New research paradigms in the built environment

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review aspects of innovation, research and development paradigms and paradigmatic changes which have occurred in construction over recent years.Design methodology approach - The approach combines reviewing literature and some theory within the context of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Construction innovation 2010-01, Vol.10 (1), p.5-13
1. Verfasser: Fellows, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Construction innovation
container_volume 10
creator Fellows, Richard
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review aspects of innovation, research and development paradigms and paradigmatic changes which have occurred in construction over recent years.Design methodology approach - The approach combines reviewing literature and some theory within the context of the author's experiences as a participant in the construction industry and associated research and education.Findings - The paper concludes that much has been re-cycled, often under amended titles. There is notable scope and advisability in paradigm shifts from reductionist determinist approaches to stochastic approaches which accommodate complexities of interdependencies plus moves from "hard" positivism to "softer" constructivist perspectives.Research limitations implications - The paper is limited in validity and reliability due to the methods employed. However, the conclusion does stress the essential of researchers being aware of and articulating the limitations of their work; the need for sound theoretical foundations is stressed in regard to both topics and methods.Practical implications - Proper examinations of research, including ontologies, epistemologies, validities and reliabilities, as well as the topics under investigation, promotes good research and its application and avoids recycling of "popular" topics in periodically amended guises.Originality value - The paper expresses the author's original views, developed over a quite extensive and varied career; however, it expresses views held fairly widely but seldom expressed beyond "closed doors".
doi_str_mv 10.1108/14714171011017545
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2439154449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671359435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-38f2a22f3197ecd42eedb6dcd879183c669d4d1c2cb4b1081a84d0429bedc4c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkElLxEAQhYMoOC4_wFvAiwejXd2VdHKUwV0UQRlvTae7otEsY3fG5d_bOuJhRPBUC9-rerwo2gK2B8DyfUAJCBJYmECmmC5Fo7CTCctTufzVQxKAdDVa8_6RMY6Q4Sjav6TX2JEn7cxDPNVO2_q-9XHdxcMDxeWsboaYupfa9V1L3bARrVS68bT5Xdej26PDm_FJcnF1fDo-uEiMEHJIRF5xzXkloJBkLHIiW2bW2FwWkAuTZYVFC4abEsvgH3SOliEvSrIGjRTr0c787tT1zzPyg2prb6hpdEf9zCvIJIi0QJEGdHsBfexnrgvuFEdRQIqIRaBgThnXe--oUlNXt9q9K2DqM0L1K8KgSeaa2g_09iPQ7kllUshU4YQrfn43EXCWq-vAszlPLTnd2H-92P1Dsoiqqa3EBzIcjBk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439154449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New research paradigms in the built environment</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Fellows, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Fellows, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review aspects of innovation, research and development paradigms and paradigmatic changes which have occurred in construction over recent years.Design methodology approach - The approach combines reviewing literature and some theory within the context of the author's experiences as a participant in the construction industry and associated research and education.Findings - The paper concludes that much has been re-cycled, often under amended titles. There is notable scope and advisability in paradigm shifts from reductionist determinist approaches to stochastic approaches which accommodate complexities of interdependencies plus moves from "hard" positivism to "softer" constructivist perspectives.Research limitations implications - The paper is limited in validity and reliability due to the methods employed. However, the conclusion does stress the essential of researchers being aware of and articulating the limitations of their work; the need for sound theoretical foundations is stressed in regard to both topics and methods.Practical implications - Proper examinations of research, including ontologies, epistemologies, validities and reliabilities, as well as the topics under investigation, promotes good research and its application and avoids recycling of "popular" topics in periodically amended guises.Originality value - The paper expresses the author's original views, developed over a quite extensive and varied career; however, it expresses views held fairly widely but seldom expressed beyond "closed doors".</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-4175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0857</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/14714171011017545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Built environment ; Careers ; Construction ; Construction industry ; Costs ; Doors ; Education ; Epistemology ; Foundations ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Paradigms ; Productivity ; Quality circles ; R&amp;D ; Recycling ; Research &amp; development ; Research and development ; Research methods ; Sound ; Total quality ; Urban environments</subject><ispartof>Construction innovation, 2010-01, Vol.10 (1), p.5-13</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-38f2a22f3197ecd42eedb6dcd879183c669d4d1c2cb4b1081a84d0429bedc4c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-38f2a22f3197ecd42eedb6dcd879183c669d4d1c2cb4b1081a84d0429bedc4c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14714171011017545/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14714171011017545/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,21674,27901,27902,52661,52664,53219,53347</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fellows, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>New research paradigms in the built environment</title><title>Construction innovation</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review aspects of innovation, research and development paradigms and paradigmatic changes which have occurred in construction over recent years.Design methodology approach - The approach combines reviewing literature and some theory within the context of the author's experiences as a participant in the construction industry and associated research and education.Findings - The paper concludes that much has been re-cycled, often under amended titles. There is notable scope and advisability in paradigm shifts from reductionist determinist approaches to stochastic approaches which accommodate complexities of interdependencies plus moves from "hard" positivism to "softer" constructivist perspectives.Research limitations implications - The paper is limited in validity and reliability due to the methods employed. However, the conclusion does stress the essential of researchers being aware of and articulating the limitations of their work; the need for sound theoretical foundations is stressed in regard to both topics and methods.Practical implications - Proper examinations of research, including ontologies, epistemologies, validities and reliabilities, as well as the topics under investigation, promotes good research and its application and avoids recycling of "popular" topics in periodically amended guises.Originality value - The paper expresses the author's original views, developed over a quite extensive and varied career; however, it expresses views held fairly widely but seldom expressed beyond "closed doors".</description><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Doors</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Quality circles</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Total quality</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><issn>1471-4175</issn><issn>1477-0857</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkElLxEAQhYMoOC4_wFvAiwejXd2VdHKUwV0UQRlvTae7otEsY3fG5d_bOuJhRPBUC9-rerwo2gK2B8DyfUAJCBJYmECmmC5Fo7CTCctTufzVQxKAdDVa8_6RMY6Q4Sjav6TX2JEn7cxDPNVO2_q-9XHdxcMDxeWsboaYupfa9V1L3bARrVS68bT5Xdej26PDm_FJcnF1fDo-uEiMEHJIRF5xzXkloJBkLHIiW2bW2FwWkAuTZYVFC4abEsvgH3SOliEvSrIGjRTr0c787tT1zzPyg2prb6hpdEf9zCvIJIi0QJEGdHsBfexnrgvuFEdRQIqIRaBgThnXe--oUlNXt9q9K2DqM0L1K8KgSeaa2g_09iPQ7kllUshU4YQrfn43EXCWq-vAszlPLTnd2H-92P1Dsoiqqa3EBzIcjBk</recordid><startdate>20100119</startdate><enddate>20100119</enddate><creator>Fellows, Richard</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100119</creationdate><title>New research paradigms in the built environment</title><author>Fellows, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-38f2a22f3197ecd42eedb6dcd879183c669d4d1c2cb4b1081a84d0429bedc4c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Doors</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Quality circles</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Total quality</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fellows, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Construction innovation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fellows, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New research paradigms in the built environment</atitle><jtitle>Construction innovation</jtitle><date>2010-01-19</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>5-13</pages><issn>1471-4175</issn><eissn>1477-0857</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review aspects of innovation, research and development paradigms and paradigmatic changes which have occurred in construction over recent years.Design methodology approach - The approach combines reviewing literature and some theory within the context of the author's experiences as a participant in the construction industry and associated research and education.Findings - The paper concludes that much has been re-cycled, often under amended titles. There is notable scope and advisability in paradigm shifts from reductionist determinist approaches to stochastic approaches which accommodate complexities of interdependencies plus moves from "hard" positivism to "softer" constructivist perspectives.Research limitations implications - The paper is limited in validity and reliability due to the methods employed. However, the conclusion does stress the essential of researchers being aware of and articulating the limitations of their work; the need for sound theoretical foundations is stressed in regard to both topics and methods.Practical implications - Proper examinations of research, including ontologies, epistemologies, validities and reliabilities, as well as the topics under investigation, promotes good research and its application and avoids recycling of "popular" topics in periodically amended guises.Originality value - The paper expresses the author's original views, developed over a quite extensive and varied career; however, it expresses views held fairly widely but seldom expressed beyond "closed doors".</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/14714171011017545</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-4175
ispartof Construction innovation, 2010-01, Vol.10 (1), p.5-13
issn 1471-4175
1477-0857
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2439154449
source Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Built environment
Careers
Construction
Construction industry
Costs
Doors
Education
Epistemology
Foundations
Innovation
Innovations
Paradigms
Productivity
Quality circles
R&D
Recycling
Research & development
Research and development
Research methods
Sound
Total quality
Urban environments
title New research paradigms in the built environment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A25%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20research%20paradigms%20in%20the%20built%20environment&rft.jtitle=Construction%20innovation&rft.au=Fellows,%20Richard&rft.date=2010-01-19&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=5-13&rft.issn=1471-4175&rft.eissn=1477-0857&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/14714171011017545&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E1671359435%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439154449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true