Isolated single umbilical artery: Implications for pregnancy

This study aimed to evaluate whether the presence of an isolated single umbilical artery (iSUA) is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Fifty-one patients with iSUA and 54 controls were enrolled in the case-control study. Demographic characteristics and perinatal outcomes were recorded. All p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eastern Journal Of Medicine 2020, Vol.25 (3), p.444-449
Hauptverfasser: Sakar, Mehmet Nafi, Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil, SARIDAS DEMIR, SUREYYA, Gültekin, Hüseyin, Demir, Bulent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 449
container_issue 3
container_start_page 444
container_title Eastern Journal Of Medicine
container_volume 25
creator Sakar, Mehmet Nafi
Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil
SARIDAS DEMIR, SUREYYA
Gültekin, Hüseyin
Demir, Bulent
description This study aimed to evaluate whether the presence of an isolated single umbilical artery (iSUA) is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Fifty-one patients with iSUA and 54 controls were enrolled in the case-control study. Demographic characteristics and perinatal outcomes were recorded. All patients had normal umbilical artery (UMA) Doppler findings, and their detailed ultrasound weeks were between 18 and 23 weeks. The birth weights of the babies in the iSUA group were significantly lower than the control group (2898.82±434.56 g vs 3143.70±419.09 g, p=0.004). In the iSUA group, oligohydramnios (7.8% vs 0%) , preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (3.9% vs 0%), preterm delivery (9.8% vs 3.7%), small for gestational age (SGA) (11.8% vs 3.7%) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (2% vs 0%) admission rates were higher than control group, but there was no statistical significance (p>0.05). But the total adverse pregnancy outcomes were observed in 35.3% (18/51) of cases with iSUA is higher than controls 7.4% (4/54) (p=0.001). In our study, iSUA is found to be associated with low newborn weight. In the iSUA group, oligohydramnios, PPROM, preterm delivery, SGA, and NICU admission rates were high, but there was no statistical significance. But the total adverse pregnancy outcomes were higher in the iSUA group. These results indicate that close follow-up is essential to prevent and manage adverse perinatal outcomes in iSUA patients.
doi_str_mv 10.5505/ejm.2020.13540
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2438622312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2438622312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2220-41c95202163b616f9a725065f2a3c57b3f634f8fdc596fb5f907d3521255eaab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw5RyJc4K9m3UcxAVVFCpV4gJny3HtKlFe2Omh_5605TSj0Wh29TH2KHhGxOnZNV0GHHgmkHJ-xRYCeZmiUvL67EXKlcJbdhdjwzkolYsFe93EoTWT2yWx7vetSw5dVbe1NW1iwuTC8SXZdOMpmOqhj4kfQjIGt-9Nb4_37MabNrqHf12yn_X79-oz3X59bFZv29QCAE9zYUuaPxMSKymkL00BxCV5MGipqNBLzL3yO0ul9BX5khc7JBBA5IypcMmeLrtjGH4PLk66GQ6hn09qyFFJABQwt7JLy4YhxuC8HkPdmXDUgusTIT0T0idC-kwI_wDxUFgC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438622312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Isolated single umbilical artery: Implications for pregnancy</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sakar, Mehmet Nafi ; Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil ; SARIDAS DEMIR, SUREYYA ; Gültekin, Hüseyin ; Demir, Bulent</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakar, Mehmet Nafi ; Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil ; SARIDAS DEMIR, SUREYYA ; Gültekin, Hüseyin ; Demir, Bulent</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate whether the presence of an isolated single umbilical artery (iSUA) is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Fifty-one patients with iSUA and 54 controls were enrolled in the case-control study. Demographic characteristics and perinatal outcomes were recorded. All patients had normal umbilical artery (UMA) Doppler findings, and their detailed ultrasound weeks were between 18 and 23 weeks. The birth weights of the babies in the iSUA group were significantly lower than the control group (2898.82±434.56 g vs 3143.70±419.09 g, p=0.004). In the iSUA group, oligohydramnios (7.8% vs 0%) , preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (3.9% vs 0%), preterm delivery (9.8% vs 3.7%), small for gestational age (SGA) (11.8% vs 3.7%) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (2% vs 0%) admission rates were higher than control group, but there was no statistical significance (p&gt;0.05). But the total adverse pregnancy outcomes were observed in 35.3% (18/51) of cases with iSUA is higher than controls 7.4% (4/54) (p=0.001). In our study, iSUA is found to be associated with low newborn weight. In the iSUA group, oligohydramnios, PPROM, preterm delivery, SGA, and NICU admission rates were high, but there was no statistical significance. But the total adverse pregnancy outcomes were higher in the iSUA group. These results indicate that close follow-up is essential to prevent and manage adverse perinatal outcomes in iSUA patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1301-0883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1309-3886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5505/ejm.2020.13540</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Van: YYU Tip Fakultesi</publisher><subject>Amniotic fluid ; Birth weight ; Gestational age ; Gynecology ; Health sciences ; Intensive care ; Membranes ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Premature birth ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Umbilical cord ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>Eastern Journal Of Medicine, 2020, Vol.25 (3), p.444-449</ispartof><rights>Copyright YYU Tip Fakultesi 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2220-41c95202163b616f9a725065f2a3c57b3f634f8fdc596fb5f907d3521255eaab3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakar, Mehmet Nafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARIDAS DEMIR, SUREYYA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gültekin, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Bulent</creatorcontrib><title>Isolated single umbilical artery: Implications for pregnancy</title><title>Eastern Journal Of Medicine</title><description>This study aimed to evaluate whether the presence of an isolated single umbilical artery (iSUA) is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Fifty-one patients with iSUA and 54 controls were enrolled in the case-control study. Demographic characteristics and perinatal outcomes were recorded. All patients had normal umbilical artery (UMA) Doppler findings, and their detailed ultrasound weeks were between 18 and 23 weeks. The birth weights of the babies in the iSUA group were significantly lower than the control group (2898.82±434.56 g vs 3143.70±419.09 g, p=0.004). In the iSUA group, oligohydramnios (7.8% vs 0%) , preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (3.9% vs 0%), preterm delivery (9.8% vs 3.7%), small for gestational age (SGA) (11.8% vs 3.7%) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (2% vs 0%) admission rates were higher than control group, but there was no statistical significance (p&gt;0.05). But the total adverse pregnancy outcomes were observed in 35.3% (18/51) of cases with iSUA is higher than controls 7.4% (4/54) (p=0.001). In our study, iSUA is found to be associated with low newborn weight. In the iSUA group, oligohydramnios, PPROM, preterm delivery, SGA, and NICU admission rates were high, but there was no statistical significance. But the total adverse pregnancy outcomes were higher in the iSUA group. These results indicate that close follow-up is essential to prevent and manage adverse perinatal outcomes in iSUA patients.</description><subject>Amniotic fluid</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Gestational age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Premature birth</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Umbilical cord</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>1301-0883</issn><issn>1309-3886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw5RyJc4K9m3UcxAVVFCpV4gJny3HtKlFe2Omh_5605TSj0Wh29TH2KHhGxOnZNV0GHHgmkHJ-xRYCeZmiUvL67EXKlcJbdhdjwzkolYsFe93EoTWT2yWx7vetSw5dVbe1NW1iwuTC8SXZdOMpmOqhj4kfQjIGt-9Nb4_37MabNrqHf12yn_X79-oz3X59bFZv29QCAE9zYUuaPxMSKymkL00BxCV5MGipqNBLzL3yO0ul9BX5khc7JBBA5IypcMmeLrtjGH4PLk66GQ6hn09qyFFJABQwt7JLy4YhxuC8HkPdmXDUgusTIT0T0idC-kwI_wDxUFgC</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Sakar, Mehmet Nafi</creator><creator>Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil</creator><creator>SARIDAS DEMIR, SUREYYA</creator><creator>Gültekin, Hüseyin</creator><creator>Demir, Bulent</creator><general>YYU Tip Fakultesi</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Isolated single umbilical artery: Implications for pregnancy</title><author>Sakar, Mehmet Nafi ; Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil ; SARIDAS DEMIR, SUREYYA ; Gültekin, Hüseyin ; Demir, Bulent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2220-41c95202163b616f9a725065f2a3c57b3f634f8fdc596fb5f907d3521255eaab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Amniotic fluid</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Gestational age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Premature birth</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Umbilical cord</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakar, Mehmet Nafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARIDAS DEMIR, SUREYYA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gültekin, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Bulent</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Eastern Journal Of Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakar, Mehmet Nafi</au><au>Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil</au><au>SARIDAS DEMIR, SUREYYA</au><au>Gültekin, Hüseyin</au><au>Demir, Bulent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Isolated single umbilical artery: Implications for pregnancy</atitle><jtitle>Eastern Journal Of Medicine</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>444</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>444-449</pages><issn>1301-0883</issn><eissn>1309-3886</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate whether the presence of an isolated single umbilical artery (iSUA) is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Fifty-one patients with iSUA and 54 controls were enrolled in the case-control study. Demographic characteristics and perinatal outcomes were recorded. All patients had normal umbilical artery (UMA) Doppler findings, and their detailed ultrasound weeks were between 18 and 23 weeks. The birth weights of the babies in the iSUA group were significantly lower than the control group (2898.82±434.56 g vs 3143.70±419.09 g, p=0.004). In the iSUA group, oligohydramnios (7.8% vs 0%) , preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (3.9% vs 0%), preterm delivery (9.8% vs 3.7%), small for gestational age (SGA) (11.8% vs 3.7%) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (2% vs 0%) admission rates were higher than control group, but there was no statistical significance (p&gt;0.05). But the total adverse pregnancy outcomes were observed in 35.3% (18/51) of cases with iSUA is higher than controls 7.4% (4/54) (p=0.001). In our study, iSUA is found to be associated with low newborn weight. In the iSUA group, oligohydramnios, PPROM, preterm delivery, SGA, and NICU admission rates were high, but there was no statistical significance. But the total adverse pregnancy outcomes were higher in the iSUA group. These results indicate that close follow-up is essential to prevent and manage adverse perinatal outcomes in iSUA patients.</abstract><cop>Van</cop><pub>YYU Tip Fakultesi</pub><doi>10.5505/ejm.2020.13540</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1301-0883
ispartof Eastern Journal Of Medicine, 2020, Vol.25 (3), p.444-449
issn 1301-0883
1309-3886
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2438622312
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Amniotic fluid
Birth weight
Gestational age
Gynecology
Health sciences
Intensive care
Membranes
Obstetrics
Pregnancy
Premature birth
Ultrasonic imaging
Umbilical cord
Veins & arteries
title Isolated single umbilical artery: Implications for pregnancy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A27%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Isolated%20single%20umbilical%20artery:%20Implications%20for%20pregnancy&rft.jtitle=Eastern%20Journal%20Of%20Medicine&rft.au=Sakar,%20Mehmet%20Nafi&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=444&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=444-449&rft.issn=1301-0883&rft.eissn=1309-3886&rft_id=info:doi/10.5505/ejm.2020.13540&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438622312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438622312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true