The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy
•Flexible work challenges location theory-based conceptualizations of urban form.•Increased mobility is also observed in mobile service professions like childcare.•Work places are better understood as trajectories rather than fixed locations.•Gendered labour market segmentation affects experiences o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geoforum 2020-05, Vol.111, p.155-164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 164 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | Geoforum |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Stevens, Lukas Shearmur, Richard G. |
description | •Flexible work challenges location theory-based conceptualizations of urban form.•Increased mobility is also observed in mobile service professions like childcare.•Work places are better understood as trajectories rather than fixed locations.•Gendered labour market segmentation affects experiences of urban form.
In this paper we conceptualise the growing challenge faced by economic geographers and urban planners as they explore where economic activity actually occurs – where it is located – within cities. We suggest that economic activity relates to urban space by way of trajectories (punctuated by specific places) rather than by way of location. Such an approach offers a comprehensive understanding not only of the economic but also of the social realities of urban labour practices in the 21st century and the complex interplay between locations of work and leisure. As illustration, we present exploratory results that examine the work geography of some Montreal childcare workers. Whilst their work trajectories seem to have become more complex with the advent of mobile communication technology, child-caring has always required mobility and has never occurred in a single location: the convention that economic activity takes place at particular locations, although increasingly divorced from actual practice, has only ever described certain types of economic activity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440684614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718520300464</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440684614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-e9a17a53a0a49b641addeb443d85fed586499051303d1363db680fdb0d4975da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtO7DAMhiMEEsPlFVAktrQ4TXpbAUKHi4TEAlhHaeMOKdOmJC1ozhPw2KQqrNkkC3_-bX-EnDCIGbDsvI3XaBvrpi5OIIEYkhgY7JAVK_IkKnlZ7JIVBDLKWZHukwPvWwDIeVGuyNfzK1LsNbUN3dhajcb2dHxF67YX9Ml2SE03bMxS8DPVmdrZ6NO6tzM6v3R0qsV6tM6gpypErc06WkphK1rbvsZhnNTG_Df9eg6nk6tUT_2g6jA8ALbbHpG9Rm08Hv_8h-Tl5t_z9V308Hh7f331ENVcwBhhqViuUq5AibLKBFNaYyUE10XaoE6LTJQlpIwD14xnXFdZAY2uQIsyT7Xih-R0yR2cfZ_Qj7K1k-vDSJkIAVkhMiYClS1UuNV7h40cnOmU20oGcrYuW_lrXc7WJSQyWA-Nl0sjhhs-DDrpa4PBgDYuSJLamr8ivgEoTJEC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440684614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Stevens, Lukas ; Shearmur, Richard G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lukas ; Shearmur, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><description>•Flexible work challenges location theory-based conceptualizations of urban form.•Increased mobility is also observed in mobile service professions like childcare.•Work places are better understood as trajectories rather than fixed locations.•Gendered labour market segmentation affects experiences of urban form.
In this paper we conceptualise the growing challenge faced by economic geographers and urban planners as they explore where economic activity actually occurs – where it is located – within cities. We suggest that economic activity relates to urban space by way of trajectories (punctuated by specific places) rather than by way of location. Such an approach offers a comprehensive understanding not only of the economic but also of the social realities of urban labour practices in the 21st century and the complex interplay between locations of work and leisure. As illustration, we present exploratory results that examine the work geography of some Montreal childcare workers. Whilst their work trajectories seem to have become more complex with the advent of mobile communication technology, child-caring has always required mobility and has never occurred in a single location: the convention that economic activity takes place at particular locations, although increasingly divorced from actual practice, has only ever described certain types of economic activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>21st century ; Child care ; Communications technology ; Concept formation ; Contingent labour ; Economic activity ; Economic conditions ; Economics ; Geographers ; Geography ; Leisure ; Mobile communication systems ; Mobility ; Mobility studies ; Precarious labour ; Urban areas ; Urban space economy ; Urban studies ; Work ; Workplace mobility</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2020-05, Vol.111, p.155-164</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-e9a17a53a0a49b641addeb443d85fed586499051303d1363db680fdb0d4975da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-e9a17a53a0a49b641addeb443d85fed586499051303d1363db680fdb0d4975da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearmur, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><title>The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>•Flexible work challenges location theory-based conceptualizations of urban form.•Increased mobility is also observed in mobile service professions like childcare.•Work places are better understood as trajectories rather than fixed locations.•Gendered labour market segmentation affects experiences of urban form.
In this paper we conceptualise the growing challenge faced by economic geographers and urban planners as they explore where economic activity actually occurs – where it is located – within cities. We suggest that economic activity relates to urban space by way of trajectories (punctuated by specific places) rather than by way of location. Such an approach offers a comprehensive understanding not only of the economic but also of the social realities of urban labour practices in the 21st century and the complex interplay between locations of work and leisure. As illustration, we present exploratory results that examine the work geography of some Montreal childcare workers. Whilst their work trajectories seem to have become more complex with the advent of mobile communication technology, child-caring has always required mobility and has never occurred in a single location: the convention that economic activity takes place at particular locations, although increasingly divorced from actual practice, has only ever described certain types of economic activity.</description><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Concept formation</subject><subject>Contingent labour</subject><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Geographers</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Leisure</subject><subject>Mobile communication systems</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Mobility studies</subject><subject>Precarious labour</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban space economy</subject><subject>Urban studies</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Workplace mobility</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtO7DAMhiMEEsPlFVAktrQ4TXpbAUKHi4TEAlhHaeMOKdOmJC1ozhPw2KQqrNkkC3_-bX-EnDCIGbDsvI3XaBvrpi5OIIEYkhgY7JAVK_IkKnlZ7JIVBDLKWZHukwPvWwDIeVGuyNfzK1LsNbUN3dhajcb2dHxF67YX9Ml2SE03bMxS8DPVmdrZ6NO6tzM6v3R0qsV6tM6gpypErc06WkphK1rbvsZhnNTG_Df9eg6nk6tUT_2g6jA8ALbbHpG9Rm08Hv_8h-Tl5t_z9V308Hh7f331ENVcwBhhqViuUq5AibLKBFNaYyUE10XaoE6LTJQlpIwD14xnXFdZAY2uQIsyT7Xih-R0yR2cfZ_Qj7K1k-vDSJkIAVkhMiYClS1UuNV7h40cnOmU20oGcrYuW_lrXc7WJSQyWA-Nl0sjhhs-DDrpa4PBgDYuSJLamr8ivgEoTJEC</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Stevens, Lukas</creator><creator>Shearmur, Richard G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy</title><author>Stevens, Lukas ; Shearmur, Richard G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-e9a17a53a0a49b641addeb443d85fed586499051303d1363db680fdb0d4975da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Concept formation</topic><topic>Contingent labour</topic><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Geographers</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Leisure</topic><topic>Mobile communication systems</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Mobility studies</topic><topic>Precarious labour</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban space economy</topic><topic>Urban studies</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Workplace mobility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearmur, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevens, Lukas</au><au>Shearmur, Richard G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>155</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>155-164</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><abstract>•Flexible work challenges location theory-based conceptualizations of urban form.•Increased mobility is also observed in mobile service professions like childcare.•Work places are better understood as trajectories rather than fixed locations.•Gendered labour market segmentation affects experiences of urban form.
In this paper we conceptualise the growing challenge faced by economic geographers and urban planners as they explore where economic activity actually occurs – where it is located – within cities. We suggest that economic activity relates to urban space by way of trajectories (punctuated by specific places) rather than by way of location. Such an approach offers a comprehensive understanding not only of the economic but also of the social realities of urban labour practices in the 21st century and the complex interplay between locations of work and leisure. As illustration, we present exploratory results that examine the work geography of some Montreal childcare workers. Whilst their work trajectories seem to have become more complex with the advent of mobile communication technology, child-caring has always required mobility and has never occurred in a single location: the convention that economic activity takes place at particular locations, although increasingly divorced from actual practice, has only ever described certain types of economic activity.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.010</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-7185 |
ispartof | Geoforum, 2020-05, Vol.111, p.155-164 |
issn | 0016-7185 1872-9398 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2440684614 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 21st century Child care Communications technology Concept formation Contingent labour Economic activity Economic conditions Economics Geographers Geography Leisure Mobile communication systems Mobility Mobility studies Precarious labour Urban areas Urban space economy Urban studies Work Workplace mobility |
title | The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T16%3A12%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20end%20of%20location%20theory?%20Some%20implications%20of%20micro-work,%20work%20trajectories%20and%20gig-%20work%20for%20conceptualizing%20the%20urban%20space%20economy&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Stevens,%20Lukas&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=155-164&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440684614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440684614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016718520300464&rfr_iscdi=true |