Contrasted transmission efficiency of Zika virus strains by mosquito species Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus from Reunion Island
Zika virus (ZIKV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that recently emerged in the South Pacific islands and Americas where unprecedented outbreaks were reported. Although Aedes aegypti is considered to be the main vector for ZIKV, other mosquito species have been shown to be potential vectors and differ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Parasites & vectors 2020-08, Vol.13 (1), p.398-398, Article 398 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 398 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 398 |
| container_title | Parasites & vectors |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Gomard, Yann Lebon, Cyrille Mavingui, Patrick Atyame, Célestine M |
| description | Zika virus (ZIKV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that recently emerged in the South Pacific islands and Americas where unprecedented outbreaks were reported. Although Aedes aegypti is considered to be the main vector for ZIKV, other mosquito species have been shown to be potential vectors and differences in vector competence with respect to mosquito strain and ZIKV strain have been demonstrated. In this study we compared the vector competence of three mosquito species Aedes albopictus, Ae. aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus from Reunion Island for three ZIKV strains.
Five mosquito strains (2 strains of Ae. albopictus, 1 of Ae. aegypti and 2 of Cx. quinquefasciatus) were exposed to three ZIKV strains: one African strain (Dak84) and two Asian strains (PaRi_2015 and MAS66). The vector competence parameters (infection rate, dissemination efficiency and transmission efficiency) and viral loads were examined at 14 and 21 days post-infection.
The two Cx. quinquefasciatus strains did not become infected and were therefore unable to either disseminate or transmit any of the three ZIKV strains. Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti strains were poorly competent for the two Asian ZIKV strains, while both mosquito species displayed higher infection rates, dissemination and transmission efficiencies for the African ZIKV Dak84 strain. However, this African ZIKV strain was better transmitted by Ae. aegypti as compared to Ae. albopictus.
Our results show that both Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti, from Reunion Island, are more likely to be competent for ZIKV in contrast to Cx. quinquefasciatus which appeared refractory to all tested ZIKV strains. This improves our understanding of the role of mosquito species in the risk of the ZIKV emergence on Reunion Island. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13071-020-04267-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2435321598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A633072655</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_55f0728ea28b48c2b0f0395b756b7d2b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A633072655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-de8d843d0bb10aa75925c26361e78706214af19921fafb374c409fccee4b019d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9u0zAYxSMEYmPwAlwgS9wwiQz_ie3kZlJVAatUCWnADTeW49idR2J3cVKtexVeli_rNtYJJYoT-3eOk5OTZW8JPiGkFJ8SYViSHFOc44IKmd88yw6J5CJnDPPnj-4PslcpXWIscMXFy-yAUSnglIfZn3kMQ6_TYBsEY0idT8nHgKxz3ngbzBZFh3753xptfD8mlADzIaF6i7qYrkY_RJTWFtiEZraBq7ar7XrwH-8f2zquvRlAq0OD5mNrrxHowtVonU7G62nJ9bFD53YM0-aL1AL6OnvhdJvsm7vxKPv55fOP-Vm-_PZ1MZ8tcyMYGfLGlk1ZsAbXNcFaS15RbqhgglhZSiwoKbQjVUWJ065msjAFrpwx1hY1JlXDjrLFzreJ-lKte9_pfqui9up2IvYrpfvBm9Yqzh2WtLSalnVRGlpjh1nFawi6lg2twet057Ue6842xk7ptnum-yvBX6hV3ChZEFpiCgbHO4OLJ7Kz2VJNc5jhgsuSbQiwH-426yOEmQYFf8_YFsKzcUyKFoyUlFA2oe-foJdx7APEOlGcUcKr8h-10vCxPrgI72gmUzUTUCRJBedAnfyHgqOxnTcxWOdhfk9wvCcAZrDXw0qPKanF9_N9lu5Y08eUeuseQiBYTbVXu9orqL26rb26AdG7x6k_SO57zv4C1cH-Hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435321598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasted transmission efficiency of Zika virus strains by mosquito species Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus from Reunion Island</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Gomard, Yann ; Lebon, Cyrille ; Mavingui, Patrick ; Atyame, Célestine M</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomard, Yann ; Lebon, Cyrille ; Mavingui, Patrick ; Atyame, Célestine M</creatorcontrib><description>Zika virus (ZIKV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that recently emerged in the South Pacific islands and Americas where unprecedented outbreaks were reported. Although Aedes aegypti is considered to be the main vector for ZIKV, other mosquito species have been shown to be potential vectors and differences in vector competence with respect to mosquito strain and ZIKV strain have been demonstrated. In this study we compared the vector competence of three mosquito species Aedes albopictus, Ae. aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus from Reunion Island for three ZIKV strains.
Five mosquito strains (2 strains of Ae. albopictus, 1 of Ae. aegypti and 2 of Cx. quinquefasciatus) were exposed to three ZIKV strains: one African strain (Dak84) and two Asian strains (PaRi_2015 and MAS66). The vector competence parameters (infection rate, dissemination efficiency and transmission efficiency) and viral loads were examined at 14 and 21 days post-infection.
The two Cx. quinquefasciatus strains did not become infected and were therefore unable to either disseminate or transmit any of the three ZIKV strains. Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti strains were poorly competent for the two Asian ZIKV strains, while both mosquito species displayed higher infection rates, dissemination and transmission efficiencies for the African ZIKV Dak84 strain. However, this African ZIKV strain was better transmitted by Ae. aegypti as compared to Ae. albopictus.
Our results show that both Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti, from Reunion Island, are more likely to be competent for ZIKV in contrast to Cx. quinquefasciatus which appeared refractory to all tested ZIKV strains. This improves our understanding of the role of mosquito species in the risk of the ZIKV emergence on Reunion Island.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04267-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32762767</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Aedes - virology ; Aedes aegypti ; Aedes albopictus ; Animals ; Aquatic insects ; Asian tiger mosquito ; Culex - virology ; Culex quinquefasciatus ; Disease transmission ; Disease Vectors ; Efficiency ; Epidemics ; Flavivirus ; Guillain-Barre syndrome ; Humans ; Indian Ocean Islands - epidemiology ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Life Sciences ; Microbiological strains ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; Mosquito vectors ; Mosquito Vectors - virology ; Mosquitoes ; Reunion Island ; Sodium ; Species ; Strains (organisms) ; Transmission efficiency ; Vector competence ; Vector-borne diseases ; Vectors ; Virology ; Viruses ; Zika Virus ; Zika Virus Infection - transmission</subject><ispartof>Parasites & vectors, 2020-08, Vol.13 (1), p.398-398, Article 398</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-de8d843d0bb10aa75925c26361e78706214af19921fafb374c409fccee4b019d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-de8d843d0bb10aa75925c26361e78706214af19921fafb374c409fccee4b019d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7700-9201 ; 0000-0002-2213-5673 ; 0000-0003-0233-2239</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7412802/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7412802/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32762767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-03045783$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomard, Yann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebon, Cyrille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavingui, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atyame, Célestine M</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasted transmission efficiency of Zika virus strains by mosquito species Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus from Reunion Island</title><title>Parasites & vectors</title><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><description>Zika virus (ZIKV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that recently emerged in the South Pacific islands and Americas where unprecedented outbreaks were reported. Although Aedes aegypti is considered to be the main vector for ZIKV, other mosquito species have been shown to be potential vectors and differences in vector competence with respect to mosquito strain and ZIKV strain have been demonstrated. In this study we compared the vector competence of three mosquito species Aedes albopictus, Ae. aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus from Reunion Island for three ZIKV strains.
Five mosquito strains (2 strains of Ae. albopictus, 1 of Ae. aegypti and 2 of Cx. quinquefasciatus) were exposed to three ZIKV strains: one African strain (Dak84) and two Asian strains (PaRi_2015 and MAS66). The vector competence parameters (infection rate, dissemination efficiency and transmission efficiency) and viral loads were examined at 14 and 21 days post-infection.
The two Cx. quinquefasciatus strains did not become infected and were therefore unable to either disseminate or transmit any of the three ZIKV strains. Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti strains were poorly competent for the two Asian ZIKV strains, while both mosquito species displayed higher infection rates, dissemination and transmission efficiencies for the African ZIKV Dak84 strain. However, this African ZIKV strain was better transmitted by Ae. aegypti as compared to Ae. albopictus.
Our results show that both Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti, from Reunion Island, are more likely to be competent for ZIKV in contrast to Cx. quinquefasciatus which appeared refractory to all tested ZIKV strains. This improves our understanding of the role of mosquito species in the risk of the ZIKV emergence on Reunion Island.</description><subject>Aedes - virology</subject><subject>Aedes aegypti</subject><subject>Aedes albopictus</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Asian tiger mosquito</subject><subject>Culex - virology</subject><subject>Culex quinquefasciatus</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Disease Vectors</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Flavivirus</subject><subject>Guillain-Barre syndrome</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indian Ocean Islands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbiological strains</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>Mosquito vectors</subject><subject>Mosquito Vectors - virology</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Reunion Island</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Transmission efficiency</subject><subject>Vector competence</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><subject>Virology</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Zika Virus</subject><subject>Zika Virus Infection - transmission</subject><issn>1756-3305</issn><issn>1756-3305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9u0zAYxSMEYmPwAlwgS9wwiQz_ie3kZlJVAatUCWnADTeW49idR2J3cVKtexVeli_rNtYJJYoT-3eOk5OTZW8JPiGkFJ8SYViSHFOc44IKmd88yw6J5CJnDPPnj-4PslcpXWIscMXFy-yAUSnglIfZn3kMQ6_TYBsEY0idT8nHgKxz3ngbzBZFh3753xptfD8mlADzIaF6i7qYrkY_RJTWFtiEZraBq7ar7XrwH-8f2zquvRlAq0OD5mNrrxHowtVonU7G62nJ9bFD53YM0-aL1AL6OnvhdJvsm7vxKPv55fOP-Vm-_PZ1MZ8tcyMYGfLGlk1ZsAbXNcFaS15RbqhgglhZSiwoKbQjVUWJ065msjAFrpwx1hY1JlXDjrLFzreJ-lKte9_pfqui9up2IvYrpfvBm9Yqzh2WtLSalnVRGlpjh1nFawi6lg2twet057Ue6842xk7ptnum-yvBX6hV3ChZEFpiCgbHO4OLJ7Kz2VJNc5jhgsuSbQiwH-426yOEmQYFf8_YFsKzcUyKFoyUlFA2oe-foJdx7APEOlGcUcKr8h-10vCxPrgI72gmUzUTUCRJBedAnfyHgqOxnTcxWOdhfk9wvCcAZrDXw0qPKanF9_N9lu5Y08eUeuseQiBYTbVXu9orqL26rb26AdG7x6k_SO57zv4C1cH-Hw</recordid><startdate>20200806</startdate><enddate>20200806</enddate><creator>Gomard, Yann</creator><creator>Lebon, Cyrille</creator><creator>Mavingui, Patrick</creator><creator>Atyame, Célestine M</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7700-9201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-5673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-2239</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200806</creationdate><title>Contrasted transmission efficiency of Zika virus strains by mosquito species Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus from Reunion Island</title><author>Gomard, Yann ; Lebon, Cyrille ; Mavingui, Patrick ; Atyame, Célestine M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-de8d843d0bb10aa75925c26361e78706214af19921fafb374c409fccee4b019d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aedes - virology</topic><topic>Aedes aegypti</topic><topic>Aedes albopictus</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Asian tiger mosquito</topic><topic>Culex - virology</topic><topic>Culex quinquefasciatus</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Disease Vectors</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Flavivirus</topic><topic>Guillain-Barre syndrome</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indian Ocean Islands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbiological strains</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>Mosquito vectors</topic><topic>Mosquito Vectors - virology</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Reunion Island</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Transmission efficiency</topic><topic>Vector competence</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><topic>Virology</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Zika Virus</topic><topic>Zika Virus Infection - transmission</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomard, Yann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebon, Cyrille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavingui, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atyame, Célestine