The Bicentennial and the Battle over DC’s Downtown Redevelopment during the 1970s

Few studies of post–World War II, Washington, DC, focus on the development decisions local black officials made following the passage of limited home rule measures during the 1960s–1970s. This article uses the 1976 Bicentennial as a lens to study the divisions that urban development sowed locally wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of planning history 2020-11, Vol.19 (4), p.207-227
1. Verfasser:	Pearlman, Lauren
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Redevelopment Residents Urban development World War II
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	227
container_issue	4
container_start_page	207
container_title	Journal of planning history
container_volume	19
creator	Pearlman, Lauren
description	Few studies of post–World War II, Washington, DC, focus on the development decisions local black officials made following the passage of limited home rule measures during the 1960s–1970s. This article uses the 1976 Bicentennial as a lens to study the divisions that urban development sowed locally while the city’s government was in transition. It focuses on one of the most deeply divisive projects contested during the Bicentennial, the construction of a convention center in Downtown DC, and argues that a new coalition of stakeholders used the Bicentennial to implement a prodevelopment agenda at the expense of the city’s black residents.
doi_str_mv	10.1177/1538513219893356
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2435505538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1538513219893356</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2435505538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-e5685d0a3b4e4494cc92abfc9960efce837ba9c896307ec831e1cbbed0e5cd903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHhc8R_cjk-wetfULBEHrOWw2k5qSburutuLNv-Hf85eYWEEQPAwzzLzPO8wQcszZKed5fsZBKuBScK20lJDtkBEHEEkGCnaHWqpkmO-TgxAWjAmeSjUij7NnpBeNRRfRuca01LiKxqFpYmyRdhv0dDr5fP8IdNq9utgHfcAKN9h2q2XP0WrtGzf_hrjOWTgke7VpAx795DF5urqcTW6Su_vr28n5XWJFJmKCkCmomJFlimmqU2u1MGVttc4Y1haVzEujrdKZZDlaJTlyW5ZYMQRbaSbH5GTru_LdyxpDLBbd2rt-ZSFSCcCgP7pXsa3K-i4Ej3Wx8s3S-LeCs2J4XfH3dT2SbJFg5vhr-q_-C0dTbh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435505538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Bicentennial and the Battle over DC’s Downtown Redevelopment during the 1970s</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Pearlman, Lauren</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearlman, Lauren</creatorcontrib><description>Few studies of post–World War II, Washington, DC, focus on the development decisions local black officials made following the passage of limited home rule measures during the 1960s–1970s. This article uses the 1976 Bicentennial as a lens to study the divisions that urban development sowed locally while the city’s government was in transition. It focuses on one of the most deeply divisive projects contested during the Bicentennial, the construction of a convention center in Downtown DC, and argues that a new coalition of stakeholders used the Bicentennial to implement a prodevelopment agenda at the expense of the city’s black residents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-5132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1538513219893356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Redevelopment ; Residents ; Urban development ; World War II</subject><ispartof>Journal of planning history, 2020-11, Vol.19 (4), p.207-227</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-2318-4311</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1538513219893356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1538513219893356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27866,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearlman, Lauren</creatorcontrib><title>The Bicentennial and the Battle over DC’s Downtown Redevelopment during the 1970s</title><title>Journal of planning history</title><description>Few studies of post–World War II, Washington, DC, focus on the development decisions local black officials made following the passage of limited home rule measures during the 1960s–1970s. This article uses the 1976 Bicentennial as a lens to study the divisions that urban development sowed locally while the city’s government was in transition. It focuses on one of the most deeply divisive projects contested during the Bicentennial, the construction of a convention center in Downtown DC, and argues that a new coalition of stakeholders used the Bicentennial to implement a prodevelopment agenda at the expense of the city’s black residents.</description><subject>Redevelopment</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>World War II</subject><issn>1538-5132</issn><issn>1552-6585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHhc8R_cjk-wetfULBEHrOWw2k5qSburutuLNv-Hf85eYWEEQPAwzzLzPO8wQcszZKed5fsZBKuBScK20lJDtkBEHEEkGCnaHWqpkmO-TgxAWjAmeSjUij7NnpBeNRRfRuca01LiKxqFpYmyRdhv0dDr5fP8IdNq9utgHfcAKN9h2q2XP0WrtGzf_hrjOWTgke7VpAx795DF5urqcTW6Su_vr28n5XWJFJmKCkCmomJFlimmqU2u1MGVttc4Y1haVzEujrdKZZDlaJTlyW5ZYMQRbaSbH5GTru_LdyxpDLBbd2rt-ZSFSCcCgP7pXsa3K-i4Ej3Wx8s3S-LeCs2J4XfH3dT2SbJFg5vhr-q_-C0dTbh0</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Pearlman, Lauren</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2318-4311</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>The Bicentennial and the Battle over DC’s Downtown Redevelopment during the 1970s</title><author>Pearlman, Lauren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-e5685d0a3b4e4494cc92abfc9960efce837ba9c896307ec831e1cbbed0e5cd903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Redevelopment</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>World War II</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearlman, Lauren</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of planning history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearlman, Lauren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Bicentennial and the Battle over DC’s Downtown Redevelopment during the 1970s</atitle><jtitle>Journal of planning history</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>227</epage><pages>207-227</pages><issn>1538-5132</issn><eissn>1552-6585</eissn><abstract>Few studies of post–World War II, Washington, DC, focus on the development decisions local black officials made following the passage of limited home rule measures during the 1960s–1970s. This article uses the 1976 Bicentennial as a lens to study the divisions that urban development sowed locally while the city’s government was in transition. It focuses on one of the most deeply divisive projects contested during the Bicentennial, the construction of a convention center in Downtown DC, and argues that a new coalition of stakeholders used the Bicentennial to implement a prodevelopment agenda at the expense of the city’s black residents.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1538513219893356</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2318-4311</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1538-5132
ispartof	Journal of planning history, 2020-11, Vol.19 (4), p.207-227
issn	1538-5132 1552-6585
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_2435505538
source	PAIS Index; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects	Redevelopment Residents Urban development World War II
title	The Bicentennial and the Battle over DC’s Downtown Redevelopment during the 1970s
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A14%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Bicentennial%20and%20the%20Battle%20over%20DC%E2%80%99s%20Downtown%20Redevelopment%20during%20the%201970s&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20planning%20history&rft.au=Pearlman,%20Lauren&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=227&rft.pages=207-227&rft.issn=1538-5132&rft.eissn=1552-6585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1538513219893356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2435505538%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435505538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1538513219893356&rfr_iscdi=true