A Review and Comparison of Solid, Multi-Strands and Litz Style PCB Winding

At high frequency, AC resistance of a printed circuit board (PCB) winding becomes important and accounts for a large proportion of planar transformer losses. The winding is then influenced by both skin and proximity phenomenon, which makes the current distribution uneven resulting in an increased re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electronics (Basel) 2020-08, Vol.9 (8), p.1324
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Minh Huy, Fortin Blanchette, Handy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1324
container_title Electronics (Basel)
container_volume 9
creator Nguyen, Minh Huy
Fortin Blanchette, Handy
description At high frequency, AC resistance of a printed circuit board (PCB) winding becomes important and accounts for a large proportion of planar transformer losses. The winding is then influenced by both skin and proximity phenomenon, which makes the current distribution uneven resulting in an increased resistance. The study of improving AC resistance of a PCB winding has been tackled by many researchers. However, the lack of an overview and comparison among improvements has made it difficult to apply those methods to a specific winding. To overcome the above limitations, this paper investigates the pros and cons of three popular AC resistance optimizing methods: optimizing track width of a solid PCB winding, using multi-strands and using Litz style PCB winding. To verify the theoretical analysis, a total of 12 PCBs are simulated by finite element (FEM) and tested in the laboratory. Five criteria are analyzed, including skin resistance, proximity resistance, AC to DC ratio, total AC resistance and complexity are taken into consideration. The results of this study show that optimizing track width method has a significant improvement on AC resistance while the use of Litz PCB is effective for applications that need stable AC resistance in a wide frequency range. The use of parallel strands winding should be carefully considered as there is not significant benefit in both reducing the AC resistance and AC to DC ratio.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/electronics9081324
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2435934680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2435934680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-55efda8c64b48dec12ab195607e60a3bd866d1c9dfbd615a91ac290fe2588b9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LAzEYhIMoWGr_gKeAV1fzsZvmPdZFq1JRrOJxySZZSdluapJV6q93tR4E5zJzeJiBQeiYkjPOgZzb1uoUfOd0BCIpZ_keGjEyhQwYsP0_-RBNYlyRQUC55GSEbmf40b47-4FVZ3Dp1xsVXPQd9g1e-taZU3zXt8llyxQGIv5gC5c-8TJtW4sfygv84jrjutcjdNCoNtrJr4_R89XlU3mdLe7nN-VskWlOIWVFYRujpBZ5nUtjNWWqplAIMrWCKF4bKYShGkxTG0ELBVRpBqSxrJCyBsPH6GTXuwn-rbcxVSvfh26YrFjOC-C5kGSg2I7SwccYbFNtglursK0oqb5vq_7fxr8AvmJibw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435934680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Review and Comparison of Solid, Multi-Strands and Litz Style PCB Winding</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Nguyen, Minh Huy ; Fortin Blanchette, Handy</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Minh Huy ; Fortin Blanchette, Handy</creatorcontrib><description>At high frequency, AC resistance of a printed circuit board (PCB) winding becomes important and accounts for a large proportion of planar transformer losses. The winding is then influenced by both skin and proximity phenomenon, which makes the current distribution uneven resulting in an increased resistance. The study of improving AC resistance of a PCB winding has been tackled by many researchers. However, the lack of an overview and comparison among improvements has made it difficult to apply those methods to a specific winding. To overcome the above limitations, this paper investigates the pros and cons of three popular AC resistance optimizing methods: optimizing track width of a solid PCB winding, using multi-strands and using Litz style PCB winding. To verify the theoretical analysis, a total of 12 PCBs are simulated by finite element (FEM) and tested in the laboratory. Five criteria are analyzed, including skin resistance, proximity resistance, AC to DC ratio, total AC resistance and complexity are taken into consideration. The results of this study show that optimizing track width method has a significant improvement on AC resistance while the use of Litz PCB is effective for applications that need stable AC resistance in a wide frequency range. The use of parallel strands winding should be carefully considered as there is not significant benefit in both reducing the AC resistance and AC to DC ratio.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-9292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-9292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/electronics9081324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Circuit boards ; Computer simulation ; Current distribution ; Finite element method ; Frequency ranges ; Magnetic fields ; Printed circuits ; Skin ; Skin resistance ; Strands ; Winding</subject><ispartof>Electronics (Basel), 2020-08, Vol.9 (8), p.1324</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-55efda8c64b48dec12ab195607e60a3bd866d1c9dfbd615a91ac290fe2588b9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-55efda8c64b48dec12ab195607e60a3bd866d1c9dfbd615a91ac290fe2588b9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9431-2819</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Minh Huy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortin Blanchette, Handy</creatorcontrib><title>A Review and Comparison of Solid, Multi-Strands and Litz Style PCB Winding</title><title>Electronics (Basel)</title><description>At high frequency, AC resistance of a printed circuit board (PCB) winding becomes important and accounts for a large proportion of planar transformer losses. The winding is then influenced by both skin and proximity phenomenon, which makes the current distribution uneven resulting in an increased resistance. The study of improving AC resistance of a PCB winding has been tackled by many researchers. However, the lack of an overview and comparison among improvements has made it difficult to apply those methods to a specific winding. To overcome the above limitations, this paper investigates the pros and cons of three popular AC resistance optimizing methods: optimizing track width of a solid PCB winding, using multi-strands and using Litz style PCB winding. To verify the theoretical analysis, a total of 12 PCBs are simulated by finite element (FEM) and tested in the laboratory. Five criteria are analyzed, including skin resistance, proximity resistance, AC to DC ratio, total AC resistance and complexity are taken into consideration. The results of this study show that optimizing track width method has a significant improvement on AC resistance while the use of Litz PCB is effective for applications that need stable AC resistance in a wide frequency range. The use of parallel strands winding should be carefully considered as there is not significant benefit in both reducing the AC resistance and AC to DC ratio.</description><subject>Circuit boards</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Current distribution</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Frequency ranges</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Printed circuits</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Skin resistance</subject><subject>Strands</subject><subject>Winding</subject><issn>2079-9292</issn><issn>2079-9292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LAzEYhIMoWGr_gKeAV1fzsZvmPdZFq1JRrOJxySZZSdluapJV6q93tR4E5zJzeJiBQeiYkjPOgZzb1uoUfOd0BCIpZ_keGjEyhQwYsP0_-RBNYlyRQUC55GSEbmf40b47-4FVZ3Dp1xsVXPQd9g1e-taZU3zXt8llyxQGIv5gC5c-8TJtW4sfygv84jrjutcjdNCoNtrJr4_R89XlU3mdLe7nN-VskWlOIWVFYRujpBZ5nUtjNWWqplAIMrWCKF4bKYShGkxTG0ELBVRpBqSxrJCyBsPH6GTXuwn-rbcxVSvfh26YrFjOC-C5kGSg2I7SwccYbFNtglursK0oqb5vq_7fxr8AvmJibw</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Minh Huy</creator><creator>Fortin Blanchette, Handy</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9431-2819</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>A Review and Comparison of Solid, Multi-Strands and Litz Style PCB Winding</title><author>Nguyen, Minh Huy ; Fortin Blanchette, Handy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-55efda8c64b48dec12ab195607e60a3bd866d1c9dfbd615a91ac290fe2588b9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Circuit boards</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Current distribution</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Frequency ranges</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Printed circuits</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Skin resistance</topic><topic>Strands</topic><topic>Winding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Minh Huy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortin Blanchette, Handy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Electronics (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Minh Huy</au><au>Fortin Blanchette, Handy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Review and Comparison of Solid, Multi-Strands and Litz Style PCB Winding</atitle><jtitle>Electronics (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1324</spage><pages>1324-</pages><issn>2079-9292</issn><eissn>2079-9292</eissn><abstract>At high frequency, AC resistance of a printed circuit board (PCB) winding becomes important and accounts for a large proportion of planar transformer losses. The winding is then influenced by both skin and proximity phenomenon, which makes the current distribution uneven resulting in an increased resistance. The study of improving AC resistance of a PCB winding has been tackled by many researchers. However, the lack of an overview and comparison among improvements has made it difficult to apply those methods to a specific winding. To overcome the above limitations, this paper investigates the pros and cons of three popular AC resistance optimizing methods: optimizing track width of a solid PCB winding, using multi-strands and using Litz style PCB winding. To verify the theoretical analysis, a total of 12 PCBs are simulated by finite element (FEM) and tested in the laboratory. Five criteria are analyzed, including skin resistance, proximity resistance, AC to DC ratio, total AC resistance and complexity are taken into consideration. The results of this study show that optimizing track width method has a significant improvement on AC resistance while the use of Litz PCB is effective for applications that need stable AC resistance in a wide frequency range. The use of parallel strands winding should be carefully considered as there is not significant benefit in both reducing the AC resistance and AC to DC ratio.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/electronics9081324</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9431-2819</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2079-9292
ispartof Electronics (Basel), 2020-08, Vol.9 (8), p.1324
issn 2079-9292
2079-9292
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2435934680
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Circuit boards
Computer simulation
Current distribution
Finite element method
Frequency ranges
Magnetic fields
Printed circuits
Skin
Skin resistance
Strands
Winding
title A Review and Comparison of Solid, Multi-Strands and Litz Style PCB Winding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Review%20and%20Comparison%20of%20Solid,%20Multi-Strands%20and%20Litz%20Style%20PCB%20Winding&rft.jtitle=Electronics%20(Basel)&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Minh%20Huy&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1324&rft.pages=1324-&rft.issn=2079-9292&rft.eissn=2079-9292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/electronics9081324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2435934680%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435934680&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true