Rothe Development v. U.S. Department of Defense: Overcomplicating the Uncomplicated

Courts have provided a blueprint for federal agencies to justify racebased selection processes: these processes can pass strict scrutiny review if they are narrowly tailored to address established areas of prior discrimination.7 Enter Rothe Development v. United States Department of Defense.8 Rothe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Texas journal on civil liberties & civil rights 2019-10, Vol.25 (1), p.81-105
Hauptverfasser: Penrod, Charlie, Atkinson, Christopher L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue 1
container_start_page 81
container_title Texas journal on civil liberties & civil rights
container_volume 25
creator Penrod, Charlie
Atkinson, Christopher L
description Courts have provided a blueprint for federal agencies to justify racebased selection processes: these processes can pass strict scrutiny review if they are narrowly tailored to address established areas of prior discrimination.7 Enter Rothe Development v. United States Department of Defense.8 Rothe upended nearly twenty-five years of well-established jurisprudence with the proposition that using race as a factor does not make the consideration race-based.9 The Small Business Act's "8(a) program"-codified at 15 U.S.C. 637-gives special consideration to socially and economically disadvantaged contractors in the bidding process.10 Social disadvantage as defined in the act includes individuals who have been subjected to racial bias.11 8(a)'s definition of social disadvantage is clearly a race-based criterion, and as such the court should have applied strict scrutiny. For the purpose of preserving and promoting a competitive free enterprise economic system, Congress hereby declares that it is the continuing policy and responsibility of the Federal Government to use all practical means and to take such actions as are necessary, consistent with its needs and obligations and other essential considerations of national policy, to implement and coordinate all Federal department, agency, and instrumentality policies, programs, and activities in order to: foster the economic interests of small businesses; insure a competitive economic climate conducive to the development, growth and expansion of small businesses; establish incentives to assure that adequate capital and other resources at competitive prices are available to small businesses; reduce the concentration of economic resources and expand competition; and provide an opportunity for entrepreneurship, inventiveness, and the creation and growth of small businesses.14 This statute seeks to promote the viability of small businesses by providing financial assistance, including by encouraging investment in small businesses.15 The Small Business Administration (SBA) was created by 15 U.S.C. 633 as the agency responsible for these obligations.16 The stated intent of the program aligns well with popular statistics provided by the SBA: one 2016 report indicates that small businesses with less than 500 employees constitute 99.9 percent of all firms in the United States, 97.7 percent of all U.S exporting firms, and 48 percent of all employees in the private sector.17 The SBA guarantees loans, operates programs intended to
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2435544017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2435544017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24355440173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0tDQ20DUyMDHlYOAqLs4yMDA2NzSw4GQIDsovyUhVcEktS83JL8hNzStRKNNTCNUL1gOKFSQWlYCF8tOAvLTUvOJUKwX_stSi5PzcgpzM5MSSzLx0BZD-0Dy4UGoKDwNrWmJOcSovlOZmUHZzDXH20C0oyi8sTS0uic_KLy3KA0rFG5kYm5qamBgYmhsTpwoAR4I-yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435544017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rothe Development v. U.S. Department of Defense: Overcomplicating the Uncomplicated</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Penrod, Charlie ; Atkinson, Christopher L</creator><creatorcontrib>Penrod, Charlie ; Atkinson, Christopher L</creatorcontrib><description>Courts have provided a blueprint for federal agencies to justify racebased selection processes: these processes can pass strict scrutiny review if they are narrowly tailored to address established areas of prior discrimination.7 Enter Rothe Development v. United States Department of Defense.8 Rothe upended nearly twenty-five years of well-established jurisprudence with the proposition that using race as a factor does not make the consideration race-based.9 The Small Business Act's "8(a) program"-codified at 15 U.S.C. 637-gives special consideration to socially and economically disadvantaged contractors in the bidding process.10 Social disadvantage as defined in the act includes individuals who have been subjected to racial bias.11 8(a)'s definition of social disadvantage is clearly a race-based criterion, and as such the court should have applied strict scrutiny. For the purpose of preserving and promoting a competitive free enterprise economic system, Congress hereby declares that it is the continuing policy and responsibility of the Federal Government to use all practical means and to take such actions as are necessary, consistent with its needs and obligations and other essential considerations of national policy, to implement and coordinate all Federal department, agency, and instrumentality policies, programs, and activities in order to: foster the economic interests of small businesses; insure a competitive economic climate conducive to the development, growth and expansion of small businesses; establish incentives to assure that adequate capital and other resources at competitive prices are available to small businesses; reduce the concentration of economic resources and expand competition; and provide an opportunity for entrepreneurship, inventiveness, and the creation and growth of small businesses.14 This statute seeks to promote the viability of small businesses by providing financial assistance, including