Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge

This paper is integral part of the Special Issue on “Existing Concrete Structures: Structural Health Monitoring and Testing for condition assessment.” It deals with vibration‐based methods (VBMs) for damage localization that approach the problem of structural integrity management through the analysi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Structural concrete : journal of the FIB 2020-08, Vol.21 (4), p.1254-1271
Hauptverfasser: Giordano, Pier F., Limongelli, Maria P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1271
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1254
container_title Structural concrete : journal of the FIB
container_volume 21
creator Giordano, Pier F.
Limongelli, Maria P.
description This paper is integral part of the Special Issue on “Existing Concrete Structures: Structural Health Monitoring and Testing for condition assessment.” It deals with vibration‐based methods (VBMs) for damage localization that approach the problem of structural integrity management through the analysis of the dynamic response of the structure under ambient or forced vibrations. In the last years, these methods received a widespread interest in the structural health monitoring (SHM) community due to the possibility to use them for continuous SHM and real time damage identification. The performance of these methods is commonly verified on numerical models or laboratory specimens that, by their nature, cannot reproduce all the sources of uncertainties found in practice. The availability of data recorded on a real benchmark, the S101 bridge in Austria, enabled the comparison of three well known vibration‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization, namely, the curvature method, the interpolation error method, and the strain energy method. The bridge, built in the early 1960, is a typical example of a European highway bridge. Responses to ambient vibrations were recorded both in the undamaged and in several different damage scenarios artificially inflicted to the bridge. This paper reports the results of the application of the three mentioned methods of damage localization to this case study.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/suco.202000013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2446802305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2446802305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-af3f96923e0b706717734906eb0838403200e85518c6ceba589da1559d5d40693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtKAzEUDaKgVreuA66nJpPHTJZSfEGhoNZtyGTu1JSZSU2mSl35CX6jX2JKRZdeLtxz4Zz7OAidUTKmhOQXcW39OCc5SUHZHjqihaBZIXm5nzCXPOO0KA7RcYzLxE9YHKGne4gr30f4-visTIQaD67bNq5_NcGZfsAdDM--jrjxAdemMwvArbemde9mcL7HKQ22vrcBBsBVcPUCTtBBY9oIpz91hObXV4-T22w6u7mbXE4zyxRjmWlYo6TKGZCqILJINzGuiISKlKzkhKVnoBSCllZaqIwoVW2oEKoWNSdSsRE6381dBf-yhjjopV-HPq3UOeeyJDkjIrHGO5YNPsYAjV4F15mw0ZTorXd6653-9S4J1E7w5lrY_MPWD_PJ7E_7Db2ndD4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446802305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Giordano, Pier F. ; Limongelli, Maria P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Pier F. ; Limongelli, Maria P.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is integral part of the Special Issue on “Existing Concrete Structures: Structural Health Monitoring and Testing for condition assessment.” It deals with vibration‐based methods (VBMs) for damage localization that approach the problem of structural integrity management through the analysis of the dynamic response of the structure under ambient or forced vibrations. In the last years, these methods received a widespread interest in the structural health monitoring (SHM) community due to the possibility to use them for continuous SHM and real time damage identification. The performance of these methods is commonly verified on numerical models or laboratory specimens that, by their nature, cannot reproduce all the sources of uncertainties found in practice. The availability of data recorded on a real benchmark, the S101 bridge in Austria, enabled the comparison of three well known vibration‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization, namely, the curvature method, the interpolation error method, and the strain energy method. The bridge, built in the early 1960, is a typical example of a European highway bridge. Responses to ambient vibrations were recorded both in the undamaged and in several different damage scenarios artificially inflicted to the bridge. This paper reports the results of the application of the three mentioned methods of damage localization to this case study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/suco.202000013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA</publisher><subject>ambient vibration tests ; Concrete bridges ; Concrete structures ; Condition monitoring ; Damage detection ; Damage localization ; damage location ; Dynamic response ; Forced vibration ; Highway bridges ; Interpolation ; Invariants ; Numerical models ; Strain energy methods ; Structural health monitoring ; Structural integrity ; Vibration monitoring</subject><ispartof>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB, 2020-08, Vol.21 (4), p.1254-1271</ispartof><rights>2020 . International Federation for Structural Concrete</rights><rights>2020 fib. International Federation for Structural Concrete</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-af3f96923e0b706717734906eb0838403200e85518c6ceba589da1559d5d40693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-af3f96923e0b706717734906eb0838403200e85518c6ceba589da1559d5d40693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9353-5439 ; 0000-0003-0396-0253</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsuco.202000013$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsuco.202000013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Pier F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limongelli, Maria P.</creatorcontrib><title>Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge</title><title>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</title><description>This paper is integral part of the Special Issue on “Existing Concrete Structures: Structural Health Monitoring and Testing for condition assessment.” It deals with vibration‐based methods (VBMs) for damage localization that approach the problem of structural integrity management through the analysis of the dynamic response of the structure under ambient or forced vibrations. In the last years, these methods received a widespread interest in the structural health monitoring (SHM) community due to the possibility to use them for continuous SHM and real time damage identification. The performance of these methods is commonly verified on numerical models or laboratory specimens that, by their nature, cannot reproduce all the sources of uncertainties found in practice. The availability of data recorded on a real benchmark, the S101 bridge in Austria, enabled the comparison of three well known vibration‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization, namely, the curvature method, the interpolation error method, and the strain energy method. The bridge, built in the early 1960, is a typical example of a European highway bridge. Responses to ambient vibrations were recorded both in the undamaged and in several different damage scenarios artificially inflicted to the bridge. This paper reports the results of the application of the three mentioned methods of damage localization to this case study.</description><subject>ambient vibration tests</subject><subject>Concrete bridges</subject><subject>Concrete structures</subject><subject>Condition monitoring</subject><subject>Damage detection</subject><subject>Damage localization</subject><subject>damage location</subject><subject>Dynamic response</subject><subject>Forced vibration</subject><subject>Highway bridges</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Invariants</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Strain energy methods</subject><subject>Structural health monitoring</subject><subject>Structural integrity</subject><subject>Vibration monitoring</subject><issn>1464-4177</issn><issn>1751-7648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtKAzEUDaKgVreuA66nJpPHTJZSfEGhoNZtyGTu1JSZSU2mSl35CX6jX2JKRZdeLtxz4Zz7OAidUTKmhOQXcW39OCc5SUHZHjqihaBZIXm5nzCXPOO0KA7RcYzLxE9YHKGne4gr30f4-visTIQaD67bNq5_NcGZfsAdDM--jrjxAdemMwvArbemde9mcL7HKQ22vrcBBsBVcPUCTtBBY9oIpz91hObXV4-T22w6u7mbXE4zyxRjmWlYo6TKGZCqILJINzGuiISKlKzkhKVnoBSCllZaqIwoVW2oEKoWNSdSsRE6381dBf-yhjjopV-HPq3UOeeyJDkjIrHGO5YNPsYAjV4F15mw0ZTorXd6653-9S4J1E7w5lrY_MPWD_PJ7E_7Db2ndD4</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Giordano, Pier F.</creator><creator>Limongelli, Maria P.</creator><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9353-5439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0396-0253</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge</title><author>Giordano, Pier F. ; Limongelli, Maria P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-af3f96923e0b706717734906eb0838403200e85518c6ceba589da1559d5d40693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ambient vibration tests</topic><topic>Concrete bridges</topic><topic>Concrete structures</topic><topic>Condition monitoring</topic><topic>Damage detection</topic><topic>Damage localization</topic><topic>damage location</topic><topic>Dynamic response</topic><topic>Forced vibration</topic><topic>Highway bridges</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Invariants</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Strain energy methods</topic><topic>Structural health monitoring</topic><topic>Structural integrity</topic><topic>Vibration monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Pier F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limongelli, Maria P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giordano, Pier F.</au><au>Limongelli, Maria P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge</atitle><jtitle>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</jtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1254</spage><epage>1271</epage><pages>1254-1271</pages><issn>1464-4177</issn><eissn>1751-7648</eissn><abstract>This paper is integral part of the Special Issue on “Existing Concrete Structures: Structural Health Monitoring and Testing for condition assessment.” It deals with vibration‐based methods (VBMs) for damage localization that approach the problem of structural integrity management through the analysis of the dynamic response of the structure under ambient or forced vibrations. In the last years, these methods received a widespread interest in the structural health monitoring (SHM) community due to the possibility to use them for continuous SHM and real time damage identification. The performance of these methods is commonly verified on numerical models or laboratory specimens that, by their nature, cannot reproduce all the sources of uncertainties found in practice. The availability of data recorded on a real benchmark, the S101 bridge in Austria, enabled the comparison of three well known vibration‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization, namely, the curvature method, the interpolation error method, and the strain energy method. The bridge, built in the early 1960, is a typical example of a European highway bridge. Responses to ambient vibrations were recorded both in the undamaged and in several different damage scenarios artificially inflicted to the bridge. This paper reports the results of the application of the three mentioned methods of damage localization to this case study.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA</pub><doi>10.1002/suco.202000013</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9353-5439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0396-0253</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4177
ispartof Structural concrete : journal of the FIB, 2020-08, Vol.21 (4), p.1254-1271
issn 1464-4177
1751-7648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2446802305
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects ambient vibration tests
Concrete bridges
Concrete structures
Condition monitoring
Damage detection
Damage localization
damage location
Dynamic response
Forced vibration
Highway bridges
Interpolation
Invariants
Numerical models
Strain energy methods
Structural health monitoring
Structural integrity
Vibration monitoring
title Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T02%3A18%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%E2%80%90based%20time%E2%80%90invariant%20methods%20for%20damage%20localization%20on%20a%20concrete%20bridge&rft.jtitle=Structural%20concrete%20:%20journal%20of%20the%20FIB&rft.au=Giordano,%20Pier%20F.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1254&rft.epage=1271&rft.pages=1254-1271&rft.issn=1464-4177&rft.eissn=1751-7648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/suco.202000013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2446802305%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446802305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true