Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Rice Terrace Extraction from RapidEye, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images
Remote sensing images has been reported as valuable data to extract the rice terrace. However, most of these studies have been focused on high and very high spatial resolution remotely sensed images. In this paper, we investigate the capability of three medium resolution remote sensing data, namely,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geoinformatics 2020/09/25, Vol.31(3), pp.67-78 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 78 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Geoinformatics |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | DO, Hang T. YONEZAWA, Go RAGHAVAN, Venkatesh VINAYARAJ, Poliyapram TRUONG, Luan X. |
description | Remote sensing images has been reported as valuable data to extract the rice terrace. However, most of these studies have been focused on high and very high spatial resolution remotely sensed images. In this paper, we investigate the capability of three medium resolution remote sensing data, namely, RapidEye, Sentinel-2, and Landsat-8 for rice terrace extraction. Moreover, both Pixel Based Image Analysis (PBIA) and Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) are utilized to classify rice terrace using robust machine learning classifiers, namely, Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine algorithms. All three remote sensing data provide high accuracies of rice terrace classification with PBIA, with accuracies ranging from 90.3% to 92%. OBIA does not perform as well as PBIA. In general, the accuracy of OBIA decreases when the threshold of segmentation increases. OBIA applied RapidEye provides accuracy higher than 85%. Sentinel-2 shows lower accuracy at above 80%. Landsat-8 image shows the least accuracy below 75% at higher threshold levels. Although the classification accuracy for OBIA shows dependence on spatial resolution of remote sensing images, the output results for the three classifiers do no show significant difference except in the ability to distinguish smaller patches of rice terrace in images of higher resolution. Based on the results, PBIA is considered to offer a simple and more accurate method for rice terrace extraction in the study area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.6010/geoinformatics.31.3_67 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2447994435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2447994435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1877-a45a0959b9ecee159015d0af823084479d733826f2b66bd249b6db649543ead3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkF1LwzAUhoMoOHR_QQLe2pk0adpeypgfMBF0F7sLp-3pFmmTmXTi7vzpZk4EwZvznov3OR8vIRecTRTj7HqFztjW-R4GU4eJ4BOhVX5ERlzIPMkkXx6TERNFkWQsXZ6ScQimYqngWSkEH5HPqes34CP9jnT2Dt02ts5S19JHqNfGIp0jeGvsit50K-fNsO4DjRvps6mRLtB7iDr7GKJ-o613PX2GjWlmO7yiL2iHOKZLUgq2ofNYAgxJQR96WGE4JyctdAHHP3pGFrezxfQ-mT_dPUxv5knNizxPQGbAyqysSqwR4_WMZw2DtkgFK6TMyyYXokhVm1ZKVU0qy0o1lZJlJgVCI87I5WHsxru3LYZBv7qtt3GjTvd4KaXIoksdXLV3IXhs9cabHvxOc6b3eeu_eWvB9T7vCN4dwNcwxK9-MfDR1uG_WCwq_3XUa_AarfgCMjGT6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447994435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Rice Terrace Extraction from RapidEye, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>DO, Hang T. ; YONEZAWA, Go ; RAGHAVAN, Venkatesh ; VINAYARAJ, Poliyapram ; TRUONG, Luan X.</creator><creatorcontrib>DO, Hang T. ; YONEZAWA, Go ; RAGHAVAN, Venkatesh ; VINAYARAJ, Poliyapram ; TRUONG, Luan X.</creatorcontrib><description>Remote sensing images has been reported as valuable data to extract the rice terrace. However, most of these studies have been focused on high and very high spatial resolution remotely sensed images. In this paper, we investigate the capability of three medium resolution remote sensing data, namely, RapidEye, Sentinel-2, and Landsat-8 for rice terrace extraction. Moreover, both Pixel Based Image Analysis (PBIA) and Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) are utilized to classify rice terrace using robust machine learning classifiers, namely, Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine algorithms. All three remote sensing data provide high accuracies of rice terrace classification with PBIA, with accuracies ranging from 90.3% to 92%. OBIA does not perform as well as PBIA. In general, the accuracy of OBIA decreases when the threshold of segmentation increases. OBIA applied RapidEye provides accuracy higher than 85%. Sentinel-2 shows lower accuracy at above 80%. Landsat-8 image shows the least accuracy below 75% at higher threshold levels. Although the classification accuracy for OBIA shows dependence on spatial resolution of remote sensing images, the output results for the three classifiers do no show significant difference except in the ability to distinguish smaller patches of rice terrace in images of higher resolution. Based on the results, PBIA is considered to offer a simple and more accurate method for rice terrace extraction in the study area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0388-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-541X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6010/geoinformatics.31.3_67</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Osaka City: Japan Society of Geoinformatics</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Classification ; Classifiers ; Image analysis ; Image classification ; Image processing ; Image segmentation ; Landsat ; Landsat satellites ; Learning algorithms ; Machine Learning ; Multilayer Perceptron ; Multilayer perceptrons ; Pixel and Object Based Image Analysis ; Random Forest ; Remote sensing ; Resolution ; Rice ; Rice Terrace ; Satellite imagery ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial resolution ; Support Vector Machine ; Support vector machines ; Terraces</subject><ispartof>Geoinformatics, 2020/09/25, Vol.31(3), pp.67-78</ispartof><rights>2020 Japan Society of Geoinformatics</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2020</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1877-a45a0959b9ecee159015d0af823084479d733826f2b66bd249b6db649543ead3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1877,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DO, Hang T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YONEZAWA, Go</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAGHAVAN, Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VINAYARAJ, Poliyapram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRUONG, Luan X.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Rice Terrace Extraction from RapidEye, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images</title><title>Geoinformatics</title><addtitle>Geoinformatics</addtitle><description>Remote sensing images has been reported as valuable data to extract the rice terrace. However, most of these studies have been focused on high and very high spatial resolution remotely sensed images. In this paper, we investigate the capability of three medium resolution remote sensing data, namely, RapidEye, Sentinel-2, and Landsat-8 for rice terrace extraction. Moreover, both Pixel Based Image Analysis (PBIA) and Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) are utilized to classify rice terrace using robust machine learning classifiers, namely, Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine algorithms. All three remote sensing data provide high accuracies of rice terrace classification with PBIA, with accuracies ranging from 90.3% to 92%. OBIA does not perform as well as PBIA. In general, the accuracy of OBIA decreases when the threshold of segmentation increases. OBIA applied RapidEye provides accuracy higher than 85%. Sentinel-2 shows lower accuracy at above 80%. Landsat-8 image shows the least accuracy below 75% at higher threshold levels. Although the classification accuracy for OBIA shows dependence on spatial resolution of remote sensing images, the output results for the three classifiers do no show significant difference except in the ability to distinguish smaller patches of rice terrace in images of higher resolution. Based on the results, PBIA is considered to offer a simple and more accurate method for rice terrace extraction in the study area.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Image segmentation</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Landsat satellites</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Multilayer Perceptron</subject><subject>Multilayer perceptrons</subject><subject>Pixel and Object Based Image Analysis</subject><subject>Random Forest</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Rice Terrace</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Support Vector Machine</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Terraces</subject><issn>0388-502X</issn><issn>1347-541X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkF1LwzAUhoMoOHR_QQLe2pk0adpeypgfMBF0F7sLp-3pFmmTmXTi7vzpZk4EwZvznov3OR8vIRecTRTj7HqFztjW-R4GU4eJ4BOhVX5ERlzIPMkkXx6TERNFkWQsXZ6ScQimYqngWSkEH5HPqes34CP9jnT2Dt02ts5S19JHqNfGIp0jeGvsit50K-fNsO4DjRvps6mRLtB7iDr7GKJ-o613PX2GjWlmO7yiL2iHOKZLUgq2ofNYAgxJQR96WGE4JyctdAHHP3pGFrezxfQ-mT_dPUxv5knNizxPQGbAyqysSqwR4_WMZw2DtkgFK6TMyyYXokhVm1ZKVU0qy0o1lZJlJgVCI87I5WHsxru3LYZBv7qtt3GjTvd4KaXIoksdXLV3IXhs9cabHvxOc6b3eeu_eWvB9T7vCN4dwNcwxK9-MfDR1uG_WCwq_3XUa_AarfgCMjGT6w</recordid><startdate>20200925</startdate><enddate>20200925</enddate><creator>DO, Hang T.</creator><creator>YONEZAWA, Go</creator><creator>RAGHAVAN, Venkatesh</creator><creator>VINAYARAJ, Poliyapram</creator><creator>TRUONG, Luan X.</creator><general>Japan Society of Geoinformatics</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200925</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Rice Terrace Extraction from RapidEye, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images</title><author>DO, Hang T. ; YONEZAWA, Go ; RAGHAVAN, Venkatesh ; VINAYARAJ, Poliyapram ; TRUONG, Luan X.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1877-a45a0959b9ecee159015d0af823084479d733826f2b66bd249b6db649543ead3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Image segmentation</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Landsat satellites</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Multilayer Perceptron</topic><topic>Multilayer perceptrons</topic><topic>Pixel and Object Based Image Analysis</topic><topic>Random Forest</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Rice Terrace</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Support Vector Machine</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Terraces</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DO, Hang T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YONEZAWA, Go</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAGHAVAN, Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VINAYARAJ, Poliyapram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRUONG, Luan X.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geoinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DO, Hang T.</au><au>YONEZAWA, Go</au><au>RAGHAVAN, Venkatesh</au><au>VINAYARAJ, Poliyapram</au><au>TRUONG, Luan X.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Rice Terrace Extraction from RapidEye, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images</atitle><jtitle>Geoinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>Geoinformatics</addtitle><date>2020-09-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>67-78</pages><issn>0388-502X</issn><eissn>1347-541X</eissn><abstract>Remote sensing images has been reported as valuable data to extract the rice terrace. However, most of these studies have been focused on high and very high spatial resolution remotely sensed images. In this paper, we investigate the capability of three medium resolution remote sensing data, namely, RapidEye, Sentinel-2, and Landsat-8 for rice terrace extraction. Moreover, both Pixel Based Image Analysis (PBIA) and Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) are utilized to classify rice terrace using robust machine learning classifiers, namely, Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine algorithms. All three remote sensing data provide high accuracies of rice terrace classification with PBIA, with accuracies ranging from 90.3% to 92%. OBIA does not perform as well as PBIA. In general, the accuracy of OBIA decreases when the threshold of segmentation increases. OBIA applied RapidEye provides accuracy higher than 85%. Sentinel-2 shows lower accuracy at above 80%. Landsat-8 image shows the least accuracy below 75% at higher threshold levels. Although the classification accuracy for OBIA shows dependence on spatial resolution of remote sensing images, the output results for the three classifiers do no show significant difference except in the ability to distinguish smaller patches of rice terrace in images of higher resolution. Based on the results, PBIA is considered to offer a simple and more accurate method for rice terrace extraction in the study area.</abstract><cop>Osaka City</cop><pub>Japan Society of Geoinformatics</pub><doi>10.6010/geoinformatics.31.3_67</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0388-502X |
ispartof | Geoinformatics, 2020/09/25, Vol.31(3), pp.67-78 |
issn | 0388-502X 1347-541X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2447994435 |
source | J-STAGE Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Classification Classifiers Image analysis Image classification Image processing Image segmentation Landsat Landsat satellites Learning algorithms Machine Learning Multilayer Perceptron Multilayer perceptrons Pixel and Object Based Image Analysis Random Forest Remote sensing Resolution Rice Rice Terrace Satellite imagery Spatial discrimination Spatial resolution Support Vector Machine Support vector machines Terraces |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Rice Terrace Extraction from RapidEye, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A53%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Machine%20Learning%20Algorithms%20for%20Rice%20Terrace%20Extraction%20from%20RapidEye,%20Sentinel-2%20and%20Landsat-8%20Images&rft.jtitle=Geoinformatics&rft.au=DO,%20Hang%20T.&rft.date=2020-09-25&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=67-78&rft.issn=0388-502X&rft.eissn=1347-541X&rft_id=info:doi/10.6010/geoinformatics.31.3_67&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2447994435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447994435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |