A Stronger Foundation
Rather than focusing on what science has discovered about how children learn, most teacher training programs encourage their students to develop their own philosophies of teaching (Walsh 2019)-including teaching decoding, where the evidence is overwhelming that the most effective approach is systema...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | YC young children 2020-05, Vol.75 (2), p.80-84 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 84 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | YC young children |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Wexler, Natalie |
description | Rather than focusing on what science has discovered about how children learn, most teacher training programs encourage their students to develop their own philosophies of teaching (Walsh 2019)-including teaching decoding, where the evidence is overwhelming that the most effective approach is systematic instruction in phonics (Seidenberg 2017). Information about the learning process that is standard fare in an undergraduate course in cognitive psychology may not show up, or at least not stand out, in a teacher training program (Willingham 2017b). In addition to accepting the idea that the way to boost reading comprehension is to teach "skills," many teachers-like many members of the general public-are firm believers that individuals have different "learning styles." [...]while people may have different learning preferences-and while it makes sense to present the same information in different ways to the whole class-studies have found no evidence for the concept of learning styles (Pashler et al. 2008; Willingham 2018). |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2442115495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2442115495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24421154953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1DUyMDBiAbJNjS10zcwMLTkYuIqLswwMjA0NzIw4GUQdFYJLivLz0lOLFNzyS_NSEksy8_N4GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCreyMTEyNDQ1MTS1Jg4VQBy0CoG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2442115495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Stronger Foundation</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Wexler, Natalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Wexler, Natalie</creatorcontrib><description>Rather than focusing on what science has discovered about how children learn, most teacher training programs encourage their students to develop their own philosophies of teaching (Walsh 2019)-including teaching decoding, where the evidence is overwhelming that the most effective approach is systematic instruction in phonics (Seidenberg 2017). Information about the learning process that is standard fare in an undergraduate course in cognitive psychology may not show up, or at least not stand out, in a teacher training program (Willingham 2017b). In addition to accepting the idea that the way to boost reading comprehension is to teach "skills," many teachers-like many members of the general public-are firm believers that individuals have different "learning styles." [...]while people may have different learning preferences-and while it makes sense to present the same information in different ways to the whole class-studies have found no evidence for the concept of learning styles (Pashler et al. 2008; Willingham 2018).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-6619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children</publisher><subject>Educational Change ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Outcomes of Education ; Preschool Children ; Preservice Teachers ; Reading comprehension ; Reading Tests ; Students ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>YC young children, 2020-05, Vol.75 (2), p.80-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Association for the Education of Young Children May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wexler, Natalie</creatorcontrib><title>A Stronger Foundation</title><title>YC young children</title><description>Rather than focusing on what science has discovered about how children learn, most teacher training programs encourage their students to develop their own philosophies of teaching (Walsh 2019)-including teaching decoding, where the evidence is overwhelming that the most effective approach is systematic instruction in phonics (Seidenberg 2017). Information about the learning process that is standard fare in an undergraduate course in cognitive psychology may not show up, or at least not stand out, in a teacher training program (Willingham 2017b). In addition to accepting the idea that the way to boost reading comprehension is to teach "skills," many teachers-like many members of the general public-are firm believers that individuals have different "learning styles." [...]while people may have different learning preferences-and while it makes sense to present the same information in different ways to the whole class-studies have found no evidence for the concept of learning styles (Pashler et al. 2008; Willingham 2018).</description><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1538-6619</issn><issn>1941-2002</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1DUyMDBiAbJNjS10zcwMLTkYuIqLswwMjA0NzIw4GUQdFYJLivLz0lOLFNzyS_NSEksy8_N4GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCreyMTEyNDQ1MTS1Jg4VQBy0CoG</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Wexler, Natalie</creator><general>National Association for the Education of Young Children</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>A Stronger Foundation</title><author>Wexler, Natalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24421154953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wexler, Natalie</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>YC young children</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wexler, Natalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Stronger Foundation</atitle><jtitle>YC young children</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>80-84</pages><issn>1538-6619</issn><eissn>1941-2002</eissn><abstract>Rather than focusing on what science has discovered about how children learn, most teacher training programs encourage their students to develop their own philosophies of teaching (Walsh 2019)-including teaching decoding, where the evidence is overwhelming that the most effective approach is systematic instruction in phonics (Seidenberg 2017). Information about the learning process that is standard fare in an undergraduate course in cognitive psychology may not show up, or at least not stand out, in a teacher training program (Willingham 2017b). In addition to accepting the idea that the way to boost reading comprehension is to teach "skills," many teachers-like many members of the general public-are firm believers that individuals have different "learning styles." [...]while people may have different learning preferences-and while it makes sense to present the same information in different ways to the whole class-studies have found no evidence for the concept of learning styles (Pashler et al. 2008; Willingham 2018).</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>National Association for the Education of Young Children</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1538-6619 |
ispartof | YC young children, 2020-05, Vol.75 (2), p.80-84 |
issn | 1538-6619 1941-2002 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2442115495 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Educational Change Learning Learning Processes Outcomes of Education Preschool Children Preservice Teachers Reading comprehension Reading Tests Students Teaching Teaching Methods |
title | A Stronger Foundation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A54%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Stronger%20Foundation&rft.jtitle=YC%20young%20children&rft.au=Wexler,%20Natalie&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=80-84&rft.issn=1538-6619&rft.eissn=1941-2002&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2442115495%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2442115495&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |