Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application
•Deposition of droplet increased with decrease in flight altitude and speed.•Droplet density and coverage decrease with the increase of flight speed and altitude.•D0.5 increased with the decrease in flight spread and altitude.•More than 90% deposition accrues in the target zone using single rotor UA...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers and electronics in agriculture 2020-05, Vol.172, p.105350, Article 105350 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105350 |
container_title | Computers and electronics in agriculture |
container_volume | 172 |
creator | Ahmad, Fiaz Qiu, Baijing Dong, Xiaoya Ma, Jing Huang, Xin Ahmed, Shibbir Ali Chandio, Farman |
description | •Deposition of droplet increased with decrease in flight altitude and speed.•Droplet density and coverage decrease with the increase of flight speed and altitude.•D0.5 increased with the decrease in flight spread and altitude.•More than 90% deposition accrues in the target zone using single rotor UAV sprayers.
Droplet size, weather conditions and operational parameters of sprayers also affect the spray coverage, absorption attachment to the target. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) currently, is considered a modern spraying technology which is helpful for efficient spraying. However, the effect of operational parameters on deposition in target and off-target zones still required to determine. Field tests were conducted to determine spray deposition, the number of spray deposits, coverage and droplet size under various flight heights (2 and 3 m) and flight speed (2 and 3 m/s) for control of outer field control. DepositScan software was applied to determine the spray deposition, number of deposits, coverage and droplet diameter. The results showed that the average deposition (2.29 µL/cm2) in the target area was found the highest when the UAV operates with 2 m/s forward speed at 2 m height (T1), the spray coverage under the T1 treatment achieved 36.19% at zero position of the central flight line. At the flight central line, the relative span was 0.70, 1.01, 1.03 and 1.05 for treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively. The treatment T1 showed maximum VMD = D0.5 as 448.75 µm whereas T4 showed minimum D0.5 with a value of 238.95 µm. The deposition in the off-target zone was nearly negligible for single-rotor UAV. This study provides a recommendation UAV operators, farmers and manufacturers for better utilization of this modern technology for weed control. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2438222363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168169919326353</els_id><sourcerecordid>2438222363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2ac389de4f24ce5b6f0afaedf277069badb00ae5a3540e46ada64927427fb2773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuHCEQRVHkSBk7-YMskLLuCQ30axPJsvySLHljZ4tqoBgx6gECTCL7Q_K9odNeewVVnHtV1CXka8u2LWv774etDscI-y1nfGl1omMfyKYdB94MLRvOyKZiY9P20_SJnOd8YLWexmFD_l5bi7rQYGmImKC44GGmERIcsWDKy8vz5U-aY4IXTDT49UoNxpDdwle6VNRT52mBtMdCwZsqtM1b-Ro8ZmpOyfk9DacKU-twNvQPoqE6-JLCTCHG2en_I3wmHy3MGb-8nRfk-eb66equeXi8vb-6fGi0ELI0HLQYJ4PScqmx2_WWgQU0lg8D66cdmB1jgB2ITjKUPRjo5cQHyQe7q4y4IN9W35jCrxPmog7hlOoGsuJSjJxz0YtKyZXSKeSc0KqY3BHSi2qZWhJQB7UmoJYE1JpAlf1YZVh_8NthUlk79BqNS3XnygT3vsE_lUCUgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438222363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ahmad, Fiaz ; Qiu, Baijing ; Dong, Xiaoya ; Ma, Jing ; Huang, Xin ; Ahmed, Shibbir ; Ali Chandio, Farman</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Fiaz ; Qiu, Baijing ; Dong, Xiaoya ; Ma, Jing ; Huang, Xin ; Ahmed, Shibbir ; Ali Chandio, Farman</creatorcontrib><description>•Deposition of droplet increased with decrease in flight altitude and speed.•Droplet density and coverage decrease with the increase of flight speed and altitude.•D0.5 increased with the decrease in flight spread and altitude.•More than 90% deposition accrues in the target zone using single rotor UAV sprayers.
Droplet size, weather conditions and operational parameters of sprayers also affect the spray coverage, absorption attachment to the target. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) currently, is considered a modern spraying technology which is helpful for efficient spraying. However, the effect of operational parameters on deposition in target and off-target zones still required to determine. Field tests were conducted to determine spray deposition, the number of spray deposits, coverage and droplet size under various flight heights (2 and 3 m) and flight speed (2 and 3 m/s) for control of outer field control. DepositScan software was applied to determine the spray deposition, number of deposits, coverage and droplet diameter. The results showed that the average deposition (2.29 µL/cm2) in the target area was found the highest when the UAV operates with 2 m/s forward speed at 2 m height (T1), the spray coverage under the T1 treatment achieved 36.19% at zero position of the central flight line. At the flight central line, the relative span was 0.70, 1.01, 1.03 and 1.05 for treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively. The treatment T1 showed maximum VMD = D0.5 as 448.75 µm whereas T4 showed minimum D0.5 with a value of 238.95 µm. The deposition in the off-target zone was nearly negligible for single-rotor UAV. This study provides a recommendation UAV operators, farmers and manufacturers for better utilization of this modern technology for weed control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aerial spraying ; Airspeed ; Droplets ; Field tests ; Off – target zone ; Operational parameters ; Parameters ; Spray deposition ; Sprayers ; Spraying ; Unmanned aerial sprayer ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Weather ; Weed control</subject><ispartof>Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2020-05, Vol.172, p.105350, Article 105350</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2ac389de4f24ce5b6f0afaedf277069badb00ae5a3540e46ada64927427fb2773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2ac389de4f24ce5b6f0afaedf277069badb00ae5a3540e46ada64927427fb2773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Fiaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Baijing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xiaoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shibbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali Chandio, Farman</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application</title><title>Computers and electronics in agriculture</title><description>•Deposition of droplet increased with decrease in flight altitude and speed.•Droplet density and coverage decrease with the increase of flight speed and altitude.•D0.5 increased with the decrease in flight spread and altitude.•More than 90% deposition accrues in the target zone using single rotor UAV sprayers.
Droplet size, weather conditions and operational parameters of sprayers also affect the spray coverage, absorption attachment to the target. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) currently, is considered a modern spraying technology which is helpful for efficient spraying. However, the effect of operational parameters on deposition in target and off-target zones still required to determine. Field tests were conducted to determine spray deposition, the number of spray deposits, coverage and droplet size under various flight heights (2 and 3 m) and flight speed (2 and 3 m/s) for control of outer field control. DepositScan software was applied to determine the spray deposition, number of deposits, coverage and droplet diameter. The results showed that the average deposition (2.29 µL/cm2) in the target area was found the highest when the UAV operates with 2 m/s forward speed at 2 m height (T1), the spray coverage under the T1 treatment achieved 36.19% at zero position of the central flight line. At the flight central line, the relative span was 0.70, 1.01, 1.03 and 1.05 for treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively. The treatment T1 showed maximum VMD = D0.5 as 448.75 µm whereas T4 showed minimum D0.5 with a value of 238.95 µm. The deposition in the off-target zone was nearly negligible for single-rotor UAV. This study provides a recommendation UAV operators, farmers and manufacturers for better utilization of this modern technology for weed control.</description><subject>Aerial spraying</subject><subject>Airspeed</subject><subject>Droplets</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Off – target zone</subject><subject>Operational parameters</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Spray deposition</subject><subject>Sprayers</subject><subject>Spraying</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial sprayer</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><issn>0168-1699</issn><issn>1872-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctuHCEQRVHkSBk7-YMskLLuCQ30axPJsvySLHljZ4tqoBgx6gECTCL7Q_K9odNeewVVnHtV1CXka8u2LWv774etDscI-y1nfGl1omMfyKYdB94MLRvOyKZiY9P20_SJnOd8YLWexmFD_l5bi7rQYGmImKC44GGmERIcsWDKy8vz5U-aY4IXTDT49UoNxpDdwle6VNRT52mBtMdCwZsqtM1b-Ro8ZmpOyfk9DacKU-twNvQPoqE6-JLCTCHG2en_I3wmHy3MGb-8nRfk-eb66equeXi8vb-6fGi0ELI0HLQYJ4PScqmx2_WWgQU0lg8D66cdmB1jgB2ITjKUPRjo5cQHyQe7q4y4IN9W35jCrxPmog7hlOoGsuJSjJxz0YtKyZXSKeSc0KqY3BHSi2qZWhJQB7UmoJYE1JpAlf1YZVh_8NthUlk79BqNS3XnygT3vsE_lUCUgQ</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Ahmad, Fiaz</creator><creator>Qiu, Baijing</creator><creator>Dong, Xiaoya</creator><creator>Ma, Jing</creator><creator>Huang, Xin</creator><creator>Ahmed, Shibbir</creator><creator>Ali Chandio, Farman</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application</title><author>Ahmad, Fiaz ; Qiu, Baijing ; Dong, Xiaoya ; Ma, Jing ; Huang, Xin ; Ahmed, Shibbir ; Ali Chandio, Farman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2ac389de4f24ce5b6f0afaedf277069badb00ae5a3540e46ada64927427fb2773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerial spraying</topic><topic>Airspeed</topic><topic>Droplets</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Off – target zone</topic><topic>Operational parameters</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Spray deposition</topic><topic>Sprayers</topic><topic>Spraying</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial sprayer</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Fiaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Baijing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xiaoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shibbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali Chandio, Farman</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers and electronics in agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmad, Fiaz</au><au>Qiu, Baijing</au><au>Dong, Xiaoya</au><au>Ma, Jing</au><au>Huang, Xin</au><au>Ahmed, Shibbir</au><au>Ali Chandio, Farman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application</atitle><jtitle>Computers and electronics in agriculture</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>172</volume><spage>105350</spage><pages>105350-</pages><artnum>105350</artnum><issn>0168-1699</issn><eissn>1872-7107</eissn><abstract>•Deposition of droplet increased with decrease in flight altitude and speed.•Droplet density and coverage decrease with the increase of flight speed and altitude.•D0.5 increased with the decrease in flight spread and altitude.•More than 90% deposition accrues in the target zone using single rotor UAV sprayers.
Droplet size, weather conditions and operational parameters of sprayers also affect the spray coverage, absorption attachment to the target. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) currently, is considered a modern spraying technology which is helpful for efficient spraying. However, the effect of operational parameters on deposition in target and off-target zones still required to determine. Field tests were conducted to determine spray deposition, the number of spray deposits, coverage and droplet size under various flight heights (2 and 3 m) and flight speed (2 and 3 m/s) for control of outer field control. DepositScan software was applied to determine the spray deposition, number of deposits, coverage and droplet diameter. The results showed that the average deposition (2.29 µL/cm2) in the target area was found the highest when the UAV operates with 2 m/s forward speed at 2 m height (T1), the spray coverage under the T1 treatment achieved 36.19% at zero position of the central flight line. At the flight central line, the relative span was 0.70, 1.01, 1.03 and 1.05 for treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively. The treatment T1 showed maximum VMD = D0.5 as 448.75 µm whereas T4 showed minimum D0.5 with a value of 238.95 µm. The deposition in the off-target zone was nearly negligible for single-rotor UAV. This study provides a recommendation UAV operators, farmers and manufacturers for better utilization of this modern technology for weed control.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-1699 |
ispartof | Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2020-05, Vol.172, p.105350, Article 105350 |
issn | 0168-1699 1872-7107 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2438222363 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aerial spraying Airspeed Droplets Field tests Off – target zone Operational parameters Parameters Spray deposition Sprayers Spraying Unmanned aerial sprayer Unmanned aerial vehicles Weather Weed control |
title | Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A50%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20operational%20parameters%20of%20UAV%20sprayer%20on%20spray%20deposition%20pattern%20in%20target%20and%20off-target%20zones%20during%20outer%20field%20weed%20control%20application&rft.jtitle=Computers%20and%20electronics%20in%20agriculture&rft.au=Ahmad,%20Fiaz&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=172&rft.spage=105350&rft.pages=105350-&rft.artnum=105350&rft.issn=0168-1699&rft.eissn=1872-7107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438222363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438222363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168169919326353&rfr_iscdi=true |