Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors

Urease inhibitors have been successfully used to reduce ammonia (NH3) emission from urea-based fertilizers. However, studies on its effectiveness with manures have produced inconclusive results. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rates of urease...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Journal of Soil Science 2020-09, Vol.100 (3), p.198-205
Hauptverfasser: Lasisi, Ahmed A, Akinremi, Olalekan O, Kumaragamage, Darshani
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 205
container_issue 3
container_start_page 198
container_title Canadian Journal of Soil Science
container_volume 100
creator Lasisi, Ahmed A
Akinremi, Olalekan O
Kumaragamage, Darshani
description Urease inhibitors have been successfully used to reduce ammonia (NH3) emission from urea-based fertilizers. However, studies on its effectiveness with manures have produced inconclusive results. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rates of urease [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NBPT] with and without nitrification inhibitor (NI) in reducing NH3 emission from surface-applied liquid pig manure (LPM) and solid beef manure (SBM). Ammonia emission was measured with acid-charged discs at seven dates for 28 d. Total NH3 emission (% of applied N) ranged from 4.3% to 8.2% in untreated LPM and 8.2% in untreated SBM. The corresponding NH3 emission was 6.8%–7.4% in LPM treated with NBPT, 5.0%–12.3% in LPM treated with NBPT + NI (double inhibitor; DI), and 6.0%–10.8% in SBM treated with DI. In the field study, NH3 emission was not significantly different between either LPM or SBM treated with and without DI. In the greenhouse, NBPT did not significantly reduce NH3 emission from LPM, whereas DI applied at a lower rate significantly increased NH3 emission from LPM. In conclusion, addition of NBPT to manure did not have any significant environmental benefit, whereas a combination of NBPT and NI increased NH3 emission from manure.
doi_str_mv 10.1139/cjss-2019-0128
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2437146420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2437146420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-317720585f95034380ab2cda9cfd416946c4ef912279a817e917bf398c0eead03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtXzwGvbs0kaZMcS_ELCl70HLK7E5riJjVJEf-9u9S7p2GG530HHkJugS0AhHno9qU0nIFpGHB9RmZgQDegJZyTGWNMN5IruCRXpezHVUkwM-LWw5BicBSHUEpIkfqcBjq4eMxYaM3oKvb0O9Qd7YP3mDFWmsdjocnTEXIFqYs9jaHm4EPn6tQS4i60oaZcrsmFd58Fb_7mnHw8Pb5vXprt2_PrZr1tWsFkbQQoxdlSL71ZMiGFZq7lXe9M53sJKyNXnURvgHNlnAaFBlTrhdEdQ3Q9E3Nyd-o95PR1xFLtPh1zHF9aLoUCuZJ8ohYnqsuplIzeHnIYXP6xwOyk0U4a7aTRThrHwP0p0IaUIv6H_wJ1xXVT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437146420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lasisi, Ahmed A ; Akinremi, Olalekan O ; Kumaragamage, Darshani</creator><contributor>Naeth, M. Anne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lasisi, Ahmed A ; Akinremi, Olalekan O ; Kumaragamage, Darshani ; Naeth, M. Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Urease inhibitors have been successfully used to reduce ammonia (NH3) emission from urea-based fertilizers. However, studies on its effectiveness with manures have produced inconclusive results. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rates of urease [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NBPT] with and without nitrification inhibitor (NI) in reducing NH3 emission from surface-applied liquid pig manure (LPM) and solid beef manure (SBM). Ammonia emission was measured with acid-charged discs at seven dates for 28 d. Total NH3 emission (% of applied N) ranged from 4.3% to 8.2% in untreated LPM and 8.2% in untreated SBM. The corresponding NH3 emission was 6.8%–7.4% in LPM treated with NBPT, 5.0%–12.3% in LPM treated with NBPT + NI (double inhibitor; DI), and 6.0%–10.8% in SBM treated with DI. In the field study, NH3 emission was not significantly different between either LPM or SBM treated with and without DI. In the greenhouse, NBPT did not significantly reduce NH3 emission from LPM, whereas DI applied at a lower rate significantly increased NH3 emission from LPM. In conclusion, addition of NBPT to manure did not have any significant environmental benefit, whereas a combination of NBPT and NI increased NH3 emission from manure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-1841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/cjss-2019-0128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Canadian Science Publishing</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Cattle manure ; double inhibiteur ; double inhibitors ; Emission analysis ; Emission measurements ; Emissions control ; Fertilizers ; fumier de bovins de boucherie ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouses ; Inhibitors ; liquid pig manure ; lisier de porcs ; Manures ; NBPT ; NH3 emission ; Nitrification ; Pig manure ; solid beef manure ; Terrain ; Urea ; Urease ; émissions de NH3</subject><ispartof>Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2020-09, Vol.100 (3), p.198-205</ispartof><rights>Copyright remains with the author(s) or their institution(s). Permission for reuse (free in most cases) can be obtained from RightsLink.</rights><rights>2020 Published by NRC Research Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-317720585f95034380ab2cda9cfd416946c4ef912279a817e917bf398c0eead03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-317720585f95034380ab2cda9cfd416946c4ef912279a817e917bf398c0eead03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Naeth, M. Anne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lasisi, Ahmed A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinremi, Olalekan O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaragamage, Darshani</creatorcontrib><title>Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors</title><title>Canadian Journal of Soil Science</title><description>Urease inhibitors have been successfully used to reduce ammonia (NH3) emission from urea-based fertilizers. However, studies on its effectiveness with manures have produced inconclusive results. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rates of urease [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NBPT] with and without nitrification inhibitor (NI) in reducing NH3 emission from surface-applied liquid pig manure (LPM) and solid beef manure (SBM). Ammonia emission was measured with acid-charged discs at seven dates for 28 d. Total NH3 emission (% of applied N) ranged from 4.3% to 8.2% in untreated LPM and 8.2% in untreated SBM. The corresponding NH3 emission was 6.8%–7.4% in LPM treated with NBPT, 5.0%–12.3% in LPM treated with NBPT + NI (double inhibitor; DI), and 6.0%–10.8% in SBM treated with DI. In the field study, NH3 emission was not significantly different between either LPM or SBM treated with and without DI. In the greenhouse, NBPT did not significantly reduce NH3 emission from LPM, whereas DI applied at a lower rate significantly increased NH3 emission from LPM. In conclusion, addition of NBPT to manure did not have any significant environmental benefit, whereas a combination of NBPT and NI increased NH3 emission from manure.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Cattle manure</subject><subject>double inhibiteur</subject><subject>double inhibitors</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>fumier de bovins de boucherie</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>liquid pig manure</subject><subject>lisier de porcs</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>NBPT</subject><subject>NH3 emission</subject><subject>Nitrification</subject><subject>Pig manure</subject><subject>solid beef manure</subject><subject>Terrain</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>Urease</subject><subject>émissions de NH3</subject><issn>0008-4271</issn><issn>1918-1841</issn><issn>1918-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtXzwGvbs0kaZMcS_ELCl70HLK7E5riJjVJEf-9u9S7p2GG530HHkJugS0AhHno9qU0nIFpGHB9RmZgQDegJZyTGWNMN5IruCRXpezHVUkwM-LWw5BicBSHUEpIkfqcBjq4eMxYaM3oKvb0O9Qd7YP3mDFWmsdjocnTEXIFqYs9jaHm4EPn6tQS4i60oaZcrsmFd58Fb_7mnHw8Pb5vXprt2_PrZr1tWsFkbQQoxdlSL71ZMiGFZq7lXe9M53sJKyNXnURvgHNlnAaFBlTrhdEdQ3Q9E3Nyd-o95PR1xFLtPh1zHF9aLoUCuZJ8ohYnqsuplIzeHnIYXP6xwOyk0U4a7aTRThrHwP0p0IaUIv6H_wJ1xXVT</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Lasisi, Ahmed A</creator><creator>Akinremi, Olalekan O</creator><creator>Kumaragamage, Darshani</creator><general>Canadian Science Publishing</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors</title><author>Lasisi, Ahmed A ; Akinremi, Olalekan O ; Kumaragamage, Darshani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-317720585f95034380ab2cda9cfd416946c4ef912279a817e917bf398c0eead03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Cattle manure</topic><topic>double inhibiteur</topic><topic>double inhibitors</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>fumier de bovins de boucherie</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>liquid pig manure</topic><topic>lisier de porcs</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>NBPT</topic><topic>NH3 emission</topic><topic>Nitrification</topic><topic>Pig manure</topic><topic>solid beef manure</topic><topic>Terrain</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>Urease</topic><topic>émissions de NH3</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasisi, Ahmed A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinremi, Olalekan O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaragamage, Darshani</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Soil Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasisi, Ahmed A</au><au>Akinremi, Olalekan O</au><au>Kumaragamage, Darshani</au><au>Naeth, M. Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Soil Science</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>198-205</pages><issn>0008-4271</issn><eissn>1918-1841</eissn><eissn>1918-1833</eissn><abstract>Urease inhibitors have been successfully used to reduce ammonia (NH3) emission from urea-based fertilizers. However, studies on its effectiveness with manures have produced inconclusive results. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rates of urease [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NBPT] with and without nitrification inhibitor (NI) in reducing NH3 emission from surface-applied liquid pig manure (LPM) and solid beef manure (SBM). Ammonia emission was measured with acid-charged discs at seven dates for 28 d. Total NH3 emission (% of applied N) ranged from 4.3% to 8.2% in untreated LPM and 8.2% in untreated SBM. The corresponding NH3 emission was 6.8%–7.4% in LPM treated with NBPT, 5.0%–12.3% in LPM treated with NBPT + NI (double inhibitor; DI), and 6.0%–10.8% in SBM treated with DI. In the field study, NH3 emission was not significantly different between either LPM or SBM treated with and without DI. In the greenhouse, NBPT did not significantly reduce NH3 emission from LPM, whereas DI applied at a lower rate significantly increased NH3 emission from LPM. In conclusion, addition of NBPT to manure did not have any significant environmental benefit, whereas a combination of NBPT and NI increased NH3 emission from manure.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Canadian Science Publishing</pub><doi>10.1139/cjss-2019-0128</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4271
ispartof Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2020-09, Vol.100 (3), p.198-205
issn 0008-4271
1918-1841
1918-1833
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2437146420
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Ammonia
Cattle manure
double inhibiteur
double inhibitors
Emission analysis
Emission measurements
Emissions control
Fertilizers
fumier de bovins de boucherie
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouses
Inhibitors
liquid pig manure
lisier de porcs
Manures
NBPT
NH3 emission
Nitrification
Pig manure
solid beef manure
Terrain
Urea
Urease
émissions de NH3
title Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A44%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ammonia%20emission%20from%20manures%20treated%20with%20different%20rates%20of%20urease%20and%20nitrification%20inhibitors&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Journal%20of%20Soil%20Science&rft.au=Lasisi,%20Ahmed%20A&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=198-205&rft.issn=0008-4271&rft.eissn=1918-1841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/cjss-2019-0128&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2437146420%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437146420&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true