Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from yearling beef heifers and mature cows classified for residual feed intake under drylot conditions

This study quantified methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) production from beef heifers and cows classified for residual feed intake adjusted for off-test backfat thickness (RFIfat) and reared in drylot during cold winter temperatures. Individual performance, daily feed intake, and RFIfat were obt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of animal science 2020-09, Vol.100 (3), p.522-535
Hauptverfasser: Manafiazar, G., Baron, V.S., McKeown, L., Block, H., Ominski, K., Plastow, G., Basarab, J.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 535
container_issue 3
container_start_page 522
container_title Canadian journal of animal science
container_volume 100
creator Manafiazar, G.
Baron, V.S.
McKeown, L.
Block, H.
Ominski, K.
Plastow, G.
Basarab, J.A.
description This study quantified methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) production from beef heifers and cows classified for residual feed intake adjusted for off-test backfat thickness (RFIfat) and reared in drylot during cold winter temperatures. Individual performance, daily feed intake, and RFIfat were obtained for 1068 crossbred and purebred yearling heifers (eight trials) as well as 176 crossbred mature cows (six trials) during the winters of 2015–2017 at two locations. A portion of these heifers (147 high RFIfat; 167 low RFIfat) and cows (69 high RFIfat; 70 low RFIfat) was monitored for enteric CH4 and CO2 emissions using the GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring (GEM) system (C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD, USA). Low RFIfat cattle consumed less feed [heifers, 7.80 vs. 8.48 kg dry matter (DM) d-1; cows, 11.64 vs. 13.16 kg DM d-1] and emitted less daily CH4 (2.5% for heifers; 3.7% for cows) and CO2 (1.4% for heifers; 3.4% for cows) compared with high RFIfat cattle. However, low RFIfat heifers and cows had higher CH4 (6.2% for heifers; 9.9% for cows) and CO2 yield (7.3% for heifers; 9.8% for cows) per kilogram DM intake compared with their high RFIfat pen mates. The GEM system performed at air temperatures between +20 and -30 °C. Feed intake of heifers and mature cows was differently affected by ambient temperature reduction between +20 and -15 °C and similarly increased their feed intake at temperatures below -15 °C. In conclusion, low RFIfat animals emit less daily enteric CH4 and CO2, due mainly to lower feed consumption at equal body weight, gain, and fatness.
doi_str_mv 10.1139/cjas-2019-0032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2439687776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A662386589</galeid><sourcerecordid>A662386589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b466t-53bd7558fe3e4cfd0abcba20dccb9ac1896ccb79c38cf59d101ffc4b59c3c20b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkl1rVDEQhoMouFZvvQ56JXhqcnI-kstSqhaqgh_XIR-TbdazyTbJwe5v6J9uji3oQkEkF8kMzzszGV6EXlJyTCkT78xG5aYlVDSEsPYRWlFBeUN52z9GK0IIb5jg3VP0LOdNDcehH1fo5hOUSxUAq2CxUUnHgK2P194Chq3P2ceQsUtxi_eg0uTDGmsAhy_BO0j5t26rypwAm_grYzOpKnIeLHYx4QTZ21lN2EHN-FDUT8BzsJCwTfsplqoK1pelzXP0xKkpw4v7-wj9eH_2_fRjc_Hlw_npyUWju2EoTc-0HfueO2DQGWeJ0karllhjtFCGcjHU1ygM48b1wlJCnTOd7mvGtESzI_T6ru4uxasZcpGbOKdQW8q2Y2Lg4zgOf6i1mkD64GJJytSVGHkyDC3jQ89FpV49QJmdv5J_Q8cPQPXYuuL6f3C-5g-qvjkQVKbAdVmrOWd5_u3rf7CfD9n7QUyKOSdwcpf8VqW9pEQuJpKLieRiIrmYqAre3gm0j3XOf-G3JyHI4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439687776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from yearling beef heifers and mature cows classified for residual feed intake under drylot conditions</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Manafiazar, G. ; Baron, V.S. ; McKeown, L. ; Block, H. ; Ominski, K. ; Plastow, G. ; Basarab, J.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Manafiazar, G. ; Baron, V.S. ; McKeown, L. ; Block, H. ; Ominski, K. ; Plastow, G. ; Basarab, J.A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study quantified methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) production from beef heifers and cows classified for residual feed intake adjusted for off-test backfat thickness (RFIfat) and reared in drylot during cold winter temperatures. Individual performance, daily feed intake, and RFIfat were obtained for 1068 crossbred and purebred yearling heifers (eight trials) as well as 176 crossbred mature cows (six trials) during the winters of 2015–2017 at two locations. A portion of these heifers (147 high RFIfat; 167 low RFIfat) and cows (69 high RFIfat; 70 low RFIfat) was monitored for enteric CH4 and CO2 emissions using the GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring (GEM) system (C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD, USA). Low RFIfat cattle consumed less feed [heifers, 7.80 vs. 8.48 kg dry matter (DM) d-1; cows, 11.64 vs. 13.16 kg DM d-1] and emitted less daily CH4 (2.5% for heifers; 3.7% for cows) and CO2 (1.4% for heifers; 3.4% for cows) compared with high RFIfat cattle. However, low RFIfat heifers and cows had higher CH4 (6.2% for heifers; 9.9% for cows) and CO2 yield (7.3% for heifers; 9.8% for cows) per kilogram DM intake compared with their high RFIfat pen mates. The GEM system performed at air temperatures between +20 and -30 °C. Feed intake of heifers and mature cows was differently affected by ambient temperature reduction between +20 and -15 °C and similarly increased their feed intake at temperatures below -15 °C. In conclusion, low RFIfat animals emit less daily enteric CH4 and CO2, due mainly to lower feed consumption at equal body weight, gain, and fatness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-3984</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/cjas-2019-0032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Canadian Science Publishing</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Ambient temperature ; Animal behavior ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Body weight ; bovins de boucherie ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Cattle ; cold temperature ; Costs (Law) ; dioxyde de carbone ; Dry matter ; drylot ; Emissions ; Emissions (Pollution) ; Feeds ; Ingestion ; ingestion alimentaire résiduelle ; Jewelry ; Methane ; méthane ; parc d’élevage ; Pollution monitoring ; residual feed intake ; température froide ; Thickness</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of animal science, 2020-09, Vol.100 (3), p.522-535</ispartof><rights>Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada 2020. Permission for reuse (free in most cases) can be obtained from copyright.com.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>2020 Published by NRC Research Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b466t-53bd7558fe3e4cfd0abcba20dccb9ac1896ccb79c38cf59d101ffc4b59c3c20b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b466t-53bd7558fe3e4cfd0abcba20dccb9ac1896ccb79c38cf59d101ffc4b59c3c20b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manafiazar, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeown, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Block, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ominski, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plastow, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basarab, J.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from yearling beef heifers and mature cows classified for residual feed intake under drylot conditions</title><title>Canadian journal of animal science</title><description>This study quantified methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) production from beef heifers and cows classified for residual feed intake adjusted for off-test backfat thickness (RFIfat) and reared in drylot during cold winter temperatures. Individual performance, daily feed intake, and RFIfat were obtained for 1068 crossbred and purebred yearling heifers (eight trials) as well as 176 crossbred mature cows (six trials) during the winters of 2015–2017 at two locations. A portion of these heifers (147 high RFIfat; 167 low RFIfat) and cows (69 high RFIfat; 70 low RFIfat) was monitored for enteric CH4 and CO2 emissions using the GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring (GEM) system (C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD, USA). Low RFIfat cattle consumed less feed [heifers, 7.80 vs. 8.48 kg dry matter (DM) d-1; cows, 11.64 vs. 13.16 kg DM d-1] and emitted less daily CH4 (2.5% for heifers; 3.7% for cows) and CO2 (1.4% for heifers; 3.4% for cows) compared with high RFIfat cattle. However, low RFIfat heifers and cows had higher CH4 (6.2% for heifers; 9.9% for cows) and CO2 yield (7.3% for heifers; 9.8% for cows) per kilogram DM intake compared with their high RFIfat pen mates. The GEM system performed at air temperatures between +20 and -30 °C. Feed intake of heifers and mature cows was differently affected by ambient temperature reduction between +20 and -15 °C and similarly increased their feed intake at temperatures below -15 °C. In conclusion, low RFIfat animals emit less daily enteric CH4 and CO2, due mainly to lower feed consumption at equal body weight, gain, and fatness.</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Ambient temperature</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>bovins de boucherie</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>cold temperature</subject><subject>Costs (Law)</subject><subject>dioxyde de carbone</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>drylot</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions (Pollution)</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>ingestion alimentaire résiduelle</subject><subject>Jewelry</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>méthane</subject><subject>parc d’élevage</subject><subject>Pollution monitoring</subject><subject>residual feed intake</subject><subject>température froide</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><issn>0008-3984</issn><issn>1918-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkl1rVDEQhoMouFZvvQ56JXhqcnI-kstSqhaqgh_XIR-TbdazyTbJwe5v6J9uji3oQkEkF8kMzzszGV6EXlJyTCkT78xG5aYlVDSEsPYRWlFBeUN52z9GK0IIb5jg3VP0LOdNDcehH1fo5hOUSxUAq2CxUUnHgK2P194Chq3P2ceQsUtxi_eg0uTDGmsAhy_BO0j5t26rypwAm_grYzOpKnIeLHYx4QTZ21lN2EHN-FDUT8BzsJCwTfsplqoK1pelzXP0xKkpw4v7-wj9eH_2_fRjc_Hlw_npyUWju2EoTc-0HfueO2DQGWeJ0karllhjtFCGcjHU1ygM48b1wlJCnTOd7mvGtESzI_T6ru4uxasZcpGbOKdQW8q2Y2Lg4zgOf6i1mkD64GJJytSVGHkyDC3jQ89FpV49QJmdv5J_Q8cPQPXYuuL6f3C-5g-qvjkQVKbAdVmrOWd5_u3rf7CfD9n7QUyKOSdwcpf8VqW9pEQuJpKLieRiIrmYqAre3gm0j3XOf-G3JyHI4w</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Manafiazar, G.</creator><creator>Baron, V.S.</creator><creator>McKeown, L.</creator><creator>Block, H.</creator><creator>Ominski, K.</creator><creator>Plastow, G.</creator><creator>Basarab, J.A.</creator><general>Canadian Science Publishing</general><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from yearling beef heifers and mature cows classified for residual feed intake under drylot conditions</title><author>Manafiazar, G. ; Baron, V.S. ; McKeown, L. ; Block, H. ; Ominski, K. ; Plastow, G. ; Basarab, J.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b466t-53bd7558fe3e4cfd0abcba20dccb9ac1896ccb79c38cf59d101ffc4b59c3c20b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Ambient temperature</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>bovins de boucherie</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>cold temperature</topic><topic>Costs (Law)</topic><topic>dioxyde de carbone</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>drylot</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions (Pollution)</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>ingestion alimentaire résiduelle</topic><topic>Jewelry</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>méthane</topic><topic>parc d’élevage</topic><topic>Pollution monitoring</topic><topic>residual feed intake</topic><topic>température froide</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manafiazar, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeown, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Block, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ominski, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plastow, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basarab, J.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manafiazar, G.</au><au>Baron, V.S.</au><au>McKeown, L.</au><au>Block, H.</au><au>Ominski, K.</au><au>Plastow, G.</au><au>Basarab, J.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from yearling beef heifers and mature cows classified for residual feed intake under drylot conditions</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>535</epage><pages>522-535</pages><issn>0008-3984</issn><eissn>1918-1825</eissn><abstract>This study quantified methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) production from beef heifers and cows classified for residual feed intake adjusted for off-test backfat thickness (RFIfat) and reared in drylot during cold winter temperatures. Individual performance, daily feed intake, and RFIfat were obtained for 1068 crossbred and purebred yearling heifers (eight trials) as well as 176 crossbred mature cows (six trials) during the winters of 2015–2017 at two locations. A portion of these heifers (147 high RFIfat; 167 low RFIfat) and cows (69 high RFIfat; 70 low RFIfat) was monitored for enteric CH4 and CO2 emissions using the GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring (GEM) system (C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD, USA). Low RFIfat cattle consumed less feed [heifers, 7.80 vs. 8.48 kg dry matter (DM) d-1; cows, 11.64 vs. 13.16 kg DM d-1] and emitted less daily CH4 (2.5% for heifers; 3.7% for cows) and CO2 (1.4% for heifers; 3.4% for cows) compared with high RFIfat cattle. However, low RFIfat heifers and cows had higher CH4 (6.2% for heifers; 9.9% for cows) and CO2 yield (7.3% for heifers; 9.8% for cows) per kilogram DM intake compared with their high RFIfat pen mates. The GEM system performed at air temperatures between +20 and -30 °C. Feed intake of heifers and mature cows was differently affected by ambient temperature reduction between +20 and -15 °C and similarly increased their feed intake at temperatures below -15 °C. In conclusion, low RFIfat animals emit less daily enteric CH4 and CO2, due mainly to lower feed consumption at equal body weight, gain, and fatness.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Canadian Science Publishing</pub><doi>10.1139/cjas-2019-0032</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-3984
ispartof Canadian journal of animal science, 2020-09, Vol.100 (3), p.522-535
issn 0008-3984
1918-1825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2439687776
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Air temperature
Ambient temperature
Animal behavior
Beef
Beef cattle
Body weight
bovins de boucherie
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Cattle
cold temperature
Costs (Law)
dioxyde de carbone
Dry matter
drylot
Emissions
Emissions (Pollution)
Feeds
Ingestion
ingestion alimentaire résiduelle
Jewelry
Methane
méthane
parc d’élevage
Pollution monitoring
residual feed intake
température froide
Thickness
title Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from yearling beef heifers and mature cows classified for residual feed intake under drylot conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A07%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20and%20carbon%20dioxide%20emissions%20from%20yearling%20beef%20heifers%20and%20mature%20cows%20classified%20for%20residual%20feed%20intake%20under%20drylot%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Manafiazar,%20G.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=535&rft.pages=522-535&rft.issn=0008-3984&rft.eissn=1918-1825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/cjas-2019-0032&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA662386589%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439687776&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A662386589&rfr_iscdi=true