Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation
Motivated by declining support for mandatory participation in pension arrangements, we explore whether the intergenerational risk-sharing benefits that these arrangements offer suffice to ensure their survival when participation becomes voluntary. Funded systems with asset buffers are particularly i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Insurance, mathematics & economics mathematics & economics, 2020-07, Vol.93, p.125-140 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 140 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Insurance, mathematics & economics |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Romp, Ward Beetsma, Roel |
description | Motivated by declining support for mandatory participation in pension arrangements, we explore whether the intergenerational risk-sharing benefits that these arrangements offer suffice to ensure their survival when participation becomes voluntary. Funded systems with asset buffers are particularly interesting since these buffers make contributions more sensitive to financial returns. Equilibria are characterised by thresholds on the young’s willingness to contribute. Standard values for our parameters yield two such equilibria; only the one with the higher threshold is consistent with the initial young being prepared to start the system. An advancement relative to the related literature is that the equilibria feature a non-zero probability of collapse. Finally, we explore the social welfare maximising values for the pension parameters for various levels of uncertainty and risk aversion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2446291865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167668720300536</els_id><sourcerecordid>2446291865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5d99df0f09069857a953941c444a2cffe007349e54ec0d26195b93344af757a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4MoOKffoeC59U2bpM1F0KFTGHhQzyFLE5ayJTVJJ_v2Zkzw6Ok9vM_v_fMgVGCoMGB2N1TWxZ1MG618VUMNFZAKgJ-hGe7apqSc8nM0y2hbMta1l-gqxgEAMGftDN2_TzFJ6-Tabm06FN4Uo3bRelfEQ0x6F4tvmzbF3m8nl2Q4FKMMySo7ypSha3Rh5Dbqm986R5_PTx-Ll3L1tnxdPKxKRRhOJe057w0Y4MB4R1vJacMJVoQQWStjNEDbEK4p0Qr6mmFO17xpcte0ma6bObo9zR2D_5p0TGLwU3B5pagJYTXHHaOZ6k6UCj7GoI0Yg93lowUGcbQlBvFnSxxtCSAi28rRx1NU5y_2VgcRldVO6d4GrZLovf1_yA_QJ3iL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446291865</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Romp, Ward ; Beetsma, Roel</creator><creatorcontrib>Romp, Ward ; Beetsma, Roel</creatorcontrib><description>Motivated by declining support for mandatory participation in pension arrangements, we explore whether the intergenerational risk-sharing benefits that these arrangements offer suffice to ensure their survival when participation becomes voluntary. Funded systems with asset buffers are particularly interesting since these buffers make contributions more sensitive to financial returns. Equilibria are characterised by thresholds on the young’s willingness to contribute. Standard values for our parameters yield two such equilibria; only the one with the higher threshold is consistent with the initial young being prepared to start the system. An advancement relative to the related literature is that the equilibria feature a non-zero probability of collapse. Finally, we explore the social welfare maximising values for the pension parameters for various levels of uncertainty and risk aversion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6687</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Buffers ; Equilibrium ; Funded pensions ; Intergenerational risk sharing ; Optimal pension scheme ; Parameter uncertainty ; Participation ; Pension buffers ; Pension plans ; Risk ; Risk aversion ; Risk sharing ; Social welfare ; Thresholds ; Uncertainty ; Voluntary participation</subject><ispartof>Insurance, mathematics & economics, 2020-07, Vol.93, p.125-140</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5d99df0f09069857a953941c444a2cffe007349e54ec0d26195b93344af757a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5d99df0f09069857a953941c444a2cffe007349e54ec0d26195b93344af757a23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3886-562X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romp, Ward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beetsma, Roel</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation</title><title>Insurance, mathematics & economics</title><description>Motivated by declining support for mandatory participation in pension arrangements, we explore whether the intergenerational risk-sharing benefits that these arrangements offer suffice to ensure their survival when participation becomes voluntary. Funded systems with asset buffers are particularly interesting since these buffers make contributions more sensitive to financial returns. Equilibria are characterised by thresholds on the young’s willingness to contribute. Standard values for our parameters yield two such equilibria; only the one with the higher threshold is consistent with the initial young being prepared to start the system. An advancement relative to the related literature is that the equilibria feature a non-zero probability of collapse. Finally, we explore the social welfare maximising values for the pension parameters for various levels of uncertainty and risk aversion.</description><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Funded pensions</subject><subject>Intergenerational risk sharing</subject><subject>Optimal pension scheme</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Pension buffers</subject><subject>Pension plans</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Risk sharing</subject><subject>Social welfare</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Voluntary participation</subject><issn>0167-6687</issn><issn>1873-5959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4MoOKffoeC59U2bpM1F0KFTGHhQzyFLE5ayJTVJJ_v2Zkzw6Ok9vM_v_fMgVGCoMGB2N1TWxZ1MG618VUMNFZAKgJ-hGe7apqSc8nM0y2hbMta1l-gqxgEAMGftDN2_TzFJ6-Tabm06FN4Uo3bRelfEQ0x6F4tvmzbF3m8nl2Q4FKMMySo7ypSha3Rh5Dbqm986R5_PTx-Ll3L1tnxdPKxKRRhOJe057w0Y4MB4R1vJacMJVoQQWStjNEDbEK4p0Qr6mmFO17xpcte0ma6bObo9zR2D_5p0TGLwU3B5pagJYTXHHaOZ6k6UCj7GoI0Yg93lowUGcbQlBvFnSxxtCSAi28rRx1NU5y_2VgcRldVO6d4GrZLovf1_yA_QJ3iL</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Romp, Ward</creator><creator>Beetsma, Roel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-562X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation</title><author>Romp, Ward ; Beetsma, Roel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5d99df0f09069857a953941c444a2cffe007349e54ec0d26195b93344af757a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Funded pensions</topic><topic>Intergenerational risk sharing</topic><topic>Optimal pension scheme</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Pension buffers</topic><topic>Pension plans</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Risk sharing</topic><topic>Social welfare</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Voluntary participation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romp, Ward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beetsma, Roel</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Insurance, mathematics & economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romp, Ward</au><au>Beetsma, Roel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation</atitle><jtitle>Insurance, mathematics & economics</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>93</volume><spage>125</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>125-140</pages><issn>0167-6687</issn><eissn>1873-5959</eissn><abstract>Motivated by declining support for mandatory participation in pension arrangements, we explore whether the intergenerational risk-sharing benefits that these arrangements offer suffice to ensure their survival when participation becomes voluntary. Funded systems with asset buffers are particularly interesting since these buffers make contributions more sensitive to financial returns. Equilibria are characterised by thresholds on the young’s willingness to contribute. Standard values for our parameters yield two such equilibria; only the one with the higher threshold is consistent with the initial young being prepared to start the system. An advancement relative to the related literature is that the equilibria feature a non-zero probability of collapse. Finally, we explore the social welfare maximising values for the pension parameters for various levels of uncertainty and risk aversion.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-562X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6687 |
ispartof | Insurance, mathematics & economics, 2020-07, Vol.93, p.125-140 |
issn | 0167-6687 1873-5959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2446291865 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Buffers Equilibrium Funded pensions Intergenerational risk sharing Optimal pension scheme Parameter uncertainty Participation Pension buffers Pension plans Risk Risk aversion Risk sharing Social welfare Thresholds Uncertainty Voluntary participation |
title | Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A15%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainability%20of%20pension%20systems%20with%20voluntary%20participation&rft.jtitle=Insurance,%20mathematics%20&%20economics&rft.au=Romp,%20Ward&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=93&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=125-140&rft.issn=0167-6687&rft.eissn=1873-5959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2446291865%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446291865&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167668720300536&rfr_iscdi=true |