Social heterogeneity, local capacity, and urban parks: Evidence from US cities

This paper analyzes the provision of urban parks and recreational spaces, focusing on public funding efforts in metropolitan cities. Using cities as units of analysis and fifteen years of data, we examine their public funding efforts for parks and recreational spaces, evaluating the reliability of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cities 2020-04, Vol.99, p.102588, Article 102588
Hauptverfasser: Leon-Moreta, Agustin, Totaro, Vittoria R., Dixon, David S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102588
container_title Cities
container_volume 99
creator Leon-Moreta, Agustin
Totaro, Vittoria R.
Dixon, David S.
description This paper analyzes the provision of urban parks and recreational spaces, focusing on public funding efforts in metropolitan cities. Using cities as units of analysis and fifteen years of data, we examine their public funding efforts for parks and recreational spaces, evaluating the reliability of the findings across alternative modeling specifications. Social and institutional characteristics are explored as for explanations of public funding efforts for parks and recreational spaces. The main finding is that significantly different levels of parks and recreation spending are prevalent across American cities. Additional findings are that social and institutional conditions affect the public funding of parks and recreation programs, based on a pooled spatial analysis of cities. While its primary contribution is to research on disparities in urban parks and recreational spaces, the paper also integrates social and institutional literatures to identify factors influencing the allocation of public funds to those spaces in metropolitan areas. •Development of local capacity allows urban communities to mitigate resource disparities in parks and recreational spaces.•Municipal incorporation provides unincorporated communities with self-governing capacity to support parks and recreation.•Urban parks can be supported by alternative institutional arrangements like regional districts and nonprofit participation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102588
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440678402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264275118318171</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440678402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a755194bb15dbc824c02ccbb18d6d9bce6db44ae6d3e861380475b190d3edfcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIfcLDElRTbcRyHAxJC5SFVcCg9W87aAYc2DnZaqX-PSzhzWs1qZnZ2ELqkZEYJFTftDNzgbJwxQqu0YoWUR2hCZZlngkh-jCaECZ6xsqCn6CzGlhDCBScT9Lr04PQaf9rBBv9hO-uG_TVee0hL0L2GX6w7g7eh1h3udfiKt3i-c8Z2YHET_AavlnhMcI5OGr2O9uJvTtHqcf7-8Jwt3p5eHu4XGeQ5HzJdFgWteF3TwtQgGQfCABKURpiqBitMzblOI7dS0FwSXhY1rUjCpgGTT9HV6NsH_721cVCt34YunVSMcyJKyQlLLD6yIPgYg21UH9xGh72iRB2aU60ac6tDc2psLsnuRplNH-ycDSqCOzxrXLAwKOPd_wY_xeh4yQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440678402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social heterogeneity, local capacity, and urban parks: Evidence from US cities</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Leon-Moreta, Agustin ; Totaro, Vittoria R. ; Dixon, David S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leon-Moreta, Agustin ; Totaro, Vittoria R. ; Dixon, David S.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyzes the provision of urban parks and recreational spaces, focusing on public funding efforts in metropolitan cities. Using cities as units of analysis and fifteen years of data, we examine their public funding efforts for parks and recreational spaces, evaluating the reliability of the findings across alternative modeling specifications. Social and institutional characteristics are explored as for explanations of public funding efforts for parks and recreational spaces. The main finding is that significantly different levels of parks and recreation spending are prevalent across American cities. Additional findings are that social and institutional conditions affect the public funding of parks and recreation programs, based on a pooled spatial analysis of cities. While its primary contribution is to research on disparities in urban parks and recreational spaces, the paper also integrates social and institutional literatures to identify factors influencing the allocation of public funds to those spaces in metropolitan areas. •Development of local capacity allows urban communities to mitigate resource disparities in parks and recreational spaces.•Municipal incorporation provides unincorporated communities with self-governing capacity to support parks and recreation.•Urban parks can be supported by alternative institutional arrangements like regional districts and nonprofit participation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-2751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cities ; Expenditures ; Funding ; Heterogeneity ; Local government capacity ; Metropolitan areas ; Parks &amp; recreation areas ; Recreation ; Reliability ; Social context ; Spatial analysis ; Urban parks</subject><ispartof>Cities, 2020-04, Vol.99, p.102588, Article 102588</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a755194bb15dbc824c02ccbb18d6d9bce6db44ae6d3e861380475b190d3edfcd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a755194bb15dbc824c02ccbb18d6d9bce6db44ae6d3e861380475b190d3edfcd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275118318171$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leon-Moreta, Agustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totaro, Vittoria R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, David S.</creatorcontrib><title>Social heterogeneity, local capacity, and urban parks: Evidence from US cities</title><title>Cities</title><description>This paper analyzes the provision of urban parks and recreational spaces, focusing on public funding efforts in metropolitan cities. Using cities as units of analysis and fifteen years of data, we examine their public funding efforts for parks and recreational spaces, evaluating the reliability of the findings across alternative modeling specifications. Social and institutional characteristics are explored as for explanations of public funding efforts for parks and recreational spaces. The main finding is that significantly different levels of parks and recreation spending are prevalent across American cities. Additional findings are that social and institutional conditions affect the public funding of parks and recreation programs, based on a pooled spatial analysis of cities. While its primary contribution is to research on disparities in urban parks and recreational spaces, the paper also integrates social and institutional literatures to identify factors influencing the allocation of public funds to those spaces in metropolitan areas. •Development of local capacity allows urban communities to mitigate resource disparities in parks and recreational spaces.•Municipal incorporation provides unincorporated communities with self-governing capacity to support parks and recreation.•Urban parks can be supported by alternative institutional arrangements like regional districts and nonprofit participation.</description><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Local government capacity</subject><subject>Metropolitan areas</subject><subject>Parks &amp; recreation areas</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Social context</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Urban parks</subject><issn>0264-2751</issn><issn>1873-6084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIfcLDElRTbcRyHAxJC5SFVcCg9W87aAYc2DnZaqX-PSzhzWs1qZnZ2ELqkZEYJFTftDNzgbJwxQqu0YoWUR2hCZZlngkh-jCaECZ6xsqCn6CzGlhDCBScT9Lr04PQaf9rBBv9hO-uG_TVee0hL0L2GX6w7g7eh1h3udfiKt3i-c8Z2YHET_AavlnhMcI5OGr2O9uJvTtHqcf7-8Jwt3p5eHu4XGeQ5HzJdFgWteF3TwtQgGQfCABKURpiqBitMzblOI7dS0FwSXhY1rUjCpgGTT9HV6NsH_721cVCt34YunVSMcyJKyQlLLD6yIPgYg21UH9xGh72iRB2aU60ac6tDc2psLsnuRplNH-ycDSqCOzxrXLAwKOPd_wY_xeh4yQ</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Leon-Moreta, Agustin</creator><creator>Totaro, Vittoria R.</creator><creator>Dixon, David S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Social heterogeneity, local capacity, and urban parks: Evidence from US cities</title><author>Leon-Moreta, Agustin ; Totaro, Vittoria R. ; Dixon, David S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a755194bb15dbc824c02ccbb18d6d9bce6db44ae6d3e861380475b190d3edfcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Local government capacity</topic><topic>Metropolitan areas</topic><topic>Parks &amp; recreation areas</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Social context</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Urban parks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leon-Moreta, Agustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totaro, Vittoria R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, David S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Cities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leon-Moreta, Agustin</au><au>Totaro, Vittoria R.</au><au>Dixon, David S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social heterogeneity, local capacity, and urban parks: Evidence from US cities</atitle><jtitle>Cities</jtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>99</volume><spage>102588</spage><pages>102588-</pages><artnum>102588</artnum><issn>0264-2751</issn><eissn>1873-6084</eissn><abstract>This paper analyzes the provision of urban parks and recreational spaces, focusing on public funding efforts in metropolitan cities. Using cities as units of analysis and fifteen years of data, we examine their public funding efforts for parks and recreational spaces, evaluating the reliability of the findings across alternative modeling specifications. Social and institutional characteristics are explored as for explanations of public funding efforts for parks and recreational spaces. The main finding is that significantly different levels of parks and recreation spending are prevalent across American cities. Additional findings are that social and institutional conditions affect the public funding of parks and recreation programs, based on a pooled spatial analysis of cities. While its primary contribution is to research on disparities in urban parks and recreational spaces, the paper also integrates social and institutional literatures to identify factors influencing the allocation of public funds to those spaces in metropolitan areas. •Development of local capacity allows urban communities to mitigate resource disparities in parks and recreational spaces.•Municipal incorporation provides unincorporated communities with self-governing capacity to support parks and recreation.•Urban parks can be supported by alternative institutional arrangements like regional districts and nonprofit participation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cities.2019.102588</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-2751
ispartof Cities, 2020-04, Vol.99, p.102588, Article 102588
issn 0264-2751
1873-6084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2440678402
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Cities
Expenditures
Funding
Heterogeneity
Local government capacity
Metropolitan areas
Parks & recreation areas
Recreation
Reliability
Social context
Spatial analysis
Urban parks
title Social heterogeneity, local capacity, and urban parks: Evidence from US cities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T21%3A23%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20heterogeneity,%20local%20capacity,%20and%20urban%20parks:%20Evidence%20from%20US%20cities&rft.jtitle=Cities&rft.au=Leon-Moreta,%20Agustin&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=99&rft.spage=102588&rft.pages=102588-&rft.artnum=102588&rft.issn=0264-2751&rft.eissn=1873-6084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102588&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440678402%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440678402&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264275118318171&rfr_iscdi=true