Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors
Urease inhibitors have been successfully used to reduce ammonia (NH3) emission from urea-based fertilizers. However, studies on its effectiveness with manures have produced inconclusive results. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rates of urease...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Journal of Soil Science 2020-09, Vol.100 (3), p.198-205 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 205 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Canadian Journal of Soil Science |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Lasisi, Ahmed A Akinremi, Olalekan O Kumaragamage, Darshani |
description | Urease inhibitors have been successfully used to reduce ammonia (NH3) emission from urea-based fertilizers. However, studies on its effectiveness with manures have produced inconclusive results. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rates of urease [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NBPT] with and without nitrification inhibitor (NI) in reducing NH3 emission from surface-applied liquid pig manure (LPM) and solid beef manure (SBM). Ammonia emission was measured with acid-charged discs at seven dates for 28 d. Total NH3 emission (% of applied N) ranged from 4.3% to 8.2% in untreated LPM and 8.2% in untreated SBM. The corresponding NH3 emission was 6.8%–7.4% in LPM treated with NBPT, 5.0%–12.3% in LPM treated with NBPT + NI (double inhibitor; DI), and 6.0%–10.8% in SBM treated with DI. In the field study, NH3 emission was not significantly different between either LPM or SBM treated with and without DI. In the greenhouse, NBPT did not significantly reduce NH3 emission from LPM, whereas DI applied at a lower rate significantly increased NH3 emission from LPM. In conclusion, addition of NBPT to manure did not have any significant environmental benefit, whereas a combination of NBPT and NI increased NH3 emission from manure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/cjss-2019-0128 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2437146420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2437146420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-317720585f95034380ab2cda9cfd416946c4ef912279a817e917bf398c0eead03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtXzwGvbs0kaZMcS_ELCl70HLK7E5riJjVJEf-9u9S7p2GG530HHkJugS0AhHno9qU0nIFpGHB9RmZgQDegJZyTGWNMN5IruCRXpezHVUkwM-LWw5BicBSHUEpIkfqcBjq4eMxYaM3oKvb0O9Qd7YP3mDFWmsdjocnTEXIFqYs9jaHm4EPn6tQS4i60oaZcrsmFd58Fb_7mnHw8Pb5vXprt2_PrZr1tWsFkbQQoxdlSL71ZMiGFZq7lXe9M53sJKyNXnURvgHNlnAaFBlTrhdEdQ3Q9E3Nyd-o95PR1xFLtPh1zHF9aLoUCuZJ8ohYnqsuplIzeHnIYXP6xwOyk0U4a7aTRThrHwP0p0IaUIv6H_wJ1xXVT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437146420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lasisi, Ahmed A ; Akinremi, Olalekan O ; Kumaragamage, Darshani</creator><contributor>Naeth, M. Anne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lasisi, Ahmed A ; Akinremi, Olalekan O ; Kumaragamage, Darshani ; Naeth, M. Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Urease inhibitors have been successfully used to reduce ammonia (NH3) emission from urea-based fertilizers. However, studies on its effectiveness with manures have produced inconclusive results. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rates of urease [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NBPT] with and without nitrification inhibitor (NI) in reducing NH3 emission from surface-applied liquid pig manure (LPM) and solid beef manure (SBM). Ammonia emission was measured with acid-charged discs at seven dates for 28 d. Total NH3 emission (% of applied N) ranged from 4.3% to 8.2% in untreated LPM and 8.2% in untreated SBM. The corresponding NH3 emission was 6.8%–7.4% in LPM treated with NBPT, 5.0%–12.3% in LPM treated with NBPT + NI (double inhibitor; DI), and 6.0%–10.8% in SBM treated with DI. In the field study, NH3 emission was not significantly different between either LPM or SBM treated with and without DI. In the greenhouse, NBPT did not significantly reduce NH3 emission from LPM, whereas DI applied at a lower rate significantly increased NH3 emission from LPM. In conclusion, addition of NBPT to manure did not have any significant environmental benefit, whereas a combination of NBPT and NI increased NH3 emission from manure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-1841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/cjss-2019-0128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Canadian Science Publishing</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Cattle manure ; double inhibiteur ; double inhibitors ; Emission analysis ; Emission measurements ; Emissions control ; Fertilizers ; fumier de bovins de boucherie ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouses ; Inhibitors ; liquid pig manure ; lisier de porcs ; Manures ; NBPT ; NH3 emission ; Nitrification ; Pig manure ; solid beef manure ; Terrain ; Urea ; Urease ; émissions de NH3</subject><ispartof>Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2020-09, Vol.100 (3), p.198-205</ispartof><rights>Copyright remains with the author(s) or their institution(s). Permission for reuse (free in most cases) can be obtained from RightsLink.</rights><rights>2020 Published by NRC Research Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-317720585f95034380ab2cda9cfd416946c4ef912279a817e917bf398c0eead03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-317720585f95034380ab2cda9cfd416946c4ef912279a817e917bf398c0eead03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Naeth, M. Anne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lasisi, Ahmed A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinremi, Olalekan O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaragamage, Darshani</creatorcontrib><title>Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors</title><title>Canadian Journal of Soil Science</title><description>Urease inhibitors have been successfully used to reduce ammonia (NH3) emission from urea-based fertilizers. However, studies on its effectiveness with manures have produced inconclusive results. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rates of urease [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NBPT] with and without nitrification inhibitor (NI) in reducing NH3 emission from surface-applied liquid pig manure (LPM) and solid beef manure (SBM). Ammonia emission was measured with acid-charged discs at seven dates for 28 d. Total NH3 emission (% of applied N) ranged from 4.3% to 8.2% in untreated LPM and 8.2% in untreated SBM. The corresponding NH3 emission was 6.8%–7.4% in LPM treated with NBPT, 5.0%–12.3% in LPM treated with NBPT + NI (double inhibitor; DI), and 6.0%–10.8% in SBM treated with DI. In the field study, NH3 emission was not significantly different between either LPM or SBM treated with and without DI. In the greenhouse, NBPT did not significantly reduce NH3 emission from LPM, whereas DI applied at a lower rate significantly increased NH3 emission from LPM. In conclusion, addition of NBPT to manure did not have any significant environmental benefit, whereas a combination of NBPT and NI increased NH3 emission from manure.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Cattle manure</subject><subject>double inhibiteur</subject><subject>double inhibitors</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>fumier de bovins de boucherie</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>liquid pig manure</subject><subject>lisier de porcs</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>NBPT</subject><subject>NH3 emission</subject><subject>Nitrification</subject><subject>Pig manure</subject><subject>solid beef manure</subject><subject>Terrain</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>Urease</subject><subject>émissions de NH3</subject><issn>0008-4271</issn><issn>1918-1841</issn><issn>1918-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtXzwGvbs0kaZMcS_ELCl70HLK7E5riJjVJEf-9u9S7p2GG530HHkJugS0AhHno9qU0nIFpGHB9RmZgQDegJZyTGWNMN5IruCRXpezHVUkwM-LWw5BicBSHUEpIkfqcBjq4eMxYaM3oKvb0O9Qd7YP3mDFWmsdjocnTEXIFqYs9jaHm4EPn6tQS4i60oaZcrsmFd58Fb_7mnHw8Pb5vXprt2_PrZr1tWsFkbQQoxdlSL71ZMiGFZq7lXe9M53sJKyNXnURvgHNlnAaFBlTrhdEdQ3Q9E3Nyd-o95PR1xFLtPh1zHF9aLoUCuZJ8ohYnqsuplIzeHnIYXP6xwOyk0U4a7aTRThrHwP0p0IaUIv6H_wJ1xXVT</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Lasisi, Ahmed A</creator><creator>Akinremi, Olalekan O</creator><creator>Kumaragamage, Darshani</creator><general>Canadian Science Publishing</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors</title><author>Lasisi, Ahmed A ; Akinremi, Olalekan O ; Kumaragamage, Darshani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-317720585f95034380ab2cda9cfd416946c4ef912279a817e917bf398c0eead03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Cattle manure</topic><topic>double inhibiteur</topic><topic>double inhibitors</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>fumier de bovins de boucherie</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>liquid pig manure</topic><topic>lisier de porcs</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>NBPT</topic><topic>NH3 emission</topic><topic>Nitrification</topic><topic>Pig manure</topic><topic>solid beef manure</topic><topic>Terrain</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>Urease</topic><topic>émissions de NH3</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasisi, Ahmed A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinremi, Olalekan O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaragamage, Darshani</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Soil Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasisi, Ahmed A</au><au>Akinremi, Olalekan O</au><au>Kumaragamage, Darshani</au><au>Naeth, M. Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Soil Science</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>198-205</pages><issn>0008-4271</issn><eissn>1918-1841</eissn><eissn>1918-1833</eissn><abstract>Urease inhibitors have been successfully used to reduce ammonia (NH3) emission from urea-based fertilizers. However, studies on its effectiveness with manures have produced inconclusive results. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rates of urease [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NBPT] with and without nitrification inhibitor (NI) in reducing NH3 emission from surface-applied liquid pig manure (LPM) and solid beef manure (SBM). Ammonia emission was measured with acid-charged discs at seven dates for 28 d. Total NH3 emission (% of applied N) ranged from 4.3% to 8.2% in untreated LPM and 8.2% in untreated SBM. The corresponding NH3 emission was 6.8%–7.4% in LPM treated with NBPT, 5.0%–12.3% in LPM treated with NBPT + NI (double inhibitor; DI), and 6.0%–10.8% in SBM treated with DI. In the field study, NH3 emission was not significantly different between either LPM or SBM treated with and without DI. In the greenhouse, NBPT did not significantly reduce NH3 emission from LPM, whereas DI applied at a lower rate significantly increased NH3 emission from LPM. In conclusion, addition of NBPT to manure did not have any significant environmental benefit, whereas a combination of NBPT and NI increased NH3 emission from manure.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Canadian Science Publishing</pub><doi>10.1139/cjss-2019-0128</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-4271 |
ispartof | Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2020-09, Vol.100 (3), p.198-205 |
issn | 0008-4271 1918-1841 1918-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2437146420 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Ammonia Cattle manure double inhibiteur double inhibitors Emission analysis Emission measurements Emissions control Fertilizers fumier de bovins de boucherie Greenhouse effect Greenhouses Inhibitors liquid pig manure lisier de porcs Manures NBPT NH3 emission Nitrification Pig manure solid beef manure Terrain Urea Urease émissions de NH3 |
title | Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A44%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ammonia%20emission%20from%20manures%20treated%20with%20different%20rates%20of%20urease%20and%20nitrification%20inhibitors&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Journal%20of%20Soil%20Science&rft.au=Lasisi,%20Ahmed%20A&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=198-205&rft.issn=0008-4271&rft.eissn=1918-1841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/cjss-2019-0128&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2437146420%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437146420&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |