The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy

•Flexible work challenges location theory-based conceptualizations of urban form.•Increased mobility is also observed in mobile service professions like childcare.•Work places are better understood as trajectories rather than fixed locations.•Gendered labour market segmentation affects experiences o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geoforum 2020-05, Vol.111, p.155-164
Hauptverfasser: Stevens, Lukas, Shearmur, Richard G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue
container_start_page 155
container_title Geoforum
container_volume 111
creator Stevens, Lukas
Shearmur, Richard G.
description •Flexible work challenges location theory-based conceptualizations of urban form.•Increased mobility is also observed in mobile service professions like childcare.•Work places are better understood as trajectories rather than fixed locations.•Gendered labour market segmentation affects experiences of urban form. In this paper we conceptualise the growing challenge faced by economic geographers and urban planners as they explore where economic activity actually occurs – where it is located – within cities. We suggest that economic activity relates to urban space by way of trajectories (punctuated by specific places) rather than by way of location. Such an approach offers a comprehensive understanding not only of the economic but also of the social realities of urban labour practices in the 21st century and the complex interplay between locations of work and leisure. As illustration, we present exploratory results that examine the work geography of some Montreal childcare workers. Whilst their work trajectories seem to have become more complex with the advent of mobile communication technology, child-caring has always required mobility and has never occurred in a single location: the convention that economic activity takes place at particular locations, although increasingly divorced from actual practice, has only ever described certain types of economic activity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440684614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718520300464</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440684614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-e9a17a53a0a49b641addeb443d85fed586499051303d1363db680fdb0d4975da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtO7DAMhiMEEsPlFVAktrQ4TXpbAUKHi4TEAlhHaeMOKdOmJC1ozhPw2KQqrNkkC3_-bX-EnDCIGbDsvI3XaBvrpi5OIIEYkhgY7JAVK_IkKnlZ7JIVBDLKWZHukwPvWwDIeVGuyNfzK1LsNbUN3dhajcb2dHxF67YX9Ml2SE03bMxS8DPVmdrZ6NO6tzM6v3R0qsV6tM6gpypErc06WkphK1rbvsZhnNTG_Df9eg6nk6tUT_2g6jA8ALbbHpG9Rm08Hv_8h-Tl5t_z9V308Hh7f331ENVcwBhhqViuUq5AibLKBFNaYyUE10XaoE6LTJQlpIwD14xnXFdZAY2uQIsyT7Xih-R0yR2cfZ_Qj7K1k-vDSJkIAVkhMiYClS1UuNV7h40cnOmU20oGcrYuW_lrXc7WJSQyWA-Nl0sjhhs-DDrpa4PBgDYuSJLamr8ivgEoTJEC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440684614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Stevens, Lukas ; Shearmur, Richard G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lukas ; Shearmur, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><description>•Flexible work challenges location theory-based conceptualizations of urban form.•Increased mobility is also observed in mobile service professions like childcare.•Work places are better understood as trajectories rather than fixed locations.•Gendered labour market segmentation affects experiences of urban form. In this paper we conceptualise the growing challenge faced by economic geographers and urban planners as they explore where economic activity actually occurs – where it is located – within cities. We suggest that economic activity relates to urban space by way of trajectories (punctuated by specific places) rather than by way of location. Such an approach offers a comprehensive understanding not only of the economic but also of the social realities of urban labour practices in the 21st century and the complex interplay between locations of work and leisure. As illustration, we present exploratory results that examine the work geography of some Montreal childcare workers. Whilst their work trajectories seem to have become more complex with the advent of mobile communication technology, child-caring has always required mobility and has never occurred in a single location: the convention that economic activity takes place at particular locations, although increasingly divorced from actual practice, has only ever described certain types of economic activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>21st century ; Child care ; Communications technology ; Concept formation ; Contingent labour ; Economic activity ; Economic conditions ; Economics ; Geographers ; Geography ; Leisure ; Mobile communication systems ; Mobility ; Mobility studies ; Precarious labour ; Urban areas ; Urban space economy ; Urban studies ; Work ; Workplace mobility</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2020-05, Vol.111, p.155-164</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-e9a17a53a0a49b641addeb443d85fed586499051303d1363db680fdb0d4975da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-e9a17a53a0a49b641addeb443d85fed586499051303d1363db680fdb0d4975da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearmur, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><title>The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>•Flexible work challenges location theory-based conceptualizations of urban form.•Increased mobility is also observed in mobile service professions like childcare.•Work places are better understood as trajectories rather than fixed locations.