by encouraging investment in small businesses.15 The Small Business Administration (SBA) was created by 15 U.S.C. 633 as the agency responsible for these obligations.16 The stated intent of the program aligns well with popular statistics provided by the SBA: one 2016 report indicates that small businesses with less than 500 employees constitute 99.9 percent of all firms in the United States, 97.7 percent of all U.S exporting firms, and 48 percent of all employees in the private sector.17 The SBA guarantees loans, operates programs intended to increase contracting by small businesses, assists with direct loans to businesses for disaster recovery, and provides technical assistance to small business owners.18 The SBA was established in 1953 by the Small Business Act to facilitate enforcement of the act.19 In FY 2019, the top SBA areas by estimated program cost, listed in descending order of spending, were disaster loans, entrepreneurial development, access to capital, and contracting programs.20 Among contracting programs, SBA offers the 8(a) Business Development Program, Historically Underutilized Business Zone Program (HUBZone), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Program, Women-Owned Small Business Program, and subcontracting programs targeting disadvantaged businesses.21 The SBA has a significant reporting responsibility in the federal government's goaling program, through which agencies seek to award prime contracting and subcontracting dollars to eligible businesses.22 There is some evidence that shows that increasing access to financing and capital provides small businesses the ability to pursue opportunities they would otherwise not have. "23 Further, rates of Black business ownership have increased where government contracting programs have been implemented; this increase in ownership rates has occurred mostly in industries where preferences were targeted.24 For public highway construction programs, additional support through affirmative action can increase the inclusion of minority businesses in the bidding process- specifically via goal programs-but the evidence of inclusion for womenowned businesses is not strong.25 A. The 8(a) program The 8(a) program "provides participating small businesses with training, technical assistance, and contracting opportunities in the form of set-aside and sole-source awards. "26 The program can be lucrative for eligible business as it allows access to sole-source acquisitions and technical assistance, mentoring, earmarks for award allocations, and General Services Administration contract consideration.27 8(a) certification is coveted; otherwise ineligible vendors have been encouraged by the benefits of 8(a) certification to form joint ventures with certified firms so that they can participate in opportunities sheltered within the program.28 Programs that focus on diverse and disadvantaged small businesses can award more lucrative contracts to those entities.29 The potential outcomes of assistance to minority business and job creation has generated interest in the program.30 For its part, the "8(a) [business development] Program has been essential for helping socially and economically disadvantaged entrepreneurs gain access to the economic mainstream of American society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-2045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Awards ; Bids ; Business Administration ; Departments ; Entrepreneurs ; Federal Government ; Highway construction ; Opportunities ; Ownership ; Program Costs ; Racial Bias ; Racial discrimination ; Selection Criteria ; Small business ; Small Businesses ; Technical Assistance</subject><ispartof>Texas journal on civil liberties &amp; civil rights, 2019-10, Vol.25 (1), p.81-105</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc. Fall 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Penrod, Charlie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Christopher L</creatorcontrib><title>Rothe Development v. U.S. Department of Defense: Overcomplicating the Uncomplicated</title><title>Texas journal on civil liberties &amp; civil rights</title><description>Courts have provided a blueprint for federal agencies to justify racebased selection processes: these processes can pass strict scrutiny review if they are narrowly tailored to address established areas of prior discrimination.7 Enter Rothe Development v. United States Department of Defense.8 Rothe upended nearly twenty-five years of well-established jurisprudence with the proposition that using race as a factor does not make the consideration race-based.9 The Small Business Act's "8(a) program"-codified at 15 U.S.C. 637-gives special consideration to socially and economically disadvantaged contractors in the bidding process.10 Social disadvantage as defined in the act includes individuals who have been subjected to racial bias.11 8(a)'s definition of social disadvantage is clearly a race-based criterion, and as such the court should have applied strict scrutiny. For the purpose of preserving and promoting a competitive free enterprise economic system, Congress hereby declares that it is the continuing policy and responsibility of the Federal Government to use all practical means and to take such actions as are necessary, consistent with its needs and obligations and other essential considerations of national policy, to implement and coordinate all Federal department, agency, and instrumentality policies, programs, and activities in order to: foster the economic interests of small businesses; insure a competitive economic climate conducive to the development, growth and expansion of small businesses; establish incentives to assure that adequate capital and other resources at competitive prices are available to small businesses; reduce the concentration of economic resources and expand competition; and provide an opportunity for entrepreneurship, inventiveness, and the creation and growth of small businesses.14 This statute seeks to promote the viability of small businesses by providing financial assistance, including by encouraging investment in small businesses.15 The Small Business Administration (SBA) was created by 15 U.S.C. 633 as the agency responsible for these obligations.16 The stated intent of the program aligns well with popular statistics provided by the SBA: one 2016 report indicates that small businesses with less than 500 employees constitute 99.9 percent of all firms in the United States, 97.7 percent of all U.S exporting firms, and 48 percent of all employees in the private sector.17 The SBA guarantees loans, operates programs intended to increase contracting by small businesses, assists with direct loans to businesses for disaster recovery, and provides technical assistance to small business owners.18 The SBA was established in 1953 by the Small Business Act to facilitate enforcement of the act.19 In FY 2019, the top SBA areas by estimated program cost, listed in descending order of spending, were disaster loans, entrepreneurial development, access to capital, and contracting programs.20 Among contracting programs, SBA offers the 8(a) Business Development Program, Historically Underutilized Business Zone Program (HUBZone), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Program, Women-Owned Small Business Program, and subcontracting programs targeting disadvantaged businesses.21 The SBA has a significant reporting responsibility in the federal government's goaling program, through which agencies seek to award prime contracting and subcontracting dollars to eligible businesses.22 There is some evidence that shows that increasing access to financing and capital provides small businesses the ability to pursue opportunities they would otherwise not have. "23 Further, rates of Black business ownership have increased where government contracting programs have been implemented; this increase in ownership rates has occurred mostly in industries where preferences were targeted.24 For public highway construction programs, additional support through affirmative action can increase the inclusion of minority businesses in the bidding process- specifically via goal programs-but the evidence of inclusion for womenowned businesses is not strong.25 A. The 8(a) program The 8(a) program "provides participating small businesses with training, technical assistance, and contracting opportunities in the form of set-aside and sole-source awards. "26 The program can be lucrative for eligible business as it allows access to sole-source acquisitions and technical assistance, mentoring, earmarks for award allocations, and General Services Administration contract consideration.27 8(a) certification is coveted; otherwise ineligible vendors have been encouraged by the benefits of 8(a) certification to form joint ventures with certified firms so that they can participate in opportunities sheltered within the program.28 Programs that focus on diverse and disadvantaged small businesses can award more lucrative contracts to those entities.29 The potential outcomes of assistance to minority business and job creation has generated interest in the program.30 For its part, the "8(a) [business development] Program has been essential for helping socially and economically disadvantaged entrepreneurs gain access to the economic mainstream of American society.</description><subject>Awards</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Business Administration</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Highway construction</subject><subject>Opportunities</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Program Costs</subject><subject>Racial Bias</subject><subject>Racial discrimination</subject><subject>Selection Criteria</subject><subject>Small business</subject><subject>Small Businesses</subject><subject>Technical Assistance</subject><issn>1930-2045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0tDQ20DUyMDHlYOAqLs4yMDA2NzSw4GQIDsovyUhVcEktS83JL8hNzStRKNNTCNUL1gOKFSQWlYCF8tOAvLTUvOJUKwX_stSi5PzcgpzM5MSSzLx0BZD-0Dy4UGoKDwNrWmJOcSovlOZmUHZzDXH20C0oyi8sTS0uic_KLy3KA0rFG5kYm5qamBgYmhsTpwoAR4I-yg</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Penrod, Charlie</creator><creator>Atkinson, Christopher L</creator><general>University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0I</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Rothe Development v. U.S. Department of Defense: Overcomplicating the Uncomplicated</title><author>Penrod, Charlie ; Atkinson, Christopher L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24355440173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Awards</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Business Administration</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Highway construction</topic><topic>Opportunities</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Program Costs</topic><topic>Racial Bias</topic><topic>Racial discrimination</topic><topic>Selection Criteria</topic><topic>Small business</topic><topic>Small Businesses</topic><topic>Technical Assistance</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penrod, Charlie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Christopher L</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Texas journal on civil liberties &amp; civil rights</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penrod, Charlie</au><au>Atkinson, Christopher L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rothe Development v. U.S. Department of Defense: Overcomplicating the Uncomplicated</atitle><jtitle>Texas journal on civil liberties &amp; civil rights</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>81-105</pages><issn>1930-2045</issn><abstract>Courts have provided a blueprint for federal agencies to justify racebased selection processes: these processes can pass strict scrutiny review if they are narrowly tailored to address established areas of prior discrimination.7 Enter Rothe Development v. United States Department of Defense.8 Rothe upended nearly twenty-five years of well-established jurisprudence with the proposition that using race as a factor does not make the consideration race-based.9 The Small Business Act's "8(a) program"-codified at 15 U.S.C. 637-gives special consideration to socially and economically disadvantaged contractors in the bidding process.10 Social disadvantage as defined in the act includes individuals who have been subjected to racial bias.11 8(a)'s definition of social disadvantage is clearly a race-based criterion, and as such the court should have applied strict scrutiny. For the purpose of preserving and promoting a competitive free enterprise economic system, Congress hereby declares that it is the continuing policy and responsibility of the Federal Government to use all practical means and to take such actions as are necessary, consistent with its needs and obligations and other essential considerations of national policy, to implement and coordinate all Federal department, agency, and instrumentality policies, programs, and activities in order to: foster the economic interests of small businesses; insure a competitive economic climate conducive to the development, growth and expansion of small businesses; establish incentives to assure that adequate capital and other resources at competitive prices are available to small businesses; reduce the concentration of economic resources and expand competition; and provide an opportunity for entrepreneurship, inventiveness, and the creation and growth of small businesses.14 This statute seeks to promote the viability of small businesses by providing financial assistance, including by encouraging investment in small businesses.15 The Small Business Administration (SBA) was created by 15 U.S.C. 633 as the agency responsible for these obligations.16 The stated intent of the program aligns well with popular statistics provided by the SBA: one 2016 report indicates that small businesses with less than 500 employees constitute 99.9 percent of all firms in the United States, 97.7 percent of all U.S exporting firms, and 48 percent of all employees in the private sector.17 The SBA guarantees loans, operates programs intended to increase contracting by small businesses, assists with direct loans to businesses for disaster recovery, and provides technical assistance to small business owners.18 The SBA was established in 1953 by the Small Business Act to facilitate enforcement of the act.19 In FY 2019, the top SBA areas by estimated program cost, listed in descending order of spending, were disaster loans, entrepreneurial development, access to capital, and contracting programs.20 Among contracting programs, SBA offers the 8(a) Business Development Program, Historically Underutilized Business Zone Program (HUBZone), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Program, Women-Owned Small Business Program, and subcontracting programs targeting disadvantaged businesses.21 The SBA has a significant reporting responsibility in the federal government's goaling program, through which agencies seek to award prime contracting and subcontracting dollars to eligible businesses.22 There is some evidence that shows that increasing access to financing and capital provides small businesses the ability to pursue opportunities they would otherwise not have. "23 Further, rates of Black business ownership have increased where government contracting programs have been implemented; this increase in ownership rates has occurred mostly in industries where preferences were targeted.24 For public highway construction programs, additional support through affirmative action can increase the inclusion of minority businesses in the bidding process- specifically via goal programs-but the evidence of inclusion for womenowned businesses is not strong.25 A. The 8(a) program The 8(a) program "provides participating small businesses with training, technical assistance, and contracting opportunities in the form of set-aside and sole-source awards. "26 The program can be lucrative for eligible business as it allows access to sole-source acquisitions and technical assistance, mentoring, earmarks for award allocations, and General Services Administration contract consideration.27 8(a) certification is coveted; otherwise ineligible vendors have been encouraged by the benefits of 8(a) certification to form joint ventures with certified firms so that they can participate in opportunities sheltered within the program.28 Programs that focus on diverse and disadvantaged small businesses can award more lucrative contracts to those entities.29 The potential outcomes of assistance to minority business and job creation has generated interest in the program.30 For its part, the "8(a) [business development] Program has been essential for helping socially and economically disadvantaged entrepreneurs gain access to the economic mainstream of American society.</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1930-2045
ispartof Texas journal on civil liberties & civil rights, 2019-10, Vol.25 (1), p.81-105
issn 1930-2045
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2435544017
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Awards
Bids
Business Administration
Departments
Entrepreneurs
Federal Government
Highway construction
Opportunities
Ownership
Program Costs
Racial Bias
Racial discrimination
Selection Criteria
Small business
Small Businesses
Technical Assistance
title Rothe Development v. U.S. Department of Defense: Overcomplicating the Uncomplicated
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A17%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rothe%20Development%20v.%20U.S.%20Department%20of%20Defense:%20Overcomplicating%20the%20Uncomplicated&rft.jtitle=Texas%20journal%20on%20civil%20liberties%20&%20civil%20rights&rft.au=Penrod,%20Charlie&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=81-105&rft.issn=1930-2045&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2435544017%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435544017&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true