Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge
This paper is integral part of the Special Issue on “Existing Concrete Structures: Structural Health Monitoring and Testing for condition assessment.” It deals with vibration‐based methods (VBMs) for damage localization that approach the problem of structural integrity management through the analysi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Structural concrete : journal of the FIB 2020-08, Vol.21 (4), p.1254-1271 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1271 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1254 |
container_title | Structural concrete : journal of the FIB |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Giordano, Pier F. Limongelli, Maria P. |
description | This paper is integral part of the Special Issue on “Existing Concrete Structures: Structural Health Monitoring and Testing for condition assessment.” It deals with vibration‐based methods (VBMs) for damage localization that approach the problem of structural integrity management through the analysis of the dynamic response of the structure under ambient or forced vibrations. In the last years, these methods received a widespread interest in the structural health monitoring (SHM) community due to the possibility to use them for continuous SHM and real time damage identification. The performance of these methods is commonly verified on numerical models or laboratory specimens that, by their nature, cannot reproduce all the sources of uncertainties found in practice. The availability of data recorded on a real benchmark, the S101 bridge in Austria, enabled the comparison of three well known vibration‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization, namely, the curvature method, the interpolation error method, and the strain energy method. The bridge, built in the early 1960, is a typical example of a European highway bridge. Responses to ambient vibrations were recorded both in the undamaged and in several different damage scenarios artificially inflicted to the bridge. This paper reports the results of the application of the three mentioned methods of damage localization to this case study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/suco.202000013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2446802305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2446802305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-af3f96923e0b706717734906eb0838403200e85518c6ceba589da1559d5d40693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtKAzEUDaKgVreuA66nJpPHTJZSfEGhoNZtyGTu1JSZSU2mSl35CX6jX2JKRZdeLtxz4Zz7OAidUTKmhOQXcW39OCc5SUHZHjqihaBZIXm5nzCXPOO0KA7RcYzLxE9YHKGne4gr30f4-visTIQaD67bNq5_NcGZfsAdDM--jrjxAdemMwvArbemde9mcL7HKQ22vrcBBsBVcPUCTtBBY9oIpz91hObXV4-T22w6u7mbXE4zyxRjmWlYo6TKGZCqILJINzGuiISKlKzkhKVnoBSCllZaqIwoVW2oEKoWNSdSsRE6381dBf-yhjjopV-HPq3UOeeyJDkjIrHGO5YNPsYAjV4F15mw0ZTorXd6653-9S4J1E7w5lrY_MPWD_PJ7E_7Db2ndD4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446802305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Giordano, Pier F. ; Limongelli, Maria P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Pier F. ; Limongelli, Maria P.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is integral part of the Special Issue on “Existing Concrete Structures: Structural Health Monitoring and Testing for condition assessment.” It deals with vibration‐based methods (VBMs) for damage localization that approach the problem of structural integrity management through the analysis of the dynamic response of the structure under ambient or forced vibrations. In the last years, these methods received a widespread interest in the structural health monitoring (SHM) community due to the possibility to use them for continuous SHM and real time damage identification. The performance of these methods is commonly verified on numerical models or laboratory specimens that, by their nature, cannot reproduce all the sources of uncertainties found in practice. The availability of data recorded on a real benchmark, the S101 bridge in Austria, enabled the comparison of three well known vibration‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization, namely, the curvature method, the interpolation error method, and the strain energy method. The bridge, built in the early 1960, is a typical example of a European highway bridge. Responses to ambient vibrations were recorded both in the undamaged and in several different damage scenarios artificially inflicted to the bridge. This paper reports the results of the application of the three mentioned methods of damage localization to this case study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/suco.202000013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA</publisher><subject>ambient vibration tests ; Concrete bridges ; Concrete structures ; Condition monitoring ; Damage detection ; Damage localization ; damage location ; Dynamic response ; Forced vibration ; Highway bridges ; Interpolation ; Invariants ; Numerical models ; Strain energy methods ; Structural health monitoring ; Structural integrity ; Vibration monitoring</subject><ispartof>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB, 2020-08, Vol.21 (4), p.1254-1271</ispartof><rights>2020 . International Federation for Structural Concrete</rights><rights>2020 fib. International Federation for Structural Concrete</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-af3f96923e0b706717734906eb0838403200e85518c6ceba589da1559d5d40693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-af3f96923e0b706717734906eb0838403200e85518c6ceba589da1559d5d40693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9353-5439 ; 0000-0003-0396-0253</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsuco.202000013$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsuco.202000013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Pier F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limongelli, Maria P.</creatorcontrib><title>Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge</title><title>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</title><description>This paper is integral part of the Special Issue on “Existing Concrete Structures: Structural Health Monitoring and Testing for condition assessment.” It deals with vibration‐based methods (VBMs) for damage localization that approach the problem of structural integrity management through the analysis of the dynamic response of the structure under ambient or forced vibrations. In the last years, these methods received a widespread interest in the structural health monitoring (SHM) community due to the possibility to use them for continuous SHM and real time damage identification. The performance of these methods is commonly verified on numerical models or laboratory specimens that, by their nature, cannot reproduce all the sources of uncertainties found in practice. The availability of data recorded on a real benchmark, the S101 bridge in Austria, enabled the comparison of three well known vibration‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization, namely, the curvature method, the interpolation error method, and the strain energy method. The bridge, built in the early 1960, is a typical example of a European highway bridge. Responses to ambient vibrations were recorded both in the undamaged and in several different damage scenarios artificially inflicted to the bridge. This paper reports the results of the application of the three mentioned methods of damage localization to this case study.</description><subject>ambient vibration tests</subject><subject>Concrete bridges</subject><subject>Concrete structures</subject><subject>Condition monitoring</subject><subject>Damage detection</subject><subject>Damage localization</subject><subject>damage location</subject><subject>Dynamic response</subject><subject>Forced vibration</subject><subject>Highway bridges</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Invariants</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Strain energy methods</subject><subject>Structural health monitoring</subject><subject>Structural integrity</subject><subject>Vibration monitoring</subject><issn>1464-4177</issn><issn>1751-7648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtKAzEUDaKgVreuA66nJpPHTJZSfEGhoNZtyGTu1JSZSU2mSl35CX6jX2JKRZdeLtxz4Zz7OAidUTKmhOQXcW39OCc5SUHZHjqihaBZIXm5nzCXPOO0KA7RcYzLxE9YHKGne4gr30f4-visTIQaD67bNq5_NcGZfsAdDM--jrjxAdemMwvArbemde9mcL7HKQ22vrcBBsBVcPUCTtBBY9oIpz91hObXV4-T22w6u7mbXE4zyxRjmWlYo6TKGZCqILJINzGuiISKlKzkhKVnoBSCllZaqIwoVW2oEKoWNSdSsRE6381dBf-yhjjopV-HPq3UOeeyJDkjIrHGO5YNPsYAjV4F15mw0ZTorXd6653-9S4J1E7w5lrY_MPWD_PJ7E_7Db2ndD4</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Giordano, Pier F.</creator><creator>Limongelli, Maria P.</creator><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9353-5439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0396-0253</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge</title><author>Giordano, Pier F. ; Limongelli, Maria P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-af3f96923e0b706717734906eb0838403200e85518c6ceba589da1559d5d40693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ambient vibration tests</topic><topic>Concrete bridges</topic><topic>Concrete structures</topic><topic>Condition monitoring</topic><topic>Damage detection</topic><topic>Damage localization</topic><topic>damage location</topic><topic>Dynamic response</topic><topic>Forced vibration</topic><topic>Highway bridges</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Invariants</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Strain energy methods</topic><topic>Structural health monitoring</topic><topic>Structural integrity</topic><topic>Vibration monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Pier F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limongelli, Maria P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giordano, Pier F.</au><au>Limongelli, Maria P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge</atitle><jtitle>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</jtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1254</spage><epage>1271</epage><pages>1254-1271</pages><issn>1464-4177</issn><eissn>1751-7648</eissn><abstract>This paper is integral part of the Special Issue on “Existing Concrete Structures: Structural Health Monitoring and Testing for condition assessment.” It deals with vibration‐based methods (VBMs) for damage localization that approach the problem of structural integrity management through the analysis of the dynamic response of the structure under ambient or forced vibrations. In the last years, these methods received a widespread interest in the structural health monitoring (SHM) community due to the possibility to use them for continuous SHM and real time damage identification. The performance of these methods is commonly verified on numerical models or laboratory specimens that, by their nature, cannot reproduce all the sources of uncertainties found in practice. The availability of data recorded on a real benchmark, the S101 bridge in Austria, enabled the comparison of three well known vibration‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization, namely, the curvature method, the interpolation error method, and the strain energy method. The bridge, built in the early 1960, is a typical example of a European highway bridge. Responses to ambient vibrations were recorded both in the undamaged and in several different damage scenarios artificially inflicted to the bridge. This paper reports the results of the application of the three mentioned methods of damage localization to this case study.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA</pub><doi>10.1002/suco.202000013</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9353-5439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0396-0253</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-4177 |
ispartof | Structural concrete : journal of the FIB, 2020-08, Vol.21 (4), p.1254-1271 |
issn | 1464-4177 1751-7648 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2446802305 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | ambient vibration tests Concrete bridges Concrete structures Condition monitoring Damage detection Damage localization damage location Dynamic response Forced vibration Highway bridges Interpolation Invariants Numerical models Strain energy methods Structural health monitoring Structural integrity Vibration monitoring |
title | Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T02%3A18%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%E2%80%90based%20time%E2%80%90invariant%20methods%20for%20damage%20localization%20on%20a%20concrete%20bridge&rft.jtitle=Structural%20concrete%20:%20journal%20of%20the%20FIB&rft.au=Giordano,%20Pier%20F.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1254&rft.epage=1271&rft.pages=1254-1271&rft.issn=1464-4177&rft.eissn=1751-7648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/suco.202000013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2446802305%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446802305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |