Getting ahead: exploitative competition by an invasive lizard

Biological invasions are a contemporary global threat because invasive species can have substantial negative economic and ecological impacts. Invasive species can outcompete native species through two main mechanisms: interference competition (direct, negative interactions like aggression) and/or ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2020-10, Vol.74 (10), p.1-12, Article 117
Hauptverfasser: Damas-Moreira, Isabel, Riley, Julia L., Carretero, Miguel A., Harris, D. James, Whiting, Martin J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 74
creator Damas-Moreira, Isabel
Riley, Julia L.
Carretero, Miguel A.
Harris, D. James
Whiting, Martin J.
description Biological invasions are a contemporary global threat because invasive species can have substantial negative economic and ecological impacts. Invasive species can outcompete native species through two main mechanisms: interference competition (direct, negative interactions like aggression) and/or exploitative competition (indirect, negative interactions resulting from species using the same, limited resources like food). The invasive Italian wall lizard (Podarcis siculus) was introduced into Lisbon, Portugal, 20 years ago, and is believed to be locally displacing the native green Iberian wall lizard (Podarcis virescens). We experimentally tested for competition between these two lizard species by establishing heterospecific (one pair of each species) and conspecific (two pairs of the same species; control) treatments in enclosures containing a high- and a low-quality refuge. Lizards were fed from food dishes every other day. We tested if species showed interference (aggressive behaviour, stealing food and shelter exclusion) or exploitative competition (tolerance between species but differences in food consumption efficiency). We found evidence for exploitative competition: the invasive species arrived first at food stations, consumed more food and gained more weight than the native species. We suggest that exploitative competition may, in part, explain the observed displacement of P. virescens from contact areas with the invasive P. siculus. Deciphering the competitive mechanisms between invasive and native species is vital for understanding the invasion process.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00265-020-02893-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440322027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48727813</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48727813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-eb6e9c8550f5d025bd919630f7e36664486d58dd48e946cff6dcf17965c3b6ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j8tKA0EQRRtRMMb8gCAIrlurq_o1SwkahYAbXTcz_YgZdCZ2Txb-vaMjunNR1OaeezmMnQm4EgDmugCgVhwQxrMVcTxgMyEJORiNh2wGJIErKemYnZTSAoAW1s7YYhWHYdttLuqXWIdTdpTq1xIXP3_Onu9un5b3fP24eljerLknKQYeGx0rb5WCpAKgakIlKk2QTCSttZRWB2VDkDZWUvuUdPBJmEorT432kebscurd5f59H8vg2n6fu3HSoZRAiIBmTOGU8rkvJcfkdnn7VucPJ8B9abtJ243a7lvb4QjRBJUx3G1i_qv-lzqfqLYMff7dkdagsYLoExkjYR4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440322027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Getting ahead: exploitative competition by an invasive lizard</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Damas-Moreira, Isabel ; Riley, Julia L. ; Carretero, Miguel A. ; Harris, D. James ; Whiting, Martin J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Damas-Moreira, Isabel ; Riley, Julia L. ; Carretero, Miguel A. ; Harris, D. James ; Whiting, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><description>Biological invasions are a contemporary global threat because invasive species can have substantial negative economic and ecological impacts. Invasive species can outcompete native species through two main mechanisms: interference competition (direct, negative interactions like aggression) and/or exploitative competition (indirect, negative interactions resulting from species using the same, limited resources like food). The invasive Italian wall lizard (Podarcis siculus) was introduced into Lisbon, Portugal, 20 years ago, and is believed to be locally displacing the native green Iberian wall lizard (Podarcis virescens). We experimentally tested for competition between these two lizard species by establishing heterospecific (one pair of each species) and conspecific (two pairs of the same species; control) treatments in enclosures containing a high- and a low-quality refuge. Lizards were fed from food dishes every other day. We tested if species showed interference (aggressive behaviour, stealing food and shelter exclusion) or exploitative competition (tolerance between species but differences in food consumption efficiency). We found evidence for exploitative competition: the invasive species arrived first at food stations, consumed more food and gained more weight than the native species. We suggest that exploitative competition may, in part, explain the observed displacement of P. virescens from contact areas with the invasive P. siculus. Deciphering the competitive mechanisms between invasive and native species is vital for understanding the invasion process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-020-02893-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Aggressive behavior ; Animal Ecology ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Competition ; Congeners ; Displacement ; Environmental conditions ; Food ; Food consumption ; Indigenous species ; Interference ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Life Sciences ; Lizards ; Native species ; Nonnative species ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE ; Podarcis siculus ; Podarcis virescens ; Sympatric populations ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2020-10, Vol.74 (10), p.1-12, Article 117</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-eb6e9c8550f5d025bd919630f7e36664486d58dd48e946cff6dcf17965c3b6ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-eb6e9c8550f5d025bd919630f7e36664486d58dd48e946cff6dcf17965c3b6ce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2335-7198 ; 0000-0002-4662-0227 ; 0000-0003-4630-3202 ; 0000-0001-5144-2421 ; 0000-0001-7691-6910</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48727813$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48727813$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Damas-Moreira, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, Julia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carretero, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, D. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiting, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Getting ahead: exploitative competition by an invasive lizard</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Biological invasions are a contemporary global threat because invasive species can have substantial negative economic and ecological impacts. Invasive species can outcompete native species through two main mechanisms: interference competition (direct, negative interactions like aggression) and/or exploitative competition (indirect, negative interactions resulting from species using the same, limited resources like food). The invasive Italian wall lizard (Podarcis siculus) was introduced into Lisbon, Portugal, 20 years ago, and is believed to be locally displacing the native green Iberian wall lizard (Podarcis virescens). We experimentally tested for competition between these two lizard species by establishing heterospecific (one pair of each species) and conspecific (two pairs of the same species; control) treatments in enclosures containing a high- and a low-quality refuge. Lizards were fed from food dishes every other day. We tested if species showed interference (aggressive behaviour, stealing food and shelter exclusion) or exploitative competition (tolerance between species but differences in food consumption efficiency). We found evidence for exploitative competition: the invasive species arrived first at food stations, consumed more food and gained more weight than the native species. We suggest that exploitative competition may, in part, explain the observed displacement of P. virescens from contact areas with the invasive P. siculus. Deciphering the competitive mechanisms between invasive and native species is vital for understanding the invasion process.</description><subject>Aggressive behavior</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Congeners</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lizards</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><subject>Podarcis siculus</subject><subject>Podarcis virescens</subject><subject>Sympatric populations</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j8tKA0EQRRtRMMb8gCAIrlurq_o1SwkahYAbXTcz_YgZdCZ2Txb-vaMjunNR1OaeezmMnQm4EgDmugCgVhwQxrMVcTxgMyEJORiNh2wGJIErKemYnZTSAoAW1s7YYhWHYdttLuqXWIdTdpTq1xIXP3_Onu9un5b3fP24eljerLknKQYeGx0rb5WCpAKgakIlKk2QTCSttZRWB2VDkDZWUvuUdPBJmEorT432kebscurd5f59H8vg2n6fu3HSoZRAiIBmTOGU8rkvJcfkdnn7VucPJ8B9abtJ243a7lvb4QjRBJUx3G1i_qv-lzqfqLYMff7dkdagsYLoExkjYR4</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Damas-Moreira, Isabel</creator><creator>Riley, Julia L.</creator><creator>Carretero, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Harris, D. James</creator><creator>Whiting, Martin J.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2335-7198</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4662-0227</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4630-3202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-2421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7691-6910</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Getting ahead</title><author>Damas-Moreira, Isabel ; Riley, Julia L. ; Carretero, Miguel A. ; Harris, D. James ; Whiting, Martin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-eb6e9c8550f5d025bd919630f7e36664486d58dd48e946cff6dcf17965c3b6ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aggressive behavior</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Congeners</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lizards</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><topic>Podarcis siculus</topic><topic>Podarcis virescens</topic><topic>Sympatric populations</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Damas-Moreira, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, Julia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carretero, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, D. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiting, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Damas-Moreira, Isabel</au><au>Riley, Julia L.</au><au>Carretero, Miguel A.</au><au>Harris, D. James</au><au>Whiting, Martin J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Getting ahead: exploitative competition by an invasive lizard</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><artnum>117</artnum><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Biological invasions are a contemporary global threat because invasive species can have substantial negative economic and ecological impacts. Invasive species can outcompete native species through two main mechanisms: interference competition (direct, negative interactions like aggression) and/or exploitative competition (indirect, negative interactions resulting from species using the same, limited resources like food). The invasive Italian wall lizard (Podarcis siculus) was introduced into Lisbon, Portugal, 20 years ago, and is believed to be locally displacing the native green Iberian wall lizard (Podarcis virescens). We experimentally tested for competition between these two lizard species by establishing heterospecific (one pair of each species) and conspecific (two pairs of the same species; control) treatments in enclosures containing a high- and a low-quality refuge. Lizards were fed from food dishes every other day. We tested if species showed interference (aggressive behaviour, stealing food and shelter exclusion) or exploitative competition (tolerance between species but differences in food consumption efficiency). We found evidence for exploitative competition: the invasive species arrived first at food stations, consumed more food and gained more weight than the native species. We suggest that exploitative competition may, in part, explain the observed displacement of P. virescens from contact areas with the invasive P. siculus. Deciphering the competitive mechanisms between invasive and native species is vital for understanding the invasion process.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-020-02893-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2335-7198</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4662-0227</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4630-3202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-2421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7691-6910</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2020-10, Vol.74 (10), p.1-12, Article 117
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2440322027
source SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Aggressive behavior
Animal Ecology
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Competition
Congeners
Displacement
Environmental conditions
Food
Food consumption
Indigenous species
Interference
Introduced species
Invasive species
Life Sciences
Lizards
Native species
Nonnative species
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Podarcis siculus
Podarcis virescens
Sympatric populations
Zoology
title Getting ahead: exploitative competition by an invasive lizard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A36%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Getting%20ahead:%20exploitative%20competition%20by%20an%20invasive%20lizard&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Damas-Moreira,%20Isabel&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.artnum=117&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-020-02893-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48727813%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440322027&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48727813&rfr_iscdi=true