A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness

Purpose – The move towards “blended learning”, consisting of a combination of online and face-to-face teaching, continues to gain pace in universities around the world. It is important, however, to question the quality of this learning. The OECD has made use of a model of “Readiness, Intensity and I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Education & training (London) 2014-04, Vol.56 (2/3), p.233-251
Hauptverfasser: Wong, Lily, Tatnall, Arthur, Burgess, Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 251
container_issue 2/3
container_start_page 233
container_title Education & training (London)
container_volume 56
creator Wong, Lily
Tatnall, Arthur
Burgess, Stephen
description Purpose – The move towards “blended learning”, consisting of a combination of online and face-to-face teaching, continues to gain pace in universities around the world. It is important, however, to question the quality of this learning. The OECD has made use of a model of “Readiness, Intensity and Impact” for investigating the adoption and use of eBusiness technologies. The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework, based on this model and adapted for blended learning, to assess the readiness, intensity of adoption and impact on blended learning offerings. The framework is tested via a description of how one university has adopted and used blended learning, and investigates the quality of the learning from this approach. Design/methodology/approach – The framework is tested via a case study involving the assessment of a blended learning approach to the delivery of a first-year undergraduate accounting unit at Victoria University, Australia. Various approaches to delivery are assessed over a two-year period. The results are drawn from a survey specifically designed to identify students’ attitudes towards blended learning. Findings – Despite having three new online options readily available for students to access, there was strong support for face-to-face delivery methods. In relation to the framework, the assessment suggested that certain aspects of the university's blended learning approach could be investigated further (particularly student readiness for different blended learning options and an overall assessment of the impact of a blended approach), to provide a more holistic view of the readiness to adopt and impact of the blended learning offerings. Originality/value – The value of this contribution lies in the development of a unique framework to assess the impact of blended learning approaches from the viewpoint of student readiness and intensity of separate delivery approaches – whilst maintaining the need to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning as an overall package.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2439155856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3247319841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-b09bd5344b0035308ae6b59b15e64e5d641cc68ffcb50de43a24f0c34169628a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsH6cvQY8bzv7mQS8lFI_oOClnpfdzWxJTZO6m1b89ybUiyCeBl7eZ2Z4CLljMGUMitlyTUFSDkxQAFmekQnLVUE14_k5mQwRUCgZvyRXKW0BBkbwCXmYZyHaHX528T0LXczq9oiprze2r9tN5hpsK6yyBm1sxwBDQN_XR2wxpRtyEWyT8PZnXpO3x-V68UxXr08vi_mKeslFTx2UrlJCSgcglIDConaqdEyhlqgqLZn3ugjBOwUVSmG5DOCFZLrUvLDimtyf9u5j93EY3jPb7hDb4aThUpRMqULp_1pMQa65znkxtGanlo9dShGD2cd6Z-OXYWBGkWa5NiDNKNKMIgdieiJwh9E21R_AL_PiGwqLca4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1507626728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Wong, Lily ; Tatnall, Arthur ; Burgess, Stephen</creator><contributor>Paul Jones and Dr Heather Skinner, Dr</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wong, Lily ; Tatnall, Arthur ; Burgess, Stephen ; Paul Jones and Dr Heather Skinner, Dr</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose – The move towards “blended learning”, consisting of a combination of online and face-to-face teaching, continues to gain pace in universities around the world. It is important, however, to question the quality of this learning. The OECD has made use of a model of “Readiness, Intensity and Impact” for investigating the adoption and use of eBusiness technologies. The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework, based on this model and adapted for blended learning, to assess the readiness, intensity of adoption and impact on blended learning offerings. The framework is tested via a description of how one university has adopted and used blended learning, and investigates the quality of the learning from this approach. Design/methodology/approach – The framework is tested via a case study involving the assessment of a blended learning approach to the delivery of a first-year undergraduate accounting unit at Victoria University, Australia. Various approaches to delivery are assessed over a two-year period. The results are drawn from a survey specifically designed to identify students’ attitudes towards blended learning. Findings – Despite having three new online options readily available for students to access, there was strong support for face-to-face delivery methods. In relation to the framework, the assessment suggested that certain aspects of the university's blended learning approach could be investigated further (particularly student readiness for different blended learning options and an overall assessment of the impact of a blended approach), to provide a more holistic view of the readiness to adopt and impact of the blended learning offerings. Originality/value – The value of this contribution lies in the development of a unique framework to assess the impact of blended learning approaches from the viewpoint of student readiness and intensity of separate delivery approaches – whilst maintaining the need to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning as an overall package.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EDUTAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Accounting ; Blended learning ; CAI ; College Administration ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Computer assisted instruction ; Course Content ; Curricular innovation in vocational education ; Distance learning ; Education ; Educational Environment ; Educational objectives ; Educational Resources ; Educational Technology ; Electronic commerce ; Electronic Learning ; Information technology ; Internet ; Investigations ; Learning Processes ; Methods ; Online instruction ; Online tutorials ; Perceptions ; Public speaking ; Students ; Studies ; Teaching Methods ; Technology ; Training ; Undergraduate Students ; University administration ; Vocational education &amp; training</subject><ispartof>Education &amp; training (London), 2014-04, Vol.56 (2/3), p.233-251</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2014</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-b09bd5344b0035308ae6b59b15e64e5d641cc68ffcb50de43a24f0c34169628a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-b09bd5344b0035308ae6b59b15e64e5d641cc68ffcb50de43a24f0c34169628a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52686,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Paul Jones and Dr Heather Skinner, Dr</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wong, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatnall, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness</title><title>Education &amp; training (London)</title><description>Purpose – The move towards “blended learning”, consisting of a combination of online and face-to-face teaching, continues to gain pace in universities around the world. It is important, however, to question the quality of this learning. The OECD has made use of a model of “Readiness, Intensity and Impact” for investigating the adoption and use of eBusiness technologies. The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework, based on this model and adapted for blended learning, to assess the readiness, intensity of adoption and impact on blended learning offerings. The framework is tested via a description of how one university has adopted and used blended learning, and investigates the quality of the learning from this approach. Design/methodology/approach – The framework is tested via a case study involving the assessment of a blended learning approach to the delivery of a first-year undergraduate accounting unit at Victoria University, Australia. Various approaches to delivery are assessed over a two-year period. The results are drawn from a survey specifically designed to identify students’ attitudes towards blended learning. Findings – Despite having three new online options readily available for students to access, there was strong support for face-to-face delivery methods. In relation to the framework, the assessment suggested that certain aspects of the university's blended learning approach could be investigated further (particularly student readiness for different blended learning options and an overall assessment of the impact of a blended approach), to provide a more holistic view of the readiness to adopt and impact of the blended learning offerings. Originality/value – The value of this contribution lies in the development of a unique framework to assess the impact of blended learning approaches from the viewpoint of student readiness and intensity of separate delivery approaches – whilst maintaining the need to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning as an overall package.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Blended learning</subject><subject>CAI</subject><subject>College Administration</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Computer assisted instruction</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Curricular innovation in vocational education</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational objectives</subject><subject>Educational Resources</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Online tutorials</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Public speaking</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>University administration</subject><subject>Vocational education &amp; training</subject><issn>0040-0912</issn><issn>1758-6127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsH6cvQY8bzv7mQS8lFI_oOClnpfdzWxJTZO6m1b89ybUiyCeBl7eZ2Z4CLljMGUMitlyTUFSDkxQAFmekQnLVUE14_k5mQwRUCgZvyRXKW0BBkbwCXmYZyHaHX528T0LXczq9oiprze2r9tN5hpsK6yyBm1sxwBDQN_XR2wxpRtyEWyT8PZnXpO3x-V68UxXr08vi_mKeslFTx2UrlJCSgcglIDConaqdEyhlqgqLZn3ugjBOwUVSmG5DOCFZLrUvLDimtyf9u5j93EY3jPb7hDb4aThUpRMqULp_1pMQa65znkxtGanlo9dShGD2cd6Z-OXYWBGkWa5NiDNKNKMIgdieiJwh9E21R_AL_PiGwqLca4</recordid><startdate>20140408</startdate><enddate>20140408</enddate><creator>Wong, Lily</creator><creator>Tatnall, Arthur</creator><creator>Burgess, Stephen</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140408</creationdate><title>A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness</title><author>Wong, Lily ; Tatnall, Arthur ; Burgess, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-b09bd5344b0035308ae6b59b15e64e5d641cc68ffcb50de43a24f0c34169628a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Blended learning</topic><topic>CAI</topic><topic>College Administration</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Computer assisted instruction</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Curricular innovation in vocational education</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational objectives</topic><topic>Educational Resources</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Online tutorials</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Public speaking</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>University administration</topic><topic>Vocational education &amp; training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatnall, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Education &amp; training (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Lily</au><au>Tatnall, Arthur</au><au>Burgess, Stephen</au><au>Paul Jones and Dr Heather Skinner, Dr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness</atitle><jtitle>Education &amp; training (London)</jtitle><date>2014-04-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2/3</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>233-251</pages><issn>0040-0912</issn><eissn>1758-6127</eissn><coden>EDUTAK</coden><abstract>Purpose – The move towards “blended learning”, consisting of a combination of online and face-to-face teaching, continues to gain pace in universities around the world. It is important, however, to question the quality of this learning. The OECD has made use of a model of “Readiness, Intensity and Impact” for investigating the adoption and use of eBusiness technologies. The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework, based on this model and adapted for blended learning, to assess the readiness, intensity of adoption and impact on blended learning offerings. The framework is tested via a description of how one university has adopted and used blended learning, and investigates the quality of the learning from this approach. Design/methodology/approach – The framework is tested via a case study involving the assessment of a blended learning approach to the delivery of a first-year undergraduate accounting unit at Victoria University, Australia. Various approaches to delivery are assessed over a two-year period. The results are drawn from a survey specifically designed to identify students’ attitudes towards blended learning. Findings – Despite having three new online options readily available for students to access, there was strong support for face-to-face delivery methods. In relation to the framework, the assessment suggested that certain aspects of the university's blended learning approach could be investigated further (particularly student readiness for different blended learning options and an overall assessment of the impact of a blended approach), to provide a more holistic view of the readiness to adopt and impact of the blended learning offerings. Originality/value – The value of this contribution lies in the development of a unique framework to assess the impact of blended learning approaches from the viewpoint of student readiness and intensity of separate delivery approaches – whilst maintaining the need to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning as an overall package.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-0912
ispartof Education & training (London), 2014-04, Vol.56 (2/3), p.233-251
issn 0040-0912
1758-6127
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2439155856
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Academic achievement
Accounting
Blended learning
CAI
College Administration
Colleges & universities
Computer assisted instruction
Course Content
Curricular innovation in vocational education
Distance learning
Education
Educational Environment
Educational objectives
Educational Resources
Educational Technology
Electronic commerce
Electronic Learning
Information technology
Internet
Investigations
Learning Processes
Methods
Online instruction
Online tutorials
Perceptions
Public speaking
Students
Studies
Teaching Methods
Technology
Training
Undergraduate Students
University administration
Vocational education & training
title A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20framework%20for%20investigating%20blended%20learning%20effectiveness&rft.jtitle=Education%20&%20training%20(London)&rft.au=Wong,%20Lily&rft.date=2014-04-08&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2/3&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=233-251&rft.issn=0040-0912&rft.eissn=1758-6127&rft.coden=EDUTAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3247319841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1507626728&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true