Attributes-Based Decision Making for Selection of Requirement Elicitation Techniques Using the Analytic Network Process
Requirement engineering is the first phase of software engineering. In requirement engineering, the first phase is requirement elicitation (RE), which is the most critical and error-prone activity. In this phase, the requirements are extracted from various sources; after extraction, they are analyze...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mathematical problems in engineering 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2020 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Mathematical problems in engineering |
container_volume | 2020 |
creator | Haq, Amin Ul Khan, Habib Ullah Nazir, Shah Li, Jun Ullah, Asif Li, Jinyu Ur Rehman, Hanif |
description | Requirement engineering is the first phase of software engineering. In requirement engineering, the first phase is requirement elicitation (RE), which is the most critical and error-prone activity. In this phase, the requirements are extracted from various sources; after extraction, they are analyzed and documented for a specific purpose of software development. In RE, process requirements from stakeholders are gathered, upon which the entire software product failure and success are dependent. In order to accomplish the goal of requirement elicitation, various techniques are used. However, the selection of these techniques is a very challenging task, as one technique may suit a situation but may not be suited for other situations. Besides this, project attributes such as documentation culture of organization, degree of relationship among stakeholders, and familiarity to domain also have a great impact on the process of technique selection. The reason is that there is no empirical value of the techniques that provide help in techniques selection to analyze the basis software project attributes. This study proposed the analytic network process, which is one of the multicriteria decision making processes for the elicitation technique selection process with respect to criterion attributes of project. The motivation toward the use of the ANP approach for the selection of requirement selection technique is that there are dependencies existing among attributes of the project elements. So, the ANP approach is capable of dealing with such situations where dependencies and complexity occur. Results of the proposed study demonstrate that the technique helps in complex situations where decision making is difficult based on the alternatives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2020/2156023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2444286457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2444286457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f1a0274a72a299d4f8ada25d0189bee3904a2cec8658aac6cf7ff46007a6d2443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EtPwzAMB_AKgcQY3DijSByhLEnT13GM8ZDGQ7BJ3CovdVi2rmVJqmnfnpZO4sgpVvyzZf0975zRG8bCcMAppwPOwojy4MDrNUXgh0zEh01NufAZDz6PvRNrl5Q2jCU9bzt0zuh57dD6t2AxJ3cotdVVSZ5hpcsvoipDPrBA6drPSpF33NTa4BpLR8aFltrBb2uKclHqTY2WzGw76RZIhiUUO6cleUG3rcyKvJlKorWn3pGCwuLZ_u17s_vxdPToT14fnkbDiS-DiDpfMaA8FhBz4GmaC5VADjzMKUvSOWKQUgFcokyiMAGQkVSxUiKiNIYo50IEfe-y2_ttqvY0ly2r2jRH2axpC55EIowbdd0paSprDars2-g1mF3GaNZGm7XRZvtoG37V8YUuc9jq__RFp7ExqOBPszSIGQt-AD7pg9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2444286457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attributes-Based Decision Making for Selection of Requirement Elicitation Techniques Using the Analytic Network Process</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Haq, Amin Ul ; Khan, Habib Ullah ; Nazir, Shah ; Li, Jun ; Ullah, Asif ; Li, Jinyu ; Ur Rehman, Hanif</creator><contributor>Celik, Erkan ; Erkan Celik</contributor><creatorcontrib>Haq, Amin Ul ; Khan, Habib Ullah ; Nazir, Shah ; Li, Jun ; Ullah, Asif ; Li, Jinyu ; Ur Rehman, Hanif ; Celik, Erkan ; Erkan Celik</creatorcontrib><description>Requirement engineering is the first phase of software engineering. In requirement engineering, the first phase is requirement elicitation (RE), which is the most critical and error-prone activity. In this phase, the requirements are extracted from various sources; after extraction, they are analyzed and documented for a specific purpose of software development. In RE, process requirements from stakeholders are gathered, upon which the entire software product failure and success are dependent. In order to accomplish the goal of requirement elicitation, various techniques are used. However, the selection of these techniques is a very challenging task, as one technique may suit a situation but may not be suited for other situations. Besides this, project attributes such as documentation culture of organization, degree of relationship among stakeholders, and familiarity to domain also have a great impact on the process of technique selection. The reason is that there is no empirical value of the techniques that provide help in techniques selection to analyze the basis software project attributes. This study proposed the analytic network process, which is one of the multicriteria decision making processes for the elicitation technique selection process with respect to criterion attributes of project. The motivation toward the use of the ANP approach for the selection of requirement selection technique is that there are dependencies existing among attributes of the project elements. So, the ANP approach is capable of dealing with such situations where dependencies and complexity occur. Results of the proposed study demonstrate that the technique helps in complex situations where decision making is difficult based on the alternatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1024-123X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1563-5147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2020/2156023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Complexity ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Empirical analysis ; Engineering ; Engineers ; Multiple criteria decision making ; Multiple criterion ; Software development ; Software engineering ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Mathematical problems in engineering, 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Jinyu Li et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Jinyu Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by Qatar National Library. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f1a0274a72a299d4f8ada25d0189bee3904a2cec8658aac6cf7ff46007a6d2443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f1a0274a72a299d4f8ada25d0189bee3904a2cec8658aac6cf7ff46007a6d2443</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0126-9944 ; 0000-0003-1342-1448 ; 0000-0001-8373-2781 ; 0000-0002-7774-5604</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Celik, Erkan</contributor><contributor>Erkan Celik</contributor><creatorcontrib>Haq, Amin Ul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Habib Ullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazir, Shah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ullah, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ur Rehman, Hanif</creatorcontrib><title>Attributes-Based Decision Making for Selection of Requirement Elicitation Techniques Using the Analytic Network Process</title><title>Mathematical problems in engineering</title><description>Requirement engineering is the first phase of software engineering. In requirement engineering, the first phase is requirement elicitation (RE), which is the most critical and error-prone activity. In this phase, the requirements are extracted from various sources; after extraction, they are analyzed and documented for a specific purpose of software development. In RE, process requirements from stakeholders are gathered, upon which the entire software product failure and success are dependent. In order to accomplish the goal of requirement elicitation, various techniques are used. However, the selection of these techniques is a very challenging task, as one technique may suit a situation but may not be suited for other situations. Besides this, project attributes such as documentation culture of organization, degree of relationship among stakeholders, and familiarity to domain also have a great impact on the process of technique selection. The reason is that there is no empirical value of the techniques that provide help in techniques selection to analyze the basis software project attributes. This study proposed the analytic network process, which is one of the multicriteria decision making processes for the elicitation technique selection process with respect to criterion attributes of project. The motivation toward the use of the ANP approach for the selection of requirement selection technique is that there are dependencies existing among attributes of the project elements. So, the ANP approach is capable of dealing with such situations where dependencies and complexity occur. Results of the proposed study demonstrate that the technique helps in complex situations where decision making is difficult based on the alternatives.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Multiple criteria decision making</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Software development</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>1024-123X</issn><issn>1563-5147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EtPwzAMB_AKgcQY3DijSByhLEnT13GM8ZDGQ7BJ3CovdVi2rmVJqmnfnpZO4sgpVvyzZf0975zRG8bCcMAppwPOwojy4MDrNUXgh0zEh01NufAZDz6PvRNrl5Q2jCU9bzt0zuh57dD6t2AxJ3cotdVVSZ5hpcsvoipDPrBA6drPSpF33NTa4BpLR8aFltrBb2uKclHqTY2WzGw76RZIhiUUO6cleUG3rcyKvJlKorWn3pGCwuLZ_u17s_vxdPToT14fnkbDiS-DiDpfMaA8FhBz4GmaC5VADjzMKUvSOWKQUgFcokyiMAGQkVSxUiKiNIYo50IEfe-y2_ttqvY0ly2r2jRH2axpC55EIowbdd0paSprDars2-g1mF3GaNZGm7XRZvtoG37V8YUuc9jq__RFp7ExqOBPszSIGQt-AD7pg9g</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Haq, Amin Ul</creator><creator>Khan, Habib Ullah</creator><creator>Nazir, Shah</creator><creator>Li, Jun</creator><creator>Ullah, Asif</creator><creator>Li, Jinyu</creator><creator>Ur Rehman, Hanif</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0126-9944</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1342-1448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-2781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7774-5604</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Attributes-Based Decision Making for Selection of Requirement Elicitation Techniques Using the Analytic Network Process</title><author>Haq, Amin Ul ; Khan, Habib Ullah ; Nazir, Shah ; Li, Jun ; Ullah, Asif ; Li, Jinyu ; Ur Rehman, Hanif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f1a0274a72a299d4f8ada25d0189bee3904a2cec8658aac6cf7ff46007a6d2443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Multiple criteria decision making</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Software development</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haq, Amin Ul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Habib Ullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazir, Shah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ullah, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ur Rehman, Hanif</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Mathematical problems in engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haq, Amin Ul</au><au>Khan, Habib Ullah</au><au>Nazir, Shah</au><au>Li, Jun</au><au>Ullah, Asif</au><au>Li, Jinyu</au><au>Ur Rehman, Hanif</au><au>Celik, Erkan</au><au>Erkan Celik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attributes-Based Decision Making for Selection of Requirement Elicitation Techniques Using the Analytic Network Process</atitle><jtitle>Mathematical problems in engineering</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2020</volume><issue>2020</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>1024-123X</issn><eissn>1563-5147</eissn><abstract>Requirement engineering is the first phase of software engineering. In requirement engineering, the first phase is requirement elicitation (RE), which is the most critical and error-prone activity. In this phase, the requirements are extracted from various sources; after extraction, they are analyzed and documented for a specific purpose of software development. In RE, process requirements from stakeholders are gathered, upon which the entire software product failure and success are dependent. In order to accomplish the goal of requirement elicitation, various techniques are used. However, the selection of these techniques is a very challenging task, as one technique may suit a situation but may not be suited for other situations. Besides this, project attributes such as documentation culture of organization, degree of relationship among stakeholders, and familiarity to domain also have a great impact on the process of technique selection. The reason is that there is no empirical value of the techniques that provide help in techniques selection to analyze the basis software project attributes. This study proposed the analytic network process, which is one of the multicriteria decision making processes for the elicitation technique selection process with respect to criterion attributes of project. The motivation toward the use of the ANP approach for the selection of requirement selection technique is that there are dependencies existing among attributes of the project elements. So, the ANP approach is capable of dealing with such situations where dependencies and complexity occur. Results of the proposed study demonstrate that the technique helps in complex situations where decision making is difficult based on the alternatives.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><doi>10.1155/2020/2156023</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0126-9944</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1342-1448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-2781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7774-5604</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1024-123X |
ispartof | Mathematical problems in engineering, 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-13 |
issn | 1024-123X 1563-5147 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2444286457 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Collaboration Complexity Decision analysis Decision making Empirical analysis Engineering Engineers Multiple criteria decision making Multiple criterion Software development Software engineering Stakeholders |
title | Attributes-Based Decision Making for Selection of Requirement Elicitation Techniques Using the Analytic Network Process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T21%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attributes-Based%20Decision%20Making%20for%20Selection%20of%20Requirement%20Elicitation%20Techniques%20Using%20the%20Analytic%20Network%20Process&rft.jtitle=Mathematical%20problems%20in%20engineering&rft.au=Haq,%20Amin%20Ul&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=2020&rft.issue=2020&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=1024-123X&rft.eissn=1563-5147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2020/2156023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2444286457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2444286457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |