Altmetrics as a research specialty (Dimensions, 2005-2018)
The scientific literature on altmetrics published from 2005 to 2018 was analysed. The overall structure of the speciality's intellectual landscape is depicted through clusters of co-cited references, analysing journal and author co-citations. The 56,936 references cited in the 8,145 papers of a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | El profesional de la informacion 2019, Vol.28 (6), p.131-148 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 148 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 131 |
| container_title | El profesional de la informacion |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio |
| description | The scientific literature on altmetrics published from 2005 to 2018 was analysed. The overall structure of the speciality's intellectual landscape is depicted through clusters of co-cited references, analysing journal and author co-citations. The 56,936 references cited in the 8,145 papers of all kinds retrieved from the Dimensions bibliographic database were included in the initial dataset used in the analysis. Pathfinder networks were generated with CiteSpace to determine the most prevalent journals and authors in the speciality. Conceptual structures were identified by co-citation clustering and latent semantic analysis. Open knowledge', altmetric collection', web indicator', assessing research', Research- Gate score', open data citation advantage', Google Scholar author citation', share data', academic tweet', Mendeley readership count' and social media metrics' were observed to be the lines of research presently favoured by specialists. Statistical indicators were calculated to determine the journals and contributors making the greatest impact. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3145/epi.2019.nov.08 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2437352952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A615911294</galeid><sourcerecordid>A615911294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-c3539d4b9d18b13453ece22e46e3a6e29d001a3cb7fb245439ccfe69af07031b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1Lw0AUxBdRsa2ePQkBLwomffuVdL3VWj-g4EXPy2b7oluTbN1Nhf73plRQGHhzmHkDP0LOKWScCjnGtcsYUJW1_juDyQEZ0FyplAkoDv_5YzKkXCnBqczZCRnGuAJgoIAOyO207hrsgrMxMb2SgBFNsB9JXKN1pu62ydW9a7CNzrfxJmEAMu1HJ9en5KgydcSz3zsibw_z19lTunh5fJ5NF6llBe9SyyVXS1GqJZ2UlAvJ0SJjKHLkJkemlgDUcFsWVcmEFFxZW2GuTAUFcFryEbnc_10H_7XB2OmV34S2n9RM8IJLpiT7S72bGrVrK98FYxsXrZ7mVCpKWU9gRMb7lA0-xoCVXgfXmLDVFPSOqe6Z6h1T3TPVMOkbF_sG1q4MXpfef0Y9X9xRJnMQ_AcQ0258</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437352952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Altmetrics as a research specialty (Dimensions, 2005-2018)</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos ; Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos ; Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>The scientific literature on altmetrics published from 2005 to 2018 was analysed. The overall structure of the speciality's intellectual landscape is depicted through clusters of co-cited references, analysing journal and author co-citations. The 56,936 references cited in the 8,145 papers of all kinds retrieved from the Dimensions bibliographic database were included in the initial dataset used in the analysis. Pathfinder networks were generated with CiteSpace to determine the most prevalent journals and authors in the speciality. Conceptual structures were identified by co-citation clustering and latent semantic analysis. Open knowledge', altmetric collection', web indicator', assessing research', Research- Gate score', open data citation advantage', Google Scholar author citation', share data', academic tweet', Mendeley readership count' and social media metrics' were observed to be the lines of research presently favoured by specialists. Statistical indicators were calculated to determine the journals and contributors making the greatest impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1699-2407</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6710</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1699-2407</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3145/epi.2019.nov.08</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 1399431562</identifier><identifier>LCCallNum: Z665 .O464 2019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madrid: El Profesional de la información</publisher><subject>Análisis de co-citación ; Análisis de redes de citas ; Autores ; Bibliographic data bases ; Bibliometrics ; Citas ; Citations ; Comunicación académica ; Espacio de citas ; Indicadores ; Informetrics ; Mapeo científico ; Redes sociales académicas ; Visualización de redes de citas</subject><ispartof>El profesional de la informacion, 2019, Vol.28 (6), p.131-148</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 EPI SCP</rights><rights>Copyright El Profesional de la Informacion 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Altmetrics as a research specialty (Dimensions, 2005-2018)</title><title>El profesional de la informacion</title><description>The scientific literature on altmetrics published from 2005 to 2018 was analysed. The overall structure of the speciality's intellectual landscape is depicted through clusters of co-cited references, analysing journal and author co-citations. The 56,936 references cited in the 8,145 papers of all kinds retrieved from the Dimensions bibliographic database were included in the initial dataset used in the analysis. Pathfinder networks were generated with CiteSpace to determine the most prevalent journals and authors in the speciality. Conceptual structures were identified by co-citation clustering and latent semantic analysis. Open knowledge', altmetric collection', web indicator', assessing research', Research- Gate score', open data citation advantage', Google Scholar author citation', share data', academic tweet', Mendeley readership count' and social media metrics' were observed to be the lines of research presently favoured by specialists. Statistical indicators were calculated to determine the journals and contributors making the greatest impact.</description><subject>Análisis de co-citación</subject><subject>Análisis de redes de citas</subject><subject>Autores</subject><subject>Bibliographic data bases</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Citas</subject><subject>Citations</subject><subject>Comunicación académica</subject><subject>Espacio de citas</subject><subject>Indicadores</subject><subject>Informetrics</subject><subject>Mapeo científico</subject><subject>Redes sociales académicas</subject><subject>Visualización de redes de citas</subject><issn>1699-2407</issn><issn>1386-6710</issn><issn>1699-2407</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1Lw0AUxBdRsa2ePQkBLwomffuVdL3VWj-g4EXPy2b7oluTbN1Nhf73plRQGHhzmHkDP0LOKWScCjnGtcsYUJW1_juDyQEZ0FyplAkoDv_5YzKkXCnBqczZCRnGuAJgoIAOyO207hrsgrMxMb2SgBFNsB9JXKN1pu62ydW9a7CNzrfxJmEAMu1HJ9en5KgydcSz3zsibw_z19lTunh5fJ5NF6llBe9SyyVXS1GqJZ2UlAvJ0SJjKHLkJkemlgDUcFsWVcmEFFxZW2GuTAUFcFryEbnc_10H_7XB2OmV34S2n9RM8IJLpiT7S72bGrVrK98FYxsXrZ7mVCpKWU9gRMb7lA0-xoCVXgfXmLDVFPSOqe6Z6h1T3TPVMOkbF_sG1q4MXpfef0Y9X9xRJnMQ_AcQ0258</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos</creator><creator>Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio</creator><general>El Profesional de la información</general><general>EPI SCP</general><general>El Profesional de la Informacion</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>INF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Altmetrics as a research specialty (Dimensions, 2005-2018)</title><author>Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos ; Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-c3539d4b9d18b13453ece22e46e3a6e29d001a3cb7fb245439ccfe69af07031b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Análisis de co-citación</topic><topic>Análisis de redes de citas</topic><topic>Autores</topic><topic>Bibliographic data bases</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Citas</topic><topic>Citations</topic><topic>Comunicación académica</topic><topic>Espacio de citas</topic><topic>Indicadores</topic><topic>Informetrics</topic><topic>Mapeo científico</topic><topic>Redes sociales académicas</topic><topic>Visualización de redes de citas</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: Informe Academico</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>El profesional de la informacion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos</au><au>Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Altmetrics as a research specialty (Dimensions, 2005-2018)</atitle><jtitle>El profesional de la informacion</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>131-148</pages><issn>1699-2407</issn><issn>1386-6710</issn><eissn>1699-2407</eissn><abstract>The scientific literature on altmetrics published from 2005 to 2018 was analysed. The overall structure of the speciality's intellectual landscape is depicted through clusters of co-cited references, analysing journal and author co-citations. The 56,936 references cited in the 8,145 papers of all kinds retrieved from the Dimensions bibliographic database were included in the initial dataset used in the analysis. Pathfinder networks were generated with CiteSpace to determine the most prevalent journals and authors in the speciality. Conceptual structures were identified by co-citation clustering and latent semantic analysis. Open knowledge', altmetric collection', web indicator', assessing research', Research- Gate score', open data citation advantage', Google Scholar author citation', share data', academic tweet', Mendeley readership count' and social media metrics' were observed to be the lines of research presently favoured by specialists. Statistical indicators were calculated to determine the journals and contributors making the greatest impact.</abstract><cop>Madrid</cop><pub>El Profesional de la información</pub><doi>10.3145/epi.2019.nov.08</doi><oclcid>1399431562</oclcid><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1699-2407 |
| ispartof | El profesional de la informacion, 2019, Vol.28 (6), p.131-148 |
| issn | 1699-2407 1386-6710 1699-2407 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2437352952 |
| source | Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Análisis de co-citación Análisis de redes de citas Autores Bibliographic data bases Bibliometrics Citas Citations Comunicación académica Espacio de citas Indicadores Informetrics Mapeo científico Redes sociales académicas Visualización de redes de citas |
| title | Altmetrics as a research specialty (Dimensions, 2005-2018) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A01%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Altmetrics%20as%20a%20research%20specialty%20(Dimensions,%202005-2018)&rft.jtitle=El%20profesional%20de%20la%20informacion&rft.au=Olmeda-Go%CC%81mez,%20Carlos&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=131-148&rft.issn=1699-2407&rft.eissn=1699-2407&rft_id=info:doi/10.3145/epi.2019.nov.08&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA615911294%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437352952&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A615911294&rfr_iscdi=true |