HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION
Markups vary systematically across firms and are a source of misallocation. This paper develops a tractable model of firm dynamics where firms’ market power is endogenous and the distribution of markups emerges as an equilibrium outcome. Monopoly power is the result of a process of forward-looking,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Econometrica 2020-09, Vol.88 (5), p.2037-2073 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2073 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2037 |
container_title | Econometrica |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Peters, Michael |
description | Markups vary systematically across firms and are a source of misallocation. This paper develops a tractable model of firm dynamics where firms’ market power is endogenous and the distribution of markups emerges as an equilibrium outcome. Monopoly power is the result of a process of forward-looking, risky accumulation: firms invest in productivity growth to increase markups in their existing products but are stochastically replaced by more efficient competitors. Creative destruction therefore has procompetitive effects because faster churn gives firms less time to accumulate market power. In an application to firm-level data from Indonesia, the model predicts that, relative to the United States, misallocation is more severe and firms are substantially smaller. To explain these patterns, the model suggests an important role for frictions that prevent existing firms from entering new markets. Differences in entry costs for new firms are less important. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3982/ECTA15565 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2446008606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A636496187</galeid><jstor_id>48597210</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A636496187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5269-50e197a7e0710c8a2a72bec245276255783cd56d639b06bd491b4f4a9386e0993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FtLwzAYBuAgCs7phT9AKAiCsOqXNEe8Kl3dhrWVrcPL0HbZ2JjrbDp0_95uFe-EQAJ5vgMvQtcYHjwlyWMYpD5mjLMT1MGUSxcIJ6eoA4CJq7gk5-jC2hUAsOZ00NMwTMNxMgjjMJlOnFd__DJ9m_ScwTh5T4c9x4_7Thj3D-D4P5r4UZQEfjpK4kt0Ns_W1lz93l00fQ7TYOhGyWAU-JFbMMKVy8BgJTJhQGAoZEYyQXJTEMqI4IQxIb1ixviMeyoHns-owjmd00x5khtQyuui27bvtio_d8bWelXuqk0zUhNKOYDkwBt116pFtjZ6uSnKTW2-60W2s1Zrn3ucKo6laOB9C4uqtLYyc72tlh9ZtdcY9CFE_RdiY3Frv5Zrs_8fHl-kCVkc1r1pa1a2Lqu_GiqZEgSD9wO_Z3Nx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446008606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Peters, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Peters, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Markups vary systematically across firms and are a source of misallocation. This paper develops a tractable model of firm dynamics where firms’ market power is endogenous and the distribution of markups emerges as an equilibrium outcome. Monopoly power is the result of a process of forward-looking, risky accumulation: firms invest in productivity growth to increase markups in their existing products but are stochastically replaced by more efficient competitors. Creative destruction therefore has procompetitive effects because faster churn gives firms less time to accumulate market power. In an application to firm-level data from Indonesia, the model predicts that, relative to the United States, misallocation is more severe and firms are substantially smaller. To explain these patterns, the model suggests an important role for frictions that prevent existing firms from entering new markets. Differences in entry costs for new firms are less important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3982/ECTA15565</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Evanston: Wiley</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Analysis ; Companies ; Competitors ; Creative destruction ; Endogenous ; firm dynamics ; Markets ; markups ; Monopolies ; New business enterprises ; Power ; Productivity</subject><ispartof>Econometrica, 2020-09, Vol.88 (5), p.2037-2073</ispartof><rights>2020 The Econometric Society</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5269-50e197a7e0710c8a2a72bec245276255783cd56d639b06bd491b4f4a9386e0993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5269-50e197a7e0710c8a2a72bec245276255783cd56d639b06bd491b4f4a9386e0993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48597210$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48597210$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,828,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57995,57999,58228,58232</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peters, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION</title><title>Econometrica</title><description>Markups vary systematically across firms and are a source of misallocation. This paper develops a tractable model of firm dynamics where firms’ market power is endogenous and the distribution of markups emerges as an equilibrium outcome. Monopoly power is the result of a process of forward-looking, risky accumulation: firms invest in productivity growth to increase markups in their existing products but are stochastically replaced by more efficient competitors. Creative destruction therefore has procompetitive effects because faster churn gives firms less time to accumulate market power. In an application to firm-level data from Indonesia, the model predicts that, relative to the United States, misallocation is more severe and firms are substantially smaller. To explain these patterns, the model suggests an important role for frictions that prevent existing firms from entering new markets. Differences in entry costs for new firms are less important.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Competitors</subject><subject>Creative destruction</subject><subject>Endogenous</subject><subject>firm dynamics</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>markups</subject><subject>Monopolies</subject><subject>New business enterprises</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><issn>0012-9682</issn><issn>1468-0262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10FtLwzAYBuAgCs7phT9AKAiCsOqXNEe8Kl3dhrWVrcPL0HbZ2JjrbDp0_95uFe-EQAJ5vgMvQtcYHjwlyWMYpD5mjLMT1MGUSxcIJ6eoA4CJq7gk5-jC2hUAsOZ00NMwTMNxMgjjMJlOnFd__DJ9m_ScwTh5T4c9x4_7Thj3D-D4P5r4UZQEfjpK4kt0Ns_W1lz93l00fQ7TYOhGyWAU-JFbMMKVy8BgJTJhQGAoZEYyQXJTEMqI4IQxIb1ixviMeyoHns-owjmd00x5khtQyuui27bvtio_d8bWelXuqk0zUhNKOYDkwBt116pFtjZ6uSnKTW2-60W2s1Zrn3ucKo6laOB9C4uqtLYyc72tlh9ZtdcY9CFE_RdiY3Frv5Zrs_8fHl-kCVkc1r1pa1a2Lqu_GiqZEgSD9wO_Z3Nx</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Peters, Michael</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION</title><author>Peters, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5269-50e197a7e0710c8a2a72bec245276255783cd56d639b06bd491b4f4a9386e0993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Competitors</topic><topic>Creative destruction</topic><topic>Endogenous</topic><topic>firm dynamics</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>markups</topic><topic>Monopolies</topic><topic>New business enterprises</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peters, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Econometrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peters, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION</atitle><jtitle>Econometrica</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2037</spage><epage>2073</epage><pages>2037-2073</pages><issn>0012-9682</issn><eissn>1468-0262</eissn><abstract>Markups vary systematically across firms and are a source of misallocation. This paper develops a tractable model of firm dynamics where firms’ market power is endogenous and the distribution of markups emerges as an equilibrium outcome. Monopoly power is the result of a process of forward-looking, risky accumulation: firms invest in productivity growth to increase markups in their existing products but are stochastically replaced by more efficient competitors. Creative destruction therefore has procompetitive effects because faster churn gives firms less time to accumulate market power. In an application to firm-level data from Indonesia, the model predicts that, relative to the United States, misallocation is more severe and firms are substantially smaller. To explain these patterns, the model suggests an important role for frictions that prevent existing firms from entering new markets. Differences in entry costs for new firms are less important.</abstract><cop>Evanston</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.3982/ECTA15565</doi><tpages>37</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9682 |
ispartof | Econometrica, 2020-09, Vol.88 (5), p.2037-2073 |
issn | 0012-9682 1468-0262 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2446008606 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Accumulation Analysis Companies Competitors Creative destruction Endogenous firm dynamics Markets markups Monopolies New business enterprises Power Productivity |
title | HETEROGENEOUS MARKUPS, GROWTH, AND ENDOGENOUS MISALLOCATION |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A36%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HETEROGENEOUS%20MARKUPS,%20GROWTH,%20AND%20ENDOGENOUS%20MISALLOCATION&rft.jtitle=Econometrica&rft.au=Peters,%20Michael&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2037&rft.epage=2073&rft.pages=2037-2073&rft.issn=0012-9682&rft.eissn=1468-0262&rft_id=info:doi/10.3982/ECTA15565&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA636496187%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446008606&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A636496187&rft_jstor_id=48597210&rfr_iscdi=true |