Worker and Community Ownership as an Economic Development Strategy: Innovative Rebirth or Tired Retread of a Failed Idea?
A generation ago, American state and local experiments with worker and community ownership appeared unsuccessful. Does their current revival offer anything new to the field of economic development or is this merely a tired retread of a failed idea? Using historical analysis, case studies, and interv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economic development quarterly 2020-11, Vol.34 (4), p.325-342, Article 0891242420941597 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 342 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 325 |
container_title | Economic development quarterly |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Spicer, Jason S. |
description | A generation ago, American state and local experiments with worker and community ownership appeared unsuccessful. Does their current revival offer anything new to the field of economic development or is this merely a tired retread of a failed idea? Using historical analysis, case studies, and interview data from three U.S. regions, the author analyzes the current range of initiatives that seek to remove impediments, stimulate development, and provide direct technical and financial support to worker and community-owned enterprises. The author also identifies how these efforts differ from those in the past, with respect to scope, scale, and success orientation. Collectively, these differences suggest a focus on engaging with, rather than escaping from, market-based economic development. Key challenges are also identified: popular education, community capacity, competitive pressure, early-stage financing, and managing political content. While too early to assess outcomes, these differences suggest the possibility of more substantial results than in the past. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0891242420941597 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2447815779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0891242420941597</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2447815779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4a6b9e654cb7a1214944e18346888bcaa241258615e4ad9b55c94b841dfcc4ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd1rHCEUxaU00G3S9z4KfQyTqqOr5iWUyaZdCATyQR8Hx7mTmOzoVt0N-9_XZUoDgUD0Qbjnd656LkJfKTmhVMrvRGnKeNlEcyq0_IBmVAhW1YLXH9FsL1d7_RP6nNIjIYQypmdo9zvEJ4jY-B43YRw33uUdvnr2ENODW2OTioQXNvgwOovPYQursB7BZ3yTo8lwvzvFS-_D1mS3BXwNnYv5AYeIb12EvhRyBNPjMGCDL4xbldqyB3N2hA4Gs0rw5d95iO4uFrfNr-ry6uey-XFZ2VrrXHEz7zTMBbedNJRRrjkHqmo-V0p11hjGKRNqTgVw0-tOCKt5pzjtB2v5MNSH6NvUdx3Dnw2k3D6GTfTlypZxLhUVUupCkYmyMaQUYWjX0Y0m7lpK2n3A7euAiwVPFijpuPRikLXUWjJWF-R4Qp6hC0OyDryF_2AZgiirVpTs51Fo9X66cbkkHnwTNj4XazVZk7mHlw---fa_D7qlUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447815779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Worker and Community Ownership as an Economic Development Strategy: Innovative Rebirth or Tired Retread of a Failed Idea?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Spicer, Jason S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spicer, Jason S.</creatorcontrib><description>A generation ago, American state and local experiments with worker and community ownership appeared unsuccessful. Does their current revival offer anything new to the field of economic development or is this merely a tired retread of a failed idea? Using historical analysis, case studies, and interview data from three U.S. regions, the author analyzes the current range of initiatives that seek to remove impediments, stimulate development, and provide direct technical and financial support to worker and community-owned enterprises. The author also identifies how these efforts differ from those in the past, with respect to scope, scale, and success orientation. Collectively, these differences suggest a focus on engaging with, rather than escaping from, market-based economic development. Key challenges are also identified: popular education, community capacity, competitive pressure, early-stage financing, and managing political content. While too early to assess outcomes, these differences suggest the possibility of more substantial results than in the past.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0891-2424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0891242420941597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Business & Economics ; Case studies ; Community ; Development strategies ; Development Studies ; Economic development ; Economics ; Experiments ; Financial support ; Historical analysis ; Ownership ; Political finance ; Popular education ; Social Sciences ; Urban Studies ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Economic development quarterly, 2020-11, Vol.34 (4), p.325-342, Article 0891242420941597</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>13</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000555538100001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4a6b9e654cb7a1214944e18346888bcaa241258615e4ad9b55c94b841dfcc4ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4a6b9e654cb7a1214944e18346888bcaa241258615e4ad9b55c94b841dfcc4ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3286-8034</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0891242420941597$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242420941597$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27866,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spicer, Jason S.</creatorcontrib><title>Worker and Community Ownership as an Economic Development Strategy: Innovative Rebirth or Tired Retread of a Failed Idea?</title><title>Economic development quarterly</title><addtitle>ECON DEV Q</addtitle><description>A generation ago, American state and local experiments with worker and community ownership appeared unsuccessful. Does their current revival offer anything new to the field of economic development or is this merely a tired retread of a failed idea? Using historical analysis, case studies, and interview data from three U.S. regions, the author analyzes the current range of initiatives that seek to remove impediments, stimulate development, and provide direct technical and financial support to worker and community-owned enterprises. The author also identifies how these efforts differ from those in the past, with respect to scope, scale, and success orientation. Collectively, these differences suggest a focus on engaging with, rather than escaping from, market-based economic development. Key challenges are also identified: popular education, community capacity, competitive pressure, early-stage financing, and managing political content. While too early to assess outcomes, these differences suggest the possibility of more substantial results than in the past.</description><subject>Business & Economics</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Development strategies</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Financial support</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Political finance</subject><subject>Popular education</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Urban Studies</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0891-2424</issn><issn>1552-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd1rHCEUxaU00G3S9z4KfQyTqqOr5iWUyaZdCATyQR8Hx7mTmOzoVt0N-9_XZUoDgUD0Qbjnd656LkJfKTmhVMrvRGnKeNlEcyq0_IBmVAhW1YLXH9FsL1d7_RP6nNIjIYQypmdo9zvEJ4jY-B43YRw33uUdvnr2ENODW2OTioQXNvgwOovPYQursB7BZ3yTo8lwvzvFS-_D1mS3BXwNnYv5AYeIb12EvhRyBNPjMGCDL4xbldqyB3N2hA4Gs0rw5d95iO4uFrfNr-ry6uey-XFZ2VrrXHEz7zTMBbedNJRRrjkHqmo-V0p11hjGKRNqTgVw0-tOCKt5pzjtB2v5MNSH6NvUdx3Dnw2k3D6GTfTlypZxLhUVUupCkYmyMaQUYWjX0Y0m7lpK2n3A7euAiwVPFijpuPRikLXUWjJWF-R4Qp6hC0OyDryF_2AZgiirVpTs51Fo9X66cbkkHnwTNj4XazVZk7mHlw---fa_D7qlUw</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Spicer, Jason S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-8034</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Worker and Community Ownership as an Economic Development Strategy: Innovative Rebirth or Tired Retread of a Failed Idea?</title><author>Spicer, Jason S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4a6b9e654cb7a1214944e18346888bcaa241258615e4ad9b55c94b841dfcc4ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business & Economics</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Development strategies</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Financial support</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Political finance</topic><topic>Popular education</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Urban Studies</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spicer, Jason S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economic development quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spicer, Jason S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Worker and Community Ownership as an Economic Development Strategy: Innovative Rebirth or Tired Retread of a Failed Idea?</atitle><jtitle>Economic development quarterly</jtitle><stitle>ECON DEV Q</stitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>325-342</pages><artnum>0891242420941597</artnum><issn>0891-2424</issn><eissn>1552-3543</eissn><abstract>A generation ago, American state and local experiments with worker and community ownership appeared unsuccessful. Does their current revival offer anything new to the field of economic development or is this merely a tired retread of a failed idea? Using historical analysis, case studies, and interview data from three U.S. regions, the author analyzes the current range of initiatives that seek to remove impediments, stimulate development, and provide direct technical and financial support to worker and community-owned enterprises. The author also identifies how these efforts differ from those in the past, with respect to scope, scale, and success orientation. Collectively, these differences suggest a focus on engaging with, rather than escaping from, market-based economic development. Key challenges are also identified: popular education, community capacity, competitive pressure, early-stage financing, and managing political content. While too early to assess outcomes, these differences suggest the possibility of more substantial results than in the past.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0891242420941597</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-8034</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0891-2424 |
ispartof | Economic development quarterly, 2020-11, Vol.34 (4), p.325-342, Article 0891242420941597 |
issn | 0891-2424 1552-3543 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2447815779 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Journals Online |
subjects | Business & Economics Case studies Community Development strategies Development Studies Economic development Economics Experiments Financial support Historical analysis Ownership Political finance Popular education Social Sciences Urban Studies Workers |
title | Worker and Community Ownership as an Economic Development Strategy: Innovative Rebirth or Tired Retread of a Failed Idea? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A27%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Worker%20and%20Community%20Ownership%20as%20an%20Economic%20Development%20Strategy:%20Innovative%20Rebirth%20or%20Tired%20Retread%20of%20a%20Failed%20Idea?&rft.jtitle=Economic%20development%20quarterly&rft.au=Spicer,%20Jason%20S.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=325-342&rft.artnum=0891242420941597&rft.issn=0891-2424&rft.eissn=1552-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0891242420941597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E2447815779%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447815779&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0891242420941597&rfr_iscdi=true |