Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application

•Deposition of droplet increased with decrease in flight altitude and speed.•Droplet density and coverage decrease with the increase of flight speed and altitude.•D0.5 increased with the decrease in flight spread and altitude.•More than 90% deposition accrues in the target zone using single rotor UA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers and electronics in agriculture 2020-05, Vol.172, p.105350, Article 105350
Hauptverfasser: Ahmad, Fiaz, Qiu, Baijing, Dong, Xiaoya, Ma, Jing, Huang, Xin, Ahmed, Shibbir, Ali Chandio, Farman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105350
container_title Computers and electronics in agriculture
container_volume 172
creator Ahmad, Fiaz
Qiu, Baijing
Dong, Xiaoya
Ma, Jing
Huang, Xin
Ahmed, Shibbir
Ali Chandio, Farman
description •Deposition of droplet increased with decrease in flight altitude and speed.•Droplet density and coverage decrease with the increase of flight speed and altitude.•D0.5 increased with the decrease in flight spread and altitude.•More than 90% deposition accrues in the target zone using single rotor UAV sprayers. Droplet size, weather conditions and operational parameters of sprayers also affect the spray coverage, absorption attachment to the target. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) currently, is considered a modern spraying technology which is helpful for efficient spraying. However, the effect of operational parameters on deposition in target and off-target zones still required to determine. Field tests were conducted to determine spray deposition, the number of spray deposits, coverage and droplet size under various flight heights (2 and 3 m) and flight speed (2 and 3 m/s) for control of outer field control. DepositScan software was applied to determine the spray deposition, number of deposits, coverage and droplet diameter. The results showed that the average deposition (2.29 µL/cm2) in the target area was found the highest when the UAV operates with 2 m/s forward speed at 2 m height (T1), the spray coverage under the T1 treatment achieved 36.19% at zero position of the central flight line. At the flight central line, the relative span was 0.70, 1.01, 1.03 and 1.05 for treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively. The treatment T1 showed maximum VMD = D0.5 as 448.75 µm whereas T4 showed minimum D0.5 with a value of 238.95 µm. The deposition in the off-target zone was nearly negligible for single-rotor UAV. This study provides a recommendation UAV operators, farmers and manufacturers for better utilization of this modern technology for weed control.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2438222363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168169919326353</els_id><sourcerecordid>2438222363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2ac389de4f24ce5b6f0afaedf277069badb00ae5a3540e46ada64927427fb2773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuHCEQRVHkSBk7-YMskLLuCQ30axPJsvySLHljZ4tqoBgx6gECTCL7Q_K9odNeewVVnHtV1CXka8u2LWv774etDscI-y1nfGl1omMfyKYdB94MLRvOyKZiY9P20_SJnOd8YLWexmFD_l5bi7rQYGmImKC44GGmERIcsWDKy8vz5U-aY4IXTDT49UoNxpDdwle6VNRT52mBtMdCwZsqtM1b-Ro8ZmpOyfk9DacKU-twNvQPoqE6-JLCTCHG2en_I3wmHy3MGb-8nRfk-eb66equeXi8vb-6fGi0ELI0HLQYJ4PScqmx2_WWgQU0lg8D66cdmB1jgB2ITjKUPRjo5cQHyQe7q4y4IN9W35jCrxPmog7hlOoGsuJSjJxz0YtKyZXSKeSc0KqY3BHSi2qZWhJQB7UmoJYE1JpAlf1YZVh_8NthUlk79BqNS3XnygT3vsE_lUCUgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438222363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ahmad, Fiaz ; Qiu, Baijing ; Dong, Xiaoya ; Ma, Jing ; Huang, Xin ; Ahmed, Shibbir ; Ali Chandio, Farman</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Fiaz ; Qiu, Baijing ; Dong, Xiaoya ; Ma, Jing ; Huang, Xin ; Ahmed, Shibbir ; Ali Chandio, Farman</creatorcontrib><description>•Deposition of droplet increased with decrease in flight altitude and speed.•Droplet density and coverage decrease with the increase of flight speed and altitude.•D0.5 increased with the decrease in flight spread and altitude.•More than 90% deposition accrues in the target zone using single rotor UAV sprayers. Droplet size, weather conditions and operational parameters of sprayers also affect the spray coverage, absorption attachment to the target. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) currently, is considered a modern spraying technology which is helpful for efficient spraying. However, the effect of operational parameters on deposition in target and off-target zones still required to determine. Field tests were conducted to determine spray deposition, the number of spray deposits, coverage and droplet size under various flight heights (2 and 3 m) and flight speed (2 and 3 m/s) for control of outer field control. DepositScan software was applied to determine the spray deposition, number of deposits, coverage and droplet diameter. The results showed that the average deposition (2.29 µL/cm2) in the target area was found the highest when the UAV operates with 2 m/s forward speed at 2 m height (T1), the spray coverage under the T1 treatment achieved 36.19% at zero position of the central flight line. At the flight central line, the relative span was 0.70, 1.01, 1.03 and 1.05 for treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively. The treatment T1 showed maximum VMD = D0.5 as 448.75 µm whereas T4 showed minimum D0.5 with a value of 238.95 µm. The deposition in the off-target zone was nearly negligible for single-rotor UAV. This study provides a recommendation UAV operators, farmers and manufacturers for better utilization of this modern technology for weed control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aerial spraying ; Airspeed ; Droplets ; Field tests ; Off – target zone ; Operational parameters ; Parameters ; Spray deposition ; Sprayers ; Spraying ; Unmanned aerial sprayer ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Weather ; Weed control</subject><ispartof>Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2020-05, Vol.172, p.105350, Article 105350</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2ac389de4f24ce5b6f0afaedf277069badb00ae5a3540e46ada64927427fb2773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2ac389de4f24ce5b6f0afaedf277069badb00ae5a3540e46ada64927427fb2773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Fiaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Baijing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xiaoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shibbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali Chandio, Farman</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application</title><title>Computers and electronics in agriculture</title><description>•Deposition of droplet increased with decrease in flight altitude and speed.•Droplet density and coverage decrease with the increase of flight speed and altitude.•D0.5 increased with the decrease in flight spread and altitude.•More than 90% deposition accrues in the target zone using single rotor UAV sprayers. Droplet size, weather conditions and operational parameters of sprayers also affect the spray coverage, absorption attachment to the target. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) currently, is considered a modern spraying technology which is helpful for efficient spraying. However, the effect of operational parameters on deposition in target and off-target zones still required to determine. Field tests were conducted to determine spray deposition, the number of spray deposits, coverage and droplet size under various flight heights (2 and 3 m) and flight speed (2 and 3 m/s) for control of outer field control. DepositScan software was applied to determine the spray deposition, number of deposits, coverage and droplet diameter. The results showed that the average deposition (2.29 µL/cm2) in the target area was found the highest when the UAV operates with 2 m/s forward speed at 2 m height (T1), the spray coverage under the T1 treatment achieved 36.19% at zero position of the central flight line. At the flight central line, the relative span was 0.70, 1.01, 1.03 and 1.05 for treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively. The treatment T1 showed maximum VMD = D0.5 as 448.75 µm whereas T4 showed minimum D0.5 with a value of 238.95 µm. The deposition in the off-target zone was nearly negligible for single-rotor UAV. This study provides a recommendation UAV operators, farmers and manufacturers for better utilization of this modern technology for weed control.</description><subject>Aerial spraying</subject><subject>Airspeed</subject><subject>Droplets</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Off – target zone</subject><subject>Operational parameters</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Spray deposition</subject><subject>Sprayers</subject><subject>Spraying</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial sprayer</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><issn>0168-1699</issn><issn>1872-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctuHCEQRVHkSBk7-YMskLLuCQ30axPJsvySLHljZ4tqoBgx6gECTCL7Q_K9odNeewVVnHtV1CXka8u2LWv774etDscI-y1nfGl1omMfyKYdB94MLRvOyKZiY9P20_SJnOd8YLWexmFD_l5bi7rQYGmImKC44GGmERIcsWDKy8vz5U-aY4IXTDT49UoNxpDdwle6VNRT52mBtMdCwZsqtM1b-Ro8ZmpOyfk9DacKU-twNvQPoqE6-JLCTCHG2en_I3wmHy3MGb-8nRfk-eb66equeXi8vb-6fGi0ELI0HLQYJ4PScqmx2_WWgQU0lg8D66cdmB1jgB2ITjKUPRjo5cQHyQe7q4y4IN9W35jCrxPmog7hlOoGsuJSjJxz0YtKyZXSKeSc0KqY3BHSi2qZWhJQB7UmoJYE1JpAlf1YZVh_8NthUlk79BqNS3XnygT3vsE_lUCUgQ</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Ahmad, Fiaz</creator><creator>Qiu, Baijing</creator><creator>Dong, Xiaoya</creator><creator>Ma, Jing</creator><creator>Huang, Xin</creator><creator>Ahmed, Shibbir</creator><creator>Ali Chandio, Farman</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application</title><author>Ahmad, Fiaz ; Qiu, Baijing ; Dong, Xiaoya ; Ma, Jing ; Huang, Xin ; Ahmed, Shibbir ; Ali Chandio, Farman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2ac389de4f24ce5b6f0afaedf277069badb00ae5a3540e46ada64927427fb2773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerial spraying</topic><topic>Airspeed</topic><topic>Droplets</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Off – target zone</topic><topic>Operational parameters</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Spray deposition</topic><topic>Sprayers</topic><topic>Spraying</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial sprayer</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Fiaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Baijing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xiaoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shibbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali Chandio, Farman</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers and electronics in agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmad, Fiaz</au><au>Qiu, Baijing</au><au>Dong, Xiaoya</au><au>Ma, Jing</au><au>Huang, Xin</au><au>Ahmed, Shibbir</au><au>Ali Chandio, Farman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application</atitle><jtitle>Computers and electronics in agriculture</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>172</volume><spage>105350</spage><pages>105350-</pages><artnum>105350</artnum><issn>0168-1699</issn><eissn>1872-7107</eissn><abstract>•Deposition of droplet increased with decrease in flight altitude and speed.•Droplet density and coverage decrease with the increase of flight speed and altitude.•D0.5 increased with the decrease in flight spread and altitude.•More than 90% deposition accrues in the target zone using single rotor UAV sprayers. Droplet size, weather conditions and operational parameters of sprayers also affect the spray coverage, absorption attachment to the target. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) currently, is considered a modern spraying technology which is helpful for efficient spraying. However, the effect of operational parameters on deposition in target and off-target zones still required to determine. Field tests were conducted to determine spray deposition, the number of spray deposits, coverage and droplet size under various flight heights (2 and 3 m) and flight speed (2 and 3 m/s) for control of outer field control. DepositScan software was applied to determine the spray deposition, number of deposits, coverage and droplet diameter. The results showed that the average deposition (2.29 µL/cm2) in the target area was found the highest when the UAV operates with 2 m/s forward speed at 2 m height (T1), the spray coverage under the T1 treatment achieved 36.19% at zero position of the central flight line. At the flight central line, the relative span was 0.70, 1.01, 1.03 and 1.05 for treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively. The treatment T1 showed maximum VMD = D0.5 as 448.75 µm whereas T4 showed minimum D0.5 with a value of 238.95 µm. The deposition in the off-target zone was nearly negligible for single-rotor UAV. This study provides a recommendation UAV operators, farmers and manufacturers for better utilization of this modern technology for weed control.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1699
ispartof Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2020-05, Vol.172, p.105350, Article 105350
issn 0168-1699
1872-7107
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2438222363
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aerial spraying
Airspeed
Droplets
Field tests
Off – target zone
Operational parameters
Parameters
Spray deposition
Sprayers
Spraying
Unmanned aerial sprayer
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Weather
Weed control
title Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A50%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20operational%20parameters%20of%20UAV%20sprayer%20on%20spray%20deposition%20pattern%20in%20target%20and%20off-target%20zones%20during%20outer%20field%20weed%20control%20application&rft.jtitle=Computers%20and%20electronics%20in%20agriculture&rft.au=Ahmad,%20Fiaz&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=172&rft.spage=105350&rft.pages=105350-&rft.artnum=105350&rft.issn=0168-1699&rft.eissn=1872-7107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438222363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438222363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168169919326353&rfr_iscdi=true