THOUGHT GAMES ABOUT CHINA
[...]this is an awkward review to write. Yet in extending their findings to the current era, none of these books examine Chinese interests, perceptions, goals, identity, history, religion, culture, and philosophy—or even capabilities, domestic politics, or its economy—in any depth. If identity, cult...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of East Asian Studies 2020-07, Vol.20 (2), p.135-150 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 150 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 135 |
| container_title | Journal of East Asian Studies |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Kang, David |
| description | [...]this is an awkward review to write. Yet in extending their findings to the current era, none of these books examine Chinese interests, perceptions, goals, identity, history, religion, culture, and philosophy—or even capabilities, domestic politics, or its economy—in any depth. If identity, culture, and ideas, or even the domestic politics and business of a country, have even a marginal impact on the behavior and perceptions of actors in international politics—and a wide swath of the IR profession, along with MacDonald and Parent, Goddard, and Schake, clearly believes that they do—then we cannot expect the books under review to tell us much about China and power transitions. Shifrinson argues that structural reasons determine the strategy a rising power takes, such as the distribution of power, geography and political relationship, and the declining state's own military tools (p. 3). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/jea.2020.18 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2435119580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_jea_2020_18</cupid><galeid>A636780183</galeid><sourcerecordid>A636780183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f143ea1b9b17df60025a363861431389d54ec95be12a2db9eb45a33ed739123b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0s9LwzAUB_AgCs7pyZO3gSeRzvxqmx7rmOtgrod1XkPavo6O_phJB_rfm7ExGQyRHEIen3xDeA-he4KHBBP_ZQ1qSDG1J3GBepQy7ngeZ5eoR9xAOJRjcY1ujFljTL2Ash56SKJ4OYmSwSR8Hy8G4Wu8TAajaDoPb9FVoSoDd4e9j5Zv42QUObN4Mh2FMyfjPu-cgnAGiqRBSvy88Gywq5jHhGfrhIkgdzlkgZsCoYrmaQApt4BB7rOAUJayPnrc5250-7kF08l1u9WNfVJSzlxCAlfgX7VSFciyKdpOq6wuTSZDj3m-wEQwq5wzagUNaFW1DRSlLZ_44RlvVw51mZ298HRywZoOvrqV2hojp4v5_2388W8rJrO_PnmwWVtVsAJpmzOKT_3z3me6NUZDITe6rJX-lgTL3dhIOzZyNzbS8mN6pupUl7lNPPbjnP8BkFO4cA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435119580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THOUGHT GAMES ABOUT CHINA</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Kang, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Kang, David</creatorcontrib><description>[...]this is an awkward review to write. Yet in extending their findings to the current era, none of these books examine Chinese interests, perceptions, goals, identity, history, religion, culture, and philosophy—or even capabilities, domestic politics, or its economy—in any depth. If identity, culture, and ideas, or even the domestic politics and business of a country, have even a marginal impact on the behavior and perceptions of actors in international politics—and a wide swath of the IR profession, along with MacDonald and Parent, Goddard, and Schake, clearly believes that they do—then we cannot expect the books under review to tell us much about China and power transitions. Shifrinson argues that structural reasons determine the strategy a rising power takes, such as the distribution of power, geography and political relationship, and the declining state's own military tools (p. 3).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1598-2408</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-6643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/jea.2020.18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>18th century ; 20th century ; A Book Reviews Roundtable ; Analysis ; Authors ; Chinese foreign relations ; Chinese languages ; Criticism and interpretation ; Cultural identity ; Culture ; Domestic politics ; Games ; Geography ; Goddard, Stacie ; Great powers ; Identity ; International relations ; International security ; MacDonald, Paul K ; Parent, Joseph M ; Perceptions ; Philosophy ; Political geography ; Political power ; Politics ; Power ; Predation ; Religion ; Rhetoric ; Schake, Kori ; Security, International ; Shifrinson, Joshua R ; Writers</subject><ispartof>Journal of East Asian Studies, 2020-07, Vol.20 (2), p.135-150</ispartof><rights>Copyright © East Asia Institute 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f143ea1b9b17df60025a363861431389d54ec95be12a2db9eb45a33ed739123b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f143ea1b9b17df60025a363861431389d54ec95be12a2db9eb45a33ed739123b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1598240820000181/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,313,314,776,780,788,12824,27899,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kang, David</creatorcontrib><title>THOUGHT GAMES ABOUT CHINA</title><title>Journal of East Asian Studies</title><addtitle>J. East Asian Stud</addtitle><description>[...]this is an awkward review to write. Yet in extending their findings to the current era, none of these books examine Chinese interests, perceptions, goals, identity, history, religion, culture, and philosophy—or even capabilities, domestic politics, or its economy—in any depth. If identity, culture, and ideas, or even the domestic politics and business of a country, have even a marginal impact on the behavior and perceptions of actors in international politics—and a wide swath of the IR profession, along with MacDonald and Parent, Goddard, and Schake, clearly believes that they do—then we cannot expect the books under review to tell us much about China and power transitions. Shifrinson argues that structural reasons determine the strategy a rising power takes, such as the distribution of power, geography and political relationship, and the declining state's own military tools (p. 3).</description><subject>18th century</subject><subject>20th century</subject><subject>A Book Reviews Roundtable</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Authors</subject><subject>Chinese foreign relations</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Criticism and interpretation</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Domestic politics</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Goddard, Stacie</subject><subject>Great powers</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International security</subject><subject>MacDonald, Paul K</subject><subject>Parent, Joseph M</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Political geography</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Schake, Kori</subject><subject>Security, International</subject><subject>Shifrinson, Joshua R</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>1598-2408</issn><issn>2234-6643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0s9LwzAUB_AgCs7pyZO3gSeRzvxqmx7rmOtgrod1XkPavo6O_phJB_rfm7ExGQyRHEIen3xDeA-he4KHBBP_ZQ1qSDG1J3GBepQy7ngeZ5eoR9xAOJRjcY1ujFljTL2Ash56SKJ4OYmSwSR8Hy8G4Wu8TAajaDoPb9FVoSoDd4e9j5Zv42QUObN4Mh2FMyfjPu-cgnAGiqRBSvy88Gywq5jHhGfrhIkgdzlkgZsCoYrmaQApt4BB7rOAUJayPnrc5250-7kF08l1u9WNfVJSzlxCAlfgX7VSFciyKdpOq6wuTSZDj3m-wEQwq5wzagUNaFW1DRSlLZ_44RlvVw51mZ298HRywZoOvrqV2hojp4v5_2388W8rJrO_PnmwWVtVsAJpmzOKT_3z3me6NUZDITe6rJX-lgTL3dhIOzZyNzbS8mN6pupUl7lNPPbjnP8BkFO4cA</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Kang, David</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>THOUGHT GAMES ABOUT CHINA</title><author>Kang, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f143ea1b9b17df60025a363861431389d54ec95be12a2db9eb45a33ed739123b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>18th century</topic><topic>20th century</topic><topic>A Book Reviews Roundtable</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Authors</topic><topic>Chinese foreign relations</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Criticism and interpretation</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Domestic politics</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Goddard, Stacie</topic><topic>Great powers</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International security</topic><topic>MacDonald, Paul K</topic><topic>Parent, Joseph M</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Political geography</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Schake, Kori</topic><topic>Security, International</topic><topic>Shifrinson, Joshua R</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kang, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of East Asian Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kang, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THOUGHT GAMES ABOUT CHINA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of East Asian Studies</jtitle><addtitle>J. East Asian Stud</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>135-150</pages><issn>1598-2408</issn><eissn>2234-6643</eissn><abstract>[...]this is an awkward review to write. Yet in extending their findings to the current era, none of these books examine Chinese interests, perceptions, goals, identity, history, religion, culture, and philosophy—or even capabilities, domestic politics, or its economy—in any depth. If identity, culture, and ideas, or even the domestic politics and business of a country, have even a marginal impact on the behavior and perceptions of actors in international politics—and a wide swath of the IR profession, along with MacDonald and Parent, Goddard, and Schake, clearly believes that they do—then we cannot expect the books under review to tell us much about China and power transitions. Shifrinson argues that structural reasons determine the strategy a rising power takes, such as the distribution of power, geography and political relationship, and the declining state's own military tools (p. 3).</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/jea.2020.18</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1598-2408 |
| ispartof | Journal of East Asian Studies, 2020-07, Vol.20 (2), p.135-150 |
| issn | 1598-2408 2234-6643 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2435119580 |
| source | Cambridge Journals Online; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| subjects | 18th century 20th century A Book Reviews Roundtable Analysis Authors Chinese foreign relations Chinese languages Criticism and interpretation Cultural identity Culture Domestic politics Games Geography Goddard, Stacie Great powers Identity International relations International security MacDonald, Paul K Parent, Joseph M Perceptions Philosophy Political geography Political power Politics Power Predation Religion Rhetoric Schake, Kori Security, International Shifrinson, Joshua R Writers |
| title | THOUGHT GAMES ABOUT CHINA |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T17%3A33%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THOUGHT%20GAMES%20ABOUT%20CHINA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20East%20Asian%20Studies&rft.au=Kang,%20David&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=135-150&rft.issn=1598-2408&rft.eissn=2234-6643&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/jea.2020.18&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA636780183%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435119580&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A636780183&rft_cupid=10_1017_jea_2020_18&rfr_iscdi=true |