Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation
Within agricultural innovation systems (AIS), various stakeholder groups inevitably interpret ‘innovation’ from their own vantage point of privilege and power. In rural developing areas where small-scale and subsistence farming systems support livelihoods, dominant policy actors often focus heavily...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2020-01, Vol.12 (2), p.461 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 461 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Eidt, Colleen M. Pant, Laxmi P. Hickey, Gordon M. |
description | Within agricultural innovation systems (AIS), various stakeholder groups inevitably interpret ‘innovation’ from their own vantage point of privilege and power. In rural developing areas where small-scale and subsistence farming systems support livelihoods, dominant policy actors often focus heavily on participatory modernization and commercialization initiatives to enhance productivity, access, and quality. However, existing social hierarchies may undermine the potential of such initiatives to promote inclusive and sustainable farmer-driven innovation. Focusing on the chronically food insecure smallholder agricultural systems operating in Yatta Sub-county, Eastern Kenya, this paper explores how power dynamics between stakeholders can influence, and can be influenced by, participatory agricultural innovation initiatives. Findings suggest that there are often significant disparities in access to, and control over, platform resources between smallholder farmers and other stakeholder groups, resulting in large asymmetries. We discuss how these power dynamics may increase the risk of agricultural intervention, further marginalizing already disempowered groups and reinforcing power hierarchies to the detriment of smallholders. This study highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the institutional contexts that facilitate and maintain relationships of power within agricultural innovation systems, as well as the complexities associated with promoting transformational agricultural innovation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12020461 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2443208720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2443208720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-dc6750ed1957f8747309bf0c87c0845ac31254570e202551763e4f026086db793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF9LwzAUxYMoOOZe_AQB32TTm6RpWt_G_LPBxMH0uWRp6jK7pCapY9_eugl6X87l8ONc7kHoksANYznchpZQoJCk5AT1KAgyIsDh9N9-jgYhbKAbxkhO0h5aL2oZK-e3Q7yQPhplGhmNs0MsbYkXbqf9HZ66Hb53W2OljQf_2VjnTdzjZZQfeu3qUvuAl2vZaDx-90a1dWy9rPHMWvd1CLxAZ5Wsgx78ah-9PT68Tqaj-cvTbDKejxTNeRyVKhUcdElyLqpMJIJBvqpAZUJBlnCpGKE84QJ09yrnRKRMJxXQFLK0XImc9dHVMbfx7rPVIRYb13rbnSxokjAKmaDQUddHSnkXgtdV0XizlX5fECh-yiz-ymTfqyplnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2443208720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Eidt, Colleen M. ; Pant, Laxmi P. ; Hickey, Gordon M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eidt, Colleen M. ; Pant, Laxmi P. ; Hickey, Gordon M.</creatorcontrib><description>Within agricultural innovation systems (AIS), various stakeholder groups inevitably interpret ‘innovation’ from their own vantage point of privilege and power. In rural developing areas where small-scale and subsistence farming systems support livelihoods, dominant policy actors often focus heavily on participatory modernization and commercialization initiatives to enhance productivity, access, and quality. However, existing social hierarchies may undermine the potential of such initiatives to promote inclusive and sustainable farmer-driven innovation. Focusing on the chronically food insecure smallholder agricultural systems operating in Yatta Sub-county, Eastern Kenya, this paper explores how power dynamics between stakeholders can influence, and can be influenced by, participatory agricultural innovation initiatives. Findings suggest that there are often significant disparities in access to, and control over, platform resources between smallholder farmers and other stakeholder groups, resulting in large asymmetries. We discuss how these power dynamics may increase the risk of agricultural intervention, further marginalizing already disempowered groups and reinforcing power hierarchies to the detriment of smallholders. This study highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the institutional contexts that facilitate and maintain relationships of power within agricultural innovation systems, as well as the complexities associated with promoting transformational agricultural innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12020461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Access control ; Agricultural policy ; Agriculture ; Commercialization ; Empowerment ; Farmers ; Food security ; Hierarchies ; Households ; Innovations ; Modernization ; Participation ; Power ; R&D ; Research & development ; Rural areas ; Small farms ; Social exclusion ; Stakeholders ; Subsistence agriculture ; Sustainable agriculture ; Technology adoption</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-01, Vol.12 (2), p.461</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-dc6750ed1957f8747309bf0c87c0845ac31254570e202551763e4f026086db793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-dc6750ed1957f8747309bf0c87c0845ac31254570e202551763e4f026086db793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eidt, Colleen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pant, Laxmi P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hickey, Gordon M.</creatorcontrib><title>Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Within agricultural innovation systems (AIS), various stakeholder groups inevitably interpret ‘innovation’ from their own vantage point of privilege and power. In rural developing areas where small-scale and subsistence farming systems support livelihoods, dominant policy actors often focus heavily on participatory modernization and commercialization initiatives to enhance productivity, access, and quality. However, existing social hierarchies may undermine the potential of such initiatives to promote inclusive and sustainable farmer-driven innovation. Focusing on the chronically food insecure smallholder agricultural systems operating in Yatta Sub-county, Eastern Kenya, this paper explores how power dynamics between stakeholders can influence, and can be influenced by, participatory agricultural innovation initiatives. Findings suggest that there are often significant disparities in access to, and control over, platform resources between smallholder farmers and other stakeholder groups, resulting in large asymmetries. We discuss how these power dynamics may increase the risk of agricultural intervention, further marginalizing already disempowered groups and reinforcing power hierarchies to the detriment of smallholders. This study highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the institutional contexts that facilitate and maintain relationships of power within agricultural innovation systems, as well as the complexities associated with promoting transformational agricultural innovation.</description><subject>Access control</subject><subject>Agricultural policy</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Small farms</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Subsistence agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF9LwzAUxYMoOOZe_AQB32TTm6RpWt_G_LPBxMH0uWRp6jK7pCapY9_eugl6X87l8ONc7kHoksANYznchpZQoJCk5AT1KAgyIsDh9N9-jgYhbKAbxkhO0h5aL2oZK-e3Q7yQPhplGhmNs0MsbYkXbqf9HZ66Hb53W2OljQf_2VjnTdzjZZQfeu3qUvuAl2vZaDx-90a1dWy9rPHMWvd1CLxAZ5Wsgx78ah-9PT68Tqaj-cvTbDKejxTNeRyVKhUcdElyLqpMJIJBvqpAZUJBlnCpGKE84QJ09yrnRKRMJxXQFLK0XImc9dHVMbfx7rPVIRYb13rbnSxokjAKmaDQUddHSnkXgtdV0XizlX5fECh-yiz-ymTfqyplnQ</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Eidt, Colleen M.</creator><creator>Pant, Laxmi P.</creator><creator>Hickey, Gordon M.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation</title><author>Eidt, Colleen M. ; Pant, Laxmi P. ; Hickey, Gordon M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-dc6750ed1957f8747309bf0c87c0845ac31254570e202551763e4f026086db793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Access control</topic><topic>Agricultural policy</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Small farms</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Subsistence agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eidt, Colleen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pant, Laxmi P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hickey, Gordon M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eidt, Colleen M.</au><au>Pant, Laxmi P.</au><au>Hickey, Gordon M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>461</spage><pages>461-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Within agricultural innovation systems (AIS), various stakeholder groups inevitably interpret ‘innovation’ from their own vantage point of privilege and power. In rural developing areas where small-scale and subsistence farming systems support livelihoods, dominant policy actors often focus heavily on participatory modernization and commercialization initiatives to enhance productivity, access, and quality. However, existing social hierarchies may undermine the potential of such initiatives to promote inclusive and sustainable farmer-driven innovation. Focusing on the chronically food insecure smallholder agricultural systems operating in Yatta Sub-county, Eastern Kenya, this paper explores how power dynamics between stakeholders can influence, and can be influenced by, participatory agricultural innovation initiatives. Findings suggest that there are often significant disparities in access to, and control over, platform resources between smallholder farmers and other stakeholder groups, resulting in large asymmetries. We discuss how these power dynamics may increase the risk of agricultural intervention, further marginalizing already disempowered groups and reinforcing power hierarchies to the detriment of smallholders. This study highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the institutional contexts that facilitate and maintain relationships of power within agricultural innovation systems, as well as the complexities associated with promoting transformational agricultural innovation.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12020461</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2020-01, Vol.12 (2), p.461 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2443208720 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Access control Agricultural policy Agriculture Commercialization Empowerment Farmers Food security Hierarchies Households Innovations Modernization Participation Power R&D Research & development Rural areas Small farms Social exclusion Stakeholders Subsistence agriculture Sustainable agriculture Technology adoption |
title | Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T22%3A59%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Platform,%20Participation,%20and%20Power:%20How%20Dominant%20and%20Minority%20Stakeholders%20Shape%20Agricultural%20Innovation&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Eidt,%20Colleen%20M.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=461&rft.pages=461-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12020461&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2443208720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2443208720&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |