Cognitive optimism of distinctive initiatives to foster self-directed and self-regulated learning skills: A comparative analysis of conventional and blended-learning in undergraduate studies
Independent learning in massive open online courses (MOOCs) requires considerable effort from the learners themselves. Blended-learning has been recognised to foster independent learning among undergraduate students. With the popularity of the blended-learning approach to teach in traditional educat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Education and information technologies 2020-09, Vol.25 (5), p.4365-4380 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4380 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 4365 |
container_title | Education and information technologies |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Onah, Daniel F. O. Pang, Elaine L. L. Sinclair, Jane E. |
description | Independent learning in massive open online courses (MOOCs) requires considerable effort from the learners themselves. Blended-learning has been recognised to foster independent learning among undergraduate students. With the popularity of the blended-learning approach to teach in traditional educational settings, little has been mentioned on how cohesive this approach is in fostering self-directed learning and self-regulation among university students. This study hopes to explore undergraduate learners in their distinctive study patterns. The study was conducted to investigate a comparative study between students from two departments; Science and Social Science. The aim was to explore the students’ self-directed and self-regulated learning skills in conventional classrooms and aspects of blended-learning embedded in a MOOC platform in two academic years for undergraduates at a top UK university. This study encompasses two case studies; firstly, a combine blended-learning seminar and a conventional seminar classes and a study undertaken with a student of English as a second language (ESL). The blended-learning students were participants who registered in a conventional university and took an optional module in computer security. The second group of students participated in a core module of logic and verification. The second case study was with a final year undergraduate student in Education Studies. The students studied and engaged with the course content using their initiative and directing their learning approaches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10639-020-10172-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2436315353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713712975</galeid><ericid>EJ1266309</ericid><sourcerecordid>A713712975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ad7df647066a2ef89874898f6c2539d60633385250ab97589dcec6ccab08f9da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1rFTEUXETBWv0DghDwOW0-dpNd3y6XqpWCL_occpOTJXU3uSbZlv45f5vZu9IiiASSw8yZSXKmad5SckEJkZeZEsEHTBjBlFDJ8P2z5ox2kmMpSP-81lwQzHgnXzavcr4lhAyyZWfNr30cgy_-DlA8Fj_7PKPokPW5-GBOuF95vZYZlYhczAUSyjA5bH0CU8AiHeyGJBiXSa_QBDoFH0aUf_hpyh_QDpk4H3U6WVWFnh6yz-ttJoY7CMXHip2sDhMECxY_eviAloqkMWm7VHuUy2I95NfNC6enDG_-nOfN949X3_af8c3XT9f73Q02bccK1lZaJ1pJhNAMXD_0sq2bE4Z1fLCiDo_zvmMd0YdBdv1gDRhhjD6Q3g1W8_Pm_eZ7TPHnArmo27ik-tysWMsFpx3v-FPXqCdQPrhYkjZ1pkbtJOWSsmpeuy7-0VWXhdnXUYDzFf9LwDaBSTHnBE4dk591elCUqDV-tcWvavzqFL-6r6J3mwiSN4-Cqy-UCcHJUHm-8blyYYT09KP_uP4GjtjAyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2436315353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive optimism of distinctive initiatives to foster self-directed and self-regulated learning skills: A comparative analysis of conventional and blended-learning in undergraduate studies</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Onah, Daniel F. O. ; Pang, Elaine L. L. ; Sinclair, Jane E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Onah, Daniel F. O. ; Pang, Elaine L. L. ; Sinclair, Jane E.</creatorcontrib><description>Independent learning in massive open online courses (MOOCs) requires considerable effort from the learners themselves. Blended-learning has been recognised to foster independent learning among undergraduate students. With the popularity of the blended-learning approach to teach in traditional educational settings, little has been mentioned on how cohesive this approach is in fostering self-directed learning and self-regulation among university students. This study hopes to explore undergraduate learners in their distinctive study patterns. The study was conducted to investigate a comparative study between students from two departments; Science and Social Science. The aim was to explore the students’ self-directed and self-regulated learning skills in conventional classrooms and aspects of blended-learning embedded in a MOOC platform in two academic years for undergraduates at a top UK university. This study encompasses two case studies; firstly, a combine blended-learning seminar and a conventional seminar classes and a study undertaken with a student of English as a second language (ESL). The blended-learning students were participants who registered in a conventional university and took an optional module in computer security. The second group of students participated in a core module of logic and verification. The second case study was with a final year undergraduate student in Education Studies. The students studied and engaged with the course content using their initiative and directing their learning approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-2357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7608</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10172-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Blended Learning ; Case Studies ; College students ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Computer assisted language learning ; Computer Science ; Computer Security ; Computers and Education ; Conventional Instruction ; Course Content ; Distance learning ; Education ; Educational Technology ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language ; English as a second language learning ; Foreign Countries ; Independent Study ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Learning strategies ; Mass Instruction ; Massive open online courses ; Metacognition ; Online Courses ; Online education ; Online instruction ; Positive Attitudes ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Self instruction ; Self regulation ; Social sciences ; Student Attitudes ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate education ; Undergraduate Students ; Undergraduate Study ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><ispartof>Education and information technologies, 2020-09, Vol.25 (5), p.4365-4380</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ad7df647066a2ef89874898f6c2539d60633385250ab97589dcec6ccab08f9da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ad7df647066a2ef89874898f6c2539d60633385250ab97589dcec6ccab08f9da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10639-020-10172-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-020-10172-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1266309$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Onah, Daniel F. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Elaine L. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Jane E.</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive optimism of distinctive initiatives to foster self-directed and self-regulated learning skills: A comparative analysis of conventional and blended-learning in undergraduate studies</title><title>Education and information technologies</title><addtitle>Educ Inf Technol</addtitle><description>Independent learning in massive open online courses (MOOCs) requires considerable effort from the learners themselves. Blended-learning has been recognised to foster independent learning among undergraduate students. With the popularity of the blended-learning approach to teach in traditional educational settings, little has been mentioned on how cohesive this approach is in fostering self-directed learning and self-regulation among university students. This study hopes to explore undergraduate learners in their distinctive study patterns. The study was conducted to investigate a comparative study between students from two departments; Science and Social Science. The aim was to explore the students’ self-directed and self-regulated learning skills in conventional classrooms and aspects of blended-learning embedded in a MOOC platform in two academic years for undergraduates at a top UK university. This study encompasses two case studies; firstly, a combine blended-learning seminar and a conventional seminar classes and a study undertaken with a student of English as a second language (ESL). The blended-learning students were participants who registered in a conventional university and took an optional module in computer security. The second group of students participated in a core module of logic and verification. The second case study was with a final year undergraduate student in Education Studies. The students studied and engaged with the course content using their initiative and directing their learning approaches.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Blended Learning</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Computer assisted language learning</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer Security</subject><subject>Computers and Education</subject><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Independent Study</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Learning strategies</subject><subject>Mass Instruction</subject><subject>Massive open online courses</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Online education</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Positive Attitudes</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Self instruction</subject><subject>Self regulation</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate education</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><issn>1360-2357</issn><issn>1573-7608</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV1rFTEUXETBWv0DghDwOW0-dpNd3y6XqpWCL_occpOTJXU3uSbZlv45f5vZu9IiiASSw8yZSXKmad5SckEJkZeZEsEHTBjBlFDJ8P2z5ox2kmMpSP-81lwQzHgnXzavcr4lhAyyZWfNr30cgy_-DlA8Fj_7PKPokPW5-GBOuF95vZYZlYhczAUSyjA5bH0CU8AiHeyGJBiXSa_QBDoFH0aUf_hpyh_QDpk4H3U6WVWFnh6yz-ttJoY7CMXHip2sDhMECxY_eviAloqkMWm7VHuUy2I95NfNC6enDG_-nOfN949X3_af8c3XT9f73Q02bccK1lZaJ1pJhNAMXD_0sq2bE4Z1fLCiDo_zvmMd0YdBdv1gDRhhjD6Q3g1W8_Pm_eZ7TPHnArmo27ik-tysWMsFpx3v-FPXqCdQPrhYkjZ1pkbtJOWSsmpeuy7-0VWXhdnXUYDzFf9LwDaBSTHnBE4dk591elCUqDV-tcWvavzqFL-6r6J3mwiSN4-Cqy-UCcHJUHm-8blyYYT09KP_uP4GjtjAyg</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Onah, Daniel F. O.</creator><creator>Pang, Elaine L. L.</creator><creator>Sinclair, Jane E.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Cognitive optimism of distinctive initiatives to foster self-directed and self-regulated learning skills: A comparative analysis of conventional and blended-learning in undergraduate studies</title><author>Onah, Daniel F. O. ; Pang, Elaine L. L. ; Sinclair, Jane E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ad7df647066a2ef89874898f6c2539d60633385250ab97589dcec6ccab08f9da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Blended Learning</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Computer assisted language learning</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer Security</topic><topic>Computers and Education</topic><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Independent Study</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Learning strategies</topic><topic>Mass Instruction</topic><topic>Massive open online courses</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Online education</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Positive Attitudes</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Self instruction</topic><topic>Self regulation</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate education</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Onah, Daniel F. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Elaine L. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Jane E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Education and information technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Onah, Daniel F. O.</au><au>Pang, Elaine L. L.</au><au>Sinclair, Jane E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1266309</ericid><atitle>Cognitive optimism of distinctive initiatives to foster self-directed and self-regulated learning skills: A comparative analysis of conventional and blended-learning in undergraduate studies</atitle><jtitle>Education and information technologies</jtitle><stitle>Educ Inf Technol</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>4365</spage><epage>4380</epage><pages>4365-4380</pages><issn>1360-2357</issn><eissn>1573-7608</eissn><abstract>Independent learning in massive open online courses (MOOCs) requires considerable effort from the learners themselves. Blended-learning has been recognised to foster independent learning among undergraduate students. With the popularity of the blended-learning approach to teach in traditional educational settings, little has been mentioned on how cohesive this approach is in fostering self-directed learning and self-regulation among university students. This study hopes to explore undergraduate learners in their distinctive study patterns. The study was conducted to investigate a comparative study between students from two departments; Science and Social Science. The aim was to explore the students’ self-directed and self-regulated learning skills in conventional classrooms and aspects of blended-learning embedded in a MOOC platform in two academic years for undergraduates at a top UK university. This study encompasses two case studies; firstly, a combine blended-learning seminar and a conventional seminar classes and a study undertaken with a student of English as a second language (ESL). The blended-learning students were participants who registered in a conventional university and took an optional module in computer security. The second group of students participated in a core module of logic and verification. The second case study was with a final year undergraduate student in Education Studies. The students studied and engaged with the course content using their initiative and directing their learning approaches.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10639-020-10172-w</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1360-2357 |
ispartof | Education and information technologies, 2020-09, Vol.25 (5), p.4365-4380 |
issn | 1360-2357 1573-7608 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2436315353 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Analysis Blended Learning Case Studies College students Comparative Analysis Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences Computer assisted language learning Computer Science Computer Security Computers and Education Conventional Instruction Course Content Distance learning Education Educational Technology English (Second Language) English as a second language English as a second language learning Foreign Countries Independent Study Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) Laws, regulations and rules Learning strategies Mass Instruction Massive open online courses Metacognition Online Courses Online education Online instruction Positive Attitudes Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Self instruction Self regulation Social sciences Student Attitudes Teaching Methods Undergraduate education Undergraduate Students Undergraduate Study User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction |
title | Cognitive optimism of distinctive initiatives to foster self-directed and self-regulated learning skills: A comparative analysis of conventional and blended-learning in undergraduate studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A26%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20optimism%20of%20distinctive%20initiatives%20to%20foster%20self-directed%20and%20self-regulated%20learning%20skills:%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20conventional%20and%20blended-learning%20in%20undergraduate%20studies&rft.jtitle=Education%20and%20information%20technologies&rft.au=Onah,%20Daniel%20F.%20O.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=4365&rft.epage=4380&rft.pages=4365-4380&rft.issn=1360-2357&rft.eissn=1573-7608&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10639-020-10172-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713712975%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2436315353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713712975&rft_ericid=EJ1266309&rfr_iscdi=true |