Do Learning Approaches Set the Stage for Emotional Well-Being in College Students?
The research aim of this paper was two-fold: to generate evidence that personality factors are linear predictors of the variable approaches to learning (a relevant cognitive-motivational variable of Educational Psychology); and to show that each type of learning approach differentially predicts posi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2020-09, Vol.12 (17), p.6984 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 6984 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | de la Fuente, Jesús Peralta-Sánchez, Francisco Javier Martínez-Vicente, José Manuel Santos, Flavia H. Fadda, Salvatore Gaeta-González, Martha Leticia |
description | The research aim of this paper was two-fold: to generate evidence that personality factors are linear predictors of the variable approaches to learning (a relevant cognitive-motivational variable of Educational Psychology); and to show that each type of learning approach differentially predicts positive or negative achievement emotions, in three learning situations: class time, study time, and testing. A total of 658 university students voluntarily completed validated questionnaires referring to these three variables. Using an ex post facto design, we conducted correlational analyses, regression analyses, and multiple structural predictions. The results showed that Conscientiousness is associated with and predicts a Deep Approach to learning, while also predicting positive achievement emotions. By contrast, Neuroticism is associated with and significantly predicts a Surface Approach to learning, as well as negative achievement emotions. There are important psychoeducational implications in the university context, both for prevention and for self-improvement, and for programs that offer psychoeducational guidance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12176984 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2438863640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2438863640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b44300235e3be29cb2e2421909328c188c9e03b99cfc3e9f84a5719b2b4a549b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LAzEUxIMoWGovfoKAN2E1yctuk5PUWv_AgmAVj0sS37ZbtpuaZA_99m6poHN5c_i9YRhCLjm7AdDsNvZc8GmhlTwhI8GmPOMsZ6f__DmZxLhhgwC45sWIvD14WqIJXdOt6Gy3C964NUa6xETTGukymRXS2ge62PrU-M609BPbNrvHw0fT0blvW1wdyP4LuxTvLshZbdqIk987Jh-Pi_f5c1a-Pr3MZ2XmhM5TZqUExgTkCBaFdlagkIJrpkEox5VyGhlYrV3tAHWtpMmnXFthByO1hTG5OuYOpb97jKna-D4MBWMlJChVQCHZQF0fKRd8jAHrahearQn7irPqMFv1Nxv8ACyjXV0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438863640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Learning Approaches Set the Stage for Emotional Well-Being in College Students?</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>de la Fuente, Jesús ; Peralta-Sánchez, Francisco Javier ; Martínez-Vicente, José Manuel ; Santos, Flavia H. ; Fadda, Salvatore ; Gaeta-González, Martha Leticia</creator><creatorcontrib>de la Fuente, Jesús ; Peralta-Sánchez, Francisco Javier ; Martínez-Vicente, José Manuel ; Santos, Flavia H. ; Fadda, Salvatore ; Gaeta-González, Martha Leticia</creatorcontrib><description>The research aim of this paper was two-fold: to generate evidence that personality factors are linear predictors of the variable approaches to learning (a relevant cognitive-motivational variable of Educational Psychology); and to show that each type of learning approach differentially predicts positive or negative achievement emotions, in three learning situations: class time, study time, and testing. A total of 658 university students voluntarily completed validated questionnaires referring to these three variables. Using an ex post facto design, we conducted correlational analyses, regression analyses, and multiple structural predictions. The results showed that Conscientiousness is associated with and predicts a Deep Approach to learning, while also predicting positive achievement emotions. By contrast, Neuroticism is associated with and significantly predicts a Surface Approach to learning, as well as negative achievement emotions. There are important psychoeducational implications in the university context, both for prevention and for self-improvement, and for programs that offer psychoeducational guidance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12176984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Colleges & universities ; Correlation analysis ; Educational psychology ; Emotions ; Ex post facto design ; Hypotheses ; Learning ; Motivation ; Neurosis ; Personality ; Questionnaires ; Stress ; Students ; Teaching ; University students ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-09, Vol.12 (17), p.6984</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b44300235e3be29cb2e2421909328c188c9e03b99cfc3e9f84a5719b2b4a549b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b44300235e3be29cb2e2421909328c188c9e03b99cfc3e9f84a5719b2b4a549b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1710-217X ; 0000-0001-9401-4419 ; 0000-0003-4831-1628 ; 0000-0002-1829-9202 ; 0000-0003-2592-9038</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de la Fuente, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peralta-Sánchez, Francisco Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Vicente, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Flavia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadda, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaeta-González, Martha Leticia</creatorcontrib><title>Do Learning Approaches Set the Stage for Emotional Well-Being in College Students?</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The research aim of this paper was two-fold: to generate evidence that personality factors are linear predictors of the variable approaches to learning (a relevant cognitive-motivational variable of Educational Psychology); and to show that each type of learning approach differentially predicts positive or negative achievement emotions, in three learning situations: class time, study time, and testing. A total of 658 university students voluntarily completed validated questionnaires referring to these three variables. Using an ex post facto design, we conducted correlational analyses, regression analyses, and multiple structural predictions. The results showed that Conscientiousness is associated with and predicts a Deep Approach to learning, while also predicting positive achievement emotions. By contrast, Neuroticism is associated with and significantly predicts a Surface Approach to learning, as well as negative achievement emotions. There are important psychoeducational implications in the university context, both for prevention and for self-improvement, and for programs that offer psychoeducational guidance.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Ex post facto design</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Neurosis</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>University students</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9LAzEUxIMoWGovfoKAN2E1yctuk5PUWv_AgmAVj0sS37ZbtpuaZA_99m6poHN5c_i9YRhCLjm7AdDsNvZc8GmhlTwhI8GmPOMsZ6f__DmZxLhhgwC45sWIvD14WqIJXdOt6Gy3C964NUa6xETTGukymRXS2ge62PrU-M609BPbNrvHw0fT0blvW1wdyP4LuxTvLshZbdqIk987Jh-Pi_f5c1a-Pr3MZ2XmhM5TZqUExgTkCBaFdlagkIJrpkEox5VyGhlYrV3tAHWtpMmnXFthByO1hTG5OuYOpb97jKna-D4MBWMlJChVQCHZQF0fKRd8jAHrahearQn7irPqMFv1Nxv8ACyjXV0</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>de la Fuente, Jesús</creator><creator>Peralta-Sánchez, Francisco Javier</creator><creator>Martínez-Vicente, José Manuel</creator><creator>Santos, Flavia H.</creator><creator>Fadda, Salvatore</creator><creator>Gaeta-González, Martha Leticia</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1710-217X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9401-4419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-1628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-9202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-9038</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Do Learning Approaches Set the Stage for Emotional Well-Being in College Students?</title><author>de la Fuente, Jesús ; Peralta-Sánchez, Francisco Javier ; Martínez-Vicente, José Manuel ; Santos, Flavia H. ; Fadda, Salvatore ; Gaeta-González, Martha Leticia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b44300235e3be29cb2e2421909328c188c9e03b99cfc3e9f84a5719b2b4a549b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Ex post facto design</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Neurosis</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>University students</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de la Fuente, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peralta-Sánchez, Francisco Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Vicente, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Flavia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadda, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaeta-González, Martha Leticia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de la Fuente, Jesús</au><au>Peralta-Sánchez, Francisco Javier</au><au>Martínez-Vicente, José Manuel</au><au>Santos, Flavia H.</au><au>Fadda, Salvatore</au><au>Gaeta-González, Martha Leticia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Learning Approaches Set the Stage for Emotional Well-Being in College Students?</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>6984</spage><pages>6984-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The research aim of this paper was two-fold: to generate evidence that personality factors are linear predictors of the variable approaches to learning (a relevant cognitive-motivational variable of Educational Psychology); and to show that each type of learning approach differentially predicts positive or negative achievement emotions, in three learning situations: class time, study time, and testing. A total of 658 university students voluntarily completed validated questionnaires referring to these three variables. Using an ex post facto design, we conducted correlational analyses, regression analyses, and multiple structural predictions. The results showed that Conscientiousness is associated with and predicts a Deep Approach to learning, while also predicting positive achievement emotions. By contrast, Neuroticism is associated with and significantly predicts a Surface Approach to learning, as well as negative achievement emotions. There are important psychoeducational implications in the university context, both for prevention and for self-improvement, and for programs that offer psychoeducational guidance.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12176984</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1710-217X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9401-4419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-1628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-9202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-9038</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2020-09, Vol.12 (17), p.6984 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2438863640 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Academic achievement Colleges & universities Correlation analysis Educational psychology Emotions Ex post facto design Hypotheses Learning Motivation Neurosis Personality Questionnaires Stress Students Teaching University students Variables |
title | Do Learning Approaches Set the Stage for Emotional Well-Being in College Students? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T08%3A53%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Learning%20Approaches%20Set%20the%20Stage%20for%20Emotional%20Well-Being%20in%20College%20Students?&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=de%20la%20Fuente,%20Jes%C3%BAs&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=6984&rft.pages=6984-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12176984&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438863640%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438863640&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |