How to Engineer Organic Solvent Resistant Enzymes: Insights from Combined Molecular Dynamics and Directed Evolution Study

Expanding synthetic capabilities to routinely employ enzymes in organic solvents (OSs) is a dream for protein engineers and synthetic chemists. Despite significant advances in the field of protein engineering, general and transferable design principles to improve the OS resistance of enzymes are poo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ChemCatChem 2020-08, Vol.12 (16), p.4073-4083
Hauptverfasser: Cui, Haiyang, Stadtmüller, Tom H. J., Jiang, Qianjia, Jaeger, Karl‐Erich, Schwaneberg, Ulrich, Davari, Mehdi D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4083
container_issue 16
container_start_page 4073
container_title ChemCatChem
container_volume 12
creator Cui, Haiyang
Stadtmüller, Tom H. J.
Jiang, Qianjia
Jaeger, Karl‐Erich
Schwaneberg, Ulrich
Davari, Mehdi D.
description Expanding synthetic capabilities to routinely employ enzymes in organic solvents (OSs) is a dream for protein engineers and synthetic chemists. Despite significant advances in the field of protein engineering, general and transferable design principles to improve the OS resistance of enzymes are poorly understood. Herein, we report a combined computational and directed evolution study of Bacillus subtlis lipase A (BSLA) in three OSs (i. e., 1,4‐dioxane, dimethyl sulfoxide, 2,2,2‐trifluoroethanol) to devise a rational strategy to guide engineering OS resistant enzymes. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that OSs reduce BSLA activity and resistance in OSs by (i) stripping off essential water molecules from the BLSA surface mainly through H‐bonds binding; and (ii) penetrating the substrate binding cleft leading to inhibition and conformational change. Interestingly, integration of computational results with “BSLA‐SSM” variant library (3439 variants; all natural diversity with amino acid exchange) revealed two complementary rational design strategies: (i) surface charge engineering, and (ii) substrate binding cleft engineering. These strategies are most likely applicable to stabilize other lipases and enzymes and assist experimentalists to design organic solvent resistant enzymes with reduced time and screening effort in lab experiments. Stay positive: Surface charge engineering (introduction of positively charged substitutions) and substrate binding cleft non‐polar engineering strategies could serve as general rational protein engineering principles to stabilize lipases in OSs and might apply to other enzymes sharing a similar α/β‐hydrolase fold.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cctc.202000422
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2435726757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2435726757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-3c38610a4910e8b23a80ab35812dc0c913f97883b61c1911d356f14a3b17a9403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAcxYsoOKdXzwHPnfnRH4k36aobTAZunkuapjOjTWaSbtS_3o7JPHr6Pvi-z3vwguAewQmCED8K4cUEQwwhjDC-CEaIJmlIKGOXZ03hdXDj3BbChJE0HgX9zByANyDXG6WltGBpN1wrAVam2Uvtwbt0ynk-qFx_9610T2Cundp8egdqa1qQmbYc0Aq8mUaKruEWTHvNWyUc4LoCU2Wl8MM_35um88posPJd1d8GVzVvnLz7vePg4yVfZ7NwsXydZ8-LUJA4xSERhCYI8oghKGmJCaeQlySmCFcCCoZIzVJKSZkggRhCFYmTGkWclCjlLIJkHDyccnfWfHXS-WJrOquHygJHx4okjdPBNTm5hDXOWVkXO6tabvsCweI4b3GctzjPOwDsBBxUI_t_3EWWrbM_9gdXon6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435726757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to Engineer Organic Solvent Resistant Enzymes: Insights from Combined Molecular Dynamics and Directed Evolution Study</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Cui, Haiyang ; Stadtmüller, Tom H. J. ; Jiang, Qianjia ; Jaeger, Karl‐Erich ; Schwaneberg, Ulrich ; Davari, Mehdi D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cui, Haiyang ; Stadtmüller, Tom H. J. ; Jiang, Qianjia ; Jaeger, Karl‐Erich ; Schwaneberg, Ulrich ; Davari, Mehdi D.</creatorcontrib><description>Expanding synthetic capabilities to routinely employ enzymes in organic solvents (OSs) is a dream for protein engineers and synthetic chemists. Despite significant advances in the field of protein engineering, general and transferable design principles to improve the OS resistance of enzymes are poorly understood. Herein, we report a combined computational and directed evolution study of Bacillus subtlis lipase A (BSLA) in three OSs (i. e., 1,4‐dioxane, dimethyl sulfoxide, 2,2,2‐trifluoroethanol) to devise a rational strategy to guide engineering OS resistant enzymes. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that OSs reduce BSLA activity and resistance in OSs by (i) stripping off essential water molecules from the BLSA surface mainly through H‐bonds binding; and (ii) penetrating the substrate binding cleft leading to inhibition and conformational change. Interestingly, integration of computational results with “BSLA‐SSM” variant library (3439 variants; all natural diversity with amino acid exchange) revealed two complementary rational design strategies: (i) surface charge engineering, and (ii) substrate binding cleft engineering. These strategies are most likely applicable to stabilize other lipases and enzymes and assist experimentalists to design organic solvent resistant enzymes with reduced time and screening effort in lab experiments. Stay positive: Surface charge engineering (introduction of positively charged substitutions) and substrate binding cleft non‐polar engineering strategies could serve as general rational protein engineering principles to stabilize lipases in OSs and might apply to other enzymes sharing a similar α/β‐hydrolase fold.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-3880</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-3899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202000422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacillus subtilis Lipase A ; Binding ; biocatalysis ; Chemists ; Computer simulation ; Dimethyl sulfoxide ; directed evolution ; Engineering ; Engineers ; Enzymes ; Evolution ; Lipase ; Molecular dynamics ; molecular dynamics simulation ; organic solvent ; Proteins ; Solvents ; Substrate inhibition ; Surface charge ; Water chemistry</subject><ispartof>ChemCatChem, 2020-08, Vol.12 (16), p.4073-4083</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-3c38610a4910e8b23a80ab35812dc0c913f97883b61c1911d356f14a3b17a9403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-3c38610a4910e8b23a80ab35812dc0c913f97883b61c1911d356f14a3b17a9403</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8360-0447 ; 0000-0003-0089-7156 ; 0000-0003-4026-701X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcctc.202000422$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcctc.202000422$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cui, Haiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadtmüller, Tom H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Qianjia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaeger, Karl‐Erich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwaneberg, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davari, Mehdi D.</creatorcontrib><title>How to Engineer Organic Solvent Resistant Enzymes: Insights from Combined Molecular Dynamics and Directed Evolution Study</title><title>ChemCatChem</title><description>Expanding synthetic capabilities to routinely employ enzymes in organic solvents (OSs) is a dream for protein engineers and synthetic chemists. Despite significant advances in the field of protein engineering, general and transferable design principles to improve the OS resistance of enzymes are poorly understood. Herein, we report a combined computational and directed evolution study of Bacillus subtlis lipase A (BSLA) in three OSs (i. e., 1,4‐dioxane, dimethyl sulfoxide, 2,2,2‐trifluoroethanol) to devise a rational strategy to guide engineering OS resistant enzymes. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that OSs reduce BSLA activity and resistance in OSs by (i) stripping off essential water molecules from the BLSA surface mainly through H‐bonds binding; and (ii) penetrating the substrate binding cleft leading to inhibition and conformational change. Interestingly, integration of computational results with “BSLA‐SSM” variant library (3439 variants; all natural diversity with amino acid exchange) revealed two complementary rational design strategies: (i) surface charge engineering, and (ii) substrate binding cleft engineering. These strategies are most likely applicable to stabilize other lipases and enzymes and assist experimentalists to design organic solvent resistant enzymes with reduced time and screening effort in lab experiments. Stay positive: Surface charge engineering (introduction of positively charged substitutions) and substrate binding cleft non‐polar engineering strategies could serve as general rational protein engineering principles to stabilize lipases in OSs and might apply to other enzymes sharing a similar α/β‐hydrolase fold.</description><subject>Bacillus subtilis Lipase A</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>biocatalysis</subject><subject>Chemists</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dimethyl sulfoxide</subject><subject>directed evolution</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Lipase</subject><subject>Molecular dynamics</subject><subject>molecular dynamics simulation</subject><subject>organic solvent</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Substrate inhibition</subject><subject>Surface charge</subject><subject>Water chemistry</subject><issn>1867-3880</issn><issn>1867-3899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAcxYsoOKdXzwHPnfnRH4k36aobTAZunkuapjOjTWaSbtS_3o7JPHr6Pvi-z3vwguAewQmCED8K4cUEQwwhjDC-CEaIJmlIKGOXZ03hdXDj3BbChJE0HgX9zByANyDXG6WltGBpN1wrAVam2Uvtwbt0ynk-qFx_9610T2Cundp8egdqa1qQmbYc0Aq8mUaKruEWTHvNWyUc4LoCU2Wl8MM_35um88posPJd1d8GVzVvnLz7vePg4yVfZ7NwsXydZ8-LUJA4xSERhCYI8oghKGmJCaeQlySmCFcCCoZIzVJKSZkggRhCFYmTGkWclCjlLIJkHDyccnfWfHXS-WJrOquHygJHx4okjdPBNTm5hDXOWVkXO6tabvsCweI4b3GctzjPOwDsBBxUI_t_3EWWrbM_9gdXon6c</recordid><startdate>20200820</startdate><enddate>20200820</enddate><creator>Cui, Haiyang</creator><creator>Stadtmüller, Tom H. J.</creator><creator>Jiang, Qianjia</creator><creator>Jaeger, Karl‐Erich</creator><creator>Schwaneberg, Ulrich</creator><creator>Davari, Mehdi D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8360-0447</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0089-7156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4026-701X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200820</creationdate><title>How to Engineer Organic Solvent Resistant Enzymes: Insights from Combined Molecular Dynamics and Directed Evolution Study</title><author>Cui, Haiyang ; Stadtmüller, Tom H. J. ; Jiang, Qianjia ; Jaeger, Karl‐Erich ; Schwaneberg, Ulrich ; Davari, Mehdi D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-3c38610a4910e8b23a80ab35812dc0c913f97883b61c1911d356f14a3b17a9403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bacillus subtilis Lipase A</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>biocatalysis</topic><topic>Chemists</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dimethyl sulfoxide</topic><topic>directed evolution</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Lipase</topic><topic>Molecular dynamics</topic><topic>molecular dynamics simulation</topic><topic>organic solvent</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Substrate inhibition</topic><topic>Surface charge</topic><topic>Water chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cui, Haiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadtmüller, Tom H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Qianjia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaeger, Karl‐Erich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwaneberg, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davari, Mehdi D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ChemCatChem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cui, Haiyang</au><au>Stadtmüller, Tom H. J.</au><au>Jiang, Qianjia</au><au>Jaeger, Karl‐Erich</au><au>Schwaneberg, Ulrich</au><au>Davari, Mehdi D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to Engineer Organic Solvent Resistant Enzymes: Insights from Combined Molecular Dynamics and Directed Evolution Study</atitle><jtitle>ChemCatChem</jtitle><date>2020-08-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>4073</spage><epage>4083</epage><pages>4073-4083</pages><issn>1867-3880</issn><eissn>1867-3899</eissn><abstract>Expanding synthetic capabilities to routinely employ enzymes in organic solvents (OSs) is a dream for protein engineers and synthetic chemists. Despite significant advances in the field of protein engineering, general and transferable design principles to improve the OS resistance of enzymes are poorly understood. Herein, we report a combined computational and directed evolution study of Bacillus subtlis lipase A (BSLA) in three OSs (i. e., 1,4‐dioxane, dimethyl sulfoxide, 2,2,2‐trifluoroethanol) to devise a rational strategy to guide engineering OS resistant enzymes. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that OSs reduce BSLA activity and resistance in OSs by (i) stripping off essential water molecules from the BLSA surface mainly through H‐bonds binding; and (ii) penetrating the substrate binding cleft leading to inhibition and conformational change. Interestingly, integration of computational results with “BSLA‐SSM” variant library (3439 variants; all natural diversity with amino acid exchange) revealed two complementary rational design strategies: (i) surface charge engineering, and (ii) substrate binding cleft engineering. These strategies are most likely applicable to stabilize other lipases and enzymes and assist experimentalists to design organic solvent resistant enzymes with reduced time and screening effort in lab experiments. Stay positive: Surface charge engineering (introduction of positively charged substitutions) and substrate binding cleft non‐polar engineering strategies could serve as general rational protein engineering principles to stabilize lipases in OSs and might apply to other enzymes sharing a similar α/β‐hydrolase fold.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/cctc.202000422</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8360-0447</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0089-7156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4026-701X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1867-3880
ispartof ChemCatChem, 2020-08, Vol.12 (16), p.4073-4083
issn 1867-3880
1867-3899
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2435726757
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Bacillus subtilis Lipase A
Binding
biocatalysis
Chemists
Computer simulation
Dimethyl sulfoxide
directed evolution
Engineering
Engineers
Enzymes
Evolution
Lipase
Molecular dynamics
molecular dynamics simulation
organic solvent
Proteins
Solvents
Substrate inhibition
Surface charge
Water chemistry
title How to Engineer Organic Solvent Resistant Enzymes: Insights from Combined Molecular Dynamics and Directed Evolution Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A46%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20Engineer%20Organic%20Solvent%20Resistant%20Enzymes:%20Insights%20from%20Combined%20Molecular%20Dynamics%20and%20Directed%20Evolution%20Study&rft.jtitle=ChemCatChem&rft.au=Cui,%20Haiyang&rft.date=2020-08-20&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=4073&rft.epage=4083&rft.pages=4073-4083&rft.issn=1867-3880&rft.eissn=1867-3899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cctc.202000422&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2435726757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435726757&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true