Improving BMP Cost-Share Enrollment Rates: Insights from a Survey of Florida Farmers

This paper investigates cost-share program attributes that would affect producers' willingness to enroll in a cost-share program to fund the adoption of best management practices to improve water quality and decrease water use. Through a survey administered to Florida agricultural producers, we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural and resource economics review 2020-08, Vol.49 (2), p.237-269
Hauptverfasser: Yehouenou, Lauriane S., Grogan, Kelly A., Bi, Xiang, Borisova, Tatiana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 269
container_issue 2
container_start_page 237
container_title Agricultural and resource economics review
container_volume 49
creator Yehouenou, Lauriane S.
Grogan, Kelly A.
Bi, Xiang
Borisova, Tatiana
description This paper investigates cost-share program attributes that would affect producers' willingness to enroll in a cost-share program to fund the adoption of best management practices to improve water quality and decrease water use. Through a survey administered to Florida agricultural producers, we conducted choice experiments to assess farmers’ preferences for cost-share programs using five attributes: contracting agency, length of contract, annual verification process, costs included, and percent of costs covered. Results suggest that producers prefer cost-share programs with shorter contract lengths, self-monitoring, and administration by agricultural (as opposed to environmental) agencies. Our findings suggest the importance of an existing trust between the local communities and the contracting agencies for higher enrollment rates in cost –share programs. Our results can inform policymakers on ways to increase enrollment rates that move towards long-term environmental goals.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/age.2020.5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440653733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_age_2020_5</cupid><sourcerecordid>2440653733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-73d3ab4774c6a192b1851a5df4cbdb6d85fe139b29cb0e86909b423f72c4291e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE9PwjAAxRujiYhe_ARNvBmH_d_NmxJQEoxG8Ny0Wwcj24rtIOHbUwLRi6d3-b338h4AtxgNMMLyUS_sgCCCBvwM9AiVJCECs3PQw0ikCUkRvwRXIaxQZFAqe2A-adbebat2AV_eP-HQhS6ZLbW3cNR6V9eNbTv4pTsbnuCkDdVi2QVYetdADWcbv7U76Eo4rp2vCg3H2jfWh2twUeo62JuT9sH3eDQfviXTj9fJ8Hma5IyQLpG0oNowKVkuNM6IwSnHmhcly01hRJHy0mKaGZLlBtlUZCgzjNBSkujPsKV9cHfMjRN-NjZ0auU2vo2VijCGBKeS0kjdH6ncuxC8LdXaV432O4WROrym4mvq8JriEYZH2OaurcIfKjmSUpBUROThlKcbE2dH82_tP4l7GrV3dA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440653733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving BMP Cost-Share Enrollment Rates: Insights from a Survey of Florida Farmers</title><source>AgEcon</source><source>Cambridge Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Yehouenou, Lauriane S. ; Grogan, Kelly A. ; Bi, Xiang ; Borisova, Tatiana</creator><creatorcontrib>Yehouenou, Lauriane S. ; Grogan, Kelly A. ; Bi, Xiang ; Borisova, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates cost-share program attributes that would affect producers' willingness to enroll in a cost-share program to fund the adoption of best management practices to improve water quality and decrease water use. Through a survey administered to Florida agricultural producers, we conducted choice experiments to assess farmers’ preferences for cost-share programs using five attributes: contracting agency, length of contract, annual verification process, costs included, and percent of costs covered. Results suggest that producers prefer cost-share programs with shorter contract lengths, self-monitoring, and administration by agricultural (as opposed to environmental) agencies. Our findings suggest the importance of an existing trust between the local communities and the contracting agencies for higher enrollment rates in cost –share programs. Our results can inform policymakers on ways to increase enrollment rates that move towards long-term environmental goals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-2805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2372-2614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/age.2020.5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural management ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Best management practices ; Contraction ; Decision making ; Design ; Economic theory ; Experiments ; Farmers ; Freshwater resources ; Irrigation ; Local communities ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Population growth ; Tourism ; Water quality ; Water quality management ; Water shortages ; Water supply ; Water use ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Agricultural and resource economics review, 2020-08, Vol.49 (2), p.237-269</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>2020 This article is published under (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-73d3ab4774c6a192b1851a5df4cbdb6d85fe139b29cb0e86909b423f72c4291e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-73d3ab4774c6a192b1851a5df4cbdb6d85fe139b29cb0e86909b423f72c4291e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1820-2677</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1068280520000052/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,23299,27903,27904,55782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yehouenou, Lauriane S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grogan, Kelly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bi, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borisova, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><title>Improving BMP Cost-Share Enrollment Rates: Insights from a Survey of Florida Farmers</title><title>Agricultural and resource economics review</title><addtitle>Agric. Resour. Econom. Rev</addtitle><description>This paper investigates cost-share program attributes that would affect producers' willingness to enroll in a cost-share program to fund the adoption of best management practices to improve water quality and decrease water use. Through a survey administered to Florida agricultural producers, we conducted choice experiments to assess farmers’ preferences for cost-share programs using five attributes: contracting agency, length of contract, annual verification process, costs included, and percent of costs covered. Results suggest that producers prefer cost-share programs with shorter contract lengths, self-monitoring, and administration by agricultural (as opposed to environmental) agencies. Our findings suggest the importance of an existing trust between the local communities and the contracting agencies for higher enrollment rates in cost –share programs. Our results can inform policymakers on ways to increase enrollment rates that move towards long-term environmental goals.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Best management practices</subject><subject>Contraction</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Freshwater resources</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality management</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>1068-2805</issn><issn>2372-2614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE9PwjAAxRujiYhe_ARNvBmH_d_NmxJQEoxG8Ny0Wwcj24rtIOHbUwLRi6d3-b338h4AtxgNMMLyUS_sgCCCBvwM9AiVJCECs3PQw0ikCUkRvwRXIaxQZFAqe2A-adbebat2AV_eP-HQhS6ZLbW3cNR6V9eNbTv4pTsbnuCkDdVi2QVYetdADWcbv7U76Eo4rp2vCg3H2jfWh2twUeo62JuT9sH3eDQfviXTj9fJ8Hma5IyQLpG0oNowKVkuNM6IwSnHmhcly01hRJHy0mKaGZLlBtlUZCgzjNBSkujPsKV9cHfMjRN-NjZ0auU2vo2VijCGBKeS0kjdH6ncuxC8LdXaV432O4WROrym4mvq8JriEYZH2OaurcIfKjmSUpBUROThlKcbE2dH82_tP4l7GrV3dA</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Yehouenou, Lauriane S.</creator><creator>Grogan, Kelly A.</creator><creator>Bi, Xiang</creator><creator>Borisova, Tatiana</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1820-2677</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Improving BMP Cost-Share Enrollment Rates: Insights from a Survey of Florida Farmers</title><author>Yehouenou, Lauriane S. ; Grogan, Kelly A. ; Bi, Xiang ; Borisova, Tatiana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-73d3ab4774c6a192b1851a5df4cbdb6d85fe139b29cb0e86909b423f72c4291e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Best management practices</topic><topic>Contraction</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Freshwater resources</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality management</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yehouenou, Lauriane S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grogan, Kelly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bi, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borisova, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agricultural and resource economics review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yehouenou, Lauriane S.</au><au>Grogan, Kelly A.</au><au>Bi, Xiang</au><au>Borisova, Tatiana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving BMP Cost-Share Enrollment Rates: Insights from a Survey of Florida Farmers</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural and resource economics review</jtitle><addtitle>Agric. Resour. Econom. Rev</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>237-269</pages><issn>1068-2805</issn><eissn>2372-2614</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates cost-share program attributes that would affect producers' willingness to enroll in a cost-share program to fund the adoption of best management practices to improve water quality and decrease water use. Through a survey administered to Florida agricultural producers, we conducted choice experiments to assess farmers’ preferences for cost-share programs using five attributes: contracting agency, length of contract, annual verification process, costs included, and percent of costs covered. Results suggest that producers prefer cost-share programs with shorter contract lengths, self-monitoring, and administration by agricultural (as opposed to environmental) agencies. Our findings suggest the importance of an existing trust between the local communities and the contracting agencies for higher enrollment rates in cost –share programs. Our results can inform policymakers on ways to increase enrollment rates that move towards long-term environmental goals.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/age.2020.5</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1820-2677</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-2805
ispartof Agricultural and resource economics review, 2020-08, Vol.49 (2), p.237-269
issn 1068-2805
2372-2614
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2440653733
source AgEcon; Cambridge Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural economics
Agricultural management
Agricultural production
Agriculture
Best management practices
Contraction
Decision making
Design
Economic theory
Experiments
Farmers
Freshwater resources
Irrigation
Local communities
Polls & surveys
Population growth
Tourism
Water quality
Water quality management
Water shortages
Water supply
Water use
Willingness to pay
title Improving BMP Cost-Share Enrollment Rates: Insights from a Survey of Florida Farmers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A37%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20BMP%20Cost-Share%20Enrollment%20Rates:%20Insights%20from%20a%20Survey%20of%20Florida%20Farmers&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics%20review&rft.au=Yehouenou,%20Lauriane%20S.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=237-269&rft.issn=1068-2805&rft.eissn=2372-2614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/age.2020.5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440653733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440653733&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_age_2020_5&rfr_iscdi=true