•Gendered labour market segmentation affects experiences of urban form. In this paper we conceptualise the growing challenge faced by economic geographers and urban planners as they explore where economic activity actually occurs – where it is located – within cities. We suggest that economic activity relates to urban space by way of trajectories (punctuated by specific places) rather than by way of location. Such an approach offers a comprehensive understanding not only of the economic but also of the social realities of urban labour practices in the 21st century and the complex interplay between locations of work and leisure. As illustration, we present exploratory results that examine the work geography of some Montreal childcare workers. Whilst their work trajectories seem to have become more complex with the advent of mobile communication technology, child-caring has always required mobility and has never occurred in a single location: the convention that economic activity takes place at particular locations, although increasingly divorced from actual practice, has only ever described certain types of economic activity.</description><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Concept formation</subject><subject>Contingent labour</subject><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Geographers</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Leisure</subject><subject>Mobile communication systems</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Mobility studies</subject><subject>Precarious labour</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban space economy</subject><subject>Urban studies</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Workplace mobility</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtO7DAMhiMEEsPlFVAktrQ4TXpbAUKHi4TEAlhHaeMOKdOmJC1ozhPw2KQqrNkkC3_-bX-EnDCIGbDsvI3XaBvrpi5OIIEYkhgY7JAVK_IkKnlZ7JIVBDLKWZHukwPvWwDIeVGuyNfzK1LsNbUN3dhajcb2dHxF67YX9Ml2SE03bMxS8DPVmdrZ6NO6tzM6v3R0qsV6tM6gpypErc06WkphK1rbvsZhnNTG_Df9eg6nk6tUT_2g6jA8ALbbHpG9Rm08Hv_8h-Tl5t_z9V308Hh7f331ENVcwBhhqViuUq5AibLKBFNaYyUE10XaoE6LTJQlpIwD14xnXFdZAY2uQIsyT7Xih-R0yR2cfZ_Qj7K1k-vDSJkIAVkhMiYClS1UuNV7h40cnOmU20oGcrYuW_lrXc7WJSQyWA-Nl0sjhhs-DDrpa4PBgDYuSJLamr8ivgEoTJEC</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Stevens, Lukas</creator><creator>Shearmur, Richard G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy</title><author>Stevens, Lukas ; Shearmur, Richard G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-e9a17a53a0a49b641addeb443d85fed586499051303d1363db680fdb0d4975da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Concept formation</topic><topic>Contingent labour</topic><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Geographers</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Leisure</topic><topic>Mobile communication systems</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Mobility studies</topic><topic>Precarious labour</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban space economy</topic><topic>Urban studies</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Workplace mobility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearmur, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevens, Lukas</au><au>Shearmur, Richard G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>155</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>155-164</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><abstract>•Flexible work challenges location theory-based conceptualizations of urban form.•Increased mobility is also observed in mobile service professions like childcare.•Work places are better understood as trajectories rather than fixed locations.•Gendered labour market segmentation affects experiences of urban form. In this paper we conceptualise the growing challenge faced by economic geographers and urban planners as they explore where economic activity actually occurs – where it is located – within cities. We suggest that economic activity relates to urban space by way of trajectories (punctuated by specific places) rather than by way of location. Such an approach offers a comprehensive understanding not only of the economic but also of the social realities of urban labour practices in the 21st century and the complex interplay between locations of work and leisure. As illustration, we present exploratory results that examine the work geography of some Montreal childcare workers. Whilst their work trajectories seem to have become more complex with the advent of mobile communication technology, child-caring has always required mobility and has never occurred in a single location: the convention that economic activity takes place at particular locations, although increasingly divorced from actual practice, has only ever described certain types of economic activity.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.010</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7185
ispartof Geoforum, 2020-05, Vol.111, p.155-164
issn 0016-7185
1872-9398
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2440684614
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects 21st century
Child care
Communications technology
Concept formation
Contingent labour
Economic activity
Economic conditions
Economics
Geographers
Geography
Leisure
Mobile communication systems
Mobility
Mobility studies
Precarious labour
Urban areas
Urban space economy
Urban studies
Work
Workplace mobility
title The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T16%3A12%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20end%20of%20location%20theory?%20Some%20implications%20of%20micro-work,%20work%20trajectories%20and%20gig-%20work%20for%20conceptualizing%20the%20urban%20space%20economy&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Stevens,%20Lukas&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=155-164&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440684614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440684614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016718520300464&rfr_iscdi=true