision making ; Developing countries ; Development strategies ; Evidence ; Forest management ; Forest monitoring ; Forest policy ; Forests ; LDCs ; Monitoring ; Monitoring systems ; Policy implementation ; Policy making ; Policy-making cycle ; Reforms ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Sustainability ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Forest policy and economics, 2020-09, Vol.118, p.102248, Article 102248</ispartof><rights>2020 , , Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23a7855e6f436d8576f3a0631fa95b797de03bf74bace14cc45650a4fae065ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23a7855e6f436d8576f3a0631fa95b797de03bf74bace14cc45650a4fae065ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934119303405$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neeff, Till</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>How countries link forest monitoring into policy-making</title><title>Forest policy and economics</title><description>Providing decision-makers with information is often seen as an important development strategy. Wishful thinking aside, to what extent do countries actually take up forest monitoring results in policy-making? And where this does happen, how are forest monitoring systems particularly suitable for informing policy-making? This paper reports on an indicator-based assessment of 38 developing countries. First, the contributions of forest monitoring were investigated throughout the stages of the policy-making cycle. In most countries, forest monitoring is instrumental in setting the agenda of decision-makers, defining solutions and evaluating outcomes. There may be an underused opportunity, however, to leverage forest monitoring in policy implementation, such as by guiding decision-making in government programmes or by underpinning fiscal incentive schemes. Second, an indicator set on the accessibility, transparency, reliability and credibility, relevance, and sustainability of forest monitoring was the basis for exploring how suitable current forest monitoring systems are for informing policy-making. The assessments showed that countries have invested more in the transparency, reliability and credibility of forest monitoring than in making sure that data and analysis are accessible and relevant to policy-makers. Moreover, in most countries, the sustainability of forest monitoring systems is at risk. Although there may therefore be the opportunity and requirement for continued investment in forest monitoring, efforts to leverage forest monitoring as a development strategy need to acknowledge that information can at best catalyse but not directly drive change. Where the point of departure is not data and analysis alone but an open window of opportunity for policy change, forest monitoring can powerfully enable better policy-making.
•In 38 developing countries the contribution of forest monitoring to policy-making was assessed.•Data and analysis are instrumental for agenda setting, for defining solutions, for implementing them, and for evaluating policy outcomes.•Most impactful are forest monitoring systems that are accessible, transparent, reliable and credible, relevant, and sustainable.•Where a window of opportunity for change is open, forest monitoring can powerfully enable better policy-making.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Capacity development</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Development strategies</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest monitoring</subject><subject>Forest policy</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring systems</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Policy-making cycle</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>1389-9341</issn><issn>1872-7050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4DDwuet-Y72YsgRa1Q8KLnkM1OJNt2U5Ot0n9vynr2NMPjfcw8hG4JXhBM5H2_8DHt43ZBMT1BlHJ9hmZEK1orLPB52Zlu6oZxcomucu4xJgoTNkNqFX8qFw_DmALkahuGTVXMII_VLg5hjCkMn1UYxliVgOCO9c5uCnSNLrzdZrj5m3P08fz0vlzV67eX1-XjunaM8bGmzCotBEjPmey0UNIziyUj3jaiVY3qALPWK95aB4Q7x4UU2HJvAUsBns3R3eS7T_HrUM4yfTykoUQayrmWWlLJC4tPLJdizgm82aews-loCDanikxvporMqSIzVVRkD5MMygffAZLJLsDgoAsJ3Gi6GP43-AVts3Ds</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Neeff, Till</creator><creator>Piazza, Marco</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>How countries link forest monitoring into policy-making</title><author>Neeff, Till ; Piazza, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23a7855e6f436d8576f3a0631fa95b797de03bf74bace14cc45650a4fae065ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Capacity development</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Development strategies</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest monitoring</topic><topic>Forest policy</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring systems</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Policy-making cycle</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neeff, Till</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neeff, Till</au><au>Piazza, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How countries link forest monitoring into policy-making</atitle><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>118</volume><spage>102248</spage><pages>102248-</pages><artnum>102248</artnum><issn>1389-9341</issn><eissn>1872-7050</eissn><abstract>Providing decision-makers with information is often seen as an important development strategy. Wishful thinking aside, to what extent do countries actually take up forest monitoring results in policy-making? And where this does happen, how are forest monitoring systems particularly suitable for informing policy-making? This paper reports on an indicator-based assessment of 38 developing countries. First, the contributions of forest monitoring were investigated throughout the stages of the policy-making cycle. In most countries, forest monitoring is instrumental in setting the agenda of decision-makers, defining solutions and evaluating outcomes. There may be an underused opportunity, however, to leverage forest monitoring in policy implementation, such as by guiding decision-making in government programmes or by underpinning fiscal incentive schemes. Second, an indicator set on the accessibility, transparency, reliability and credibility, relevance, and sustainability of forest monitoring was the basis for exploring how suitable current forest monitoring systems are for informing policy-making. The assessments showed that countries have invested more in the transparency, reliability and credibility of forest monitoring than in making sure that data and analysis are accessible and relevant to policy-makers. Moreover, in most countries, the sustainability of forest monitoring systems is at risk. Although there may therefore be the opportunity and requirement for continued investment in forest monitoring, efforts to leverage forest monitoring as a development strategy need to acknowledge that information can at best catalyse but not directly drive change. Where the point of departure is not data and analysis alone but an open window of opportunity for policy change, forest monitoring can powerfully enable better policy-making.
•In 38 developing countries the contribution of forest monitoring to policy-making was assessed.•Data and analysis are instrumental for agenda setting, for defining solutions, for implementing them, and for evaluating policy outcomes.•Most impactful are forest monitoring systems that are accessible, transparent, reliable and credible, relevant, and sustainable.•Where a window of opportunity for change is open, forest monitoring can powerfully enable better policy-making.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102248</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-9341 |
ispartof | Forest policy and economics, 2020-09, Vol.118, p.102248, Article 102248 |
issn | 1389-9341 1872-7050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2448686264 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Accessibility Capacity development Credibility Data analysis Decision making Developing countries Development strategies Evidence Forest management Forest monitoring Forest policy Forests LDCs Monitoring Monitoring systems Policy implementation Policy making Policy-making cycle Reforms Reliability Reliability analysis Sustainability Transparency |
title | How countries link forest monitoring into policy-making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A12%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20countries%20link%20forest%20monitoring%20into%20policy-making&rft.jtitle=Forest%20policy%20and%20economics&rft.au=Neeff,%20Till&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=118&rft.spage=102248&rft.pages=102248-&rft.artnum=102248&rft.issn=1389-9341&rft.eissn=1872-7050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102248&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2448686264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448686264&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1389934119303405&rfr_iscdi=true |