A Stronger Foundation

Rather than focusing on what science has discovered about how children learn, most teacher training programs encourage their students to develop their own philosophies of teaching (Walsh 2019)-including teaching decoding, where the evidence is overwhelming that the most effective approach is systema...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:YC young children 2020-05, Vol.75 (2), p.80-84
1. Verfasser: Wexler, Natalie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 2
container_start_page 80
container_title YC young children
container_volume 75
creator Wexler, Natalie
description Rather than focusing on what science has discovered about how children learn, most teacher training programs encourage their students to develop their own philosophies of teaching (Walsh 2019)-including teaching decoding, where the evidence is overwhelming that the most effective approach is systematic instruction in phonics (Seidenberg 2017). Information about the learning process that is standard fare in an undergraduate course in cognitive psychology may not show up, or at least not stand out, in a teacher training program (Willingham 2017b). In addition to accepting the idea that the way to boost reading comprehension is to teach "skills," many teachers-like many members of the general public-are firm believers that individuals have different "learning styles." [...]while people may have different learning preferences-and while it makes sense to present the same information in different ways to the whole class-studies have found no evidence for the concept of learning styles (Pashler et al. 2008; Willingham 2018).
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2442115495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2442115495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24421154953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1DUyMDBiAbJNjS10zcwMLTkYuIqLswwMjA0NzIw4GUQdFYJLivLz0lOLFNzyS_NSEksy8_N4GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCreyMTEyNDQ1MTS1Jg4VQBy0CoG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2442115495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Stronger Foundation</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Wexler, Natalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Wexler, Natalie</creatorcontrib><description>Rather than focusing on what science has discovered about how children learn, most teacher training programs encourage their students to develop their own philosophies of teaching (Walsh 2019)-including teaching decoding, where the evidence is overwhelming that the most effective approach is systematic instruction in phonics (Seidenberg 2017). Information about the learning process that is standard fare in an undergraduate course in cognitive psychology may not show up, or at least not stand out, in a teacher training program (Willingham 2017b). In addition to accepting the idea that the way to boost reading comprehension is to teach "skills," many teachers-like many members of the general public-are firm believers that individuals have different "learning styles." [...]while people may have different learning preferences-and while it makes sense to present the same information in different ways to the whole class-studies have found no evidence for the concept of learning styles (Pashler et al. 2008; Willingham 2018).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-6619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children</publisher><subject>Educational Change ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Outcomes of Education ; Preschool Children ; Preservice Teachers ; Reading comprehension ; Reading Tests ; Students ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>YC young children, 2020-05, Vol.75 (2), p.80-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Association for the Education of Young Children May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wexler, Natalie</creatorcontrib><title>A Stronger Foundation</title><title>YC young children</title><description>Rather than focusing on what science has discovered about how children learn, most teacher training programs encourage their students to develop their own philosophies of teaching (Walsh 2019)-including teaching decoding, where the evidence is overwhelming that the most effective approach is systematic instruction in phonics (Seidenberg 2017). Information about the learning process that is standard fare in an undergraduate course in cognitive psychology may not show up, or at least not stand out, in a teacher training program (Willingham 2017b). In addition to accepting the idea that the way to boost reading comprehension is to teach "skills," many teachers-like many members of the general public-are firm believers that individuals have different "learning styles." [...]while people may have different learning preferences-and while it makes sense to present the same information in different ways to the whole class-studies have found no evidence for the concept of learning styles (Pashler et al. 2008; Willingham 2018).</description><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1538-6619</issn><issn>1941-2002</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1DUyMDBiAbJNjS10zcwMLTkYuIqLswwMjA0NzIw4GUQdFYJLivLz0lOLFNzyS_NSEksy8_N4GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCreyMTEyNDQ1MTS1Jg4VQBy0CoG</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Wexler, Natalie</creator><general>National Association for the Education of Young Children</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>A Stronger Foundation</title><author>Wexler, Natalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24421154953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wexler, Natalie</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>YC young children</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wexler, Natalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Stronger Foundation</atitle><jtitle>YC young children</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>80-84</pages><issn>1538-6619</issn><eissn>1941-2002</eissn><abstract>Rather than focusing on what science has discovered about how children learn, most teacher training programs encourage their students to develop their own philosophies of teaching (Walsh 2019)-including teaching decoding, where the evidence is overwhelming that the most effective approach is systematic instruction in phonics (Seidenberg 2017). Information about the learning process that is standard fare in an undergraduate course in cognitive psychology may not show up, or at least not stand out, in a teacher training program (Willingham 2017b). In addition to accepting the idea that the way to boost reading comprehension is to teach "skills," many teachers-like many members of the general public-are firm believers that individuals have different "learning styles." [...]while people may have different learning preferences-and while it makes sense to present the same information in different ways to the whole class-studies have found no evidence for the concept of learning styles (Pashler et al. 2008; Willingham 2018).</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>National Association for the Education of Young Children</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-6619
ispartof YC young children, 2020-05, Vol.75 (2), p.80-84
issn 1538-6619
1941-2002
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2442115495
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Educational Change
Learning
Learning Processes
Outcomes of Education
Preschool Children
Preservice Teachers
Reading comprehension
Reading Tests
Students
Teaching
Teaching Methods
title A Stronger Foundation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A54%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Stronger%20Foundation&rft.jtitle=YC%20young%20children&rft.au=Wexler,%20Natalie&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=80-84&rft.issn=1538-6619&rft.eissn=1941-2002&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2442115495%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2442115495&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true