Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment
With a focus on different CO2 pressures and H2O, the influences of the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on the microstructures of low-rank coal samples were compared and analyzed, offering further analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity in coal seams rendered unworkable owing to the effect of water. By...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fuel (Guildford) 2020-11, Vol.279, p.118493, Article 118493 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 118493 |
container_title | Fuel (Guildford) |
container_volume | 279 |
creator | Song, Yao Zou, Quanle Su, Erlei Zhang, Yongjiang Sun, Yingjun |
description | With a focus on different CO2 pressures and H2O, the influences of the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on the microstructures of low-rank coal samples were compared and analyzed, offering further analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity in coal seams rendered unworkable owing to the effect of water. By using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), the changes in porosity, pore size, pore size distribution (PSD), fractal dimension, and minerals in coal samples of the two states were compared and analyzed. XRD analysis revealed that a large number of carbonate rocks (calcite) and aluminosilicate minerals (clay minerals) were found in coal. ScCO2 presented the optimal dissolution effect in the water-saturated samples. NMR analysis showed that compared with a single CO2 fluid, the pore structures of the coal samples varied more remarkably under the coupling effect of CO2 and H2O. Moreover, under the supercritical state of CO2, the effect on the coal sample was the greatest. With the increase in pressure during the CO2 treatment, the porosity of the coal samples increased, and the proportion of macropores grew, indicating the transformation of small pores into large pores. The roughness of adsorption pores increased, whereas the complexity and heterogeneity of seepage pores in the coal samples after ScCO2 treatment declined. Generally, the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on coal samples caused further changes in the pore structures, promoting mineral dissolution in the coal samples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2448686187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016236120314897</els_id><sourcerecordid>2448686187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b826abcc07ad0b601ed679521e5993b19c3b614fd065f465bd715e1796c6e10a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB1x3zaNMW3EjxBQOz0Y2bkKa3Tmof403q4L-3pa5dXTj3nPv4CLnmbMMZV7fNph6h3QgmJoFncS5PyIpnqYxSnshTsmKTKxJS8XNy4X3DGEuzJF6R92Jv-g_w1PU07IF2zuLgA442jAh0qGk7HCM0_Se1g2mpqQMg9eMB0KILzk5asRPU9BU9mrkXEEzooA-X5Kw2rYerv7omb48Pr8VztN09vRT328hKkYWozIQypbUsNRUrFeNQqTRPBIckz2XJcytLxeO6YiqpY5WU1fQS8DRXVgFnRq7JzTL3gMPXCD7oZhixn1ZqEceZytQMYk3E4pr_8wi1PqDrDP5ozvTMUDd6ZqhnhnphOIXulhBM9387QO2tg95C5RBs0NXg_ov_Av2-ej4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448686187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Song, Yao ; Zou, Quanle ; Su, Erlei ; Zhang, Yongjiang ; Sun, Yingjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Yao ; Zou, Quanle ; Su, Erlei ; Zhang, Yongjiang ; Sun, Yingjun</creatorcontrib><description>With a focus on different CO2 pressures and H2O, the influences of the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on the microstructures of low-rank coal samples were compared and analyzed, offering further analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity in coal seams rendered unworkable owing to the effect of water. By using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), the changes in porosity, pore size, pore size distribution (PSD), fractal dimension, and minerals in coal samples of the two states were compared and analyzed. XRD analysis revealed that a large number of carbonate rocks (calcite) and aluminosilicate minerals (clay minerals) were found in coal. ScCO2 presented the optimal dissolution effect in the water-saturated samples. NMR analysis showed that compared with a single CO2 fluid, the pore structures of the coal samples varied more remarkably under the coupling effect of CO2 and H2O. Moreover, under the supercritical state of CO2, the effect on the coal sample was the greatest. With the increase in pressure during the CO2 treatment, the porosity of the coal samples increased, and the proportion of macropores grew, indicating the transformation of small pores into large pores. The roughness of adsorption pores increased, whereas the complexity and heterogeneity of seepage pores in the coal samples after ScCO2 treatment declined. Generally, the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on coal samples caused further changes in the pore structures, promoting mineral dissolution in the coal samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aluminosilicates ; Aluminum silicates ; Calcite ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide fixation ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbonate rocks ; Clay minerals ; Coal ; Coupling ; Dissolution ; Fractal geometry ; Heterogeneity ; Low-rank coal ; Minerals ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Pore size ; Pore size distribution ; Pore structure ; Pores ; Porosity ; Seepage ; Size distribution ; Supercritical carbon dioxide ; Water treatment ; X ray powder diffraction ; X-ray diffraction</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 2020-11, Vol.279, p.118493, Article 118493</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Nov 1, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b826abcc07ad0b601ed679521e5993b19c3b614fd065f465bd715e1796c6e10a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b826abcc07ad0b601ed679521e5993b19c3b614fd065f465bd715e1796c6e10a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Quanle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Erlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yongjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yingjun</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>With a focus on different CO2 pressures and H2O, the influences of the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on the microstructures of low-rank coal samples were compared and analyzed, offering further analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity in coal seams rendered unworkable owing to the effect of water. By using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), the changes in porosity, pore size, pore size distribution (PSD), fractal dimension, and minerals in coal samples of the two states were compared and analyzed. XRD analysis revealed that a large number of carbonate rocks (calcite) and aluminosilicate minerals (clay minerals) were found in coal. ScCO2 presented the optimal dissolution effect in the water-saturated samples. NMR analysis showed that compared with a single CO2 fluid, the pore structures of the coal samples varied more remarkably under the coupling effect of CO2 and H2O. Moreover, under the supercritical state of CO2, the effect on the coal sample was the greatest. With the increase in pressure during the CO2 treatment, the porosity of the coal samples increased, and the proportion of macropores grew, indicating the transformation of small pores into large pores. The roughness of adsorption pores increased, whereas the complexity and heterogeneity of seepage pores in the coal samples after ScCO2 treatment declined. Generally, the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on coal samples caused further changes in the pore structures, promoting mineral dissolution in the coal samples.</description><subject>Aluminosilicates</subject><subject>Aluminum silicates</subject><subject>Calcite</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide fixation</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbonate rocks</subject><subject>Clay minerals</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coupling</subject><subject>Dissolution</subject><subject>Fractal geometry</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Low-rank coal</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Pore size distribution</subject><subject>Pore structure</subject><subject>Pores</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Seepage</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Supercritical carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>X ray powder diffraction</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB1x3zaNMW3EjxBQOz0Y2bkKa3Tmof403q4L-3pa5dXTj3nPv4CLnmbMMZV7fNph6h3QgmJoFncS5PyIpnqYxSnshTsmKTKxJS8XNy4X3DGEuzJF6R92Jv-g_w1PU07IF2zuLgA442jAh0qGk7HCM0_Se1g2mpqQMg9eMB0KILzk5asRPU9BU9mrkXEEzooA-X5Kw2rYerv7omb48Pr8VztN09vRT328hKkYWozIQypbUsNRUrFeNQqTRPBIckz2XJcytLxeO6YiqpY5WU1fQS8DRXVgFnRq7JzTL3gMPXCD7oZhixn1ZqEceZytQMYk3E4pr_8wi1PqDrDP5ozvTMUDd6ZqhnhnphOIXulhBM9387QO2tg95C5RBs0NXg_ov_Av2-ej4</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Song, Yao</creator><creator>Zou, Quanle</creator><creator>Su, Erlei</creator><creator>Zhang, Yongjiang</creator><creator>Sun, Yingjun</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment</title><author>Song, Yao ; Zou, Quanle ; Su, Erlei ; Zhang, Yongjiang ; Sun, Yingjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b826abcc07ad0b601ed679521e5993b19c3b614fd065f465bd715e1796c6e10a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aluminosilicates</topic><topic>Aluminum silicates</topic><topic>Calcite</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide fixation</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbonate rocks</topic><topic>Clay minerals</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coupling</topic><topic>Dissolution</topic><topic>Fractal geometry</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Low-rank coal</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Pore size distribution</topic><topic>Pore structure</topic><topic>Pores</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Seepage</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Supercritical carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>X ray powder diffraction</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Quanle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Erlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yongjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yingjun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Yao</au><au>Zou, Quanle</au><au>Su, Erlei</au><au>Zhang, Yongjiang</au><au>Sun, Yingjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>279</volume><spage>118493</spage><pages>118493-</pages><artnum>118493</artnum><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>With a focus on different CO2 pressures and H2O, the influences of the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on the microstructures of low-rank coal samples were compared and analyzed, offering further analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity in coal seams rendered unworkable owing to the effect of water. By using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), the changes in porosity, pore size, pore size distribution (PSD), fractal dimension, and minerals in coal samples of the two states were compared and analyzed. XRD analysis revealed that a large number of carbonate rocks (calcite) and aluminosilicate minerals (clay minerals) were found in coal. ScCO2 presented the optimal dissolution effect in the water-saturated samples. NMR analysis showed that compared with a single CO2 fluid, the pore structures of the coal samples varied more remarkably under the coupling effect of CO2 and H2O. Moreover, under the supercritical state of CO2, the effect on the coal sample was the greatest. With the increase in pressure during the CO2 treatment, the porosity of the coal samples increased, and the proportion of macropores grew, indicating the transformation of small pores into large pores. The roughness of adsorption pores increased, whereas the complexity and heterogeneity of seepage pores in the coal samples after ScCO2 treatment declined. Generally, the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on coal samples caused further changes in the pore structures, promoting mineral dissolution in the coal samples.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-2361 |
ispartof | Fuel (Guildford), 2020-11, Vol.279, p.118493, Article 118493 |
issn | 0016-2361 1873-7153 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2448686187 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Aluminosilicates Aluminum silicates Calcite Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide fixation Carbon sequestration Carbonate rocks Clay minerals Coal Coupling Dissolution Fractal geometry Heterogeneity Low-rank coal Minerals NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Pore size Pore size distribution Pore structure Pores Porosity Seepage Size distribution Supercritical carbon dioxide Water treatment X ray powder diffraction X-ray diffraction |
title | Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A04%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20the%20microstructure%20of%20low-rank%20coal%20after%20supercritical%20CO2%20and%20water%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Song,%20Yao&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=279&rft.spage=118493&rft.pages=118493-&rft.artnum=118493&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2448686187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448686187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016236120314897&rfr_iscdi=true |