Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation

Motivated by declining support for mandatory participation in pension arrangements, we explore whether the intergenerational risk-sharing benefits that these arrangements offer suffice to ensure their survival when participation becomes voluntary. Funded systems with asset buffers are particularly i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Insurance, mathematics & economics mathematics & economics, 2020-07, Vol.93, p.125-140
Hauptverfasser: Romp, Ward, Beetsma, Roel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140
container_issue
container_start_page 125
container_title Insurance, mathematics & economics
container_volume 93
creator Romp, Ward
Beetsma, Roel
description Motivated by declining support for mandatory participation in pension arrangements, we explore whether the intergenerational risk-sharing benefits that these arrangements offer suffice to ensure their survival when participation becomes voluntary. Funded systems with asset buffers are particularly interesting since these buffers make contributions more sensitive to financial returns. Equilibria are characterised by thresholds on the young’s willingness to contribute. Standard values for our parameters yield two such equilibria; only the one with the higher threshold is consistent with the initial young being prepared to start the system. An advancement relative to the related literature is that the equilibria feature a non-zero probability of collapse. Finally, we explore the social welfare maximising values for the pension parameters for various levels of uncertainty and risk aversion.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2446291865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167668720300536</els_id><sourcerecordid>2446291865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5d99df0f09069857a953941c444a2cffe007349e54ec0d26195b93344af757a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4MoOKffoeC59U2bpM1F0KFTGHhQzyFLE5ayJTVJJ_v2Zkzw6Ok9vM_v_fMgVGCoMGB2N1TWxZ1MG618VUMNFZAKgJ-hGe7apqSc8nM0y2hbMta1l-gqxgEAMGftDN2_TzFJ6-Tabm06FN4Uo3bRelfEQ0x6F4tvmzbF3m8nl2Q4FKMMySo7ypSha3Rh5Dbqm986R5_PTx-Ll3L1tnxdPKxKRRhOJe057w0Y4MB4R1vJacMJVoQQWStjNEDbEK4p0Qr6mmFO17xpcte0ma6bObo9zR2D_5p0TGLwU3B5pagJYTXHHaOZ6k6UCj7GoI0Yg93lowUGcbQlBvFnSxxtCSAi28rRx1NU5y_2VgcRldVO6d4GrZLovf1_yA_QJ3iL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446291865</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Romp, Ward ; Beetsma, Roel</creator><creatorcontrib>Romp, Ward ; Beetsma, Roel</creatorcontrib><description>Motivated by declining support for mandatory participation in pension arrangements, we explore whether the intergenerational risk-sharing benefits that these arrangements offer suffice to ensure their survival when participation becomes voluntary. Funded systems with asset buffers are particularly interesting since these buffers make contributions more sensitive to financial returns. Equilibria are characterised by thresholds on the young’s willingness to contribute. Standard values for our parameters yield two such equilibria; only the one with the higher threshold is consistent with the initial young being prepared to start the system. An advancement relative to the related literature is that the equilibria feature a non-zero probability of collapse. Finally, we explore the social welfare maximising values for the pension parameters for various levels of uncertainty and risk aversion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6687</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Buffers ; Equilibrium ; Funded pensions ; Intergenerational risk sharing ; Optimal pension scheme ; Parameter uncertainty ; Participation ; Pension buffers ; Pension plans ; Risk ; Risk aversion ; Risk sharing ; Social welfare ; Thresholds ; Uncertainty ; Voluntary participation</subject><ispartof>Insurance, mathematics &amp; economics, 2020-07, Vol.93, p.125-140</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5d99df0f09069857a953941c444a2cffe007349e54ec0d26195b93344af757a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5d99df0f09069857a953941c444a2cffe007349e54ec0d26195b93344af757a23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3886-562X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romp, Ward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beetsma, Roel</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation</title><title>Insurance, mathematics &amp; economics</title><description>Motivated by declining support for mandatory participation in pension arrangements, we explore whether the intergenerational risk-sharing benefits that these arrangements offer suffice to ensure their survival when participation becomes voluntary. Funded systems with asset buffers are particularly interesting since these buffers make contributions more sensitive to financial returns. Equilibria are characterised by thresholds on the young’s willingness to contribute. Standard values for our parameters yield two such equilibria; only the one with the higher threshold is consistent with the initial young being prepared to start the system. An advancement relative to the related literature is that the equilibria feature a non-zero probability of collapse. Finally, we explore the social welfare maximising values for the pension parameters for various levels of uncertainty and risk aversion.</description><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Funded pensions</subject><subject>Intergenerational risk sharing</subject><subject>Optimal pension scheme</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Pension buffers</subject><subject>Pension plans</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Risk sharing</subject><subject>Social welfare</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Voluntary participation</subject><issn>0167-6687</issn><issn>1873-5959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4MoOKffoeC59U2bpM1F0KFTGHhQzyFLE5ayJTVJJ_v2Zkzw6Ok9vM_v_fMgVGCoMGB2N1TWxZ1MG618VUMNFZAKgJ-hGe7apqSc8nM0y2hbMta1l-gqxgEAMGftDN2_TzFJ6-Tabm06FN4Uo3bRelfEQ0x6F4tvmzbF3m8nl2Q4FKMMySo7ypSha3Rh5Dbqm986R5_PTx-Ll3L1tnxdPKxKRRhOJe057w0Y4MB4R1vJacMJVoQQWStjNEDbEK4p0Qr6mmFO17xpcte0ma6bObo9zR2D_5p0TGLwU3B5pagJYTXHHaOZ6k6UCj7GoI0Yg93lowUGcbQlBvFnSxxtCSAi28rRx1NU5y_2VgcRldVO6d4GrZLovf1_yA_QJ3iL</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Romp, Ward</creator><creator>Beetsma, Roel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-562X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation</title><author>Romp, Ward ; Beetsma, Roel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5d99df0f09069857a953941c444a2cffe007349e54ec0d26195b93344af757a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Funded pensions</topic><topic>Intergenerational risk sharing</topic><topic>Optimal pension scheme</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Pension buffers</topic><topic>Pension plans</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Risk sharing</topic><topic>Social welfare</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Voluntary participation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romp, Ward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beetsma, Roel</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Insurance, mathematics &amp; economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romp, Ward</au><au>Beetsma, Roel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation</atitle><jtitle>Insurance, mathematics &amp; economics</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>93</volume><spage>125</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>125-140</pages><issn>0167-6687</issn><eissn>1873-5959</eissn><abstract>Motivated by declining support for mandatory participation in pension arrangements, we explore whether the intergenerational risk-sharing benefits that these arrangements offer suffice to ensure their survival when participation becomes voluntary. Funded systems with asset buffers are particularly interesting since these buffers make contributions more sensitive to financial returns. Equilibria are characterised by thresholds on the young’s willingness to contribute. Standard values for our parameters yield two such equilibria; only the one with the higher threshold is consistent with the initial young being prepared to start the system. An advancement relative to the related literature is that the equilibria feature a non-zero probability of collapse. Finally, we explore the social welfare maximising values for the pension parameters for various levels of uncertainty and risk aversion.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-562X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6687
ispartof Insurance, mathematics & economics, 2020-07, Vol.93, p.125-140
issn 0167-6687
1873-5959
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2446291865
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Buffers
Equilibrium
Funded pensions
Intergenerational risk sharing
Optimal pension scheme
Parameter uncertainty
Participation
Pension buffers
Pension plans
Risk
Risk aversion
Risk sharing
Social welfare
Thresholds
Uncertainty
Voluntary participation
title Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A15%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainability%20of%20pension%20systems%20with%20voluntary%20participation&rft.jtitle=Insurance,%20mathematics%20&%20economics&rft.au=Romp,%20Ward&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=93&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=125-140&rft.issn=0167-6687&rft.eissn=1873-5959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2446291865%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446291865&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167668720300536&rfr_iscdi=true