HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION

Markups vary systematically across firms and are a source of misallocation. This paper develops a tractable model of firm dynamics where firms’ market power is endogenous and the distribution of markups emerges as an equilibrium outcome. Monopoly power is the result of a process of forward-looking,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Econometrica 2020-09, Vol.88 (5), p.2037-2073
1. Verfasser: Peters, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2073
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2037
container_title Econometrica
container_volume 88
creator Peters, Michael
description Markups vary systematically across firms and are a source of misallocation. This paper develops a tractable model of firm dynamics where firms’ market power is endogenous and the distribution of markups emerges as an equilibrium outcome. Monopoly power is the result of a process of forward-looking, risky accumulation: firms invest in productivity growth to increase markups in their existing products but are stochastically replaced by more efficient competitors. Creative destruction therefore has procompetitive effects because faster churn gives firms less time to accumulate market power. In an application to firm-level data from Indonesia, the model predicts that, relative to the United States, misallocation is more severe and firms are substantially smaller. To explain these patterns, the model suggests an important role for frictions that prevent existing firms from entering new markets. Differences in entry costs for new firms are less important.
doi_str_mv 10.3982/ECTA15565
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2446008606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A636496187</galeid><jstor_id>48597210</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A636496187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5269-50e197a7e0710c8a2a72bec245276255783cd56d639b06bd491b4f4a9386e0993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FtLwzAYBuAgCs7phT9AKAiCsOqXNEe8Kl3dhrWVrcPL0HbZ2JjrbDp0_95uFe-EQAJ5vgMvQtcYHjwlyWMYpD5mjLMT1MGUSxcIJ6eoA4CJq7gk5-jC2hUAsOZ00NMwTMNxMgjjMJlOnFd__DJ9m_ScwTh5T4c9x4_7Thj3D-D4P5r4UZQEfjpK4kt0Ns_W1lz93l00fQ7TYOhGyWAU-JFbMMKVy8BgJTJhQGAoZEYyQXJTEMqI4IQxIb1ixviMeyoHns-owjmd00x5khtQyuui27bvtio_d8bWelXuqk0zUhNKOYDkwBt116pFtjZ6uSnKTW2-60W2s1Zrn3ucKo6laOB9C4uqtLYyc72tlh9ZtdcY9CFE_RdiY3Frv5Zrs_8fHl-kCVkc1r1pa1a2Lqu_GiqZEgSD9wO_Z3Nx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446008606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics &amp; Statistics</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Peters, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Peters, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Markups vary systematically across firms and are a source of misallocation. This paper develops a tractable model of firm dynamics where firms’ market power is endogenous and the distribution of markups emerges as an equilibrium outcome. Monopoly power is the result of a process of forward-looking, risky accumulation: firms invest in productivity growth to increase markups in their existing products but are stochastically replaced by more efficient competitors. Creative destruction therefore has procompetitive effects because faster churn gives firms less time to accumulate market power. In an application to firm-level data from Indonesia, the model predicts that, relative to the United States, misallocation is more severe and firms are substantially smaller. To explain these patterns, the model suggests an important role for frictions that prevent existing firms from entering new markets. Differences in entry costs for new firms are less important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3982/ECTA15565</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Evanston: Wiley</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Analysis ; Companies ; Competitors ; Creative destruction ; Endogenous ; firm dynamics ; Markets ; markups ; Monopolies ; New business enterprises ; Power ; Productivity</subject><ispartof>Econometrica, 2020-09, Vol.88 (5), p.2037-2073</ispartof><rights>2020 The Econometric Society</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5269-50e197a7e0710c8a2a72bec245276255783cd56d639b06bd491b4f4a9386e0993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5269-50e197a7e0710c8a2a72bec245276255783cd56d639b06bd491b4f4a9386e0993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48597210$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48597210$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,828,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57995,57999,58228,58232</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peters, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION</title><title>Econometrica</title><description>Markups vary systematically across firms and are a source of misallocation. This paper develops a tractable model of firm dynamics where firms’ market power is endogenous and the distribution of markups emerges as an equilibrium outcome. Monopoly power is the result of a process of forward-looking, risky accumulation: firms invest in productivity growth to increase markups in their existing products but are stochastically replaced by more efficient competitors. Creative destruction therefore has procompetitive effects because faster churn gives firms less time to accumulate market power. In an application to firm-level data from Indonesia, the model predicts that, relative to the United States, misallocation is more severe and firms are substantially smaller. To explain these patterns, the model suggests an important role for frictions that prevent existing firms from entering new markets. Differences in entry costs for new firms are less important.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Competitors</subject><subject>Creative destruction</subject><subject>Endogenous</subject><subject>firm dynamics</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>markups</subject><subject>Monopolies</subject><subject>New business enterprises</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><issn>0012-9682</issn><issn>1468-0262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10FtLwzAYBuAgCs7phT9AKAiCsOqXNEe8Kl3dhrWVrcPL0HbZ2JjrbDp0_95uFe-EQAJ5vgMvQtcYHjwlyWMYpD5mjLMT1MGUSxcIJ6eoA4CJq7gk5-jC2hUAsOZ00NMwTMNxMgjjMJlOnFd__DJ9m_ScwTh5T4c9x4_7Thj3D-D4P5r4UZQEfjpK4kt0Ns_W1lz93l00fQ7TYOhGyWAU-JFbMMKVy8BgJTJhQGAoZEYyQXJTEMqI4IQxIb1ixviMeyoHns-owjmd00x5khtQyuui27bvtio_d8bWelXuqk0zUhNKOYDkwBt116pFtjZ6uSnKTW2-60W2s1Zrn3ucKo6laOB9C4uqtLYyc72tlh9ZtdcY9CFE_RdiY3Frv5Zrs_8fHl-kCVkc1r1pa1a2Lqu_GiqZEgSD9wO_Z3Nx</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Peters, Michael</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION</title><author>Peters, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5269-50e197a7e0710c8a2a72bec245276255783cd56d639b06bd491b4f4a9386e0993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Competitors</topic><topic>Creative destruction</topic><topic>Endogenous</topic><topic>firm dynamics</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>markups</topic><topic>Monopolies</topic><topic>New business enterprises</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peters, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Econometrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peters, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION</atitle><jtitle>Econometrica</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2037</spage><epage>2073</epage><pages>2037-2073</pages><issn>0012-9682</issn><eissn>1468-0262</eissn><abstract>Markups vary systematically across firms and are a source of misallocation. This paper develops a tractable model of firm dynamics where firms’ market power is endogenous and the distribution of markups emerges as an equilibrium outcome. Monopoly power is the result of a process of forward-looking, risky accumulation: firms invest in productivity growth to increase markups in their existing products but are stochastically replaced by more efficient competitors. Creative destruction therefore has procompetitive effects because faster churn gives firms less time to accumulate market power. In an application to firm-level data from Indonesia, the model predicts that, relative to the United States, misallocation is more severe and firms are substantially smaller. To explain these patterns, the model suggests an important role for frictions that prevent existing firms from entering new markets. Differences in entry costs for new firms are less important.</abstract><cop>Evanston</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.3982/ECTA15565</doi><tpages>37</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9682
ispartof Econometrica, 2020-09, Vol.88 (5), p.2037-2073
issn 0012-9682
1468-0262
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2446008606
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Accumulation
Analysis
Companies
Competitors
Creative destruction
Endogenous
firm dynamics
Markets
markups
Monopolies
New business enterprises
Power
Productivity
title HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A36%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HETEROGENEOUS%20MARKUPS,%20GROWTH,%20AND%20ENDOGENOUS%20MISALLOCATION&rft.jtitle=Econometrica&rft.au=Peters,%20Michael&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2037&rft.epage=2073&rft.pages=2037-2073&rft.issn=0012-9682&rft.eissn=1468-0262&rft_id=info:doi/10.3982/ECTA15565&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA636496187%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446008606&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A636496187&rft_jstor_id=48597210&rfr_iscdi=true