The potential of mini‐ridging for controlling intrarow weeds: estimating minimum lethal burial depth
Weed management using synthetic herbicides is undergoing a global decline, necessitating a re‐evaluation of existing control measures and the development of novel weed management tools. ‘Mini‐ridging’ is a non‐discriminatory, physical weeding method that functions by burying weeds in the intrarow wi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed research 2020-10, Vol.60 (5), p.353-362 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 362 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 353 |
container_title | Weed research |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Merfield, Charles N. Bennett, Jacquelyn R. Berry, Nadine A. Bluon, Arthur O’Connell, Dean M. Hodge, Simon |
description | Weed management using synthetic herbicides is undergoing a global decline, necessitating a re‐evaluation of existing control measures and the development of novel weed management tools. ‘Mini‐ridging’ is a non‐discriminatory, physical weeding method that functions by burying weeds in the intrarow with a laterally shifted ridge of soil. In glasshouse trials using potted plants, we found that plant recovery after soil application was influenced by plant size, which in turn was influenced by plant species, developmental stage and/or age. The likelihood of plant recovery after soil application was negatively related to the depth of soil applied: very few plants survived total coverage by soil but, conversely, survival could be substantial if some parts of the plants were not covered. The results suggest that burial under a depth of 6 cm of soil would eliminate most plants regardless of species or growth stage. Larger plants would require the application of a greater total depth of soil to achieve this 6 cm of soil cover, and weed management would, therefore, tend to be more successful and more practical if weeds were targeted when still small. This research demonstrates the potential of plant burial as a simple and reliable means of non‐chemical weed management, and re‐emphasises that, for weed control to be effective, the applied soil layer must cover the whole plant. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/wre.12441 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2442773467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2442773467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2571-25327ad79950ae7e4c47c5d70fc755349bdf37384bb53b7b8593066f242170163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AaWWLFIa8d2pmGHqvIjVUJCRSyt_NiNqyQOTqKoO47AGTkJDmGLN2Nrvnnj9xC6pmRB_VkOTi1oyDk9QTPKIhEwuiKnaEYIZwEFBufoom0PhJAoiuMZ0rtC4cZ2qu5MUmKrcWVq8_355Uy-N_Uea-twZuvO2bIc38ZfE2cHPCiVt3dYtZ2pkm5sjZNVX-FSdYXXSns3Suaq6YpLdKaTslVXf3WO3h42u_VTsH15fF7fb4MsFECDULAQkhziWJBEgeIZh0zkQHQGQjAep7lmwFY8TQVLIV2JmHkjOuQhBUIjNkc3k27j7Efv_yYPtne1Xyl9KCEA4xF46naiMmfb1iktG-dNuKOkRI4xSh-j_I3Rs8uJHUypjv-D8v11M038ABOAdT8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2442773467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The potential of mini‐ridging for controlling intrarow weeds: estimating minimum lethal burial depth</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Merfield, Charles N. ; Bennett, Jacquelyn R. ; Berry, Nadine A. ; Bluon, Arthur ; O’Connell, Dean M. ; Hodge, Simon</creator><creatorcontrib>Merfield, Charles N. ; Bennett, Jacquelyn R. ; Berry, Nadine A. ; Bluon, Arthur ; O’Connell, Dean M. ; Hodge, Simon</creatorcontrib><description>Weed management using synthetic herbicides is undergoing a global decline, necessitating a re‐evaluation of existing control measures and the development of novel weed management tools. ‘Mini‐ridging’ is a non‐discriminatory, physical weeding method that functions by burying weeds in the intrarow with a laterally shifted ridge of soil. In glasshouse trials using potted plants, we found that plant recovery after soil application was influenced by plant size, which in turn was influenced by plant species, developmental stage and/or age. The likelihood of plant recovery after soil application was negatively related to the depth of soil applied: very few plants survived total coverage by soil but, conversely, survival could be substantial if some parts of the plants were not covered. The results suggest that burial under a depth of 6 cm of soil would eliminate most plants regardless of species or growth stage. Larger plants would require the application of a greater total depth of soil to achieve this 6 cm of soil cover, and weed management would, therefore, tend to be more successful and more practical if weeds were targeted when still small. This research demonstrates the potential of plant burial as a simple and reliable means of non‐chemical weed management, and re‐emphasises that, for weed control to be effective, the applied soil layer must cover the whole plant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3180</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wre.12441</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Coverage ; Developmental stages ; Greenhouses ; Growth stage ; Herbicides ; Management ; Management tools ; mini‐ridger ; organic ; physical weeding ; Plant species ; Recovery ; Ridging ; Soil depth ; Soil layers ; Soils ; weed burial ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed research, 2020-10, Vol.60 (5), p.353-362</ispartof><rights>2020 European Weed Research Society</rights><rights>Weed Research © 2020 European Weed Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2571-25327ad79950ae7e4c47c5d70fc755349bdf37384bb53b7b8593066f242170163</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3210-1386 ; 0000-0002-6871-7337 ; 0000-0003-2866-7213 ; 0000-0001-6933-5253</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fwre.12441$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fwre.12441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merfield, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Jacquelyn R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Nadine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bluon, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, Dean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Simon</creatorcontrib><title>The potential of mini‐ridging for controlling intrarow weeds: estimating minimum lethal burial depth</title><title>Weed research</title><description>Weed management using synthetic herbicides is undergoing a global decline, necessitating a re‐evaluation of existing control measures and the development of novel weed management tools. ‘Mini‐ridging’ is a non‐discriminatory, physical weeding method that functions by burying weeds in the intrarow with a laterally shifted ridge of soil. In glasshouse trials using potted plants, we found that plant recovery after soil application was influenced by plant size, which in turn was influenced by plant species, developmental stage and/or age. The likelihood of plant recovery after soil application was negatively related to the depth of soil applied: very few plants survived total coverage by soil but, conversely, survival could be substantial if some parts of the plants were not covered. The results suggest that burial under a depth of 6 cm of soil would eliminate most plants regardless of species or growth stage. Larger plants would require the application of a greater total depth of soil to achieve this 6 cm of soil cover, and weed management would, therefore, tend to be more successful and more practical if weeds were targeted when still small. This research demonstrates the potential of plant burial as a simple and reliable means of non‐chemical weed management, and re‐emphasises that, for weed control to be effective, the applied soil layer must cover the whole plant.</description><subject>Coverage</subject><subject>Developmental stages</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Growth stage</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management tools</subject><subject>mini‐ridger</subject><subject>organic</subject><subject>physical weeding</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Ridging</subject><subject>Soil depth</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>weed burial</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0043-1737</issn><issn>1365-3180</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AaWWLFIa8d2pmGHqvIjVUJCRSyt_NiNqyQOTqKoO47AGTkJDmGLN2Nrvnnj9xC6pmRB_VkOTi1oyDk9QTPKIhEwuiKnaEYIZwEFBufoom0PhJAoiuMZ0rtC4cZ2qu5MUmKrcWVq8_355Uy-N_Uea-twZuvO2bIc38ZfE2cHPCiVt3dYtZ2pkm5sjZNVX-FSdYXXSns3Suaq6YpLdKaTslVXf3WO3h42u_VTsH15fF7fb4MsFECDULAQkhziWJBEgeIZh0zkQHQGQjAep7lmwFY8TQVLIV2JmHkjOuQhBUIjNkc3k27j7Efv_yYPtne1Xyl9KCEA4xF46naiMmfb1iktG-dNuKOkRI4xSh-j_I3Rs8uJHUypjv-D8v11M038ABOAdT8</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Merfield, Charles N.</creator><creator>Bennett, Jacquelyn R.</creator><creator>Berry, Nadine A.</creator><creator>Bluon, Arthur</creator><creator>O’Connell, Dean M.</creator><creator>Hodge, Simon</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3210-1386</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6871-7337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-7213</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6933-5253</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>The potential of mini‐ridging for controlling intrarow weeds: estimating minimum lethal burial depth</title><author>Merfield, Charles N. ; Bennett, Jacquelyn R. ; Berry, Nadine A. ; Bluon, Arthur ; O’Connell, Dean M. ; Hodge, Simon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2571-25327ad79950ae7e4c47c5d70fc755349bdf37384bb53b7b8593066f242170163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Coverage</topic><topic>Developmental stages</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Growth stage</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management tools</topic><topic>mini‐ridger</topic><topic>organic</topic><topic>physical weeding</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Ridging</topic><topic>Soil depth</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>weed burial</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merfield, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Jacquelyn R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Nadine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bluon, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, Dean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Simon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Weed research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merfield, Charles N.</au><au>Bennett, Jacquelyn R.</au><au>Berry, Nadine A.</au><au>Bluon, Arthur</au><au>O’Connell, Dean M.</au><au>Hodge, Simon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The potential of mini‐ridging for controlling intrarow weeds: estimating minimum lethal burial depth</atitle><jtitle>Weed research</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>353-362</pages><issn>0043-1737</issn><eissn>1365-3180</eissn><abstract>Weed management using synthetic herbicides is undergoing a global decline, necessitating a re‐evaluation of existing control measures and the development of novel weed management tools. ‘Mini‐ridging’ is a non‐discriminatory, physical weeding method that functions by burying weeds in the intrarow with a laterally shifted ridge of soil. In glasshouse trials using potted plants, we found that plant recovery after soil application was influenced by plant size, which in turn was influenced by plant species, developmental stage and/or age. The likelihood of plant recovery after soil application was negatively related to the depth of soil applied: very few plants survived total coverage by soil but, conversely, survival could be substantial if some parts of the plants were not covered. The results suggest that burial under a depth of 6 cm of soil would eliminate most plants regardless of species or growth stage. Larger plants would require the application of a greater total depth of soil to achieve this 6 cm of soil cover, and weed management would, therefore, tend to be more successful and more practical if weeds were targeted when still small. This research demonstrates the potential of plant burial as a simple and reliable means of non‐chemical weed management, and re‐emphasises that, for weed control to be effective, the applied soil layer must cover the whole plant.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/wre.12441</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3210-1386</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6871-7337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-7213</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6933-5253</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1737 |
ispartof | Weed research, 2020-10, Vol.60 (5), p.353-362 |
issn | 0043-1737 1365-3180 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2442773467 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Coverage Developmental stages Greenhouses Growth stage Herbicides Management Management tools mini‐ridger organic physical weeding Plant species Recovery Ridging Soil depth Soil layers Soils weed burial Weed control Weeds |
title | The potential of mini‐ridging for controlling intrarow weeds: estimating minimum lethal burial depth |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T13%3A07%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20potential%20of%20mini%E2%80%90ridging%20for%20controlling%20intrarow%20weeds:%20estimating%20minimum%20lethal%20burial%20depth&rft.jtitle=Weed%20research&rft.au=Merfield,%20Charles%20N.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=353-362&rft.issn=0043-1737&rft.eissn=1365-3180&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wre.12441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2442773467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2442773467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |