Value of Full‐Field Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging for the Histological Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer
Background and Objectives In head and neck surgery, intraoperative and postoperative evaluation of tumor margins is achieved by histopathological assessment, which is a multistep process. Intraoperative analysis of tumor margins to obtain a preliminary diagnosis is usually carried out on frozen sect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lasers in surgery and medicine 2020-10, Vol.52 (8), p.768-778 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 778 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 768 |
container_title | Lasers in surgery and medicine |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | De Leeuw, Frederic Abbaci, Muriel Casiraghi, Odile Ben Lakhdar, Aïcha Alfaro, Alexia Breuskin, Ingrid Laplace‐Builhé, Corinne |
description | Background and Objectives
In head and neck surgery, intraoperative and postoperative evaluation of tumor margins is achieved by histopathological assessment, which is a multistep process. Intraoperative analysis of tumor margins to obtain a preliminary diagnosis is usually carried out on frozen sections. Analysis of frozen sections is challenging due to technical difficulties in processing. Full‐field optical coherence tomography (FFOCT) provides ex vivo images of fresh tissue samples at a microscopic scale without tissue processing. The objectives of our study were to define the diagnostic criteria required to interpret head and neck FFOCT images and to evaluate the reliability of a histological diagnosis made on an “optical biopsy” produced by head and neck FFOCT imaging compared with conventional histology.
Study Design/Materials and Methods
First, we established an atlas of comparative images (FFOCT/standard histology) and defined the diagnostic criteria based on FFOCT images. Two pathologists subsequently performed a blinded review on 57 FFOCT images (32 patients). Specificity and sensitivity were measured by comparison with the standard histological diagnosis. The primary endpoint was major concordance, defined as two classifications leading to the same therapeutic decision (treatment/no treatment).
Results
Pathologists identified four main criteria for tissue diagnosis on FFOCT images: heterogeneous cell distribution, stromal reaction, coiling, and keratinization abnormalities. The correlation study showed good results, with sensitivity from 88% to 90% and specificity from 81% to 87%, regardless of whether the FFOCT image review was performed by a pathologist with or without previous experience in optical imaging.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that FFOCT images can be used by pathologists for differential diagnosis, and that high‐resolution FFOCT imaging can provide an assessment of microscopic architecture in head and neck tissues without tissue processing requirements. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lsm.23223 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440878559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2440878559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-11e5506ac7993e09349e18f7433c5c96c2e59451fb2cee7697e96197f159ba733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EoqUw8ALIEhNDW1_ipB6ritJKhQ4U1sh1TtIUJy52ItSNR-AZeRLSC2xM_xm-852jH6FrSnqUENY3vugxzhg_QW1KZNiVlNBT1Ca0mQdEsha68H5NCOGMROeotQsWCtFG7lWZGrBN8bg25vvza5yDSfB8U-VaGTyyK3BQasALW9jMqc1qi6eFyvIyw6l1uFoBnuS-ssZm-42h9-B9AWW1k05AJViVCX4C_YZHqjG5S3SWKuPh6pgd9DK-X4wm3dn8YToazrq6eY93KQUhSKh0JCUHInkggQ7SKOBcCy1DzUDIQNB0yTRAFMoIZEhllFIhlyrivINuD96Ns-81-Cpe29qVzcmYBQEZRAMhZEPdHSjtrPcO0njj8kK5bUxJvGs3btqN9-027M3RWC8LSP7I3zoboH8APnID2_9N8ez58aD8AaZpg24</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440878559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value of Full‐Field Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging for the Histological Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>De Leeuw, Frederic ; Abbaci, Muriel ; Casiraghi, Odile ; Ben Lakhdar, Aïcha ; Alfaro, Alexia ; Breuskin, Ingrid ; Laplace‐Builhé, Corinne</creator><creatorcontrib>De Leeuw, Frederic ; Abbaci, Muriel ; Casiraghi, Odile ; Ben Lakhdar, Aïcha ; Alfaro, Alexia ; Breuskin, Ingrid ; Laplace‐Builhé, Corinne</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives
In head and neck surgery, intraoperative and postoperative evaluation of tumor margins is achieved by histopathological assessment, which is a multistep process. Intraoperative analysis of tumor margins to obtain a preliminary diagnosis is usually carried out on frozen sections. Analysis of frozen sections is challenging due to technical difficulties in processing. Full‐field optical coherence tomography (FFOCT) provides ex vivo images of fresh tissue samples at a microscopic scale without tissue processing. The objectives of our study were to define the diagnostic criteria required to interpret head and neck FFOCT images and to evaluate the reliability of a histological diagnosis made on an “optical biopsy” produced by head and neck FFOCT imaging compared with conventional histology.
Study Design/Materials and Methods
First, we established an atlas of comparative images (FFOCT/standard histology) and defined the diagnostic criteria based on FFOCT images. Two pathologists subsequently performed a blinded review on 57 FFOCT images (32 patients). Specificity and sensitivity were measured by comparison with the standard histological diagnosis. The primary endpoint was major concordance, defined as two classifications leading to the same therapeutic decision (treatment/no treatment).
Results
Pathologists identified four main criteria for tissue diagnosis on FFOCT images: heterogeneous cell distribution, stromal reaction, coiling, and keratinization abnormalities. The correlation study showed good results, with sensitivity from 88% to 90% and specificity from 81% to 87%, regardless of whether the FFOCT image review was performed by a pathologist with or without previous experience in optical imaging.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that FFOCT images can be used by pathologists for differential diagnosis, and that high‐resolution FFOCT imaging can provide an assessment of microscopic architecture in head and neck tissues without tissue processing requirements. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23223</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32072655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Biopsy ; Coiling ; Correlation analysis ; Criteria ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Differential diagnosis ; Evaluation ; full‐field optical coherence tomography ; Head & neck cancer ; head and neck cancer ; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma ; Histology ; Keratinization ; Lasers ; Medical imaging ; optical biopsy ; Optical Coherence Tomography ; pathology ; Reliability analysis ; Sensitivity ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Surgery ; Tissues ; Tomography ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2020-10, Vol.52 (8), p.768-778</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-11e5506ac7993e09349e18f7433c5c96c2e59451fb2cee7697e96197f159ba733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-11e5506ac7993e09349e18f7433c5c96c2e59451fb2cee7697e96197f159ba733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8408-8868</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flsm.23223$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flsm.23223$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32072655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Leeuw, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaci, Muriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casiraghi, Odile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Lakhdar, Aïcha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfaro, Alexia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuskin, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laplace‐Builhé, Corinne</creatorcontrib><title>Value of Full‐Field Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging for the Histological Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer</title><title>Lasers in surgery and medicine</title><addtitle>Lasers Surg Med</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives
In head and neck surgery, intraoperative and postoperative evaluation of tumor margins is achieved by histopathological assessment, which is a multistep process. Intraoperative analysis of tumor margins to obtain a preliminary diagnosis is usually carried out on frozen sections. Analysis of frozen sections is challenging due to technical difficulties in processing. Full‐field optical coherence tomography (FFOCT) provides ex vivo images of fresh tissue samples at a microscopic scale without tissue processing. The objectives of our study were to define the diagnostic criteria required to interpret head and neck FFOCT images and to evaluate the reliability of a histological diagnosis made on an “optical biopsy” produced by head and neck FFOCT imaging compared with conventional histology.
Study Design/Materials and Methods
First, we established an atlas of comparative images (FFOCT/standard histology) and defined the diagnostic criteria based on FFOCT images. Two pathologists subsequently performed a blinded review on 57 FFOCT images (32 patients). Specificity and sensitivity were measured by comparison with the standard histological diagnosis. The primary endpoint was major concordance, defined as two classifications leading to the same therapeutic decision (treatment/no treatment).
Results
Pathologists identified four main criteria for tissue diagnosis on FFOCT images: heterogeneous cell distribution, stromal reaction, coiling, and keratinization abnormalities. The correlation study showed good results, with sensitivity from 88% to 90% and specificity from 81% to 87%, regardless of whether the FFOCT image review was performed by a pathologist with or without previous experience in optical imaging.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that FFOCT images can be used by pathologists for differential diagnosis, and that high‐resolution FFOCT imaging can provide an assessment of microscopic architecture in head and neck tissues without tissue processing requirements. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Coiling</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Differential diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>full‐field optical coherence tomography</subject><subject>Head & neck cancer</subject><subject>head and neck cancer</subject><subject>head and neck squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Keratinization</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>optical biopsy</subject><subject>Optical Coherence Tomography</subject><subject>pathology</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0196-8092</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EoqUw8ALIEhNDW1_ipB6ritJKhQ4U1sh1TtIUJy52ItSNR-AZeRLSC2xM_xm-852jH6FrSnqUENY3vugxzhg_QW1KZNiVlNBT1Ca0mQdEsha68H5NCOGMROeotQsWCtFG7lWZGrBN8bg25vvza5yDSfB8U-VaGTyyK3BQasALW9jMqc1qi6eFyvIyw6l1uFoBnuS-ssZm-42h9-B9AWW1k05AJViVCX4C_YZHqjG5S3SWKuPh6pgd9DK-X4wm3dn8YToazrq6eY93KQUhSKh0JCUHInkggQ7SKOBcCy1DzUDIQNB0yTRAFMoIZEhllFIhlyrivINuD96Ns-81-Cpe29qVzcmYBQEZRAMhZEPdHSjtrPcO0njj8kK5bUxJvGs3btqN9-027M3RWC8LSP7I3zoboH8APnID2_9N8ez58aD8AaZpg24</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>De Leeuw, Frederic</creator><creator>Abbaci, Muriel</creator><creator>Casiraghi, Odile</creator><creator>Ben Lakhdar, Aïcha</creator><creator>Alfaro, Alexia</creator><creator>Breuskin, Ingrid</creator><creator>Laplace‐Builhé, Corinne</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8408-8868</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Value of Full‐Field Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging for the Histological Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer</title><author>De Leeuw, Frederic ; Abbaci, Muriel ; Casiraghi, Odile ; Ben Lakhdar, Aïcha ; Alfaro, Alexia ; Breuskin, Ingrid ; Laplace‐Builhé, Corinne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-11e5506ac7993e09349e18f7433c5c96c2e59451fb2cee7697e96197f159ba733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Coiling</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Differential diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>full‐field optical coherence tomography</topic><topic>Head & neck cancer</topic><topic>head and neck cancer</topic><topic>head and neck squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Keratinization</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>optical biopsy</topic><topic>Optical Coherence Tomography</topic><topic>pathology</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Leeuw, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaci, Muriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casiraghi, Odile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Lakhdar, Aïcha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfaro, Alexia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuskin, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laplace‐Builhé, Corinne</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Leeuw, Frederic</au><au>Abbaci, Muriel</au><au>Casiraghi, Odile</au><au>Ben Lakhdar, Aïcha</au><au>Alfaro, Alexia</au><au>Breuskin, Ingrid</au><au>Laplace‐Builhé, Corinne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value of Full‐Field Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging for the Histological Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Lasers Surg Med</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>768</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>768-778</pages><issn>0196-8092</issn><eissn>1096-9101</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives
In head and neck surgery, intraoperative and postoperative evaluation of tumor margins is achieved by histopathological assessment, which is a multistep process. Intraoperative analysis of tumor margins to obtain a preliminary diagnosis is usually carried out on frozen sections. Analysis of frozen sections is challenging due to technical difficulties in processing. Full‐field optical coherence tomography (FFOCT) provides ex vivo images of fresh tissue samples at a microscopic scale without tissue processing. The objectives of our study were to define the diagnostic criteria required to interpret head and neck FFOCT images and to evaluate the reliability of a histological diagnosis made on an “optical biopsy” produced by head and neck FFOCT imaging compared with conventional histology.
Study Design/Materials and Methods
First, we established an atlas of comparative images (FFOCT/standard histology) and defined the diagnostic criteria based on FFOCT images. Two pathologists subsequently performed a blinded review on 57 FFOCT images (32 patients). Specificity and sensitivity were measured by comparison with the standard histological diagnosis. The primary endpoint was major concordance, defined as two classifications leading to the same therapeutic decision (treatment/no treatment).
Results
Pathologists identified four main criteria for tissue diagnosis on FFOCT images: heterogeneous cell distribution, stromal reaction, coiling, and keratinization abnormalities. The correlation study showed good results, with sensitivity from 88% to 90% and specificity from 81% to 87%, regardless of whether the FFOCT image review was performed by a pathologist with or without previous experience in optical imaging.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that FFOCT images can be used by pathologists for differential diagnosis, and that high‐resolution FFOCT imaging can provide an assessment of microscopic architecture in head and neck tissues without tissue processing requirements. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32072655</pmid><doi>10.1002/lsm.23223</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8408-8868</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-8092 |
ispartof | Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2020-10, Vol.52 (8), p.768-778 |
issn | 0196-8092 1096-9101 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2440878559 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Abnormalities Biopsy Coiling Correlation analysis Criteria Diagnosis Diagnostic systems Differential diagnosis Evaluation full‐field optical coherence tomography Head & neck cancer head and neck cancer head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Histology Keratinization Lasers Medical imaging optical biopsy Optical Coherence Tomography pathology Reliability analysis Sensitivity Squamous cell carcinoma Surgery Tissues Tomography Tumors |
title | Value of Full‐Field Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging for the Histological Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T14%3A18%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20of%20Full%E2%80%90Field%20Optical%20Coherence%20Tomography%20Imaging%20for%20the%20Histological%20Assessment%20of%20Head%20and%20Neck%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20surgery%20and%20medicine&rft.au=De%20Leeuw,%20Frederic&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=768&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=768-778&rft.issn=0196-8092&rft.eissn=1096-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lsm.23223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440878559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440878559&rft_id=info:pmid/32072655&rfr_iscdi=true |