Investigation into the antimicrobial activity of fumarate against Listeria monocytogenes and its mode of action under acidic conditions
Organic acids such as fumarate are commonly used as antimicrobials in foods. Apart from the classical mechanism of intracellular dissociation, weak acids are active through important additional mechanisms which are not well-defined. Fumarate, based on its low dissociation constants is expected to ha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of food microbiology 2020-07, Vol.324, p.108614, Article 108614 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 108614 |
container_title | International journal of food microbiology |
container_volume | 324 |
creator | Barnes, Ruth H. Karatzas, Kimon Andreas G. |
description | Organic acids such as fumarate are commonly used as antimicrobials in foods. Apart from the classical mechanism of intracellular dissociation, weak acids are active through important additional mechanisms which are not well-defined. Fumarate, based on its low dissociation constants is expected to have a low antimicrobial activity which is not the case, suggesting additional antimicrobial effects. Previously, fumarate has been shown to inhibit the GAD system of E. coli and therefore, we investigated for first time how it affects this system in Listeria monocytogenes. We found that fumarate is highly antimicrobial towards L. monocytogenes under acidic conditions. We also show that in cell lysates and similarly to E. coli, fumarate inhibits the GAD system of L. monocytogenes. However, despite the inhibition and in contrast to E. coli, L. monocytogenes is able to counteract this and achieve a higher extracellular GAD output (measured by GABA export) in the presence of fumarate compared to its absence. The latter is achieved by a dramatic 9.44-fold increase in the transcription of gadD2 which is the main component of the extracellular GAD system. Interestingly, although maleate, the cis-isomer of fumarate results in a more dramatic 48.5-fold gadD2 upregulation than that of fumarate, the final GADe output is lower suggesting that maleate might be a stronger inhibitor of the GAD system. In contrast, the GADe removes more protons in the presence of fumarate than in the presence of HCl at the same pH. All the above suggest that there are additional effects by fumarate which might be associated with the intracellular GAD system (GADi) or other acid resistance systems. We assessed the GADi output by looking at the intracellular GABA pools which were not affected by fumarate. However, there are multiple pathways (e.g. GABA shunt) that can affect GABAi pools and we cannot conclusively suggest that GADi is affected. Furthermore, similarly to maleate, fumarate is able to eliminate L. monocytogenes in biofilms under acidic conditions. Overall, fumarate is a good candidate for L. monocytogenes decontamination and biofilm removal which is not toxic compared to the toxic maleate.
•Sodium fumarate has a high bactericidal effect on L. monocytogenes at low pH conditions.•Sodium fumarate results in increased GAD activity at low pH.•Sodium fumarate is an inhibitor of the GAD enzyme in L. monocytogenes.•Sodium fumarate and maleic acid upregulate gadD2 expression.•Sodium fumarate r |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108614 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2442616510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168160520301082</els_id><sourcerecordid>2442616510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-1aea1011c8849649ba1fc654c196f1d1de49d899f3bbc3d677d63267006abfba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUctu1DAUtRAVHdr-AjJincGOHSdZohGPSiOxoWvLsa-HG3XsYjsjzRfw2zhMQSxZWFe-Og-dewh5y9mWM67ez1ucfYzuiDbFbcvadT8oLl-QDR_6sRFSsZdkU7FDwxXrrsnrnGfGWCcEe0WuRSt6Xt-G_LwPJ8gFD6ZgDBRDibR8B2pCwd_yE5pHamzBE5YzjZ765WiSKRVyMBhyoXvMBRIaeowh2nOJBwiQq4KjWHLdOlh5q0Z1WIKDVD_o0FIbg8N1nW_JlTePGe6e5w15-PTx2-5Ls__6-X73Yd9Y2anScAOmnoDbYZCjkuNkuLeqk5aPynPHHcjRDePoxTRZ4VTfOyVa1TOmzOQnI27Iu4vuU4o_lppcz3FJoVrqVspWcdVxVlHjBVUPkHMCr58S1thnzZleK9Cz_qcCvVagLxVU7ptnh2U6gvvL_HPzCthdAFBznhCSzhYhWHCYwBbtIv6HzS9C3qDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2442616510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation into the antimicrobial activity of fumarate against Listeria monocytogenes and its mode of action under acidic conditions</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Barnes, Ruth H. ; Karatzas, Kimon Andreas G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Ruth H. ; Karatzas, Kimon Andreas G.</creatorcontrib><description>Organic acids such as fumarate are commonly used as antimicrobials in foods. Apart from the classical mechanism of intracellular dissociation, weak acids are active through important additional mechanisms which are not well-defined. Fumarate, based on its low dissociation constants is expected to have a low antimicrobial activity which is not the case, suggesting additional antimicrobial effects. Previously, fumarate has been shown to inhibit the GAD system of E. coli and therefore, we investigated for first time how it affects this system in Listeria monocytogenes. We found that fumarate is highly antimicrobial towards L. monocytogenes under acidic conditions. We also show that in cell lysates and similarly to E. coli, fumarate inhibits the GAD system of L. monocytogenes. However, despite the inhibition and in contrast to E. coli, L. monocytogenes is able to counteract this and achieve a higher extracellular GAD output (measured by GABA export) in the presence of fumarate compared to its absence. The latter is achieved by a dramatic 9.44-fold increase in the transcription of gadD2 which is the main component of the extracellular GAD system. Interestingly, although maleate, the cis-isomer of fumarate results in a more dramatic 48.5-fold gadD2 upregulation than that of fumarate, the final GADe output is lower suggesting that maleate might be a stronger inhibitor of the GAD system. In contrast, the GADe removes more protons in the presence of fumarate than in the presence of HCl at the same pH. All the above suggest that there are additional effects by fumarate which might be associated with the intracellular GAD system (GADi) or other acid resistance systems. We assessed the GADi output by looking at the intracellular GABA pools which were not affected by fumarate. However, there are multiple pathways (e.g. GABA shunt) that can affect GABAi pools and we cannot conclusively suggest that GADi is affected. Furthermore, similarly to maleate, fumarate is able to eliminate L. monocytogenes in biofilms under acidic conditions. Overall, fumarate is a good candidate for L. monocytogenes decontamination and biofilm removal which is not toxic compared to the toxic maleate.
•Sodium fumarate has a high bactericidal effect on L. monocytogenes at low pH conditions.•Sodium fumarate results in increased GAD activity at low pH.•Sodium fumarate is an inhibitor of the GAD enzyme in L. monocytogenes.•Sodium fumarate and maleic acid upregulate gadD2 expression.•Sodium fumarate removes L. monocytogenes biofilms at low pH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32371237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acid resistance ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Antimicrobial activity ; Antimicrobial agents ; Biofilm ; Biofilms ; Decontamination ; E coli ; Fumaric acid ; GAD ; Glutamate decarboxylase ; Inhibition ; Intracellular ; Listeria ; Listeria monocytogenes ; Lysates ; Mode of action ; Organic acids ; Protons ; Transcription ; γ-Aminobutyric acid</subject><ispartof>International journal of food microbiology, 2020-07, Vol.324, p.108614, Article 108614</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jul 2, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-1aea1011c8849649ba1fc654c196f1d1de49d899f3bbc3d677d63267006abfba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-1aea1011c8849649ba1fc654c196f1d1de49d899f3bbc3d677d63267006abfba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5533-4038</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108614$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32371237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Ruth H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatzas, Kimon Andreas G.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation into the antimicrobial activity of fumarate against Listeria monocytogenes and its mode of action under acidic conditions</title><title>International journal of food microbiology</title><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><description>Organic acids such as fumarate are commonly used as antimicrobials in foods. Apart from the classical mechanism of intracellular dissociation, weak acids are active through important additional mechanisms which are not well-defined. Fumarate, based on its low dissociation constants is expected to have a low antimicrobial activity which is not the case, suggesting additional antimicrobial effects. Previously, fumarate has been shown to inhibit the GAD system of E. coli and therefore, we investigated for first time how it affects this system in Listeria monocytogenes. We found that fumarate is highly antimicrobial towards L. monocytogenes under acidic conditions. We also show that in cell lysates and similarly to E. coli, fumarate inhibits the GAD system of L. monocytogenes. However, despite the inhibition and in contrast to E. coli, L. monocytogenes is able to counteract this and achieve a higher extracellular GAD output (measured by GABA export) in the presence of fumarate compared to its absence. The latter is achieved by a dramatic 9.44-fold increase in the transcription of gadD2 which is the main component of the extracellular GAD system. Interestingly, although maleate, the cis-isomer of fumarate results in a more dramatic 48.5-fold gadD2 upregulation than that of fumarate, the final GADe output is lower suggesting that maleate might be a stronger inhibitor of the GAD system. In contrast, the GADe removes more protons in the presence of fumarate than in the presence of HCl at the same pH. All the above suggest that there are additional effects by fumarate which might be associated with the intracellular GAD system (GADi) or other acid resistance systems. We assessed the GADi output by looking at the intracellular GABA pools which were not affected by fumarate. However, there are multiple pathways (e.g. GABA shunt) that can affect GABAi pools and we cannot conclusively suggest that GADi is affected. Furthermore, similarly to maleate, fumarate is able to eliminate L. monocytogenes in biofilms under acidic conditions. Overall, fumarate is a good candidate for L. monocytogenes decontamination and biofilm removal which is not toxic compared to the toxic maleate.
•Sodium fumarate has a high bactericidal effect on L. monocytogenes at low pH conditions.•Sodium fumarate results in increased GAD activity at low pH.•Sodium fumarate is an inhibitor of the GAD enzyme in L. monocytogenes.•Sodium fumarate and maleic acid upregulate gadD2 expression.•Sodium fumarate removes L. monocytogenes biofilms at low pH.</description><subject>Acid resistance</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Antimicrobial activity</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Fumaric acid</subject><subject>GAD</subject><subject>Glutamate decarboxylase</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Intracellular</subject><subject>Listeria</subject><subject>Listeria monocytogenes</subject><subject>Lysates</subject><subject>Mode of action</subject><subject>Organic acids</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Transcription</subject><subject>γ-Aminobutyric acid</subject><issn>0168-1605</issn><issn>1879-3460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUctu1DAUtRAVHdr-AjJincGOHSdZohGPSiOxoWvLsa-HG3XsYjsjzRfw2zhMQSxZWFe-Og-dewh5y9mWM67ez1ucfYzuiDbFbcvadT8oLl-QDR_6sRFSsZdkU7FDwxXrrsnrnGfGWCcEe0WuRSt6Xt-G_LwPJ8gFD6ZgDBRDibR8B2pCwd_yE5pHamzBE5YzjZ765WiSKRVyMBhyoXvMBRIaeowh2nOJBwiQq4KjWHLdOlh5q0Z1WIKDVD_o0FIbg8N1nW_JlTePGe6e5w15-PTx2-5Ls__6-X73Yd9Y2anScAOmnoDbYZCjkuNkuLeqk5aPynPHHcjRDePoxTRZ4VTfOyVa1TOmzOQnI27Iu4vuU4o_lppcz3FJoVrqVspWcdVxVlHjBVUPkHMCr58S1thnzZleK9Cz_qcCvVagLxVU7ptnh2U6gvvL_HPzCthdAFBznhCSzhYhWHCYwBbtIv6HzS9C3qDQ</recordid><startdate>20200702</startdate><enddate>20200702</enddate><creator>Barnes, Ruth H.</creator><creator>Karatzas, Kimon Andreas G.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5533-4038</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200702</creationdate><title>Investigation into the antimicrobial activity of fumarate against Listeria monocytogenes and its mode of action under acidic conditions</title><author>Barnes, Ruth H. ; Karatzas, Kimon Andreas G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-1aea1011c8849649ba1fc654c196f1d1de49d899f3bbc3d677d63267006abfba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acid resistance</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Antimicrobial activity</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Fumaric acid</topic><topic>GAD</topic><topic>Glutamate decarboxylase</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Intracellular</topic><topic>Listeria</topic><topic>Listeria monocytogenes</topic><topic>Lysates</topic><topic>Mode of action</topic><topic>Organic acids</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Transcription</topic><topic>γ-Aminobutyric acid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Ruth H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatzas, Kimon Andreas G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barnes, Ruth H.</au><au>Karatzas, Kimon Andreas G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation into the antimicrobial activity of fumarate against Listeria monocytogenes and its mode of action under acidic conditions</atitle><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><date>2020-07-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>324</volume><spage>108614</spage><pages>108614-</pages><artnum>108614</artnum><issn>0168-1605</issn><eissn>1879-3460</eissn><abstract>Organic acids such as fumarate are commonly used as antimicrobials in foods. Apart from the classical mechanism of intracellular dissociation, weak acids are active through important additional mechanisms which are not well-defined. Fumarate, based on its low dissociation constants is expected to have a low antimicrobial activity which is not the case, suggesting additional antimicrobial effects. Previously, fumarate has been shown to inhibit the GAD system of E. coli and therefore, we investigated for first time how it affects this system in Listeria monocytogenes. We found that fumarate is highly antimicrobial towards L. monocytogenes under acidic conditions. We also show that in cell lysates and similarly to E. coli, fumarate inhibits the GAD system of L. monocytogenes. However, despite the inhibition and in contrast to E. coli, L. monocytogenes is able to counteract this and achieve a higher extracellular GAD output (measured by GABA export) in the presence of fumarate compared to its absence. The latter is achieved by a dramatic 9.44-fold increase in the transcription of gadD2 which is the main component of the extracellular GAD system. Interestingly, although maleate, the cis-isomer of fumarate results in a more dramatic 48.5-fold gadD2 upregulation than that of fumarate, the final GADe output is lower suggesting that maleate might be a stronger inhibitor of the GAD system. In contrast, the GADe removes more protons in the presence of fumarate than in the presence of HCl at the same pH. All the above suggest that there are additional effects by fumarate which might be associated with the intracellular GAD system (GADi) or other acid resistance systems. We assessed the GADi output by looking at the intracellular GABA pools which were not affected by fumarate. However, there are multiple pathways (e.g. GABA shunt) that can affect GABAi pools and we cannot conclusively suggest that GADi is affected. Furthermore, similarly to maleate, fumarate is able to eliminate L. monocytogenes in biofilms under acidic conditions. Overall, fumarate is a good candidate for L. monocytogenes decontamination and biofilm removal which is not toxic compared to the toxic maleate.
•Sodium fumarate has a high bactericidal effect on L. monocytogenes at low pH conditions.•Sodium fumarate results in increased GAD activity at low pH.•Sodium fumarate is an inhibitor of the GAD enzyme in L. monocytogenes.•Sodium fumarate and maleic acid upregulate gadD2 expression.•Sodium fumarate removes L. monocytogenes biofilms at low pH.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32371237</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108614</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5533-4038</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-1605 |
ispartof | International journal of food microbiology, 2020-07, Vol.324, p.108614, Article 108614 |
issn | 0168-1605 1879-3460 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2442616510 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Acid resistance Antiinfectives and antibacterials Antimicrobial activity Antimicrobial agents Biofilm Biofilms Decontamination E coli Fumaric acid GAD Glutamate decarboxylase Inhibition Intracellular Listeria Listeria monocytogenes Lysates Mode of action Organic acids Protons Transcription γ-Aminobutyric acid |
title | Investigation into the antimicrobial activity of fumarate against Listeria monocytogenes and its mode of action under acidic conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A56%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20into%20the%20antimicrobial%20activity%20of%20fumarate%20against%20Listeria%20monocytogenes%20and%20its%20mode%20of%20action%20under%20acidic%20conditions&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20food%20microbiology&rft.au=Barnes,%20Ruth%20H.&rft.date=2020-07-02&rft.volume=324&rft.spage=108614&rft.pages=108614-&rft.artnum=108614&rft.issn=0168-1605&rft.eissn=1879-3460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108614&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2442616510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2442616510&rft_id=info:pmid/32371237&rft_els_id=S0168160520301082&rfr_iscdi=true |