Spatial heterogeneity and habitat configuration overcome habitat composition influences on alpha and beta mammal diversity
The effects of habitat fragmentation on different taxa and ecosystems are subject to intense debate, and disentangling them is of utmost importance to support conservation and management strategies. We evaluated the importance of landscape composition and configuration, and spatial heterogeneity to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biotropica 2020-09, Vol.52 (5), p.969-980 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The effects of habitat fragmentation on different taxa and ecosystems are subject to intense debate, and disentangling them is of utmost importance to support conservation and management strategies. We evaluated the importance of landscape composition and configuration, and spatial heterogeneity to explain α‐ and β‐diversity of mammals across a gradient of percent woody cover and land use diversity. We expected species richness to be positively related to all predictive variables, with the strongest relationship with landscape composition and configuration, and spatial heterogeneity respectively. We also expected landscape to influence β‐diversity in the same order of importance expected for species richness, with a stronger influence on nestedness due to deterministic loss of species more sensitive to habitat disturbance. We analyzed landscape structure using: (a) landscape metrics based on thematic maps and (b) image texture of a vegetation index. We compared a set of univariate explanatory models of species richness using AIC, and evaluated how dissimilarities in landscape composition and configuration and spatial heterogeneity affect β‐diversity components using a Multiple Regression on distance Matrix. Contrary with our expectations, landscape configuration was the main driver of species richness, followed by spatial heterogeneity and last by landscape composition. Nestedness was explained, in order of importance, by spatial heterogeneity, landscape configuration, and landscape composition. Although conservation policies tend to focus mainly on habitat amount, we advocate that landscape management must include strategies to preserve and improve habitat quality and complexity in natural patches and the surrounding matrix, enabling landscapes to harbor high species diversity.
in Portuguese is available with online material.
Resumo
Os efeitos da fragmentação de habitats em diferentes taxa e ecossistemas estão sujeitos a intenso debate, e esclarecê‐los é de extrema importância para subsidiar estratégias de conservação e manejo. Avaliamos a importância da composição e configuração da paisagem em escala grossa e da heterogeneidade espacial dentro do habitat para explicar a diversidade α e β de mamíferos em um gradiente de porcentagem de cobertura de vegetação lenhosa e de diversidade de uso da terra. Esperamos que a riqueza de espécies seja positivamente relacionada a todas as variáveis explanatórias, sendo a relação mais forte com medidas de composição, co |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-3606 1744-7429 |
DOI: | 10.1111/btp.12800 |