M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Parasites & vectors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomard, Yann</au><au>Lebon, Cyrille</au><au>Mavingui, Patrick</au><au>Atyame, Célestine M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasted transmission efficiency of Zika virus strains by mosquito species Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus from Reunion Island</atitle><jtitle>Parasites & vectors</jtitle><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><date>2020-08-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>398</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>398-398</pages><artnum>398</artnum><issn>1756-3305</issn><eissn>1756-3305</eissn><abstract>Zika virus (ZIKV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that recently emerged in the South Pacific islands and Americas where unprecedented outbreaks were reported. Although Aedes aegypti is considered to be the main vector for ZIKV, other mosquito species have been shown to be potential vectors and differences in vector competence with respect to mosquito strain and ZIKV strain have been demonstrated. In this study we compared the vector competence of three mosquito species Aedes albopictus, Ae. aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus from Reunion Island for three ZIKV strains.
Five mosquito strains (2 strains of Ae. albopictus, 1 of Ae. aegypti and 2 of Cx. quinquefasciatus) were exposed to three ZIKV strains: one African strain (Dak84) and two Asian strains (PaRi_2015 and MAS66). The vector competence parameters (infection rate, dissemination efficiency and transmission efficiency) and viral loads were examined at 14 and 21 days post-infection.
The two Cx. quinquefasciatus strains did not become infected and were therefore unable to either disseminate or transmit any of the three ZIKV strains. Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti strains were poorly competent for the two Asian ZIKV strains, while both mosquito species displayed higher infection rates, dissemination and transmission efficiencies for the African ZIKV Dak84 strain. However, this African ZIKV strain was better transmitted by Ae. aegypti as compared to Ae. albopictus.
Our results show that both Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti, from Reunion Island, are more likely to be competent for ZIKV in contrast to Cx. quinquefasciatus which appeared refractory to all tested ZIKV strains. This improves our understanding of the role of mosquito species in the risk of the ZIKV emergence on Reunion Island.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>32762767</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13071-020-04267-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7700-9201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-5673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-2239</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1756-3305 |
| ispartof | Parasites & vectors, 2020-08, Vol.13 (1), p.398-398, Article 398 |
| issn | 1756-3305 1756-3305 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2435321598 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
| subjects | Aedes - virology Aedes aegypti Aedes albopictus Animals Aquatic insects Asian tiger mosquito Culex - virology Culex quinquefasciatus Disease transmission Disease Vectors Efficiency Epidemics Flavivirus Guillain-Barre syndrome Humans Indian Ocean Islands - epidemiology Infections Laboratories Life Sciences Microbiological strains Microbiology and Parasitology Mosquito vectors Mosquito Vectors - virology Mosquitoes Reunion Island Sodium Species Strains (organisms) Transmission efficiency Vector competence Vector-borne diseases Vectors Virology Viruses Zika Virus Zika Virus Infection - transmission |
| title | Contrasted transmission efficiency of Zika virus strains by mosquito species Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus from Reunion Island |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A10%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasted%20transmission%20efficiency%20of%20Zika%20virus%20strains%20by%20mosquito%20species%20Aedes%20aegypti,%20Aedes%20albopictus%20and%20Culex%20quinquefasciatus%20from%20Reunion%20Island&rft.jtitle=Parasites%20&%20vectors&rft.au=Gomard,%20Yann&rft.date=2020-08-06&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=398&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=398-398&rft.artnum=398&rft.issn=1756-3305&rft.eissn=1756-3305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13071-020-04267-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA633072655%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435321598&rft_id=info:pmid/32762767&rft_galeid=A633072655&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_55f0728ea28b48c2b0f0395b756b7d2b&rfr_iscdi=true |