Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses
Yangtze River annual maxima data are available for 1877–1981, for Yichang near the Three Gorges Dam. However, subsequent annual maxima seem not available outside China. Therefore, published methodologies applied to Yangtze discharge maxima cannot always be checked independently against data, despite...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2020-09, Vol.103 (2), p.2613-2615 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2615 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 2613 |
container_title | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Bardsley, Earl |
description | Yangtze River annual maxima data are available for 1877–1981, for Yichang near the Three Gorges Dam. However, subsequent annual maxima seem not available outside China. Therefore, published methodologies applied to Yangtze discharge maxima cannot always be checked independently against data, despite papers appearing in international journals. The point is illustrated with respect to apparent anomalies in parameter estimation for the generalised extreme value distribution (GEV) applied to Yichang annual maxima. Specifically, Wang et al. (Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31: 2281–2296, 2017) list GEV parameter estimates derived from the period 1890–2000. These parameter values give underfit of all Yichang annual maxima between 1877 and 1981. In contrast, the GEV parameter estimates of Sutcliffe (J Hydrol 96: 159–171) paper give better data fits. It may be that the underfit is related to the proposed methodology, which should then be treated with caution. Alternatively, there may be just a typographical error in a listed parameter value. Whatever the cause, the point is made that it would be helpful to have complete time series of hydrological data from China to confirm published analyses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2438796710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2438796710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-75cf6756557cdd487ec83667b00efe7964e5de163ec752d104477ac0cc5bcf543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKt_wNWA6-jL98xSitpCQRAFXYU086ZMaTM1mYr115s6gjtXjwf3XC6HkEsG1wzA3CTGQFcUOFCQoDmFIzJiyggKpYRjMoKKMwoCXk_JWUorAMY0r0bEzILvQmpTj8G3mIo2FG8uLPsvLJ7aD4yFC2Hn1sXGfbYblz-33idM5-SkceuEF793TF7u754nUzp_fJhNbufUcwM9Nco32iitlPF1LUuDvhRamwUANmgqLVHVyLRAbxSvGUhpjPPgvVr4RkkxJldD7zZ27ztMvV11u5hHJMulKHODYZBTfEj52KUUsbHbmNfGvWVgD4LsIMhmQfZHkD1AYoBSDoclxr_qf6hvq0hn6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438796710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Bardsley, Earl</creator><creatorcontrib>Bardsley, Earl</creatorcontrib><description>Yangtze River annual maxima data are available for 1877–1981, for Yichang near the Three Gorges Dam. However, subsequent annual maxima seem not available outside China. Therefore, published methodologies applied to Yangtze discharge maxima cannot always be checked independently against data, despite papers appearing in international journals. The point is illustrated with respect to apparent anomalies in parameter estimation for the generalised extreme value distribution (GEV) applied to Yichang annual maxima. Specifically, Wang et al. (Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31: 2281–2296, 2017) list GEV parameter estimates derived from the period 1890–2000. These parameter values give underfit of all Yichang annual maxima between 1877 and 1981. In contrast, the GEV parameter estimates of Sutcliffe (J Hydrol 96: 159–171) paper give better data fits. It may be that the underfit is related to the proposed methodology, which should then be treated with caution. Alternatively, there may be just a typographical error in a listed parameter value. Whatever the cause, the point is made that it would be helpful to have complete time series of hydrological data from China to confirm published analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Annual ; Anomalies ; Canyons ; Civil Engineering ; Data ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Management ; Extreme value distribution ; Extreme values ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrology ; Natural Hazards ; Parameter estimation ; Risk assessment ; Rivers ; Short Communication</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2020-09, Vol.103 (2), p.2613-2615</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-75cf6756557cdd487ec83667b00efe7964e5de163ec752d104477ac0cc5bcf543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6405-6295</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bardsley, Earl</creatorcontrib><title>Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>Yangtze River annual maxima data are available for 1877–1981, for Yichang near the Three Gorges Dam. However, subsequent annual maxima seem not available outside China. Therefore, published methodologies applied to Yangtze discharge maxima cannot always be checked independently against data, despite papers appearing in international journals. The point is illustrated with respect to apparent anomalies in parameter estimation for the generalised extreme value distribution (GEV) applied to Yichang annual maxima. Specifically, Wang et al. (Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31: 2281–2296, 2017) list GEV parameter estimates derived from the period 1890–2000. These parameter values give underfit of all Yichang annual maxima between 1877 and 1981. In contrast, the GEV parameter estimates of Sutcliffe (J Hydrol 96: 159–171) paper give better data fits. It may be that the underfit is related to the proposed methodology, which should then be treated with caution. Alternatively, there may be just a typographical error in a listed parameter value. Whatever the cause, the point is made that it would be helpful to have complete time series of hydrological data from China to confirm published analyses.</description><subject>Annual</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Canyons</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Extreme value distribution</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Short Communication</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKt_wNWA6-jL98xSitpCQRAFXYU086ZMaTM1mYr115s6gjtXjwf3XC6HkEsG1wzA3CTGQFcUOFCQoDmFIzJiyggKpYRjMoKKMwoCXk_JWUorAMY0r0bEzILvQmpTj8G3mIo2FG8uLPsvLJ7aD4yFC2Hn1sXGfbYblz-33idM5-SkceuEF793TF7u754nUzp_fJhNbufUcwM9Nco32iitlPF1LUuDvhRamwUANmgqLVHVyLRAbxSvGUhpjPPgvVr4RkkxJldD7zZ27ztMvV11u5hHJMulKHODYZBTfEj52KUUsbHbmNfGvWVgD4LsIMhmQfZHkD1AYoBSDoclxr_qf6hvq0hn6Q</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Bardsley, Earl</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-6295</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses</title><author>Bardsley, Earl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-75cf6756557cdd487ec83667b00efe7964e5de163ec752d104477ac0cc5bcf543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Annual</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Canyons</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Extreme value distribution</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Short Communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bardsley, Earl</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bardsley, Earl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2613</spage><epage>2615</epage><pages>2613-2615</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>Yangtze River annual maxima data are available for 1877–1981, for Yichang near the Three Gorges Dam. However, subsequent annual maxima seem not available outside China. Therefore, published methodologies applied to Yangtze discharge maxima cannot always be checked independently against data, despite papers appearing in international journals. The point is illustrated with respect to apparent anomalies in parameter estimation for the generalised extreme value distribution (GEV) applied to Yichang annual maxima. Specifically, Wang et al. (Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31: 2281–2296, 2017) list GEV parameter estimates derived from the period 1890–2000. These parameter values give underfit of all Yichang annual maxima between 1877 and 1981. In contrast, the GEV parameter estimates of Sutcliffe (J Hydrol 96: 159–171) paper give better data fits. It may be that the underfit is related to the proposed methodology, which should then be treated with caution. Alternatively, there may be just a typographical error in a listed parameter value. Whatever the cause, the point is made that it would be helpful to have complete time series of hydrological data from China to confirm published analyses.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-6295</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-030X |
ispartof | Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2020-09, Vol.103 (2), p.2613-2615 |
issn | 0921-030X 1573-0840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2438796710 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Annual Anomalies Canyons Civil Engineering Data Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environmental Management Extreme value distribution Extreme values Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Hydrologic data Hydrology Natural Hazards Parameter estimation Risk assessment Rivers Short Communication |
title | Inconsistencies in Yangtze River annual maxima analyses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inconsistencies%20in%20Yangtze%20River%20annual%20maxima%20analyses&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Bardsley,%20Earl&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2613&rft.epage=2615&rft.pages=2613-2615&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-020-04062-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438796710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438796710&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |