Evaluation of different (bollworms) infestation on Bt and Non-Bt cotton cultivars

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of chewing pests on Bt and Non-Bt cotton varieties in Southern Punjab (Pakistan). Five cotton varieties (One NIAB Non-Bt and four Bt varieties viz. IUB-33, MNH-988, Lalazar, and Sitara-009) were grown in four regions (Multan, Khanewal,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pure and applied biology 2020-09, Vol.9 (3), p.1873-1881
1. Verfasser: Akhtar, Mujahid Niaz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1881
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1873
container_title Pure and applied biology
container_volume 9
creator Akhtar, Mujahid Niaz
description The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of chewing pests on Bt and Non-Bt cotton varieties in Southern Punjab (Pakistan). Five cotton varieties (One NIAB Non-Bt and four Bt varieties viz. IUB-33, MNH-988, Lalazar, and Sitara-009) were grown in four regions (Multan, Khanewal, Muzaffar Garh and Kabirwala). These cotton varieties were surveyed for the collection of data on different chewing pests (American, Pink, and Spotted bollworms) populations. The eggs and adult counts were calculated from April 2014 to October 2016. It was found that NIAB Non-Bt cotton has resulted in a larger number of chewing worms and eggs as compared to Bt varieties. Bt cotton showed significantly higher resistance than Non-Bt variety against chewing bollworms. It may be due to a lesser number of adults and eggs of these bollworms. However, it was estimated that these varieties were also affected by the climatic conditions of southern Punjab in Pakistan. Also, Non-Bt cotton varieties showed poor Host plant susceptibility index (HPSI) as compared to Bt varieties for all four sites. Host plant susceptibility index (HPSI) for Non-Bt cotton variety was 47.5, 40.59, and 25.1, on the other hand (HPSI) for Bt varieties were 90.18, 94.81 and 97.82 respectively for years 2014-2016. Therefore, it was suggested that the Bt cotton varieties are better than Non-Bt cotton varieties due to greater resistance against chewing bollworms.
doi_str_mv 10.19045/bspab.2020.90200
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2439163444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2439163444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1130-f13c2e7f009594fc82aa9e99cc1773d54427bfb2466e2784e10df9759af8db433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWLQ_wFvAix625mO22Ry11A8oiqDnkM0msGWb1CRb8d8b2x6cw8zL8DLz8iB0RcmMSgL1XZu2up0xwshMlkZO0IRxAhUD0Zz-0-domtKalJKCE1FP0Ptyp4dR5z54HBzueudstD7jmzYMw3eIm3SLe-9sykeTxw8Za9_h1-CrIk3IuSzNOOR-p2O6RGdOD8lOj_MCfT4uPxbP1ert6WVxv6oMpZxUjnLDrHAlSi3BmYZpLa2UxlAheFcDMNG6lsF8bplowFLSOSlqqV3TtcD5Bbo-3N3G8DWWfGodxujLS8WASzrnAFBc9OAyMaQUrVPb2G90_FGUqD08tYen_uCpPTz-C-9vYkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439163444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of different (bollworms) infestation on Bt and Non-Bt cotton cultivars</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Akhtar, Mujahid Niaz</creator><creatorcontrib>Akhtar, Mujahid Niaz</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of chewing pests on Bt and Non-Bt cotton varieties in Southern Punjab (Pakistan). Five cotton varieties (One NIAB Non-Bt and four Bt varieties viz. IUB-33, MNH-988, Lalazar, and Sitara-009) were grown in four regions (Multan, Khanewal, Muzaffar Garh and Kabirwala). These cotton varieties were surveyed for the collection of data on different chewing pests (American, Pink, and Spotted bollworms) populations. The eggs and adult counts were calculated from April 2014 to October 2016. It was found that NIAB Non-Bt cotton has resulted in a larger number of chewing worms and eggs as compared to Bt varieties. Bt cotton showed significantly higher resistance than Non-Bt variety against chewing bollworms. It may be due to a lesser number of adults and eggs of these bollworms. However, it was estimated that these varieties were also affected by the climatic conditions of southern Punjab in Pakistan. Also, Non-Bt cotton varieties showed poor Host plant susceptibility index (HPSI) as compared to Bt varieties for all four sites. Host plant susceptibility index (HPSI) for Non-Bt cotton variety was 47.5, 40.59, and 25.1, on the other hand (HPSI) for Bt varieties were 90.18, 94.81 and 97.82 respectively for years 2014-2016. Therefore, it was suggested that the Bt cotton varieties are better than Non-Bt cotton varieties due to greater resistance against chewing bollworms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2304-2478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2304-2478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.19045/bspab.2020.90200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Quetta: International Society of Pure and Applied Biology</publisher><subject>Adults ; Agricultural production ; Bollworms ; Chewing ; Climatic conditions ; Cotton ; Cultivars ; Eggs ; Host plants ; Infestation ; Insecticides ; Insects ; Mastication ; Pest resistance ; Pests ; Seeds</subject><ispartof>Pure and applied biology, 2020-09, Vol.9 (3), p.1873-1881</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akhtar, Mujahid Niaz</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of different (bollworms) infestation on Bt and Non-Bt cotton cultivars</title><title>Pure and applied biology</title><description>The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of chewing pests on Bt and Non-Bt cotton varieties in Southern Punjab (Pakistan). Five cotton varieties (One NIAB Non-Bt and four Bt varieties viz. IUB-33, MNH-988, Lalazar, and Sitara-009) were grown in four regions (Multan, Khanewal, Muzaffar Garh and Kabirwala). These cotton varieties were surveyed for the collection of data on different chewing pests (American, Pink, and Spotted bollworms) populations. The eggs and adult counts were calculated from April 2014 to October 2016. It was found that NIAB Non-Bt cotton has resulted in a larger number of chewing worms and eggs as compared to Bt varieties. Bt cotton showed significantly higher resistance than Non-Bt variety against chewing bollworms. It may be due to a lesser number of adults and eggs of these bollworms. However, it was estimated that these varieties were also affected by the climatic conditions of southern Punjab in Pakistan. Also, Non-Bt cotton varieties showed poor Host plant susceptibility index (HPSI) as compared to Bt varieties for all four sites. Host plant susceptibility index (HPSI) for Non-Bt cotton variety was 47.5, 40.59, and 25.1, on the other hand (HPSI) for Bt varieties were 90.18, 94.81 and 97.82 respectively for years 2014-2016. Therefore, it was suggested that the Bt cotton varieties are better than Non-Bt cotton varieties due to greater resistance against chewing bollworms.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Bollworms</subject><subject>Chewing</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Infestation</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Mastication</subject><subject>Pest resistance</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><issn>2304-2478</issn><issn>2304-2478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWLQ_wFvAix625mO22Ry11A8oiqDnkM0msGWb1CRb8d8b2x6cw8zL8DLz8iB0RcmMSgL1XZu2up0xwshMlkZO0IRxAhUD0Zz-0-domtKalJKCE1FP0Ptyp4dR5z54HBzueudstD7jmzYMw3eIm3SLe-9sykeTxw8Za9_h1-CrIk3IuSzNOOR-p2O6RGdOD8lOj_MCfT4uPxbP1ert6WVxv6oMpZxUjnLDrHAlSi3BmYZpLa2UxlAheFcDMNG6lsF8bplowFLSOSlqqV3TtcD5Bbo-3N3G8DWWfGodxujLS8WASzrnAFBc9OAyMaQUrVPb2G90_FGUqD08tYen_uCpPTz-C-9vYkQ</recordid><startdate>20200910</startdate><enddate>20200910</enddate><creator>Akhtar, Mujahid Niaz</creator><general>International Society of Pure and Applied Biology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200910</creationdate><title>Evaluation of different (bollworms) infestation on Bt and Non-Bt cotton cultivars</title><author>Akhtar, Mujahid Niaz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1130-f13c2e7f009594fc82aa9e99cc1773d54427bfb2466e2784e10df9759af8db433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Bollworms</topic><topic>Chewing</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Infestation</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Mastication</topic><topic>Pest resistance</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akhtar, Mujahid Niaz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Pure and applied biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akhtar, Mujahid Niaz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of different (bollworms) infestation on Bt and Non-Bt cotton cultivars</atitle><jtitle>Pure and applied biology</jtitle><date>2020-09-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1873</spage><epage>1881</epage><pages>1873-1881</pages><issn>2304-2478</issn><eissn>2304-2478</eissn><abstract>The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of chewing pests on Bt and Non-Bt cotton varieties in Southern Punjab (Pakistan). Five cotton varieties (One NIAB Non-Bt and four Bt varieties viz. IUB-33, MNH-988, Lalazar, and Sitara-009) were grown in four regions (Multan, Khanewal, Muzaffar Garh and Kabirwala). These cotton varieties were surveyed for the collection of data on different chewing pests (American, Pink, and Spotted bollworms) populations. The eggs and adult counts were calculated from April 2014 to October 2016. It was found that NIAB Non-Bt cotton has resulted in a larger number of chewing worms and eggs as compared to Bt varieties. Bt cotton showed significantly higher resistance than Non-Bt variety against chewing bollworms. It may be due to a lesser number of adults and eggs of these bollworms. However, it was estimated that these varieties were also affected by the climatic conditions of southern Punjab in Pakistan. Also, Non-Bt cotton varieties showed poor Host plant susceptibility index (HPSI) as compared to Bt varieties for all four sites. Host plant susceptibility index (HPSI) for Non-Bt cotton variety was 47.5, 40.59, and 25.1, on the other hand (HPSI) for Bt varieties were 90.18, 94.81 and 97.82 respectively for years 2014-2016. Therefore, it was suggested that the Bt cotton varieties are better than Non-Bt cotton varieties due to greater resistance against chewing bollworms.</abstract><cop>Quetta</cop><pub>International Society of Pure and Applied Biology</pub><doi>10.19045/bspab.2020.90200</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2304-2478
ispartof Pure and applied biology, 2020-09, Vol.9 (3), p.1873-1881
issn 2304-2478
2304-2478
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2439163444
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adults
Agricultural production
Bollworms
Chewing
Climatic conditions
Cotton
Cultivars
Eggs
Host plants
Infestation
Insecticides
Insects
Mastication
Pest resistance
Pests
Seeds
title Evaluation of different (bollworms) infestation on Bt and Non-Bt cotton cultivars
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20different%20(bollworms)%20infestation%20on%20Bt%20and%20Non-Bt%20cotton%20cultivars&rft.jtitle=Pure%20and%20applied%20biology&rft.au=Akhtar,%20Mujahid%20Niaz&rft.date=2020-09-10&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1873&rft.epage=1881&rft.pages=1873-1881&rft.issn=2304-2478&rft.eissn=2304-2478&rft_id=info:doi/10.19045/bspab.2020.90200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2439163444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439163444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true