Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities

To explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0–12 item) in adult patients suffering from motor disabilities. The questionnaire of WHODAS 2.0–12 item was officially translated and cross-culturally adapted into Gr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of developmental and physical disabilities 2020-10, Vol.32 (5), p.801-819
Hauptverfasser: Papadopoulou, Marianna, Stasi, Sophia, Bakalidou, Daphne, Papageorgiou, Effie, Tsokani, Aristi, Bratsi, Theodora, Papathanasiou, George
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 819
container_issue 5
container_start_page 801
container_title Journal of developmental and physical disabilities
container_volume 32
creator Papadopoulou, Marianna
Stasi, Sophia
Bakalidou, Daphne
Papageorgiou, Effie
Tsokani, Aristi
Bratsi, Theodora
Papathanasiou, George
description To explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0–12 item) in adult patients suffering from motor disabilities. The questionnaire of WHODAS 2.0–12 item was officially translated and cross-culturally adapted into Greek (WHODAS 2.0–12Gr).136 adult patients with motor disabilities included in the present observational study. A reliability study was carried out to explore WHODAS 2.0–12Gr’s internal consistency (Cronbach’s a ), repeatability (Pearson’s r ) and test retest test-retest reliability between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr outcomes of day-1 and day-8 [intra-class correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (ICC 95%CI)], and the convergent validity (item-total correlation) of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr, while the concurrent validity of the questionnaire was testing against the Greek Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 1.0 (SF-36v1.0-Gr). Reliability properties: WHODAS 2.0–12Gr Cronbach’s a was 0.814 ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10882-019-09721-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2436975514</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2436975514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fa9b4150924f20b49c1dee15ef173b7977f1cdc3db7100b433f9892678cc8cc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkdFqFDEUhgdRsFZfwKuAN4qkniQzk8nlsq1uobILVepdmMmc6abMTtYkS1kfxOf12BF7J0Igh_D9_znnT1G8FnAmAPSHJKBpJAdhOBgtBYcnxYmotOKqauAp1VDVXNbq2_PiRUp3AFBLY06Kn5t0dNuwwxy9Y5sY9hizx8TCwPIWmZD8MuOO3YQ49myF7Zi3bB1v28n_aLMPEzv3qe386PORLVLClHY4ZXbtttgfRmRvb1br88U1k2fwjvmJLeg1sw1pCUvs3pPf55BDfDSi9i-LZ0M7Jnz15z4tvn68-LJc8av1p8vl4oo7JUzmQ2u6UlRgZDlI6ErjRI8oKhyEVp02Wg_C9U71naaYulKpwTRG1rpxjo5Qp8Wb2Xcfw_cDpmzvwiFO1NLKUtVGV5UoiZIz5WJIKeJg99Hv2ni0Auzv_O2cv6X87UP-Fkj0fhbdYxeG5Ghfh3-F9AFVXRooNVWgiW7-n176_JD9MhymTFI1SxPh0y3Gxx3-Md4vrE-pxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2436975514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Papadopoulou, Marianna ; Stasi, Sophia ; Bakalidou, Daphne ; Papageorgiou, Effie ; Tsokani, Aristi ; Bratsi, Theodora ; Papathanasiou, George</creator><creatorcontrib>Papadopoulou, Marianna ; Stasi, Sophia ; Bakalidou, Daphne ; Papageorgiou, Effie ; Tsokani, Aristi ; Bratsi, Theodora ; Papathanasiou, George</creatorcontrib><description>To explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0–12 item) in adult patients suffering from motor disabilities. The questionnaire of WHODAS 2.0–12 item was officially translated and cross-culturally adapted into Greek (WHODAS 2.0–12Gr).136 adult patients with motor disabilities included in the present observational study. A reliability study was carried out to explore WHODAS 2.0–12Gr’s internal consistency (Cronbach’s a ), repeatability (Pearson’s r ) and test retest test-retest reliability between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr outcomes of day-1 and day-8 [intra-class correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (ICC 95%CI)], and the convergent validity (item-total correlation) of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr, while the concurrent validity of the questionnaire was testing against the Greek Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 1.0 (SF-36v1.0-Gr). Reliability properties: WHODAS 2.0–12Gr Cronbach’s a was 0.814 ( p  &lt; 0.001), Pearson’s r value was 0.980 (p &lt; 0.001) and ICC (95%CI) was 0.990 (0.985–0.993) (p &lt; 0.001). Validity properties: Pearson ’s r values of item-total correlation were ranged from 0.376 to 0.736. EFA extracted a 3-factor model. Regarding concurrent validity, the significant correlations between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr and the SF36v1.0-Gr ranged from −0.169 to −0.720. WHODAS 2.0–12Gr showed significant high to excellent reliability and significant weak to strong validity properties. Overall, it can be suggested that WHODAS 2.0–12Gr could be a reliable and valid tool for assessing patients with motor disabilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-263X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3580</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10882-019-09721-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adults ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Construct Validity ; Convergent validity ; Correlation ; Disability ; Education &amp; Educational Research ; Education, Special ; Exploratory factor analysis ; Factor Analysis ; Health surveys ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Original Article ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Psychology ; Psychology, Developmental ; Psychometrics ; Public Health ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation ; Science &amp; Technology ; Social Sciences ; Suffering ; Test-Retest reliability ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2020-10, Vol.32 (5), p.801-819</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>6</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000564904700007</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fa9b4150924f20b49c1dee15ef173b7977f1cdc3db7100b433f9892678cc8cc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fa9b4150924f20b49c1dee15ef173b7977f1cdc3db7100b433f9892678cc8cc13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0163-7455</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10882-019-09721-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10882-019-09721-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,12855,27933,27934,28258,31008,41497,42566,51328</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papadopoulou, Marianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stasi, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakalidou, Daphne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papageorgiou, Effie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsokani, Aristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bratsi, Theodora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papathanasiou, George</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities</title><title>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</title><addtitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</addtitle><addtitle>J DEV PHYS DISABIL</addtitle><description>To explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0–12 item) in adult patients suffering from motor disabilities. The questionnaire of WHODAS 2.0–12 item was officially translated and cross-culturally adapted into Greek (WHODAS 2.0–12Gr).136 adult patients with motor disabilities included in the present observational study. A reliability study was carried out to explore WHODAS 2.0–12Gr’s internal consistency (Cronbach’s a ), repeatability (Pearson’s r ) and test retest test-retest reliability between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr outcomes of day-1 and day-8 [intra-class correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (ICC 95%CI)], and the convergent validity (item-total correlation) of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr, while the concurrent validity of the questionnaire was testing against the Greek Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 1.0 (SF-36v1.0-Gr). Reliability properties: WHODAS 2.0–12Gr Cronbach’s a was 0.814 ( p  &lt; 0.001), Pearson’s r value was 0.980 (p &lt; 0.001) and ICC (95%CI) was 0.990 (0.985–0.993) (p &lt; 0.001). Validity properties: Pearson ’s r values of item-total correlation were ranged from 0.376 to 0.736. EFA extracted a 3-factor model. Regarding concurrent validity, the significant correlations between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr and the SF36v1.0-Gr ranged from −0.169 to −0.720. WHODAS 2.0–12Gr showed significant high to excellent reliability and significant weak to strong validity properties. Overall, it can be suggested that WHODAS 2.0–12Gr could be a reliable and valid tool for assessing patients with motor disabilities.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Education &amp; Educational Research</subject><subject>Education, Special</subject><subject>Exploratory factor analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology, Developmental</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Suffering</subject><subject>Test-Retest reliability</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1056-263X</issn><issn>1573-3580</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkdFqFDEUhgdRsFZfwKuAN4qkniQzk8nlsq1uobILVepdmMmc6abMTtYkS1kfxOf12BF7J0Igh_D9_znnT1G8FnAmAPSHJKBpJAdhOBgtBYcnxYmotOKqauAp1VDVXNbq2_PiRUp3AFBLY06Kn5t0dNuwwxy9Y5sY9hizx8TCwPIWmZD8MuOO3YQ49myF7Zi3bB1v28n_aLMPEzv3qe386PORLVLClHY4ZXbtttgfRmRvb1br88U1k2fwjvmJLeg1sw1pCUvs3pPf55BDfDSi9i-LZ0M7Jnz15z4tvn68-LJc8av1p8vl4oo7JUzmQ2u6UlRgZDlI6ErjRI8oKhyEVp02Wg_C9U71naaYulKpwTRG1rpxjo5Qp8Wb2Xcfw_cDpmzvwiFO1NLKUtVGV5UoiZIz5WJIKeJg99Hv2ni0Auzv_O2cv6X87UP-Fkj0fhbdYxeG5Ghfh3-F9AFVXRooNVWgiW7-n176_JD9MhymTFI1SxPh0y3Gxx3-Md4vrE-pxA</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Papadopoulou, Marianna</creator><creator>Stasi, Sophia</creator><creator>Bakalidou, Daphne</creator><creator>Papageorgiou, Effie</creator><creator>Tsokani, Aristi</creator><creator>Bratsi, Theodora</creator><creator>Papathanasiou, George</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0163-7455</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities</title><author>Papadopoulou, Marianna ; Stasi, Sophia ; Bakalidou, Daphne ; Papageorgiou, Effie ; Tsokani, Aristi ; Bratsi, Theodora ; Papathanasiou, George</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fa9b4150924f20b49c1dee15ef173b7977f1cdc3db7100b433f9892678cc8cc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Education &amp; Educational Research</topic><topic>Education, Special</topic><topic>Exploratory factor analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology, Developmental</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Suffering</topic><topic>Test-Retest reliability</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papadopoulou, Marianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stasi, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakalidou, Daphne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papageorgiou, Effie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsokani, Aristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bratsi, Theodora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papathanasiou, George</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papadopoulou, Marianna</au><au>Stasi, Sophia</au><au>Bakalidou, Daphne</au><au>Papageorgiou, Effie</au><au>Tsokani, Aristi</au><au>Bratsi, Theodora</au><au>Papathanasiou, George</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle><stitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</stitle><stitle>J DEV PHYS DISABIL</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>801</spage><epage>819</epage><pages>801-819</pages><issn>1056-263X</issn><eissn>1573-3580</eissn><abstract>To explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0–12 item) in adult patients suffering from motor disabilities. The questionnaire of WHODAS 2.0–12 item was officially translated and cross-culturally adapted into Greek (WHODAS 2.0–12Gr).136 adult patients with motor disabilities included in the present observational study. A reliability study was carried out to explore WHODAS 2.0–12Gr’s internal consistency (Cronbach’s a ), repeatability (Pearson’s r ) and test retest test-retest reliability between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr outcomes of day-1 and day-8 [intra-class correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (ICC 95%CI)], and the convergent validity (item-total correlation) of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr, while the concurrent validity of the questionnaire was testing against the Greek Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 1.0 (SF-36v1.0-Gr). Reliability properties: WHODAS 2.0–12Gr Cronbach’s a was 0.814 ( p  &lt; 0.001), Pearson’s r value was 0.980 (p &lt; 0.001) and ICC (95%CI) was 0.990 (0.985–0.993) (p &lt; 0.001). Validity properties: Pearson ’s r values of item-total correlation were ranged from 0.376 to 0.736. EFA extracted a 3-factor model. Regarding concurrent validity, the significant correlations between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr and the SF36v1.0-Gr ranged from −0.169 to −0.720. WHODAS 2.0–12Gr showed significant high to excellent reliability and significant weak to strong validity properties. Overall, it can be suggested that WHODAS 2.0–12Gr could be a reliable and valid tool for assessing patients with motor disabilities.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10882-019-09721-0</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0163-7455</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1056-263X
ispartof Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2020-10, Vol.32 (5), p.801-819
issn 1056-263X
1573-3580
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2436975514
source SpringerNature Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Adults
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Child and School Psychology
Construct Validity
Convergent validity
Correlation
Disability
Education & Educational Research
Education, Special
Exploratory factor analysis
Factor Analysis
Health surveys
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Original Article
Patients
Pediatrics
Psychology
Psychology, Developmental
Psychometrics
Public Health
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Rehabilitation
Science & Technology
Social Sciences
Suffering
Test-Retest reliability
Validity
title Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T13%3A41%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20Properties%20of%20the%2012-Item%20World%20Health%20Organization%20Disability%20Assessment%20Schedule%20(WHODAS%202.0)%20in%20Adult%20Patients%20with%20Motor%20Disabilities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20developmental%20and%20physical%20disabilities&rft.au=Papadopoulou,%20Marianna&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=801&rft.epage=819&rft.pages=801-819&rft.issn=1056-263X&rft.eissn=1573-3580&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10882-019-09721-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2436975514%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2436975514&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true