Impacts of Converting Courses to Virtual Instruction Midsemester at a Hispanic-Serving Institution

The sudden transition from in-person to virtual learning during the spring 2020 semester posed challenges for students and faculty alike. This paper explores the techniques used by faculty to transform the chemistry and biochemistry curriculum at a Hispanic-serving institution with a significant pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical education 2020-09, Vol.97 (9), p.2526-2533
Hauptverfasser: Shapiro, Marina, Solano, Danielle M, Bergkamp, Jesse J, Gebauer, Andreas, Gillian, Emma, Lopez, Karlo M, Santoke, Hanoz, Talbert, Lance E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2533
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2526
container_title Journal of chemical education
container_volume 97
creator Shapiro, Marina
Solano, Danielle M
Bergkamp, Jesse J
Gebauer, Andreas
Gillian, Emma
Lopez, Karlo M
Santoke, Hanoz
Talbert, Lance E
description The sudden transition from in-person to virtual learning during the spring 2020 semester posed challenges for students and faculty alike. This paper explores the techniques used by faculty to transform the chemistry and biochemistry curriculum at a Hispanic-serving institution with a significant proportion of first-generation students and the response of students to these changes. Faculty utilized an assortment of techniques, including synchronous lectures by video conference, asynchronous prerecorded lectures, online examinations with varying timing policies, and virtual office hours. A survey was completed by 332 students across 26 different courses taught by 11 faculty regarding their preferences for course delivery format and the academic and nonacademic challenges they faced. A paired samples t-test indicated a statistically significant difference in satisfaction with face-to-face instruction (M = 4.13, SD = 0.765) and satisfaction with virtual instruction (M = 3.57, SD = 0.961), t(440) = 13.30, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d of 0.63, and Cronbach’s α of 0.767. The results indicated a preference for face-to-face instruction. Open-ended survey questions identify that the primary academic challenges faced by students involved technology, understanding material, and difficulty obtaining help, while the primary nonacademic challenges were work issues, focus/motivation, and family issues. These results may inform future practices for virtual instruction.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00788
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2444673771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1273519</ericid><sourcerecordid>2444673771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-1dddeba7b4cf9ce352eff3850939260b53b291317cc2214b475c2b6773fff4eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKu_QISA62nzmmaylKK2UnHhYxuSTKIp7UxNMgX_vRmnunR1A_c759wcAC4xmmBE8FSZOFmbD7u19QQZhHhVHYERFrQqMCXVMRihjBWirNgpOItxjRAmpahGQC-3O2VShK2D87bZ25B8856fXYg2wtTCNx9SpzZw2cQUOpN828BHX8ccFpMNUCWo4MLHnWq8KZ5t2PcGPe1T19Pn4MSpTbQXhzkGr3e3L_NFsXq6X85vVoWiVKQC13VtteKaGSeMpSWxztGqRIIKMkO6pJoITDE3hhDMNOOlIXrGOXXOMavpGFwPvrvQfnb5OLnOv2hypCSMsRmnnONM0YEyoY0xWCd3wW9V-JIYyb5MmcuUhzLlocysuhpUNnjzp7h9wITTMvc8BtNh_yP-jf3P8RsSfoXF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2444673771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of Converting Courses to Virtual Instruction Midsemester at a Hispanic-Serving Institution</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Shapiro, Marina ; Solano, Danielle M ; Bergkamp, Jesse J ; Gebauer, Andreas ; Gillian, Emma ; Lopez, Karlo M ; Santoke, Hanoz ; Talbert, Lance E</creator><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Marina ; Solano, Danielle M ; Bergkamp, Jesse J ; Gebauer, Andreas ; Gillian, Emma ; Lopez, Karlo M ; Santoke, Hanoz ; Talbert, Lance E</creatorcontrib><description>The sudden transition from in-person to virtual learning during the spring 2020 semester posed challenges for students and faculty alike. This paper explores the techniques used by faculty to transform the chemistry and biochemistry curriculum at a Hispanic-serving institution with a significant proportion of first-generation students and the response of students to these changes. Faculty utilized an assortment of techniques, including synchronous lectures by video conference, asynchronous prerecorded lectures, online examinations with varying timing policies, and virtual office hours. A survey was completed by 332 students across 26 different courses taught by 11 faculty regarding their preferences for course delivery format and the academic and nonacademic challenges they faced. A paired samples t-test indicated a statistically significant difference in satisfaction with face-to-face instruction (M = 4.13, SD = 0.765) and satisfaction with virtual instruction (M = 3.57, SD = 0.961), t(440) = 13.30, p &lt; 0.001, Cohen’s d of 0.63, and Cronbach’s α of 0.767. The results indicated a preference for face-to-face instruction. Open-ended survey questions identify that the primary academic challenges faced by students involved technology, understanding material, and difficulty obtaining help, while the primary nonacademic challenges were work issues, focus/motivation, and family issues. These results may inform future practices for virtual instruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Asynchronous Communication ; Barriers ; College Faculty ; College Science ; College Students ; Conventional Instruction ; COVID-19 ; Curricula ; Distance Education ; Distance learning ; Educational Technology ; Electronic Learning ; Elementary school students ; First Generation College Students ; Hispanic American Students ; Hispanic students ; Independent study ; Online Courses ; Online instruction ; Organic Chemistry ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Preferences ; Science Instruction ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Students ; Synchronous Communication ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Telecommunications ; Video conferencing ; Video Technology ; Videoconferencing ; Virtual offices ; Virtual reality</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2020-09, Vol.97 (9), p.2526-2533</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Sep 8, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-1dddeba7b4cf9ce352eff3850939260b53b291317cc2214b475c2b6773fff4eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-1dddeba7b4cf9ce352eff3850939260b53b291317cc2214b475c2b6773fff4eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3443-0255 ; 0000-0002-5152-3931</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00788$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00788$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1273519$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solano, Danielle M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergkamp, Jesse J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebauer, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillian, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Karlo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoke, Hanoz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbert, Lance E</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of Converting Courses to Virtual Instruction Midsemester at a Hispanic-Serving Institution</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>The sudden transition from in-person to virtual learning during the spring 2020 semester posed challenges for students and faculty alike. This paper explores the techniques used by faculty to transform the chemistry and biochemistry curriculum at a Hispanic-serving institution with a significant proportion of first-generation students and the response of students to these changes. Faculty utilized an assortment of techniques, including synchronous lectures by video conference, asynchronous prerecorded lectures, online examinations with varying timing policies, and virtual office hours. A survey was completed by 332 students across 26 different courses taught by 11 faculty regarding their preferences for course delivery format and the academic and nonacademic challenges they faced. A paired samples t-test indicated a statistically significant difference in satisfaction with face-to-face instruction (M = 4.13, SD = 0.765) and satisfaction with virtual instruction (M = 3.57, SD = 0.961), t(440) = 13.30, p &lt; 0.001, Cohen’s d of 0.63, and Cronbach’s α of 0.767. The results indicated a preference for face-to-face instruction. Open-ended survey questions identify that the primary academic challenges faced by students involved technology, understanding material, and difficulty obtaining help, while the primary nonacademic challenges were work issues, focus/motivation, and family issues. These results may inform future practices for virtual instruction.</description><subject>Asynchronous Communication</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Distance Education</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>First Generation College Students</subject><subject>Hispanic American Students</subject><subject>Hispanic students</subject><subject>Independent study</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Organic Chemistry</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Synchronous Communication</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Video conferencing</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Videoconferencing</subject><subject>Virtual offices</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKu_QISA62nzmmaylKK2UnHhYxuSTKIp7UxNMgX_vRmnunR1A_c759wcAC4xmmBE8FSZOFmbD7u19QQZhHhVHYERFrQqMCXVMRihjBWirNgpOItxjRAmpahGQC-3O2VShK2D87bZ25B8856fXYg2wtTCNx9SpzZw2cQUOpN828BHX8ccFpMNUCWo4MLHnWq8KZ5t2PcGPe1T19Pn4MSpTbQXhzkGr3e3L_NFsXq6X85vVoWiVKQC13VtteKaGSeMpSWxztGqRIIKMkO6pJoITDE3hhDMNOOlIXrGOXXOMavpGFwPvrvQfnb5OLnOv2hypCSMsRmnnONM0YEyoY0xWCd3wW9V-JIYyb5MmcuUhzLlocysuhpUNnjzp7h9wITTMvc8BtNh_yP-jf3P8RsSfoXF</recordid><startdate>20200908</startdate><enddate>20200908</enddate><creator>Shapiro, Marina</creator><creator>Solano, Danielle M</creator><creator>Bergkamp, Jesse J</creator><creator>Gebauer, Andreas</creator><creator>Gillian, Emma</creator><creator>Lopez, Karlo M</creator><creator>Santoke, Hanoz</creator><creator>Talbert, Lance E</creator><general>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3443-0255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5152-3931</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200908</creationdate><title>Impacts of Converting Courses to Virtual Instruction Midsemester at a Hispanic-Serving Institution</title><author>Shapiro, Marina ; Solano, Danielle M ; Bergkamp, Jesse J ; Gebauer, Andreas ; Gillian, Emma ; Lopez, Karlo M ; Santoke, Hanoz ; Talbert, Lance E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-1dddeba7b4cf9ce352eff3850939260b53b291317cc2214b475c2b6773fff4eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Asynchronous Communication</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Distance Education</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>First Generation College Students</topic><topic>Hispanic American Students</topic><topic>Hispanic students</topic><topic>Independent study</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Organic Chemistry</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Synchronous Communication</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Video conferencing</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Videoconferencing</topic><topic>Virtual offices</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solano, Danielle M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergkamp, Jesse J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebauer, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillian, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Karlo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoke, Hanoz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbert, Lance E</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shapiro, Marina</au><au>Solano, Danielle M</au><au>Bergkamp, Jesse J</au><au>Gebauer, Andreas</au><au>Gillian, Emma</au><au>Lopez, Karlo M</au><au>Santoke, Hanoz</au><au>Talbert, Lance E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1273519</ericid><atitle>Impacts of Converting Courses to Virtual Instruction Midsemester at a Hispanic-Serving Institution</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2020-09-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2526</spage><epage>2533</epage><pages>2526-2533</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><abstract>The sudden transition from in-person to virtual learning during the spring 2020 semester posed challenges for students and faculty alike. This paper explores the techniques used by faculty to transform the chemistry and biochemistry curriculum at a Hispanic-serving institution with a significant proportion of first-generation students and the response of students to these changes. Faculty utilized an assortment of techniques, including synchronous lectures by video conference, asynchronous prerecorded lectures, online examinations with varying timing policies, and virtual office hours. A survey was completed by 332 students across 26 different courses taught by 11 faculty regarding their preferences for course delivery format and the academic and nonacademic challenges they faced. A paired samples t-test indicated a statistically significant difference in satisfaction with face-to-face instruction (M = 4.13, SD = 0.765) and satisfaction with virtual instruction (M = 3.57, SD = 0.961), t(440) = 13.30, p &lt; 0.001, Cohen’s d of 0.63, and Cronbach’s α of 0.767. The results indicated a preference for face-to-face instruction. Open-ended survey questions identify that the primary academic challenges faced by students involved technology, understanding material, and difficulty obtaining help, while the primary nonacademic challenges were work issues, focus/motivation, and family issues. These results may inform future practices for virtual instruction.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00788</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3443-0255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5152-3931</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9584
ispartof Journal of chemical education, 2020-09, Vol.97 (9), p.2526-2533
issn 0021-9584
1938-1328
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2444673771
source American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Asynchronous Communication
Barriers
College Faculty
College Science
College Students
Conventional Instruction
COVID-19
Curricula
Distance Education
Distance learning
Educational Technology
Electronic Learning
Elementary school students
First Generation College Students
Hispanic American Students
Hispanic students
Independent study
Online Courses
Online instruction
Organic Chemistry
Polls & surveys
Preferences
Science Instruction
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Students
Synchronous Communication
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Telecommunications
Video conferencing
Video Technology
Videoconferencing
Virtual offices
Virtual reality
title Impacts of Converting Courses to Virtual Instruction Midsemester at a Hispanic-Serving Institution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T06%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20Converting%20Courses%20to%20Virtual%20Instruction%20Midsemester%20at%20a%20Hispanic-Serving%20Institution&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Shapiro,%20Marina&rft.date=2020-09-08&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2526&rft.epage=2533&rft.pages=2526-2533&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00788&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2444673771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2444673771&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1273519&rfr_iscdi=true