New research paradigms in the built environment
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review aspects of innovation, research and development paradigms and paradigmatic changes which have occurred in construction over recent years.Design methodology approach - The approach combines reviewing literature and some theory within the context of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Construction innovation 2010-01, Vol.10 (1), p.5-13 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | Construction innovation |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Fellows, Richard |
description | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review aspects of innovation, research and development paradigms and paradigmatic changes which have occurred in construction over recent years.Design methodology approach - The approach combines reviewing literature and some theory within the context of the author's experiences as a participant in the construction industry and associated research and education.Findings - The paper concludes that much has been re-cycled, often under amended titles. There is notable scope and advisability in paradigm shifts from reductionist determinist approaches to stochastic approaches which accommodate complexities of interdependencies plus moves from "hard" positivism to "softer" constructivist perspectives.Research limitations implications - The paper is limited in validity and reliability due to the methods employed. However, the conclusion does stress the essential of researchers being aware of and articulating the limitations of their work; the need for sound theoretical foundations is stressed in regard to both topics and methods.Practical implications - Proper examinations of research, including ontologies, epistemologies, validities and reliabilities, as well as the topics under investigation, promotes good research and its application and avoids recycling of "popular" topics in periodically amended guises.Originality value - The paper expresses the author's original views, developed over a quite extensive and varied career; however, it expresses views held fairly widely but seldom expressed beyond "closed doors". |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/14714171011017545 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2439154449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671359435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-38f2a22f3197ecd42eedb6dcd879183c669d4d1c2cb4b1081a84d0429bedc4c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkElLxEAQhYMoOC4_wFvAiwejXd2VdHKUwV0UQRlvTae7otEsY3fG5d_bOuJhRPBUC9-rerwo2gK2B8DyfUAJCBJYmECmmC5Fo7CTCctTufzVQxKAdDVa8_6RMY6Q4Sjav6TX2JEn7cxDPNVO2_q-9XHdxcMDxeWsboaYupfa9V1L3bARrVS68bT5Xdej26PDm_FJcnF1fDo-uEiMEHJIRF5xzXkloJBkLHIiW2bW2FwWkAuTZYVFC4abEsvgH3SOliEvSrIGjRTr0c787tT1zzPyg2prb6hpdEf9zCvIJIi0QJEGdHsBfexnrgvuFEdRQIqIRaBgThnXe--oUlNXt9q9K2DqM0L1K8KgSeaa2g_09iPQ7kllUshU4YQrfn43EXCWq-vAszlPLTnd2H-92P1Dsoiqqa3EBzIcjBk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439154449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New research paradigms in the built environment</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Fellows, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Fellows, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review aspects of innovation, research and development paradigms and paradigmatic changes which have occurred in construction over recent years.Design methodology approach - The approach combines reviewing literature and some theory within the context of the author's experiences as a participant in the construction industry and associated research and education.Findings - The paper concludes that much has been re-cycled, often under amended titles. There is notable scope and advisability in paradigm shifts from reductionist determinist approaches to stochastic approaches which accommodate complexities of interdependencies plus moves from "hard" positivism to "softer" constructivist perspectives.Research limitations implications - The paper is limited in validity and reliability due to the methods employed. However, the conclusion does stress the essential of researchers being aware of and articulating the limitations of their work; the need for sound theoretical foundations is stressed in regard to both topics and methods.Practical implications - Proper examinations of research, including ontologies, epistemologies, validities and reliabilities, as well as the topics under investigation, promotes good research and its application and avoids recycling of "popular" topics in periodically amended guises.Originality value - The paper expresses the author's original views, developed over a quite extensive and varied career; however, it expresses views held fairly widely but seldom expressed beyond "closed doors".</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-4175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0857</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/14714171011017545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Built environment ; Careers ; Construction ; Construction industry ; Costs ; Doors ; Education ; Epistemology ; Foundations ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Paradigms ; Productivity ; Quality circles ; R&D ; Recycling ; Research & development ; Research and development ; Research methods ; Sound ; Total quality ; Urban environments</subject><ispartof>Construction innovation, 2010-01, Vol.10 (1), p.5-13</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-38f2a22f3197ecd42eedb6dcd879183c669d4d1c2cb4b1081a84d0429bedc4c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-38f2a22f3197ecd42eedb6dcd879183c669d4d1c2cb4b1081a84d0429bedc4c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14714171011017545/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14714171011017545/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,21674,27901,27902,52661,52664,53219,53347</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fellows, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>New research paradigms in the built environment</title><title>Construction innovation</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review aspects of innovation, research and development paradigms and paradigmatic changes which have occurred in construction over recent years.Design methodology approach - The approach combines reviewing literature and some theory within the context of the author's experiences as a participant in the construction industry and associated research and education.Findings - The paper concludes that much has been re-cycled, often under amended titles. There is notable scope and advisability in paradigm shifts from reductionist determinist approaches to stochastic approaches which accommodate complexities of interdependencies plus moves from "hard" positivism to "softer" constructivist perspectives.Research limitations implications - The paper is limited in validity and reliability due to the methods employed. However, the conclusion does stress the essential of researchers being aware of and articulating the limitations of their work; the need for sound theoretical foundations is stressed in regard to both topics and methods.Practical implications - Proper examinations of research, including ontologies, epistemologies, validities and reliabilities, as well as the topics under investigation, promotes good research and its application and avoids recycling of "popular" topics in periodically amended guises.Originality value - The paper expresses the author's original views, developed over a quite extensive and varied career; however, it expresses views held fairly widely but seldom expressed beyond "closed doors".</description><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Doors</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Quality circles</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Total quality</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><issn>1471-4175</issn><issn>1477-0857</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkElLxEAQhYMoOC4_wFvAiwejXd2VdHKUwV0UQRlvTae7otEsY3fG5d_bOuJhRPBUC9-rerwo2gK2B8DyfUAJCBJYmECmmC5Fo7CTCctTufzVQxKAdDVa8_6RMY6Q4Sjav6TX2JEn7cxDPNVO2_q-9XHdxcMDxeWsboaYupfa9V1L3bARrVS68bT5Xdej26PDm_FJcnF1fDo-uEiMEHJIRF5xzXkloJBkLHIiW2bW2FwWkAuTZYVFC4abEsvgH3SOliEvSrIGjRTr0c787tT1zzPyg2prb6hpdEf9zCvIJIi0QJEGdHsBfexnrgvuFEdRQIqIRaBgThnXe--oUlNXt9q9K2DqM0L1K8KgSeaa2g_09iPQ7kllUshU4YQrfn43EXCWq-vAszlPLTnd2H-92P1Dsoiqqa3EBzIcjBk</recordid><startdate>20100119</startdate><enddate>20100119</enddate><creator>Fellows, Richard</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100119</creationdate><title>New research paradigms in the built environment</title><author>Fellows, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-38f2a22f3197ecd42eedb6dcd879183c669d4d1c2cb4b1081a84d0429bedc4c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Doors</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Quality circles</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Total quality</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fellows, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Construction innovation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fellows, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New research paradigms in the built environment</atitle><jtitle>Construction innovation</jtitle><date>2010-01-19</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>5-13</pages><issn>1471-4175</issn><eissn>1477-0857</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review aspects of innovation, research and development paradigms and paradigmatic changes which have occurred in construction over recent years.Design methodology approach - The approach combines reviewing literature and some theory within the context of the author's experiences as a participant in the construction industry and associated research and education.Findings - The paper concludes that much has been re-cycled, often under amended titles. There is notable scope and advisability in paradigm shifts from reductionist determinist approaches to stochastic approaches which accommodate complexities of interdependencies plus moves from "hard" positivism to "softer" constructivist perspectives.Research limitations implications - The paper is limited in validity and reliability due to the methods employed. However, the conclusion does stress the essential of researchers being aware of and articulating the limitations of their work; the need for sound theoretical foundations is stressed in regard to both topics and methods.Practical implications - Proper examinations of research, including ontologies, epistemologies, validities and reliabilities, as well as the topics under investigation, promotes good research and its application and avoids recycling of "popular" topics in periodically amended guises.Originality value - The paper expresses the author's original views, developed over a quite extensive and varied career; however, it expresses views held fairly widely but seldom expressed beyond "closed doors".</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/14714171011017545</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-4175 |
ispartof | Construction innovation, 2010-01, Vol.10 (1), p.5-13 |
issn | 1471-4175 1477-0857 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2439154449 |
source | Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Built environment Careers Construction Construction industry Costs Doors Education Epistemology Foundations Innovation Innovations Paradigms Productivity Quality circles R&D Recycling Research & development Research and development Research methods Sound Total quality Urban environments |
title | New research paradigms in the built environment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A25%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20research%20paradigms%20in%20the%20built%20environment&rft.jtitle=Construction%20innovation&rft.au=Fellows,%20Richard&rft.date=2010-01-19&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=5-13&rft.issn=1471-4175&rft.eissn=1477-0857&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/14714171011017545&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E1671359435%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439154449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |