CFD simulations and evaluation of applicability of a wall roughness model applied on a NACA 633‐418 airfoil
The implementation of a model to simulate distributed surface roughness, which is the new k−ω extension by Knopp et al. into the DTU Wind Energy in‐house CFD Reynolds‐Average Naviar Stokes solver EllipSys, was validated against wind tunnel experiments conducted in the Laminar Wind Tunnel of the Inst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wind energy (Chichester, England) England), 2020-11, Vol.23 (11), p.2056-2067 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2067 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2056 |
container_title | Wind energy (Chichester, England) |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Kruse, Emil Krog Sørensen, Niels Bak, Christian Nielsen, Mikkel Schou |
description | The implementation of a model to simulate distributed surface roughness, which is the new k−ω extension by Knopp et al. into the DTU Wind Energy in‐house CFD Reynolds‐Average Naviar Stokes solver EllipSys, was validated against wind tunnel experiments conducted in the Laminar Wind Tunnel of the Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics, University of Stuttgart. The effort was to predict the aerodynamic penalty of five cases of leading edge roughness applied to a NACA 633‐418. Three cases were sandpaper, and two cases were turbulators/zigzag tape. Simulation of the sandpaper cases showed some agreement in the tendencies of decreased lift and increased drag as a function of angle of attack. However, the magnitudes of the aerodynamic changes were predicted and underestimated the lift and overestimated the drag. Modeling the zigzag tape using the roughness model was not successful, because the influence from the model was too small. The simulated zigzag tape hardly deviated from the fully turbulent simulation, so when using the model in its current form, one should be aware of its limitations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/we.2545 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2448239493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2448239493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1345-4dbbb1b13d1c9fc61934427be5b4372bcbea2b0759218634fea01449a1666ad33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFOwzAQRS0EEqUgrmCJJUrx2E4aL6vQAlIFGxBLy04ccOXEIW6IuuMIPSMnIWlZ_ZnRm_mjj9A1kBkQQu96M6Mxj0_QBIgQEaSUnx7qOOKU83N0EcKGECAA6QRV2eoeB1t1Tm2trwNWdYHNt3Ldoce-xKppnM2Vts5ud4cB7pVzuPXdx2dtQsCVL4w7cqbAw5bCz4tsgRPGfn_2HFKsbFt66y7RWalcMFf_OkVvq-Vr9hitXx6essU6aoDx4c9Caw0aWAG5KPMEBOOczrWJNWdzqnNtFNVkHgsKacJ4aRQBzoWCJElUwdgU3RzvNq3_6kzYyo3v2nqwlEMEKWWCi5G6PVK9dWYnm9ZWqt1JIHIMUvZGjkHK9-Uo7A9YLGZK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448239493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CFD simulations and evaluation of applicability of a wall roughness model applied on a NACA 633‐418 airfoil</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kruse, Emil Krog ; Sørensen, Niels ; Bak, Christian ; Nielsen, Mikkel Schou</creator><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Emil Krog ; Sørensen, Niels ; Bak, Christian ; Nielsen, Mikkel Schou</creatorcontrib><description>The implementation of a model to simulate distributed surface roughness, which is the new k−ω extension by Knopp et al. into the DTU Wind Energy in‐house CFD Reynolds‐Average Naviar Stokes solver EllipSys, was validated against wind tunnel experiments conducted in the Laminar Wind Tunnel of the Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics, University of Stuttgart. The effort was to predict the aerodynamic penalty of five cases of leading edge roughness applied to a NACA 633‐418. Three cases were sandpaper, and two cases were turbulators/zigzag tape. Simulation of the sandpaper cases showed some agreement in the tendencies of decreased lift and increased drag as a function of angle of attack. However, the magnitudes of the aerodynamic changes were predicted and underestimated the lift and overestimated the drag. Modeling the zigzag tape using the roughness model was not successful, because the influence from the model was too small. The simulated zigzag tape hardly deviated from the fully turbulent simulation, so when using the model in its current form, one should be aware of its limitations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-4244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/we.2545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Angle of attack ; CFD ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; distributed roughness ; Drag ; Gas dynamics ; leading edge roughness ; LER ; NACA 633‐418 ; Sandpaper ; Surface roughness ; Wind power ; Wind tunnel testing ; Wind tunnels</subject><ispartof>Wind energy (Chichester, England), 2020-11, Vol.23 (11), p.2056-2067</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-6915-4652</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwe.2545$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwe.2545$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Emil Krog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bak, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Mikkel Schou</creatorcontrib><title>CFD simulations and evaluation of applicability of a wall roughness model applied on a NACA 633‐418 airfoil</title><title>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</title><description>The implementation of a model to simulate distributed surface roughness, which is the new k−ω extension by Knopp et al. into the DTU Wind Energy in‐house CFD Reynolds‐Average Naviar Stokes solver EllipSys, was validated against wind tunnel experiments conducted in the Laminar Wind Tunnel of the Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics, University of Stuttgart. The effort was to predict the aerodynamic penalty of five cases of leading edge roughness applied to a NACA 633‐418. Three cases were sandpaper, and two cases were turbulators/zigzag tape. Simulation of the sandpaper cases showed some agreement in the tendencies of decreased lift and increased drag as a function of angle of attack. However, the magnitudes of the aerodynamic changes were predicted and underestimated the lift and overestimated the drag. Modeling the zigzag tape using the roughness model was not successful, because the influence from the model was too small. The simulated zigzag tape hardly deviated from the fully turbulent simulation, so when using the model in its current form, one should be aware of its limitations.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Angle of attack</subject><subject>CFD</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>distributed roughness</subject><subject>Drag</subject><subject>Gas dynamics</subject><subject>leading edge roughness</subject><subject>LER</subject><subject>NACA 633‐418</subject><subject>Sandpaper</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind tunnel testing</subject><subject>Wind tunnels</subject><issn>1095-4244</issn><issn>1099-1824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEFOwzAQRS0EEqUgrmCJJUrx2E4aL6vQAlIFGxBLy04ccOXEIW6IuuMIPSMnIWlZ_ZnRm_mjj9A1kBkQQu96M6Mxj0_QBIgQEaSUnx7qOOKU83N0EcKGECAA6QRV2eoeB1t1Tm2trwNWdYHNt3Ldoce-xKppnM2Vts5ud4cB7pVzuPXdx2dtQsCVL4w7cqbAw5bCz4tsgRPGfn_2HFKsbFt66y7RWalcMFf_OkVvq-Vr9hitXx6essU6aoDx4c9Caw0aWAG5KPMEBOOczrWJNWdzqnNtFNVkHgsKacJ4aRQBzoWCJElUwdgU3RzvNq3_6kzYyo3v2nqwlEMEKWWCi5G6PVK9dWYnm9ZWqt1JIHIMUvZGjkHK9-Uo7A9YLGZK</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Kruse, Emil Krog</creator><creator>Sørensen, Niels</creator><creator>Bak, Christian</creator><creator>Nielsen, Mikkel Schou</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6915-4652</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>CFD simulations and evaluation of applicability of a wall roughness model applied on a NACA 633‐418 airfoil</title><author>Kruse, Emil Krog ; Sørensen, Niels ; Bak, Christian ; Nielsen, Mikkel Schou</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1345-4dbbb1b13d1c9fc61934427be5b4372bcbea2b0759218634fea01449a1666ad33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Angle of attack</topic><topic>CFD</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>distributed roughness</topic><topic>Drag</topic><topic>Gas dynamics</topic><topic>leading edge roughness</topic><topic>LER</topic><topic>NACA 633‐418</topic><topic>Sandpaper</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind tunnel testing</topic><topic>Wind tunnels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Emil Krog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bak, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Mikkel Schou</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kruse, Emil Krog</au><au>Sørensen, Niels</au><au>Bak, Christian</au><au>Nielsen, Mikkel Schou</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CFD simulations and evaluation of applicability of a wall roughness model applied on a NACA 633‐418 airfoil</atitle><jtitle>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2056</spage><epage>2067</epage><pages>2056-2067</pages><issn>1095-4244</issn><eissn>1099-1824</eissn><abstract>The implementation of a model to simulate distributed surface roughness, which is the new k−ω extension by Knopp et al. into the DTU Wind Energy in‐house CFD Reynolds‐Average Naviar Stokes solver EllipSys, was validated against wind tunnel experiments conducted in the Laminar Wind Tunnel of the Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics, University of Stuttgart. The effort was to predict the aerodynamic penalty of five cases of leading edge roughness applied to a NACA 633‐418. Three cases were sandpaper, and two cases were turbulators/zigzag tape. Simulation of the sandpaper cases showed some agreement in the tendencies of decreased lift and increased drag as a function of angle of attack. However, the magnitudes of the aerodynamic changes were predicted and underestimated the lift and overestimated the drag. Modeling the zigzag tape using the roughness model was not successful, because the influence from the model was too small. The simulated zigzag tape hardly deviated from the fully turbulent simulation, so when using the model in its current form, one should be aware of its limitations.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/we.2545</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6915-4652</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1095-4244 |
ispartof | Wind energy (Chichester, England), 2020-11, Vol.23 (11), p.2056-2067 |
issn | 1095-4244 1099-1824 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2448239493 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aerodynamics Angle of attack CFD Computational fluid dynamics Computer simulation distributed roughness Drag Gas dynamics leading edge roughness LER NACA 633‐418 Sandpaper Surface roughness Wind power Wind tunnel testing Wind tunnels |
title | CFD simulations and evaluation of applicability of a wall roughness model applied on a NACA 633‐418 airfoil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T00%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CFD%20simulations%20and%20evaluation%20of%20applicability%20of%20a%20wall%20roughness%20model%20applied%20on%20a%20NACA%20633%E2%80%90418%20airfoil&rft.jtitle=Wind%20energy%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Kruse,%20Emil%20Krog&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2056&rft.epage=2067&rft.pages=2056-2067&rft.issn=1095-4244&rft.eissn=1099-1824&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/we.2545&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2448239493%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448239493&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |