Comparative Study of Input Use, Productivity and Profitability of Hybrid and Traditional Rice Cultivation in Assam, India
With the rising demand for food in India, hybrid rice plays a vital role in its high production. A research study was conducted in Assam, a northeastern state of India is purely agrarian in nature with major rice-growing seasons Ahu (Autumn), Sali (Winter) and Boro (Summer) in the state. Hybrid rice...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economic affairs (Calcutta) 2020-09, Vol.65 (3), p.389-394 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 394 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 389 |
container_title | Economic affairs (Calcutta) |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Gogoi, Jeemoni |
description | With the rising demand for food in India, hybrid rice plays a vital role in its high production. A research study was conducted in Assam, a northeastern state of India is purely agrarian in nature with major rice-growing seasons Ahu (Autumn), Sali (Winter) and Boro (Summer) in the state. Hybrid rice in Boro season is getting momentum in the state because it is giving higher yield to the rice farmers than traditional rice varieties. The study was design to compare the economics of hybrid rice and traditional rice cultivation in Assam with total sample of 90, considering 60 hybrid rice grower and 30 traditional rice grower using cost concepts given by CACP. The result shows that the cost of cultivation of hybrid rice was higher than the traditional rice due to the higher cost of fertilizer, seed and labour. However, the yield of hybrid rice was much higher (109.92ql-ha) than the traditional rice (49.70 ql-ha)). Thus, the farmers obtained a higher return over cost from hybrid rice (2.30) than traditional rice (1.66). The finding has suggested the adoption of hybrid rice in the study area a profitable for farmers to have more income even with the higher cost of production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.46852/0424-2513.3.2020.10 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2447944506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2447944506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-4956422cdc03249c167809e26e7f77462e12189f5d5c6b02ce7d10fe8c35a2343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_wIeAr2tNbtK0fRxD3WCg6PYcsiSFjK6tSSv035tu-nQv53z3cDkIPVKSclFk8Ew48AQyylKWAgGSUnKFZqTMRcKFENdx_ydu0V0IR0IAmOAzNK7aU6e86t2PxV_9YEbcVnjTdEOP98Eu8IdvzaCj7foRq8ZMQuV6dXD1pER4PR68M2dv55VxvWsbVeNPpy1eDXU8VZOEXYOXIajTIsYbp-7RTaXqYB_-5hztX192q3WyfX_brJbbRAMnJOFlJjiANpow4KWmIi9IaUHYvMpzLsBSoEVZZSbT4kBA29xQUtlCs0wB42yOni65nW-_Bxt6eWwHHz8MEjjPS84zIiLFL5T2bQjeVrLz7qT8KCmR55LlVKGcKpRMTiVHh_0CMIZuyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447944506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study of Input Use, Productivity and Profitability of Hybrid and Traditional Rice Cultivation in Assam, India</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Gogoi, Jeemoni</creator><creatorcontrib>Gogoi, Jeemoni</creatorcontrib><description>With the rising demand for food in India, hybrid rice plays a vital role in its high production. A research study was conducted in Assam, a northeastern state of India is purely agrarian in nature with major rice-growing seasons Ahu (Autumn), Sali (Winter) and Boro (Summer) in the state. Hybrid rice in Boro season is getting momentum in the state because it is giving higher yield to the rice farmers than traditional rice varieties. The study was design to compare the economics of hybrid rice and traditional rice cultivation in Assam with total sample of 90, considering 60 hybrid rice grower and 30 traditional rice grower using cost concepts given by CACP. The result shows that the cost of cultivation of hybrid rice was higher than the traditional rice due to the higher cost of fertilizer, seed and labour. However, the yield of hybrid rice was much higher (109.92ql-ha) than the traditional rice (49.70 ql-ha)). Thus, the farmers obtained a higher return over cost from hybrid rice (2.30) than traditional rice (1.66). The finding has suggested the adoption of hybrid rice in the study area a profitable for farmers to have more income even with the higher cost of production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0424-2513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0976-4666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.46852/0424-2513.3.2020.10</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: New Delhi Publishers</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Food ; Gross income ; Product returns ; Production costs ; Productivity ; Profitability ; Profits ; Rice</subject><ispartof>Economic affairs (Calcutta), 2020-09, Vol.65 (3), p.389-394</ispartof><rights>Copyright New Delhi Publishers Sep 2020</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-4956422cdc03249c167809e26e7f77462e12189f5d5c6b02ce7d10fe8c35a2343</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-7725-7160</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gogoi, Jeemoni</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of Input Use, Productivity and Profitability of Hybrid and Traditional Rice Cultivation in Assam, India</title><title>Economic affairs (Calcutta)</title><description>With the rising demand for food in India, hybrid rice plays a vital role in its high production. A research study was conducted in Assam, a northeastern state of India is purely agrarian in nature with major rice-growing seasons Ahu (Autumn), Sali (Winter) and Boro (Summer) in the state. Hybrid rice in Boro season is getting momentum in the state because it is giving higher yield to the rice farmers than traditional rice varieties. The study was design to compare the economics of hybrid rice and traditional rice cultivation in Assam with total sample of 90, considering 60 hybrid rice grower and 30 traditional rice grower using cost concepts given by CACP. The result shows that the cost of cultivation of hybrid rice was higher than the traditional rice due to the higher cost of fertilizer, seed and labour. However, the yield of hybrid rice was much higher (109.92ql-ha) than the traditional rice (49.70 ql-ha)). Thus, the farmers obtained a higher return over cost from hybrid rice (2.30) than traditional rice (1.66). The finding has suggested the adoption of hybrid rice in the study area a profitable for farmers to have more income even with the higher cost of production.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Gross income</subject><subject>Product returns</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Rice</subject><issn>0424-2513</issn><issn>0976-4666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_wIeAr2tNbtK0fRxD3WCg6PYcsiSFjK6tSSv035tu-nQv53z3cDkIPVKSclFk8Ew48AQyylKWAgGSUnKFZqTMRcKFENdx_ydu0V0IR0IAmOAzNK7aU6e86t2PxV_9YEbcVnjTdEOP98Eu8IdvzaCj7foRq8ZMQuV6dXD1pER4PR68M2dv55VxvWsbVeNPpy1eDXU8VZOEXYOXIajTIsYbp-7RTaXqYB_-5hztX192q3WyfX_brJbbRAMnJOFlJjiANpow4KWmIi9IaUHYvMpzLsBSoEVZZSbT4kBA29xQUtlCs0wB42yOni65nW-_Bxt6eWwHHz8MEjjPS84zIiLFL5T2bQjeVrLz7qT8KCmR55LlVKGcKpRMTiVHh_0CMIZuyg</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Gogoi, Jeemoni</creator><general>New Delhi Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7725-7160</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of Input Use, Productivity and Profitability of Hybrid and Traditional Rice Cultivation in Assam, India</title><author>Gogoi, Jeemoni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-4956422cdc03249c167809e26e7f77462e12189f5d5c6b02ce7d10fe8c35a2343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Gross income</topic><topic>Product returns</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Rice</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gogoi, Jeemoni</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Economic affairs (Calcutta)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gogoi, Jeemoni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of Input Use, Productivity and Profitability of Hybrid and Traditional Rice Cultivation in Assam, India</atitle><jtitle>Economic affairs (Calcutta)</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>389-394</pages><issn>0424-2513</issn><eissn>0976-4666</eissn><abstract>With the rising demand for food in India, hybrid rice plays a vital role in its high production. A research study was conducted in Assam, a northeastern state of India is purely agrarian in nature with major rice-growing seasons Ahu (Autumn), Sali (Winter) and Boro (Summer) in the state. Hybrid rice in Boro season is getting momentum in the state because it is giving higher yield to the rice farmers than traditional rice varieties. The study was design to compare the economics of hybrid rice and traditional rice cultivation in Assam with total sample of 90, considering 60 hybrid rice grower and 30 traditional rice grower using cost concepts given by CACP. The result shows that the cost of cultivation of hybrid rice was higher than the traditional rice due to the higher cost of fertilizer, seed and labour. However, the yield of hybrid rice was much higher (109.92ql-ha) than the traditional rice (49.70 ql-ha)). Thus, the farmers obtained a higher return over cost from hybrid rice (2.30) than traditional rice (1.66). The finding has suggested the adoption of hybrid rice in the study area a profitable for farmers to have more income even with the higher cost of production.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>New Delhi Publishers</pub><doi>10.46852/0424-2513.3.2020.10</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7725-7160</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0424-2513 |
ispartof | Economic affairs (Calcutta), 2020-09, Vol.65 (3), p.389-394 |
issn | 0424-2513 0976-4666 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2447944506 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural production Agriculture Food Gross income Product returns Production costs Productivity Profitability Profits Rice |
title | Comparative Study of Input Use, Productivity and Profitability of Hybrid and Traditional Rice Cultivation in Assam, India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A50%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20Input%20Use,%20Productivity%20and%20Profitability%20of%20Hybrid%20and%20Traditional%20Rice%20Cultivation%20in%20Assam,%20India&rft.jtitle=Economic%20affairs%20(Calcutta)&rft.au=Gogoi,%20Jeemoni&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=389-394&rft.issn=0424-2513&rft.eissn=0976-4666&rft_id=info:doi/10.46852/0424-2513.3.2020.10&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2447944506%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447944506&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |