Is methanol synthesis from co-gasification of olive pomace and petcoke economically feasible?

An economic assessment of methanol production from syngas obtained by co-gasification of petcoke and olive pomace was performed. This process was simulated with Aspen Plus® software. Net Price Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback period (PBP), break-even and minimum product sales pric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fuel (Guildford) 2020-10, Vol.278, p.118284, Article 118284
Hauptverfasser: Puig-Gamero, M., Trapero, J.R., Sánchez, P., Sanchez- Silva, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 118284
container_title Fuel (Guildford)
container_volume 278
creator Puig-Gamero, M.
Trapero, J.R.
Sánchez, P.
Sanchez- Silva, L.
description An economic assessment of methanol production from syngas obtained by co-gasification of petcoke and olive pomace was performed. This process was simulated with Aspen Plus® software. Net Price Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback period (PBP), break-even and minimum product sales price were the techno-economic parameters used for analyzing the economic viability of the project. Firstly, the influence of the blend in co-gasification was analysed to study possible synergies from an economic point of view. The financial results obtained confirmed that the higher the amount of olive pomace, the more financially feasible it was. In addition, a negative NPV was obtained when the petcoke content in the blends was higher than 50 wt%. Moreover, the influence of plant size on economic viability was also analysed. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed with respect to investment, sales price of methanol and methanol production, and the economic results were seen to be significantly affected by the price of methanol. To incorporate the potential risks of methanol price volatility, several Monte Carlo simulations were defined based on density forecasting for the methanol price for the time horizon of the life cycle of the plant. The main results indicated that it was highly probable the plant would be profitable despite the volatility in methanol prices.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118284
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2446726929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016236120312801</els_id><sourcerecordid>2446726929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c308f5d3b8edd3591d7c0517c6923cde2fcd3d4dd548be080eaaf947280a7e1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA89Z87G6yIIgUPwoFL3qUkCYTm3V3U5Ot0H9vynr2NDA8zzvDi9A1JQtKaH3bLtweugUjLC-oZLI8QTMqBS8ErfgpmpFMFYzX9BxdpNQSQoSsyhn6WCXcw7jVQ-hwOgzjFpJP2MXQYxOKT52880aPPgw4OBw6_wN4F3ptAOvB4h2MJnwBBhOG0Gey6w7YQdY2HdxfojOnuwRXf3OO3p8e35Yvxfr1ebV8WBem5HIsDCfSVZZvJFjLq4ZaYUhFhakbxo0F5ozltrS2KuUGiCSgtWtKwSTRAqjhc3Qz5e5i-N5DGlUb9nHIJxUry1qwHNRkik2UiSGlCE7tou91PChK1LFG1apjjepYo5pqzNLdJEH-_8dDVMl4GAxYH8GMygb_n_4L22V8vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446726929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is methanol synthesis from co-gasification of olive pomace and petcoke economically feasible?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Puig-Gamero, M. ; Trapero, J.R. ; Sánchez, P. ; Sanchez- Silva, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Puig-Gamero, M. ; Trapero, J.R. ; Sánchez, P. ; Sanchez- Silva, L.</creatorcontrib><description>An economic assessment of methanol production from syngas obtained by co-gasification of petcoke and olive pomace was performed. This process was simulated with Aspen Plus® software. Net Price Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback period (PBP), break-even and minimum product sales price were the techno-economic parameters used for analyzing the economic viability of the project. Firstly, the influence of the blend in co-gasification was analysed to study possible synergies from an economic point of view. The financial results obtained confirmed that the higher the amount of olive pomace, the more financially feasible it was. In addition, a negative NPV was obtained when the petcoke content in the blends was higher than 50 wt%. Moreover, the influence of plant size on economic viability was also analysed. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed with respect to investment, sales price of methanol and methanol production, and the economic results were seen to be significantly affected by the price of methanol. To incorporate the potential risks of methanol price volatility, several Monte Carlo simulations were defined based on density forecasting for the methanol price for the time horizon of the life cycle of the plant. The main results indicated that it was highly probable the plant would be profitable despite the volatility in methanol prices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Co-gasification ; Computer simulation ; Economic analysis ; Economic assessment ; Forecasting ; Gasification ; Life cycles ; Methanol ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Olive pomace/petcoke ; Payback periods ; Sales ; Sensitivity analysis ; Synthesis gas ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 2020-10, Vol.278, p.118284, Article 118284</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 15, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c308f5d3b8edd3591d7c0517c6923cde2fcd3d4dd548be080eaaf947280a7e1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c308f5d3b8edd3591d7c0517c6923cde2fcd3d4dd548be080eaaf947280a7e1c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4348-7520</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118284$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Puig-Gamero, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapero, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez- Silva, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Is methanol synthesis from co-gasification of olive pomace and petcoke economically feasible?</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>An economic assessment of methanol production from syngas obtained by co-gasification of petcoke and olive pomace was performed. This process was simulated with Aspen Plus® software. Net Price Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback period (PBP), break-even and minimum product sales price were the techno-economic parameters used for analyzing the economic viability of the project. Firstly, the influence of the blend in co-gasification was analysed to study possible synergies from an economic point of view. The financial results obtained confirmed that the higher the amount of olive pomace, the more financially feasible it was. In addition, a negative NPV was obtained when the petcoke content in the blends was higher than 50 wt%. Moreover, the influence of plant size on economic viability was also analysed. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed with respect to investment, sales price of methanol and methanol production, and the economic results were seen to be significantly affected by the price of methanol. To incorporate the potential risks of methanol price volatility, several Monte Carlo simulations were defined based on density forecasting for the methanol price for the time horizon of the life cycle of the plant. The main results indicated that it was highly probable the plant would be profitable despite the volatility in methanol prices.</description><subject>Co-gasification</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic assessment</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Gasification</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Methanol</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Olive pomace/petcoke</subject><subject>Payback periods</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Synthesis gas</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA89Z87G6yIIgUPwoFL3qUkCYTm3V3U5Ot0H9vynr2NDA8zzvDi9A1JQtKaH3bLtweugUjLC-oZLI8QTMqBS8ErfgpmpFMFYzX9BxdpNQSQoSsyhn6WCXcw7jVQ-hwOgzjFpJP2MXQYxOKT52880aPPgw4OBw6_wN4F3ptAOvB4h2MJnwBBhOG0Gey6w7YQdY2HdxfojOnuwRXf3OO3p8e35Yvxfr1ebV8WBem5HIsDCfSVZZvJFjLq4ZaYUhFhakbxo0F5ozltrS2KuUGiCSgtWtKwSTRAqjhc3Qz5e5i-N5DGlUb9nHIJxUry1qwHNRkik2UiSGlCE7tou91PChK1LFG1apjjepYo5pqzNLdJEH-_8dDVMl4GAxYH8GMygb_n_4L22V8vg</recordid><startdate>20201015</startdate><enddate>20201015</enddate><creator>Puig-Gamero, M.</creator><creator>Trapero, J.R.</creator><creator>Sánchez, P.</creator><creator>Sanchez- Silva, L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4348-7520</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201015</creationdate><title>Is methanol synthesis from co-gasification of olive pomace and petcoke economically feasible?</title><author>Puig-Gamero, M. ; Trapero, J.R. ; Sánchez, P. ; Sanchez- Silva, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c308f5d3b8edd3591d7c0517c6923cde2fcd3d4dd548be080eaaf947280a7e1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Co-gasification</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic assessment</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Gasification</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Methanol</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Olive pomace/petcoke</topic><topic>Payback periods</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Synthesis gas</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Puig-Gamero, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapero, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez- Silva, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Puig-Gamero, M.</au><au>Trapero, J.R.</au><au>Sánchez, P.</au><au>Sanchez- Silva, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is methanol synthesis from co-gasification of olive pomace and petcoke economically feasible?</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>2020-10-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>278</volume><spage>118284</spage><pages>118284-</pages><artnum>118284</artnum><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>An economic assessment of methanol production from syngas obtained by co-gasification of petcoke and olive pomace was performed. This process was simulated with Aspen Plus® software. Net Price Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback period (PBP), break-even and minimum product sales price were the techno-economic parameters used for analyzing the economic viability of the project. Firstly, the influence of the blend in co-gasification was analysed to study possible synergies from an economic point of view. The financial results obtained confirmed that the higher the amount of olive pomace, the more financially feasible it was. In addition, a negative NPV was obtained when the petcoke content in the blends was higher than 50 wt%. Moreover, the influence of plant size on economic viability was also analysed. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed with respect to investment, sales price of methanol and methanol production, and the economic results were seen to be significantly affected by the price of methanol. To incorporate the potential risks of methanol price volatility, several Monte Carlo simulations were defined based on density forecasting for the methanol price for the time horizon of the life cycle of the plant. The main results indicated that it was highly probable the plant would be profitable despite the volatility in methanol prices.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118284</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4348-7520</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-2361
ispartof Fuel (Guildford), 2020-10, Vol.278, p.118284, Article 118284
issn 0016-2361
1873-7153
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2446726929
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Co-gasification
Computer simulation
Economic analysis
Economic assessment
Forecasting
Gasification
Life cycles
Methanol
Monte Carlo simulation
Olive pomace/petcoke
Payback periods
Sales
Sensitivity analysis
Synthesis gas
Volatility
title Is methanol synthesis from co-gasification of olive pomace and petcoke economically feasible?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A44%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20methanol%20synthesis%20from%20co-gasification%20of%20olive%20pomace%20and%20petcoke%20economically%20feasible?&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Puig-Gamero,%20M.&rft.date=2020-10-15&rft.volume=278&rft.spage=118284&rft.pages=118284-&rft.artnum=118284&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118284&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2446726929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446726929&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016236120312801&rfr_iscdi=true