Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses

Yangtze River annual maxima data are available for 1877–1981, for Yichang near the Three Gorges Dam. However, subsequent annual maxima seem not available outside China. Therefore, published methodologies applied to Yangtze discharge maxima cannot always be checked independently against data, despite...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2020-09, Vol.103 (2), p.2613-2615
1. Verfasser: Bardsley, Earl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2615
container_issue 2
container_start_page 2613
container_title Natural hazards (Dordrecht)
container_volume 103
creator Bardsley, Earl
description Yangtze River annual maxima data are available for 1877–1981, for Yichang near the Three Gorges Dam. However, subsequent annual maxima seem not available outside China. Therefore, published methodologies applied to Yangtze discharge maxima cannot always be checked independently against data, despite papers appearing in international journals. The point is illustrated with respect to apparent anomalies in parameter estimation for the generalised extreme value distribution (GEV) applied to Yichang annual maxima. Specifically, Wang et al. (Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31: 2281–2296, 2017) list GEV parameter estimates derived from the period 1890–2000. These parameter values give underfit of all Yichang annual maxima between 1877 and 1981. In contrast, the GEV parameter estimates of Sutcliffe (J Hydrol 96: 159–171) paper give better data fits. It may be that the underfit is related to the proposed methodology, which should then be treated with caution. Alternatively, there may be just a typographical error in a listed parameter value. Whatever the cause, the point is made that it would be helpful to have complete time series of hydrological data from China to confirm published analyses.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2438796710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2438796710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-75cf6756557cdd487ec83667b00efe7964e5de163ec752d104477ac0cc5bcf543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKt_wNWA6-jL98xSitpCQRAFXYU086ZMaTM1mYr115s6gjtXjwf3XC6HkEsG1wzA3CTGQFcUOFCQoDmFIzJiyggKpYRjMoKKMwoCXk_JWUorAMY0r0bEzILvQmpTj8G3mIo2FG8uLPsvLJ7aD4yFC2Hn1sXGfbYblz-33idM5-SkceuEF793TF7u754nUzp_fJhNbufUcwM9Nco32iitlPF1LUuDvhRamwUANmgqLVHVyLRAbxSvGUhpjPPgvVr4RkkxJldD7zZ27ztMvV11u5hHJMulKHODYZBTfEj52KUUsbHbmNfGvWVgD4LsIMhmQfZHkD1AYoBSDoclxr_qf6hvq0hn6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438796710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Bardsley, Earl</creator><creatorcontrib>Bardsley, Earl</creatorcontrib><description>Yangtze River annual maxima data are available for 1877–1981, for Yichang near the Three Gorges Dam. However, subsequent annual maxima seem not available outside China. Therefore, published methodologies applied to Yangtze discharge maxima cannot always be checked independently against data, despite papers appearing in international journals. The point is illustrated with respect to apparent anomalies in parameter estimation for the generalised extreme value distribution (GEV) applied to Yichang annual maxima. Specifically, Wang et al. (Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31: 2281–2296, 2017) list GEV parameter estimates derived from the period 1890–2000. These parameter values give underfit of all Yichang annual maxima between 1877 and 1981. In contrast, the GEV parameter estimates of Sutcliffe (J Hydrol 96: 159–171) paper give better data fits. It may be that the underfit is related to the proposed methodology, which should then be treated with caution. Alternatively, there may be just a typographical error in a listed parameter value. Whatever the cause, the point is made that it would be helpful to have complete time series of hydrological data from China to confirm published analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Annual ; Anomalies ; Canyons ; Civil Engineering ; Data ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Management ; Extreme value distribution ; Extreme values ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrology ; Natural Hazards ; Parameter estimation ; Risk assessment ; Rivers ; Short Communication</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2020-09, Vol.103 (2), p.2613-2615</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-75cf6756557cdd487ec83667b00efe7964e5de163ec752d104477ac0cc5bcf543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6405-6295</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bardsley, Earl</creatorcontrib><title>Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>Yangtze River annual maxima data are available for 1877–1981, for Yichang near the Three Gorges Dam. However, subsequent annual maxima seem not available outside China. Therefore, published methodologies applied to Yangtze discharge maxima cannot always be checked independently against data, despite papers appearing in international journals. The point is illustrated with respect to apparent anomalies in parameter estimation for the generalised extreme value distribution (GEV) applied to Yichang annual maxima. Specifically, Wang et al. (Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31: 2281–2296, 2017) list GEV parameter estimates derived from the period 1890–2000. These parameter values give underfit of all Yichang annual maxima between 1877 and 1981. In contrast, the GEV parameter estimates of Sutcliffe (J Hydrol 96: 159–171) paper give better data fits. It may be that the underfit is related to the proposed methodology, which should then be treated with caution. Alternatively, there may be just a typographical error in a listed parameter value. Whatever the cause, the point is made that it would be helpful to have complete time series of hydrological data from China to confirm published analyses.</description><subject>Annual</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Canyons</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Extreme value distribution</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Short Communication</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKt_wNWA6-jL98xSitpCQRAFXYU086ZMaTM1mYr115s6gjtXjwf3XC6HkEsG1wzA3CTGQFcUOFCQoDmFIzJiyggKpYRjMoKKMwoCXk_JWUorAMY0r0bEzILvQmpTj8G3mIo2FG8uLPsvLJ7aD4yFC2Hn1sXGfbYblz-33idM5-SkceuEF793TF7u754nUzp_fJhNbufUcwM9Nco32iitlPF1LUuDvhRamwUANmgqLVHVyLRAbxSvGUhpjPPgvVr4RkkxJldD7zZ27ztMvV11u5hHJMulKHODYZBTfEj52KUUsbHbmNfGvWVgD4LsIMhmQfZHkD1AYoBSDoclxr_qf6hvq0hn6Q</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Bardsley, Earl</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-6295</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses</title><author>Bardsley, Earl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-75cf6756557cdd487ec83667b00efe7964e5de163ec752d104477ac0cc5bcf543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Annual</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Canyons</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Extreme value distribution</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Short Communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bardsley, Earl</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bardsley, Earl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2613</spage><epage>2615</epage><pages>2613-2615</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>Yangtze River annual maxima data are available for 1877–1981, for Yichang near the Three Gorges Dam. However, subsequent annual maxima seem not available outside China. Therefore, published methodologies applied to Yangtze discharge maxima cannot always be checked independently against data, despite papers appearing in international journals. The point is illustrated with respect to apparent anomalies in parameter estimation for the generalised extreme value distribution (GEV) applied to Yichang annual maxima. Specifically, Wang et al. (Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31: 2281–2296, 2017) list GEV parameter estimates derived from the period 1890–2000. These parameter values give underfit of all Yichang annual maxima between 1877 and 1981. In contrast, the GEV parameter estimates of Sutcliffe (J Hydrol 96: 159–171) paper give better data fits. It may be that the underfit is related to the proposed methodology, which should then be treated with caution. Alternatively, there may be just a typographical error in a listed parameter value. Whatever the cause, the point is made that it would be helpful to have complete time series of hydrological data from China to confirm published analyses.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-6295</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-030X
ispartof Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2020-09, Vol.103 (2), p.2613-2615
issn 0921-030X
1573-0840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2438796710
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Annual
Anomalies
Canyons
Civil Engineering
Data
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental Management
Extreme value distribution
Extreme values
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hydrogeology
Hydrologic data
Hydrology
Natural Hazards
Parameter estimation
Risk assessment
Rivers
Short Communication
title Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inconsistencies%20in%20Yangtze%20River%20annual%20maxima%20analyses&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Bardsley,%20Earl&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2613&rft.epage=2615&rft.pages=2613-2615&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438796710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438796710&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true