Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment

With a focus on different CO2 pressures and H2O, the influences of the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on the microstructures of low-rank coal samples were compared and analyzed, offering further analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity in coal seams rendered unworkable owing to the effect of water. By...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fuel (Guildford) 2020-11, Vol.279, p.118493, Article 118493
Hauptverfasser: Song, Yao, Zou, Quanle, Su, Erlei, Zhang, Yongjiang, Sun, Yingjun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 118493
container_title Fuel (Guildford)
container_volume 279
creator Song, Yao
Zou, Quanle
Su, Erlei
Zhang, Yongjiang
Sun, Yingjun
description With a focus on different CO2 pressures and H2O, the influences of the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on the microstructures of low-rank coal samples were compared and analyzed, offering further analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity in coal seams rendered unworkable owing to the effect of water. By using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), the changes in porosity, pore size, pore size distribution (PSD), fractal dimension, and minerals in coal samples of the two states were compared and analyzed. XRD analysis revealed that a large number of carbonate rocks (calcite) and aluminosilicate minerals (clay minerals) were found in coal. ScCO2 presented the optimal dissolution effect in the water-saturated samples. NMR analysis showed that compared with a single CO2 fluid, the pore structures of the coal samples varied more remarkably under the coupling effect of CO2 and H2O. Moreover, under the supercritical state of CO2, the effect on the coal sample was the greatest. With the increase in pressure during the CO2 treatment, the porosity of the coal samples increased, and the proportion of macropores grew, indicating the transformation of small pores into large pores. The roughness of adsorption pores increased, whereas the complexity and heterogeneity of seepage pores in the coal samples after ScCO2 treatment declined. Generally, the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on coal samples caused further changes in the pore structures, promoting mineral dissolution in the coal samples.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2448686187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016236120314897</els_id><sourcerecordid>2448686187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b826abcc07ad0b601ed679521e5993b19c3b614fd065f465bd715e1796c6e10a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB1x3zaNMW3EjxBQOz0Y2bkKa3Tmof403q4L-3pa5dXTj3nPv4CLnmbMMZV7fNph6h3QgmJoFncS5PyIpnqYxSnshTsmKTKxJS8XNy4X3DGEuzJF6R92Jv-g_w1PU07IF2zuLgA442jAh0qGk7HCM0_Se1g2mpqQMg9eMB0KILzk5asRPU9BU9mrkXEEzooA-X5Kw2rYerv7omb48Pr8VztN09vRT328hKkYWozIQypbUsNRUrFeNQqTRPBIckz2XJcytLxeO6YiqpY5WU1fQS8DRXVgFnRq7JzTL3gMPXCD7oZhixn1ZqEceZytQMYk3E4pr_8wi1PqDrDP5ozvTMUDd6ZqhnhnphOIXulhBM9387QO2tg95C5RBs0NXg_ov_Av2-ej4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448686187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Song, Yao ; Zou, Quanle ; Su, Erlei ; Zhang, Yongjiang ; Sun, Yingjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Yao ; Zou, Quanle ; Su, Erlei ; Zhang, Yongjiang ; Sun, Yingjun</creatorcontrib><description>With a focus on different CO2 pressures and H2O, the influences of the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on the microstructures of low-rank coal samples were compared and analyzed, offering further analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity in coal seams rendered unworkable owing to the effect of water. By using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), the changes in porosity, pore size, pore size distribution (PSD), fractal dimension, and minerals in coal samples of the two states were compared and analyzed. XRD analysis revealed that a large number of carbonate rocks (calcite) and aluminosilicate minerals (clay minerals) were found in coal. ScCO2 presented the optimal dissolution effect in the water-saturated samples. NMR analysis showed that compared with a single CO2 fluid, the pore structures of the coal samples varied more remarkably under the coupling effect of CO2 and H2O. Moreover, under the supercritical state of CO2, the effect on the coal sample was the greatest. With the increase in pressure during the CO2 treatment, the porosity of the coal samples increased, and the proportion of macropores grew, indicating the transformation of small pores into large pores. The roughness of adsorption pores increased, whereas the complexity and heterogeneity of seepage pores in the coal samples after ScCO2 treatment declined. Generally, the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on coal samples caused further changes in the pore structures, promoting mineral dissolution in the coal samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aluminosilicates ; Aluminum silicates ; Calcite ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide fixation ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbonate rocks ; Clay minerals ; Coal ; Coupling ; Dissolution ; Fractal geometry ; Heterogeneity ; Low-rank coal ; Minerals ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Pore size ; Pore size distribution ; Pore structure ; Pores ; Porosity ; Seepage ; Size distribution ; Supercritical carbon dioxide ; Water treatment ; X ray powder diffraction ; X-ray diffraction</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 2020-11, Vol.279, p.118493, Article 118493</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Nov 1, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b826abcc07ad0b601ed679521e5993b19c3b614fd065f465bd715e1796c6e10a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b826abcc07ad0b601ed679521e5993b19c3b614fd065f465bd715e1796c6e10a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Quanle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Erlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yongjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yingjun</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>With a focus on different CO2 pressures and H2O, the influences of the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on the microstructures of low-rank coal samples were compared and analyzed, offering further analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity in coal seams rendered unworkable owing to the effect of water. By using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), the changes in porosity, pore size, pore size distribution (PSD), fractal dimension, and minerals in coal samples of the two states were compared and analyzed. XRD analysis revealed that a large number of carbonate rocks (calcite) and aluminosilicate minerals (clay minerals) were found in coal. ScCO2 presented the optimal dissolution effect in the water-saturated samples. NMR analysis showed that compared with a single CO2 fluid, the pore structures of the coal samples varied more remarkably under the coupling effect of CO2 and H2O. Moreover, under the supercritical state of CO2, the effect on the coal sample was the greatest. With the increase in pressure during the CO2 treatment, the porosity of the coal samples increased, and the proportion of macropores grew, indicating the transformation of small pores into large pores. The roughness of adsorption pores increased, whereas the complexity and heterogeneity of seepage pores in the coal samples after ScCO2 treatment declined. Generally, the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on coal samples caused further changes in the pore structures, promoting mineral dissolution in the coal samples.</description><subject>Aluminosilicates</subject><subject>Aluminum silicates</subject><subject>Calcite</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide fixation</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbonate rocks</subject><subject>Clay minerals</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coupling</subject><subject>Dissolution</subject><subject>Fractal geometry</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Low-rank coal</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Pore size distribution</subject><subject>Pore structure</subject><subject>Pores</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Seepage</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Supercritical carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>X ray powder diffraction</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB1x3zaNMW3EjxBQOz0Y2bkKa3Tmof403q4L-3pa5dXTj3nPv4CLnmbMMZV7fNph6h3QgmJoFncS5PyIpnqYxSnshTsmKTKxJS8XNy4X3DGEuzJF6R92Jv-g_w1PU07IF2zuLgA442jAh0qGk7HCM0_Se1g2mpqQMg9eMB0KILzk5asRPU9BU9mrkXEEzooA-X5Kw2rYerv7omb48Pr8VztN09vRT328hKkYWozIQypbUsNRUrFeNQqTRPBIckz2XJcytLxeO6YiqpY5WU1fQS8DRXVgFnRq7JzTL3gMPXCD7oZhixn1ZqEceZytQMYk3E4pr_8wi1PqDrDP5ozvTMUDd6ZqhnhnphOIXulhBM9387QO2tg95C5RBs0NXg_ov_Av2-ej4</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Song, Yao</creator><creator>Zou, Quanle</creator><creator>Su, Erlei</creator><creator>Zhang, Yongjiang</creator><creator>Sun, Yingjun</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment</title><author>Song, Yao ; Zou, Quanle ; Su, Erlei ; Zhang, Yongjiang ; Sun, Yingjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b826abcc07ad0b601ed679521e5993b19c3b614fd065f465bd715e1796c6e10a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aluminosilicates</topic><topic>Aluminum silicates</topic><topic>Calcite</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide fixation</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbonate rocks</topic><topic>Clay minerals</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coupling</topic><topic>Dissolution</topic><topic>Fractal geometry</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Low-rank coal</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Pore size distribution</topic><topic>Pore structure</topic><topic>Pores</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Seepage</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Supercritical carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>X ray powder diffraction</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Quanle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Erlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yongjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yingjun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Yao</au><au>Zou, Quanle</au><au>Su, Erlei</au><au>Zhang, Yongjiang</au><au>Sun, Yingjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>279</volume><spage>118493</spage><pages>118493-</pages><artnum>118493</artnum><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>With a focus on different CO2 pressures and H2O, the influences of the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on the microstructures of low-rank coal samples were compared and analyzed, offering further analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity in coal seams rendered unworkable owing to the effect of water. By using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), the changes in porosity, pore size, pore size distribution (PSD), fractal dimension, and minerals in coal samples of the two states were compared and analyzed. XRD analysis revealed that a large number of carbonate rocks (calcite) and aluminosilicate minerals (clay minerals) were found in coal. ScCO2 presented the optimal dissolution effect in the water-saturated samples. NMR analysis showed that compared with a single CO2 fluid, the pore structures of the coal samples varied more remarkably under the coupling effect of CO2 and H2O. Moreover, under the supercritical state of CO2, the effect on the coal sample was the greatest. With the increase in pressure during the CO2 treatment, the porosity of the coal samples increased, and the proportion of macropores grew, indicating the transformation of small pores into large pores. The roughness of adsorption pores increased, whereas the complexity and heterogeneity of seepage pores in the coal samples after ScCO2 treatment declined. Generally, the ScCO2–H2O coupling effect on coal samples caused further changes in the pore structures, promoting mineral dissolution in the coal samples.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-2361
ispartof Fuel (Guildford), 2020-11, Vol.279, p.118493, Article 118493
issn 0016-2361
1873-7153
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2448686187
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aluminosilicates
Aluminum silicates
Calcite
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide fixation
Carbon sequestration
Carbonate rocks
Clay minerals
Coal
Coupling
Dissolution
Fractal geometry
Heterogeneity
Low-rank coal
Minerals
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Pore size
Pore size distribution
Pore structure
Pores
Porosity
Seepage
Size distribution
Supercritical carbon dioxide
Water treatment
X ray powder diffraction
X-ray diffraction
title Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A04%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20the%20microstructure%20of%20low-rank%20coal%20after%20supercritical%20CO2%20and%20water%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Song,%20Yao&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=279&rft.spage=118493&rft.pages=118493-&rft.artnum=118493&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2448686187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448686187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016236120314897&rfr_iscdi=true