The Bullwhip Effect in Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Comparison of Series and Divergent Networks

Supply chain network structure has been mentioned as one of the contributors to the Bullwhip Effect in the supply chain. With the incorporation of reverse logistics into most of the supply chains, the structure of the supply chain changes especially if there are more than one player in the reverse c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of remanufacturing 2020-10, Vol.10 (3), p.207-238
Hauptverfasser: Tombido, Linda, Louw, Louis, van Eeden, Joubert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 238
container_issue 3
container_start_page 207
container_title Journal of remanufacturing
container_volume 10
creator Tombido, Linda
Louw, Louis
van Eeden, Joubert
description Supply chain network structure has been mentioned as one of the contributors to the Bullwhip Effect in the supply chain. With the incorporation of reverse logistics into most of the supply chains, the structure of the supply chain changes especially if there are more than one player in the reverse chain. In this research, systems dynamics models were developed to compare the Bullwhip Effect between serial and divergent supply chain networks with different structures in closed-loop supply chains. The scenario experimentation revealed that increasing the number of collectors in the reverse chain increased the Bullwhip suffered, Bullwhip generated and the Bullwhip slope in all supply chain configurations. Therefore, it seems to be more beneficial for a closed-loop supply chain to have one reliable collector supplying used products than more than one collector with uncertainties in the quantity of products returned. Findings also reveal that a serial network is more sensitive to changes in the reverse chain in terms of the number of parties involved compared to a divergent supply chain. This means that the serial network assumption overestimates Bullwhip measures. Whilst it may be easy to measure the Bullwhip Effect by assuming a serial supply chain structure, this value might be overestimated especially for supply chains that are involved with more than one player at each echelon. These findings provided some useful insights on modelling supply chain networks to reduce the Bullwhip Effect in closed-loop supply chains.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13243-020-00085-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440211531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2440211531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2919-19c46e31a64a46046a7d8c2c47605e1cbc5f02fd5bc705b856d57e277aef3c1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhCMEElXpH-BkiXNg_YobbiU8pQoOLRI3y3U2bUoaB7uh6r8nEERvnHal_WZGO1F0TuGSAqirQDkTPAYGMQCMZZweRQPGKMQiSeH4bxdvp9EohHUHUS4YpXwQ6fkKyU1bVbtV2ZC7okC7JWVNssoFzOOpcw2ZtU1T7Um2MmUdrsmEZG7TGF8GVxNXkBn6EgMxdU5uy0_0S6y35Bm3O-ffw1l0Upgq4Oh3DqPX-7t59hhPXx6essk0tiylaUxTKxLk1CTCiAREYlQ-tswKlYBEahdWFsCKXC6sArkYyySXCplSBgtuqeXD6KL3bbz7aDFs9dq1vu4iNRMCumclpx3Fesp6F4LHQje-3Bi_1xT0d5e671J3XeqfLnXaiUgvQuvqMhwkikueJgpYh_AeCd2xXqI_pP9j_AUmVn_j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440211531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Bullwhip Effect in Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Comparison of Series and Divergent Networks</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Tombido, Linda ; Louw, Louis ; van Eeden, Joubert</creator><creatorcontrib>Tombido, Linda ; Louw, Louis ; van Eeden, Joubert</creatorcontrib><description>Supply chain network structure has been mentioned as one of the contributors to the Bullwhip Effect in the supply chain. With the incorporation of reverse logistics into most of the supply chains, the structure of the supply chain changes especially if there are more than one player in the reverse chain. In this research, systems dynamics models were developed to compare the Bullwhip Effect between serial and divergent supply chain networks with different structures in closed-loop supply chains. The scenario experimentation revealed that increasing the number of collectors in the reverse chain increased the Bullwhip suffered, Bullwhip generated and the Bullwhip slope in all supply chain configurations. Therefore, it seems to be more beneficial for a closed-loop supply chain to have one reliable collector supplying used products than more than one collector with uncertainties in the quantity of products returned. Findings also reveal that a serial network is more sensitive to changes in the reverse chain in terms of the number of parties involved compared to a divergent supply chain. This means that the serial network assumption overestimates Bullwhip measures. Whilst it may be easy to measure the Bullwhip Effect by assuming a serial supply chain structure, this value might be overestimated especially for supply chains that are involved with more than one player at each echelon. These findings provided some useful insights on modelling supply chain networks to reduce the Bullwhip Effect in closed-loop supply chains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-4690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13243-020-00085-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Engineering ; Environmental Management ; Experimentation ; Networks ; Reverse logistics ; Supply chains ; Sustainable Development ; Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><ispartof>Journal of remanufacturing, 2020-10, Vol.10 (3), p.207-238</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2919-19c46e31a64a46046a7d8c2c47605e1cbc5f02fd5bc705b856d57e277aef3c1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2919-19c46e31a64a46046a7d8c2c47605e1cbc5f02fd5bc705b856d57e277aef3c1c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5424-7963</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13243-020-00085-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13243-020-00085-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tombido, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louw, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eeden, Joubert</creatorcontrib><title>The Bullwhip Effect in Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Comparison of Series and Divergent Networks</title><title>Journal of remanufacturing</title><addtitle>Jnl Remanufactur</addtitle><description>Supply chain network structure has been mentioned as one of the contributors to the Bullwhip Effect in the supply chain. With the incorporation of reverse logistics into most of the supply chains, the structure of the supply chain changes especially if there are more than one player in the reverse chain. In this research, systems dynamics models were developed to compare the Bullwhip Effect between serial and divergent supply chain networks with different structures in closed-loop supply chains. The scenario experimentation revealed that increasing the number of collectors in the reverse chain increased the Bullwhip suffered, Bullwhip generated and the Bullwhip slope in all supply chain configurations. Therefore, it seems to be more beneficial for a closed-loop supply chain to have one reliable collector supplying used products than more than one collector with uncertainties in the quantity of products returned. Findings also reveal that a serial network is more sensitive to changes in the reverse chain in terms of the number of parties involved compared to a divergent supply chain. This means that the serial network assumption overestimates Bullwhip measures. Whilst it may be easy to measure the Bullwhip Effect by assuming a serial supply chain structure, this value might be overestimated especially for supply chains that are involved with more than one player at each echelon. These findings provided some useful insights on modelling supply chain networks to reduce the Bullwhip Effect in closed-loop supply chains.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Reverse logistics</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><issn>2210-464X</issn><issn>2210-4690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhCMEElXpH-BkiXNg_YobbiU8pQoOLRI3y3U2bUoaB7uh6r8nEERvnHal_WZGO1F0TuGSAqirQDkTPAYGMQCMZZweRQPGKMQiSeH4bxdvp9EohHUHUS4YpXwQ6fkKyU1bVbtV2ZC7okC7JWVNssoFzOOpcw2ZtU1T7Um2MmUdrsmEZG7TGF8GVxNXkBn6EgMxdU5uy0_0S6y35Bm3O-ffw1l0Upgq4Oh3DqPX-7t59hhPXx6essk0tiylaUxTKxLk1CTCiAREYlQ-tswKlYBEahdWFsCKXC6sArkYyySXCplSBgtuqeXD6KL3bbz7aDFs9dq1vu4iNRMCumclpx3Fesp6F4LHQje-3Bi_1xT0d5e671J3XeqfLnXaiUgvQuvqMhwkikueJgpYh_AeCd2xXqI_pP9j_AUmVn_j</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Tombido, Linda</creator><creator>Louw, Louis</creator><creator>van Eeden, Joubert</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5424-7963</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>The Bullwhip Effect in Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Comparison of Series and Divergent Networks</title><author>Tombido, Linda ; Louw, Louis ; van Eeden, Joubert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2919-19c46e31a64a46046a7d8c2c47605e1cbc5f02fd5bc705b856d57e277aef3c1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Reverse logistics</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Waste Management/Waste Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tombido, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louw, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eeden, Joubert</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of remanufacturing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tombido, Linda</au><au>Louw, Louis</au><au>van Eeden, Joubert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Bullwhip Effect in Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Comparison of Series and Divergent Networks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of remanufacturing</jtitle><stitle>Jnl Remanufactur</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>207-238</pages><issn>2210-464X</issn><eissn>2210-4690</eissn><abstract>Supply chain network structure has been mentioned as one of the contributors to the Bullwhip Effect in the supply chain. With the incorporation of reverse logistics into most of the supply chains, the structure of the supply chain changes especially if there are more than one player in the reverse chain. In this research, systems dynamics models were developed to compare the Bullwhip Effect between serial and divergent supply chain networks with different structures in closed-loop supply chains. The scenario experimentation revealed that increasing the number of collectors in the reverse chain increased the Bullwhip suffered, Bullwhip generated and the Bullwhip slope in all supply chain configurations. Therefore, it seems to be more beneficial for a closed-loop supply chain to have one reliable collector supplying used products than more than one collector with uncertainties in the quantity of products returned. Findings also reveal that a serial network is more sensitive to changes in the reverse chain in terms of the number of parties involved compared to a divergent supply chain. This means that the serial network assumption overestimates Bullwhip measures. Whilst it may be easy to measure the Bullwhip Effect by assuming a serial supply chain structure, this value might be overestimated especially for supply chains that are involved with more than one player at each echelon. These findings provided some useful insights on modelling supply chain networks to reduce the Bullwhip Effect in closed-loop supply chains.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s13243-020-00085-9</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5424-7963</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2210-464X
ispartof Journal of remanufacturing, 2020-10, Vol.10 (3), p.207-238
issn 2210-464X
2210-4690
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2440211531
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Business and Management
Engineering
Environmental Management
Experimentation
Networks
Reverse logistics
Supply chains
Sustainable Development
Waste Management/Waste Technology
title The Bullwhip Effect in Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Comparison of Series and Divergent Networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A35%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Bullwhip%20Effect%20in%20Closed-Loop%20Supply%20Chains:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Series%20and%20Divergent%20Networks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20remanufacturing&rft.au=Tombido,%20Linda&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=207-238&rft.issn=2210-464X&rft.eissn=2210-4690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13243-020-00085-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440211531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440211531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true